Revamping downdraft gasifier to minimize clinker formation for high-ash garden waste as feedstock
[Display omitted] •Improved design of a downdraft gasifier proposed to accommodate high-ash feedstocks.•Clinker is minimized by manipulating grate movement and changing air feed position.•Grate movement, ER, and air split ratio were optimized to obtain a desired performance.•LHV of producer gas and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bioresource technology 2018-10, Vol.266, p.220-231 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 231 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 220 |
container_title | Bioresource technology |
container_volume | 266 |
creator | Siddiqui, Haseen Thengane, Sonal K. Sharma, Sandeep Mahajani, Sanjay M. |
description | [Display omitted]
•Improved design of a downdraft gasifier proposed to accommodate high-ash feedstocks.•Clinker is minimized by manipulating grate movement and changing air feed position.•Grate movement, ER, and air split ratio were optimized to obtain a desired performance.•LHV of producer gas and CGE for best case were found to be 3.59 MJ/Nm3 and 62.61%.
The conventional downdraft gasifier, when used with garden waste pellets (ash ∼10%) as feedstock, exhibits formation of clinker due to hardening of softened ash, which results in discontinuous flame and intermittent operation. The design and operation protocol of the gasifier was appropriately modified to circumvent this problem. The effects of parameters such as grate movement, equivalence ratio (ER), and ratio of air entering at combustion and drying zones (split ratio) were systematically studied to maximize the lower heating value (LHV) of gas and minimize the amount of clinker. The grate movement of once in 20 min, ER of 0.32, and air split ratio of 0:100 together proved to be the best for garden waste pellets. The producer gas LHV and cold gas efficiency were 3.59 MJ/Nm3 and 62.61%, respectively, and comparable to the producer gas obtained from other biomass resources such as rice husk, wheat straw, and cotton stalks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.086 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2067134570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960852418308654</els_id><sourcerecordid>2067134570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-e9eabcbb095afecdc3907d715c9b054e96cbbda7b9dadb5310b2300695084dbd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxa0K1C5tv0LlI5eEsZ3Y8Q1UUUCqhITgbPnPZNfbTbzY2Vbw6fFqW649zWjm92ak9wi5YdAyYPLDtnUx5QX9puXAhhZkC4M8Iys2KNFwreQbsgItoRl63l2Qd6VsAUAwxc_JBdd64NDxFbE_8NFO-zivaUhPc8h2XOjaljhGzHRJdIpznOJfpH4X54c6G1Oe7BLTfOzoJq43jS2bqskBZ_pky4LUFjoihrIk_3BF3o52V_D6uV6SX3eff95-be6_f_l2--m-8Z0YlgY1WuedA93bEX3wQoMKivVeO-g71LIug1VOBxtcLxg4LgCk7mHoggvikrw_3d3n9PuAZTFTLB53OztjOhTDq2-CDVzx11GQiomuV1BReUJ9TqVkHM0-x8nmP4aBOSZhtuYlCXNMwoA0NYkqvHn-cXAThv-yF-sr8PEEYDXlsbptio84ewwxo19MSPG1H_8AfYGfgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2067134570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revamping downdraft gasifier to minimize clinker formation for high-ash garden waste as feedstock</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Siddiqui, Haseen ; Thengane, Sonal K. ; Sharma, Sandeep ; Mahajani, Sanjay M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, Haseen ; Thengane, Sonal K. ; Sharma, Sandeep ; Mahajani, Sanjay M.</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted]
•Improved design of a downdraft gasifier proposed to accommodate high-ash feedstocks.•Clinker is minimized by manipulating grate movement and changing air feed position.•Grate movement, ER, and air split ratio were optimized to obtain a desired performance.•LHV of producer gas and CGE for best case were found to be 3.59 MJ/Nm3 and 62.61%.
The conventional downdraft gasifier, when used with garden waste pellets (ash ∼10%) as feedstock, exhibits formation of clinker due to hardening of softened ash, which results in discontinuous flame and intermittent operation. The design and operation protocol of the gasifier was appropriately modified to circumvent this problem. The effects of parameters such as grate movement, equivalence ratio (ER), and ratio of air entering at combustion and drying zones (split ratio) were systematically studied to maximize the lower heating value (LHV) of gas and minimize the amount of clinker. The grate movement of once in 20 min, ER of 0.32, and air split ratio of 0:100 together proved to be the best for garden waste pellets. The producer gas LHV and cold gas efficiency were 3.59 MJ/Nm3 and 62.61%, respectively, and comparable to the producer gas obtained from other biomass resources such as rice husk, wheat straw, and cotton stalks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8524</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2976</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.086</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29982042</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>air ; Air split ratio ; biomass ; Clinker ; cold ; combustion ; cotton ; Downdraft gasifier ; feedstocks ; garden residues ; Garden waste pellets ; Grate movement interval ; producer gas ; rice hulls ; technology ; wheat straw</subject><ispartof>Bioresource technology, 2018-10, Vol.266, p.220-231</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-e9eabcbb095afecdc3907d715c9b054e96cbbda7b9dadb5310b2300695084dbd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-e9eabcbb095afecdc3907d715c9b054e96cbbda7b9dadb5310b2300695084dbd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960852418308654$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29982042$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, Haseen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thengane, Sonal K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajani, Sanjay M.</creatorcontrib><title>Revamping downdraft gasifier to minimize clinker formation for high-ash garden waste as feedstock</title><title>Bioresource technology</title><addtitle>Bioresour Technol</addtitle><description>[Display omitted]
•Improved design of a downdraft gasifier proposed to accommodate high-ash feedstocks.•Clinker is minimized by manipulating grate movement and changing air feed position.•Grate movement, ER, and air split ratio were optimized to obtain a desired performance.•LHV of producer gas and CGE for best case were found to be 3.59 MJ/Nm3 and 62.61%.
The conventional downdraft gasifier, when used with garden waste pellets (ash ∼10%) as feedstock, exhibits formation of clinker due to hardening of softened ash, which results in discontinuous flame and intermittent operation. The design and operation protocol of the gasifier was appropriately modified to circumvent this problem. The effects of parameters such as grate movement, equivalence ratio (ER), and ratio of air entering at combustion and drying zones (split ratio) were systematically studied to maximize the lower heating value (LHV) of gas and minimize the amount of clinker. The grate movement of once in 20 min, ER of 0.32, and air split ratio of 0:100 together proved to be the best for garden waste pellets. The producer gas LHV and cold gas efficiency were 3.59 MJ/Nm3 and 62.61%, respectively, and comparable to the producer gas obtained from other biomass resources such as rice husk, wheat straw, and cotton stalks.</description><subject>air</subject><subject>Air split ratio</subject><subject>biomass</subject><subject>Clinker</subject><subject>cold</subject><subject>combustion</subject><subject>cotton</subject><subject>Downdraft gasifier</subject><subject>feedstocks</subject><subject>garden residues</subject><subject>Garden waste pellets</subject><subject>Grate movement interval</subject><subject>producer gas</subject><subject>rice hulls</subject><subject>technology</subject><subject>wheat straw</subject><issn>0960-8524</issn><issn>1873-2976</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxa0K1C5tv0LlI5eEsZ3Y8Q1UUUCqhITgbPnPZNfbTbzY2Vbw6fFqW649zWjm92ak9wi5YdAyYPLDtnUx5QX9puXAhhZkC4M8Iys2KNFwreQbsgItoRl63l2Qd6VsAUAwxc_JBdd64NDxFbE_8NFO-zivaUhPc8h2XOjaljhGzHRJdIpznOJfpH4X54c6G1Oe7BLTfOzoJq43jS2bqskBZ_pky4LUFjoihrIk_3BF3o52V_D6uV6SX3eff95-be6_f_l2--m-8Z0YlgY1WuedA93bEX3wQoMKivVeO-g71LIug1VOBxtcLxg4LgCk7mHoggvikrw_3d3n9PuAZTFTLB53OztjOhTDq2-CDVzx11GQiomuV1BReUJ9TqVkHM0-x8nmP4aBOSZhtuYlCXNMwoA0NYkqvHn-cXAThv-yF-sr8PEEYDXlsbptio84ewwxo19MSPG1H_8AfYGfgQ</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Siddiqui, Haseen</creator><creator>Thengane, Sonal K.</creator><creator>Sharma, Sandeep</creator><creator>Mahajani, Sanjay M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Revamping downdraft gasifier to minimize clinker formation for high-ash garden waste as feedstock</title><author>Siddiqui, Haseen ; Thengane, Sonal K. ; Sharma, Sandeep ; Mahajani, Sanjay M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-e9eabcbb095afecdc3907d715c9b054e96cbbda7b9dadb5310b2300695084dbd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>air</topic><topic>Air split ratio</topic><topic>biomass</topic><topic>Clinker</topic><topic>cold</topic><topic>combustion</topic><topic>cotton</topic><topic>Downdraft gasifier</topic><topic>feedstocks</topic><topic>garden residues</topic><topic>Garden waste pellets</topic><topic>Grate movement interval</topic><topic>producer gas</topic><topic>rice hulls</topic><topic>technology</topic><topic>wheat straw</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, Haseen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thengane, Sonal K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajani, Sanjay M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bioresource technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siddiqui, Haseen</au><au>Thengane, Sonal K.</au><au>Sharma, Sandeep</au><au>Mahajani, Sanjay M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revamping downdraft gasifier to minimize clinker formation for high-ash garden waste as feedstock</atitle><jtitle>Bioresource technology</jtitle><addtitle>Bioresour Technol</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>266</volume><spage>220</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>220-231</pages><issn>0960-8524</issn><eissn>1873-2976</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted]
•Improved design of a downdraft gasifier proposed to accommodate high-ash feedstocks.•Clinker is minimized by manipulating grate movement and changing air feed position.•Grate movement, ER, and air split ratio were optimized to obtain a desired performance.•LHV of producer gas and CGE for best case were found to be 3.59 MJ/Nm3 and 62.61%.
The conventional downdraft gasifier, when used with garden waste pellets (ash ∼10%) as feedstock, exhibits formation of clinker due to hardening of softened ash, which results in discontinuous flame and intermittent operation. The design and operation protocol of the gasifier was appropriately modified to circumvent this problem. The effects of parameters such as grate movement, equivalence ratio (ER), and ratio of air entering at combustion and drying zones (split ratio) were systematically studied to maximize the lower heating value (LHV) of gas and minimize the amount of clinker. The grate movement of once in 20 min, ER of 0.32, and air split ratio of 0:100 together proved to be the best for garden waste pellets. The producer gas LHV and cold gas efficiency were 3.59 MJ/Nm3 and 62.61%, respectively, and comparable to the producer gas obtained from other biomass resources such as rice husk, wheat straw, and cotton stalks.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29982042</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.086</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-8524 |
ispartof | Bioresource technology, 2018-10, Vol.266, p.220-231 |
issn | 0960-8524 1873-2976 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2067134570 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | air Air split ratio biomass Clinker cold combustion cotton Downdraft gasifier feedstocks garden residues Garden waste pellets Grate movement interval producer gas rice hulls technology wheat straw |
title | Revamping downdraft gasifier to minimize clinker formation for high-ash garden waste as feedstock |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T19%3A50%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revamping%20downdraft%20gasifier%20to%20minimize%20clinker%20formation%20for%20high-ash%20garden%20waste%20as%20feedstock&rft.jtitle=Bioresource%20technology&rft.au=Siddiqui,%20Haseen&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=266&rft.spage=220&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=220-231&rft.issn=0960-8524&rft.eissn=1873-2976&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.086&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2067134570%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2067134570&rft_id=info:pmid/29982042&rft_els_id=S0960852418308654&rfr_iscdi=true |