Hotshots, hot spots, and female preference: exploring lek formation models with a bower-building cichlid fish

In many animals, males congregate in leks that females visit for the sole purpose of mating. We observed male and female behavior on 3 different-sized leks of the bower-building cichlid fish Nyassachromis cf. microcephalus to test predictions of 3 prominent lek models: the “hotshot,” “hot spot,” and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioral ecology 2009-05, Vol.20 (3), p.609-615
Hauptverfasser: Young, Kyle A., Genner, Martin J., Joyce, Domino A., Haesler, Marcel P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 615
container_issue 3
container_start_page 609
container_title Behavioral ecology
container_volume 20
creator Young, Kyle A.
Genner, Martin J.
Joyce, Domino A.
Haesler, Marcel P.
description In many animals, males congregate in leks that females visit for the sole purpose of mating. We observed male and female behavior on 3 different-sized leks of the bower-building cichlid fish Nyassachromis cf. microcephalus to test predictions of 3 prominent lek models: the “hotshot,” “hot spot,” and “female preference” models. In this system, we were able to refine these predictions by distinguishing between indirect mate choice, by which females restrict their set of potential mates in the absence of individual male assessment, and direct mate choice, by which females assess males and their territories through dyadic behavioral interactions. On no lek were males holding central territories favored by indirect or direct mate choice, contrary to the prediction of the hotshot model that leks form because inferior males establish territories surrounding hotshot males preferred by females. Average female encounter rate of males increased with lek size, a pattern typically interpreted as evidence that leks form through female preference for lekking males, rather than because males congregate in hot spots of high female density. Female propensity to engage in premating behavior once courted did not increase with lek size, suggesting female preference for males on larger leks operated through indirect choice rather than direct choice based on individual assessment. The frequency of male–male competitive interactions increased with lek size, whereas their foraging rate decreased, implying a cost to males maintaining territories on larger leks. Together these data most strongly support the female preference model, where females may benefit through indirect mate choice for males able to meet the competitive cost of occupying larger leks.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/beheco/arp038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20671061</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/beheco/arp038</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1719047251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-8f32c7d10d08f5b8b2cc61643b80ee560b067c1847743782631bb1ca38ba6c2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0D1P3jAUBeCoaiUo7chudag6EPBXbKdbhYAXCakLlRCLZTs3jcGJUzsR9N9jCOrQhcH2HR4fXZ2qOiT4mOCWnVgYwMUTk2bM1Ltqn3DR1JLK9n2ZMW9qSnm7V33M-Q5jTFou9qtxF5c8lHOEyo3y_DKaqUM9jCYAmhP0kGBy8B3B4xxi8tNvFOAe9TGNZvFxQmPsIGT04JcBGWTjA6Tarj50z9R5NwRf8nwePlUfehMyfH59D6pf52fXp7v66ufF5emPq9px3Cy16hl1siO4w6pvrLLUOUEEZ1ZhgEZgi4V0RHEpOZOKCkasJc4wZY1wtGcH1dctd07xzwp50aPPDkIwE8Q1a1r-EyxIgV_-g3dxTVPZrRhOW9K0rKB6Qy7FnEsfek5-NOmvJlg_N6-35vXWfPHfNh_X-U36Gu3zAo__sEn3WkgmG727udXkhil6ey00YU8sUpXT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204291593</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hotshots, hot spots, and female preference: exploring lek formation models with a bower-building cichlid fish</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Young, Kyle A. ; Genner, Martin J. ; Joyce, Domino A. ; Haesler, Marcel P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Young, Kyle A. ; Genner, Martin J. ; Joyce, Domino A. ; Haesler, Marcel P.</creatorcontrib><description>In many animals, males congregate in leks that females visit for the sole purpose of mating. We observed male and female behavior on 3 different-sized leks of the bower-building cichlid fish Nyassachromis cf. microcephalus to test predictions of 3 prominent lek models: the “hotshot,” “hot spot,” and “female preference” models. In this system, we were able to refine these predictions by distinguishing between indirect mate choice, by which females restrict their set of potential mates in the absence of individual male assessment, and direct mate choice, by which females assess males and their territories through dyadic behavioral interactions. On no lek were males holding central territories favored by indirect or direct mate choice, contrary to the prediction of the hotshot model that leks form because inferior males establish territories surrounding hotshot males preferred by females. Average female encounter rate of males increased with lek size, a pattern typically interpreted as evidence that leks form through female preference for lekking males, rather than because males congregate in hot spots of high female density. Female propensity to engage in premating behavior once courted did not increase with lek size, suggesting female preference for males on larger leks operated through indirect choice rather than direct choice based on individual assessment. The frequency of male–male competitive interactions increased with lek size, whereas their foraging rate decreased, implying a cost to males maintaining territories on larger leks. Together these data most strongly support the female preference model, where females may benefit through indirect mate choice for males able to meet the competitive cost of occupying larger leks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-2249</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-7279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arp038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>bowers ; Cichlidae ; cichlids ; direct mate choice ; Freshwater ; indirect mate choice ; lek formation models</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology, 2009-05, Vol.20 (3), p.609-615</ispartof><rights>The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2009</rights><rights>The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-8f32c7d10d08f5b8b2cc61643b80ee560b067c1847743782631bb1ca38ba6c2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-8f32c7d10d08f5b8b2cc61643b80ee560b067c1847743782631bb1ca38ba6c2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Young, Kyle A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genner, Martin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joyce, Domino A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haesler, Marcel P.</creatorcontrib><title>Hotshots, hot spots, and female preference: exploring lek formation models with a bower-building cichlid fish</title><title>Behavioral ecology</title><description>In many animals, males congregate in leks that females visit for the sole purpose of mating. We observed male and female behavior on 3 different-sized leks of the bower-building cichlid fish Nyassachromis cf. microcephalus to test predictions of 3 prominent lek models: the “hotshot,” “hot spot,” and “female preference” models. In this system, we were able to refine these predictions by distinguishing between indirect mate choice, by which females restrict their set of potential mates in the absence of individual male assessment, and direct mate choice, by which females assess males and their territories through dyadic behavioral interactions. On no lek were males holding central territories favored by indirect or direct mate choice, contrary to the prediction of the hotshot model that leks form because inferior males establish territories surrounding hotshot males preferred by females. Average female encounter rate of males increased with lek size, a pattern typically interpreted as evidence that leks form through female preference for lekking males, rather than because males congregate in hot spots of high female density. Female propensity to engage in premating behavior once courted did not increase with lek size, suggesting female preference for males on larger leks operated through indirect choice rather than direct choice based on individual assessment. The frequency of male–male competitive interactions increased with lek size, whereas their foraging rate decreased, implying a cost to males maintaining territories on larger leks. Together these data most strongly support the female preference model, where females may benefit through indirect mate choice for males able to meet the competitive cost of occupying larger leks.</description><subject>bowers</subject><subject>Cichlidae</subject><subject>cichlids</subject><subject>direct mate choice</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>indirect mate choice</subject><subject>lek formation models</subject><issn>1045-2249</issn><issn>1465-7279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0D1P3jAUBeCoaiUo7chudag6EPBXbKdbhYAXCakLlRCLZTs3jcGJUzsR9N9jCOrQhcH2HR4fXZ2qOiT4mOCWnVgYwMUTk2bM1Ltqn3DR1JLK9n2ZMW9qSnm7V33M-Q5jTFou9qtxF5c8lHOEyo3y_DKaqUM9jCYAmhP0kGBy8B3B4xxi8tNvFOAe9TGNZvFxQmPsIGT04JcBGWTjA6Tarj50z9R5NwRf8nwePlUfehMyfH59D6pf52fXp7v66ufF5emPq9px3Cy16hl1siO4w6pvrLLUOUEEZ1ZhgEZgi4V0RHEpOZOKCkasJc4wZY1wtGcH1dctd07xzwp50aPPDkIwE8Q1a1r-EyxIgV_-g3dxTVPZrRhOW9K0rKB6Qy7FnEsfek5-NOmvJlg_N6-35vXWfPHfNh_X-U36Gu3zAo__sEn3WkgmG727udXkhil6ey00YU8sUpXT</recordid><startdate>20090501</startdate><enddate>20090501</enddate><creator>Young, Kyle A.</creator><creator>Genner, Martin J.</creator><creator>Joyce, Domino A.</creator><creator>Haesler, Marcel P.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090501</creationdate><title>Hotshots, hot spots, and female preference: exploring lek formation models with a bower-building cichlid fish</title><author>Young, Kyle A. ; Genner, Martin J. ; Joyce, Domino A. ; Haesler, Marcel P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-8f32c7d10d08f5b8b2cc61643b80ee560b067c1847743782631bb1ca38ba6c2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>bowers</topic><topic>Cichlidae</topic><topic>cichlids</topic><topic>direct mate choice</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>indirect mate choice</topic><topic>lek formation models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Young, Kyle A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genner, Martin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joyce, Domino A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haesler, Marcel P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Young, Kyle A.</au><au>Genner, Martin J.</au><au>Joyce, Domino A.</au><au>Haesler, Marcel P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hotshots, hot spots, and female preference: exploring lek formation models with a bower-building cichlid fish</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology</jtitle><date>2009-05-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>609</spage><epage>615</epage><pages>609-615</pages><issn>1045-2249</issn><eissn>1465-7279</eissn><abstract>In many animals, males congregate in leks that females visit for the sole purpose of mating. We observed male and female behavior on 3 different-sized leks of the bower-building cichlid fish Nyassachromis cf. microcephalus to test predictions of 3 prominent lek models: the “hotshot,” “hot spot,” and “female preference” models. In this system, we were able to refine these predictions by distinguishing between indirect mate choice, by which females restrict their set of potential mates in the absence of individual male assessment, and direct mate choice, by which females assess males and their territories through dyadic behavioral interactions. On no lek were males holding central territories favored by indirect or direct mate choice, contrary to the prediction of the hotshot model that leks form because inferior males establish territories surrounding hotshot males preferred by females. Average female encounter rate of males increased with lek size, a pattern typically interpreted as evidence that leks form through female preference for lekking males, rather than because males congregate in hot spots of high female density. Female propensity to engage in premating behavior once courted did not increase with lek size, suggesting female preference for males on larger leks operated through indirect choice rather than direct choice based on individual assessment. The frequency of male–male competitive interactions increased with lek size, whereas their foraging rate decreased, implying a cost to males maintaining territories on larger leks. Together these data most strongly support the female preference model, where females may benefit through indirect mate choice for males able to meet the competitive cost of occupying larger leks.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/beheco/arp038</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1045-2249
ispartof Behavioral ecology, 2009-05, Vol.20 (3), p.609-615
issn 1045-2249
1465-7279
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20671061
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects bowers
Cichlidae
cichlids
direct mate choice
Freshwater
indirect mate choice
lek formation models
title Hotshots, hot spots, and female preference: exploring lek formation models with a bower-building cichlid fish
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A46%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hotshots,%20hot%20spots,%20and%20female%20preference:%20exploring%20lek%20formation%20models%20with%20a%20bower-building%20cichlid%20fish&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology&rft.au=Young,%20Kyle%20A.&rft.date=2009-05-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=609&rft.epage=615&rft.pages=609-615&rft.issn=1045-2249&rft.eissn=1465-7279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/beheco/arp038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1719047251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204291593&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/beheco/arp038&rfr_iscdi=true