Foraging responses of wild house mice to accumulations of conspecific odor as a predation risk

Many predators hunt using the social and waste odors of their prey. It is unknown, however, whether potential prey modify their behavior in response to the risks of predation associated with accumulations of conspecific odor. We examined this question by measuring foraging trade-offs of wild house m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2006-05, Vol.60 (1), p.101-107
Hauptverfasser: Pastro, Louise A, Banks, Peter B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 107
container_issue 1
container_start_page 101
container_title Behavioral ecology and sociobiology
container_volume 60
creator Pastro, Louise A
Banks, Peter B
description Many predators hunt using the social and waste odors of their prey. It is unknown, however, whether potential prey modify their behavior in response to the risks of predation associated with accumulations of conspecific odor. We examined this question by measuring foraging trade-offs of wild house mice (Mus domesticus) in the field where we increased both predation risk and conspecific odor at artificial food patches in a two-factor design. Mouse giving-up densities (GUDs) were significantly higher in open habitats than in closed habitats but did not differ with the addition of mouse odors. Fine-scale behavioral observations of captive mice confirmed their attraction to the conspecific odor in an enclosure experiment, without any change to the GUD. These results indicate that house mice continue to visit and forage at food patches despite accumulations of predator-attracting odors. This most likely occurs for the social benefits obtained from conspecific odor exploration; however, such behavior may cause mice to become vulnerable to considerable olfactory exploitation by their predators. Future work must therefore focus on how mice trade off the social benefits of investigating odors that also attract their enemies.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00265-005-0146-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20666206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25063789</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25063789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-c596ee03c6532c349d875ba3d36e6ed6cf4b1ff5d450848deb3bfd6722529523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhoMoOK7-AA9iEPTWWvmqTh9l2VVhwYPr1ZDJx5ixp9Mm3Yj_3oy9KHjxkNThfaoqb15CnjJ4zQD6NxWAo-oA2mESO7hHdkwK3kGP_D7ZgZDQKSnFQ_Ko1iMAINN6R75c52IPaTrQEuqcpxoqzZH-SKOnX_NaAz0lF-iSqXVuPa2jXVKjzoxrdQ4uxeRo9rlQW6mlcwn-N0NLqt8ekwfRjjU8uasX5Pb66vbyfXfz8d2Hy7c3nZMMls6pAUMA4VAJ7oQcvO7V3govMGDw6KLcsxiVlwq01D7sxT567DlXfFBcXJBX29i55O9rqIs5perCONopNBOGAyK2678ga9MGhmfwxT_gMa9lah4MsvbmAUE3iG2QK7nWEqKZSzrZ8tMwMOdYzBaLabGYcywGWs_Lu8G2OjvGYieX6t_GvpeiLWjcs4071iWXPzpXzUWvh6Y_3_Ros7GH9tnm8ycOTABolMi1-AUbbZ9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614109608</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Foraging responses of wild house mice to accumulations of conspecific odor as a predation risk</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Pastro, Louise A ; Banks, Peter B</creator><creatorcontrib>Pastro, Louise A ; Banks, Peter B</creatorcontrib><description>Many predators hunt using the social and waste odors of their prey. It is unknown, however, whether potential prey modify their behavior in response to the risks of predation associated with accumulations of conspecific odor. We examined this question by measuring foraging trade-offs of wild house mice (Mus domesticus) in the field where we increased both predation risk and conspecific odor at artificial food patches in a two-factor design. Mouse giving-up densities (GUDs) were significantly higher in open habitats than in closed habitats but did not differ with the addition of mouse odors. Fine-scale behavioral observations of captive mice confirmed their attraction to the conspecific odor in an enclosure experiment, without any change to the GUD. These results indicate that house mice continue to visit and forage at food patches despite accumulations of predator-attracting odors. This most likely occurs for the social benefits obtained from conspecific odor exploration; however, such behavior may cause mice to become vulnerable to considerable olfactory exploitation by their predators. Future work must therefore focus on how mice trade off the social benefits of investigating odors that also attract their enemies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00265-005-0146-0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BESOD6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal ethology ; Antipredator behavior ; Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Eavesdropping ; Foraging ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Giving-up density (GUD) ; Habitats ; Liquids ; Mammalia ; Mammals ; Mice ; Mus domesticus ; Odors ; Predators ; Prey ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Signal exploitation ; Urine ; Vertebrata ; Voles ; Wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2006-05, Vol.60 (1), p.101-107</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Springer-Verlag</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-c596ee03c6532c349d875ba3d36e6ed6cf4b1ff5d450848deb3bfd6722529523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-c596ee03c6532c349d875ba3d36e6ed6cf4b1ff5d450848deb3bfd6722529523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25063789$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25063789$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17743141$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pastro, Louise A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banks, Peter B</creatorcontrib><title>Foraging responses of wild house mice to accumulations of conspecific odor as a predation risk</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><description>Many predators hunt using the social and waste odors of their prey. It is unknown, however, whether potential prey modify their behavior in response to the risks of predation associated with accumulations of conspecific odor. We examined this question by measuring foraging trade-offs of wild house mice (Mus domesticus) in the field where we increased both predation risk and conspecific odor at artificial food patches in a two-factor design. Mouse giving-up densities (GUDs) were significantly higher in open habitats than in closed habitats but did not differ with the addition of mouse odors. Fine-scale behavioral observations of captive mice confirmed their attraction to the conspecific odor in an enclosure experiment, without any change to the GUD. These results indicate that house mice continue to visit and forage at food patches despite accumulations of predator-attracting odors. This most likely occurs for the social benefits obtained from conspecific odor exploration; however, such behavior may cause mice to become vulnerable to considerable olfactory exploitation by their predators. Future work must therefore focus on how mice trade off the social benefits of investigating odors that also attract their enemies.</description><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Antipredator behavior</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Eavesdropping</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Giving-up density (GUD)</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Liquids</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mus domesticus</subject><subject>Odors</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Signal exploitation</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Voles</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhoMoOK7-AA9iEPTWWvmqTh9l2VVhwYPr1ZDJx5ixp9Mm3Yj_3oy9KHjxkNThfaoqb15CnjJ4zQD6NxWAo-oA2mESO7hHdkwK3kGP_D7ZgZDQKSnFQ_Ko1iMAINN6R75c52IPaTrQEuqcpxoqzZH-SKOnX_NaAz0lF-iSqXVuPa2jXVKjzoxrdQ4uxeRo9rlQW6mlcwn-N0NLqt8ekwfRjjU8uasX5Pb66vbyfXfz8d2Hy7c3nZMMls6pAUMA4VAJ7oQcvO7V3govMGDw6KLcsxiVlwq01D7sxT567DlXfFBcXJBX29i55O9rqIs5perCONopNBOGAyK2678ga9MGhmfwxT_gMa9lah4MsvbmAUE3iG2QK7nWEqKZSzrZ8tMwMOdYzBaLabGYcywGWs_Lu8G2OjvGYieX6t_GvpeiLWjcs4071iWXPzpXzUWvh6Y_3_Ros7GH9tnm8ycOTABolMi1-AUbbZ9Q</recordid><startdate>20060501</startdate><enddate>20060501</enddate><creator>Pastro, Louise A</creator><creator>Banks, Peter B</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060501</creationdate><title>Foraging responses of wild house mice to accumulations of conspecific odor as a predation risk</title><author>Pastro, Louise A ; Banks, Peter B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-c596ee03c6532c349d875ba3d36e6ed6cf4b1ff5d450848deb3bfd6722529523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Antipredator behavior</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Eavesdropping</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Giving-up density (GUD)</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Liquids</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mus domesticus</topic><topic>Odors</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Signal exploitation</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Voles</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pastro, Louise A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banks, Peter B</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pastro, Louise A</au><au>Banks, Peter B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Foraging responses of wild house mice to accumulations of conspecific odor as a predation risk</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><date>2006-05-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>101-107</pages><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><coden>BESOD6</coden><abstract>Many predators hunt using the social and waste odors of their prey. It is unknown, however, whether potential prey modify their behavior in response to the risks of predation associated with accumulations of conspecific odor. We examined this question by measuring foraging trade-offs of wild house mice (Mus domesticus) in the field where we increased both predation risk and conspecific odor at artificial food patches in a two-factor design. Mouse giving-up densities (GUDs) were significantly higher in open habitats than in closed habitats but did not differ with the addition of mouse odors. Fine-scale behavioral observations of captive mice confirmed their attraction to the conspecific odor in an enclosure experiment, without any change to the GUD. These results indicate that house mice continue to visit and forage at food patches despite accumulations of predator-attracting odors. This most likely occurs for the social benefits obtained from conspecific odor exploration; however, such behavior may cause mice to become vulnerable to considerable olfactory exploitation by their predators. Future work must therefore focus on how mice trade off the social benefits of investigating odors that also attract their enemies.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00265-005-0146-0</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0340-5443
ispartof Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2006-05, Vol.60 (1), p.101-107
issn 0340-5443
1432-0762
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20666206
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Animal ethology
Antipredator behavior
Behavior
Biological and medical sciences
Eavesdropping
Foraging
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Giving-up density (GUD)
Habitats
Liquids
Mammalia
Mammals
Mice
Mus domesticus
Odors
Predators
Prey
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Signal exploitation
Urine
Vertebrata
Voles
Wildlife habitats
title Foraging responses of wild house mice to accumulations of conspecific odor as a predation risk
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T22%3A58%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Foraging%20responses%20of%20wild%20house%20mice%20to%20accumulations%20of%20conspecific%20odor%20as%20a%20predation%20risk&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Pastro,%20Louise%20A&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=101-107&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft.coden=BESOD6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00265-005-0146-0&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25063789%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614109608&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25063789&rfr_iscdi=true