Revamping downdraft gasifier to minimize clinker formation for high-ash garden waste as feedstock

[Display omitted] •Improved design of a downdraft gasifier proposed to accommodate high-ash feedstocks.•Clinker is minimized by manipulating grate movement and changing air feed position.•Grate movement, ER, and air split ratio were optimized to obtain a desired performance.•LHV of producer gas and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioresource technology 2018-10, Vol.266, p.220-231
Hauptverfasser: Siddiqui, Haseen, Thengane, Sonal K., Sharma, Sandeep, Mahajani, Sanjay M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 231
container_issue
container_start_page 220
container_title Bioresource technology
container_volume 266
creator Siddiqui, Haseen
Thengane, Sonal K.
Sharma, Sandeep
Mahajani, Sanjay M.
description [Display omitted] •Improved design of a downdraft gasifier proposed to accommodate high-ash feedstocks.•Clinker is minimized by manipulating grate movement and changing air feed position.•Grate movement, ER, and air split ratio were optimized to obtain a desired performance.•LHV of producer gas and CGE for best case were found to be 3.59 MJ/Nm3 and 62.61%. The conventional downdraft gasifier, when used with garden waste pellets (ash ∼10%) as feedstock, exhibits formation of clinker due to hardening of softened ash, which results in discontinuous flame and intermittent operation. The design and operation protocol of the gasifier was appropriately modified to circumvent this problem. The effects of parameters such as grate movement, equivalence ratio (ER), and ratio of air entering at combustion and drying zones (split ratio) were systematically studied to maximize the lower heating value (LHV) of gas and minimize the amount of clinker. The grate movement of once in 20 min, ER of 0.32, and air split ratio of 0:100 together proved to be the best for garden waste pellets. The producer gas LHV and cold gas efficiency were 3.59 MJ/Nm3 and 62.61%, respectively, and comparable to the producer gas obtained from other biomass resources such as rice husk, wheat straw, and cotton stalks.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.086
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2067134570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960852418308654</els_id><sourcerecordid>2067134570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-e9eabcbb095afecdc3907d715c9b054e96cbbda7b9dadb5310b2300695084dbd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxa0K1C5tv0LlI5eEsZ3Y8Q1UUUCqhITgbPnPZNfbTbzY2Vbw6fFqW649zWjm92ak9wi5YdAyYPLDtnUx5QX9puXAhhZkC4M8Iys2KNFwreQbsgItoRl63l2Qd6VsAUAwxc_JBdd64NDxFbE_8NFO-zivaUhPc8h2XOjaljhGzHRJdIpznOJfpH4X54c6G1Oe7BLTfOzoJq43jS2bqskBZ_pky4LUFjoihrIk_3BF3o52V_D6uV6SX3eff95-be6_f_l2--m-8Z0YlgY1WuedA93bEX3wQoMKivVeO-g71LIug1VOBxtcLxg4LgCk7mHoggvikrw_3d3n9PuAZTFTLB53OztjOhTDq2-CDVzx11GQiomuV1BReUJ9TqVkHM0-x8nmP4aBOSZhtuYlCXNMwoA0NYkqvHn-cXAThv-yF-sr8PEEYDXlsbptio84ewwxo19MSPG1H_8AfYGfgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2067134570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revamping downdraft gasifier to minimize clinker formation for high-ash garden waste as feedstock</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Siddiqui, Haseen ; Thengane, Sonal K. ; Sharma, Sandeep ; Mahajani, Sanjay M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, Haseen ; Thengane, Sonal K. ; Sharma, Sandeep ; Mahajani, Sanjay M.</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] •Improved design of a downdraft gasifier proposed to accommodate high-ash feedstocks.•Clinker is minimized by manipulating grate movement and changing air feed position.•Grate movement, ER, and air split ratio were optimized to obtain a desired performance.•LHV of producer gas and CGE for best case were found to be 3.59 MJ/Nm3 and 62.61%. The conventional downdraft gasifier, when used with garden waste pellets (ash ∼10%) as feedstock, exhibits formation of clinker due to hardening of softened ash, which results in discontinuous flame and intermittent operation. The design and operation protocol of the gasifier was appropriately modified to circumvent this problem. The effects of parameters such as grate movement, equivalence ratio (ER), and ratio of air entering at combustion and drying zones (split ratio) were systematically studied to maximize the lower heating value (LHV) of gas and minimize the amount of clinker. The grate movement of once in 20 min, ER of 0.32, and air split ratio of 0:100 together proved to be the best for garden waste pellets. The producer gas LHV and cold gas efficiency were 3.59 MJ/Nm3 and 62.61%, respectively, and comparable to the producer gas obtained from other biomass resources such as rice husk, wheat straw, and cotton stalks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8524</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2976</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.086</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29982042</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>air ; Air split ratio ; biomass ; Clinker ; cold ; combustion ; cotton ; Downdraft gasifier ; feedstocks ; garden residues ; Garden waste pellets ; Grate movement interval ; producer gas ; rice hulls ; technology ; wheat straw</subject><ispartof>Bioresource technology, 2018-10, Vol.266, p.220-231</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-e9eabcbb095afecdc3907d715c9b054e96cbbda7b9dadb5310b2300695084dbd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-e9eabcbb095afecdc3907d715c9b054e96cbbda7b9dadb5310b2300695084dbd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960852418308654$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29982042$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, Haseen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thengane, Sonal K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajani, Sanjay M.</creatorcontrib><title>Revamping downdraft gasifier to minimize clinker formation for high-ash garden waste as feedstock</title><title>Bioresource technology</title><addtitle>Bioresour Technol</addtitle><description>[Display omitted] •Improved design of a downdraft gasifier proposed to accommodate high-ash feedstocks.•Clinker is minimized by manipulating grate movement and changing air feed position.•Grate movement, ER, and air split ratio were optimized to obtain a desired performance.•LHV of producer gas and CGE for best case were found to be 3.59 MJ/Nm3 and 62.61%. The conventional downdraft gasifier, when used with garden waste pellets (ash ∼10%) as feedstock, exhibits formation of clinker due to hardening of softened ash, which results in discontinuous flame and intermittent operation. The design and operation protocol of the gasifier was appropriately modified to circumvent this problem. The effects of parameters such as grate movement, equivalence ratio (ER), and ratio of air entering at combustion and drying zones (split ratio) were systematically studied to maximize the lower heating value (LHV) of gas and minimize the amount of clinker. The grate movement of once in 20 min, ER of 0.32, and air split ratio of 0:100 together proved to be the best for garden waste pellets. The producer gas LHV and cold gas efficiency were 3.59 MJ/Nm3 and 62.61%, respectively, and comparable to the producer gas obtained from other biomass resources such as rice husk, wheat straw, and cotton stalks.</description><subject>air</subject><subject>Air split ratio</subject><subject>biomass</subject><subject>Clinker</subject><subject>cold</subject><subject>combustion</subject><subject>cotton</subject><subject>Downdraft gasifier</subject><subject>feedstocks</subject><subject>garden residues</subject><subject>Garden waste pellets</subject><subject>Grate movement interval</subject><subject>producer gas</subject><subject>rice hulls</subject><subject>technology</subject><subject>wheat straw</subject><issn>0960-8524</issn><issn>1873-2976</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxa0K1C5tv0LlI5eEsZ3Y8Q1UUUCqhITgbPnPZNfbTbzY2Vbw6fFqW649zWjm92ak9wi5YdAyYPLDtnUx5QX9puXAhhZkC4M8Iys2KNFwreQbsgItoRl63l2Qd6VsAUAwxc_JBdd64NDxFbE_8NFO-zivaUhPc8h2XOjaljhGzHRJdIpznOJfpH4X54c6G1Oe7BLTfOzoJq43jS2bqskBZ_pky4LUFjoihrIk_3BF3o52V_D6uV6SX3eff95-be6_f_l2--m-8Z0YlgY1WuedA93bEX3wQoMKivVeO-g71LIug1VOBxtcLxg4LgCk7mHoggvikrw_3d3n9PuAZTFTLB53OztjOhTDq2-CDVzx11GQiomuV1BReUJ9TqVkHM0-x8nmP4aBOSZhtuYlCXNMwoA0NYkqvHn-cXAThv-yF-sr8PEEYDXlsbptio84ewwxo19MSPG1H_8AfYGfgQ</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Siddiqui, Haseen</creator><creator>Thengane, Sonal K.</creator><creator>Sharma, Sandeep</creator><creator>Mahajani, Sanjay M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Revamping downdraft gasifier to minimize clinker formation for high-ash garden waste as feedstock</title><author>Siddiqui, Haseen ; Thengane, Sonal K. ; Sharma, Sandeep ; Mahajani, Sanjay M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-e9eabcbb095afecdc3907d715c9b054e96cbbda7b9dadb5310b2300695084dbd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>air</topic><topic>Air split ratio</topic><topic>biomass</topic><topic>Clinker</topic><topic>cold</topic><topic>combustion</topic><topic>cotton</topic><topic>Downdraft gasifier</topic><topic>feedstocks</topic><topic>garden residues</topic><topic>Garden waste pellets</topic><topic>Grate movement interval</topic><topic>producer gas</topic><topic>rice hulls</topic><topic>technology</topic><topic>wheat straw</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, Haseen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thengane, Sonal K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajani, Sanjay M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bioresource technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siddiqui, Haseen</au><au>Thengane, Sonal K.</au><au>Sharma, Sandeep</au><au>Mahajani, Sanjay M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revamping downdraft gasifier to minimize clinker formation for high-ash garden waste as feedstock</atitle><jtitle>Bioresource technology</jtitle><addtitle>Bioresour Technol</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>266</volume><spage>220</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>220-231</pages><issn>0960-8524</issn><eissn>1873-2976</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] •Improved design of a downdraft gasifier proposed to accommodate high-ash feedstocks.•Clinker is minimized by manipulating grate movement and changing air feed position.•Grate movement, ER, and air split ratio were optimized to obtain a desired performance.•LHV of producer gas and CGE for best case were found to be 3.59 MJ/Nm3 and 62.61%. The conventional downdraft gasifier, when used with garden waste pellets (ash ∼10%) as feedstock, exhibits formation of clinker due to hardening of softened ash, which results in discontinuous flame and intermittent operation. The design and operation protocol of the gasifier was appropriately modified to circumvent this problem. The effects of parameters such as grate movement, equivalence ratio (ER), and ratio of air entering at combustion and drying zones (split ratio) were systematically studied to maximize the lower heating value (LHV) of gas and minimize the amount of clinker. The grate movement of once in 20 min, ER of 0.32, and air split ratio of 0:100 together proved to be the best for garden waste pellets. The producer gas LHV and cold gas efficiency were 3.59 MJ/Nm3 and 62.61%, respectively, and comparable to the producer gas obtained from other biomass resources such as rice husk, wheat straw, and cotton stalks.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29982042</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.086</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-8524
ispartof Bioresource technology, 2018-10, Vol.266, p.220-231
issn 0960-8524
1873-2976
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2067134570
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects air
Air split ratio
biomass
Clinker
cold
combustion
cotton
Downdraft gasifier
feedstocks
garden residues
Garden waste pellets
Grate movement interval
producer gas
rice hulls
technology
wheat straw
title Revamping downdraft gasifier to minimize clinker formation for high-ash garden waste as feedstock
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T19%3A50%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revamping%20downdraft%20gasifier%20to%20minimize%20clinker%20formation%20for%20high-ash%20garden%20waste%20as%20feedstock&rft.jtitle=Bioresource%20technology&rft.au=Siddiqui,%20Haseen&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=266&rft.spage=220&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=220-231&rft.issn=0960-8524&rft.eissn=1873-2976&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.086&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2067134570%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2067134570&rft_id=info:pmid/29982042&rft_els_id=S0960852418308654&rfr_iscdi=true