Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Breast Cancer Subtype: Does Subtype Change and, if so, How?: IHC Profile and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Background Breast cancer subtype, as determined by the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), together defined as hormone receptor (HR) status, and the HER2/ neu receptor (HER2), is important in predicting prognosis and guiding therapy. Knowledge regarding how tumors ev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2018-11, Vol.25 (12), p.3535-3540
Hauptverfasser: De La Cruz, Lucy M., Harhay, Michael O., Zhang, Paul, Ugras, Stacy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3540
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3535
container_title Annals of surgical oncology
container_volume 25
creator De La Cruz, Lucy M.
Harhay, Michael O.
Zhang, Paul
Ugras, Stacy
description Background Breast cancer subtype, as determined by the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), together defined as hormone receptor (HR) status, and the HER2/ neu receptor (HER2), is important in predicting prognosis and guiding therapy. Knowledge regarding how tumors evolve during treatment and whether subtype is influenced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) is limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the HR and HER2 status between core needle biopsy and residual tumor after surgery of breast cancer patients treated with nCT and to evaluate the impact of status change on therapeutic management. Methods After institutional review board approval, we performed a retrospective review of all patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer who received nCT and had their initial biopsy and post-nCT surgical specimens evaluated for tumor subtype between January 2009 and December 2014 at our institution. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of ER, PR, HER2, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for HER2 expression, when indicated, was performed using identical technique and measured by a single pathologist who specializes in breast pathology. Pre- and post-nCT subtype was cross-tabulated to assess change. Standard diagnostic metrics were computed. Results Fifty-two patients with 54 cancers were identified to have their initial biopsy and post-nCT surgical specimens evaluated for tumor subtype in identical fashion. There was a complete pathologic response after nCT in 23 cancers (42.6%). Residual disease was noted in 31 cancers (57.4%). Five of these (16.1%) had a change in tumor subtype, of which four changes were based on IHC. HR status changed from positive to negative in two cases and from negative to positive in one case. HER2 status changed from positive to negative in one case and from negative to positive in one case. Subtype change led to treatment change in all five cases, with either the addition or discontinuation of adjuvant therapies. Conclusions Patients with breast cancer may experience alterations in their tumor subtype after nCT. At our institution, this led to a change in adjuvant treatment in 100% of such patients. This implies that retesting receptor status of residual tumors after nCT should be routinely performed to tailor adjuvant therapy after nCT.
doi_str_mv 10.1245/s10434-018-6608-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2066488151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2066488151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-f166d41bd2d2eefdcf79598222de8a6ec9eac9a8cf8ab5ba8cd596c7c8ee2f353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPAyEUhYnRaH38ADeGpQtHgQ4U3Bitj5oYXahrwsBF23SGEWY0_ffStHXp6r7OOcn9EDqm5Jyykl8kSsphWRAqCyGILOgWGlCeN6WQdDv3RMhCMcH30H5KM0LoaEj4LtpjSklKGB8g81i3xnY4ePwMwbhZ_22aDo8_oQ7dJ0TTLnBo8E0Ek_LaNBYifu2rbtHCJb4NkDZT9pjmA7Bp3BmeepzCGZ6En6tDtOPNPMHRuh6g9_u7t_GkeHp5eBxfPxWWKdEVngrhSlo55hiAd9aPFFeSMeZAGgFWgbHKSOulqXiVG8eVsCMrAZgf8uEBOl3ltjF89ZA6XU-ThfncNBD6pBkRopSScpqldCW1MaQUwes2TmsTF5oSvSSrV2R1JquXZPXSc7KO76sa3J9jgzIL2EqQ8imDiHoW-tjkl_9J_QVXn4RL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2066488151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Breast Cancer Subtype: Does Subtype Change and, if so, How?: IHC Profile and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>De La Cruz, Lucy M. ; Harhay, Michael O. ; Zhang, Paul ; Ugras, Stacy</creator><creatorcontrib>De La Cruz, Lucy M. ; Harhay, Michael O. ; Zhang, Paul ; Ugras, Stacy</creatorcontrib><description>Background Breast cancer subtype, as determined by the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), together defined as hormone receptor (HR) status, and the HER2/ neu receptor (HER2), is important in predicting prognosis and guiding therapy. Knowledge regarding how tumors evolve during treatment and whether subtype is influenced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) is limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the HR and HER2 status between core needle biopsy and residual tumor after surgery of breast cancer patients treated with nCT and to evaluate the impact of status change on therapeutic management. Methods After institutional review board approval, we performed a retrospective review of all patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer who received nCT and had their initial biopsy and post-nCT surgical specimens evaluated for tumor subtype between January 2009 and December 2014 at our institution. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of ER, PR, HER2, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for HER2 expression, when indicated, was performed using identical technique and measured by a single pathologist who specializes in breast pathology. Pre- and post-nCT subtype was cross-tabulated to assess change. Standard diagnostic metrics were computed. Results Fifty-two patients with 54 cancers were identified to have their initial biopsy and post-nCT surgical specimens evaluated for tumor subtype in identical fashion. There was a complete pathologic response after nCT in 23 cancers (42.6%). Residual disease was noted in 31 cancers (57.4%). Five of these (16.1%) had a change in tumor subtype, of which four changes were based on IHC. HR status changed from positive to negative in two cases and from negative to positive in one case. HER2 status changed from positive to negative in one case and from negative to positive in one case. Subtype change led to treatment change in all five cases, with either the addition or discontinuation of adjuvant therapies. Conclusions Patients with breast cancer may experience alterations in their tumor subtype after nCT. At our institution, this led to a change in adjuvant treatment in 100% of such patients. This implies that retesting receptor status of residual tumors after nCT should be routinely performed to tailor adjuvant therapy after nCT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6608-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29981025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism ; Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Breast Neoplasms - metabolism ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Oncology ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - metabolism ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology ; Carcinoma, Lobular - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Lobular - metabolism ; Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Oncology ; Prognosis ; Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism ; Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism ; Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2018-11, Vol.25 (12), p.3535-3540</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-f166d41bd2d2eefdcf79598222de8a6ec9eac9a8cf8ab5ba8cd596c7c8ee2f353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1245/s10434-018-6608-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1245/s10434-018-6608-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29981025$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De La Cruz, Lucy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harhay, Michael O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ugras, Stacy</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Breast Cancer Subtype: Does Subtype Change and, if so, How?: IHC Profile and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background Breast cancer subtype, as determined by the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), together defined as hormone receptor (HR) status, and the HER2/ neu receptor (HER2), is important in predicting prognosis and guiding therapy. Knowledge regarding how tumors evolve during treatment and whether subtype is influenced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) is limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the HR and HER2 status between core needle biopsy and residual tumor after surgery of breast cancer patients treated with nCT and to evaluate the impact of status change on therapeutic management. Methods After institutional review board approval, we performed a retrospective review of all patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer who received nCT and had their initial biopsy and post-nCT surgical specimens evaluated for tumor subtype between January 2009 and December 2014 at our institution. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of ER, PR, HER2, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for HER2 expression, when indicated, was performed using identical technique and measured by a single pathologist who specializes in breast pathology. Pre- and post-nCT subtype was cross-tabulated to assess change. Standard diagnostic metrics were computed. Results Fifty-two patients with 54 cancers were identified to have their initial biopsy and post-nCT surgical specimens evaluated for tumor subtype in identical fashion. There was a complete pathologic response after nCT in 23 cancers (42.6%). Residual disease was noted in 31 cancers (57.4%). Five of these (16.1%) had a change in tumor subtype, of which four changes were based on IHC. HR status changed from positive to negative in two cases and from negative to positive in one case. HER2 status changed from positive to negative in one case and from negative to positive in one case. Subtype change led to treatment change in all five cases, with either the addition or discontinuation of adjuvant therapies. Conclusions Patients with breast cancer may experience alterations in their tumor subtype after nCT. At our institution, this led to a change in adjuvant treatment in 100% of such patients. This implies that retesting receptor status of residual tumors after nCT should be routinely performed to tailor adjuvant therapy after nCT.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Oncology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - metabolism</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - metabolism</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</subject><subject>Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPAyEUhYnRaH38ADeGpQtHgQ4U3Bitj5oYXahrwsBF23SGEWY0_ffStHXp6r7OOcn9EDqm5Jyykl8kSsphWRAqCyGILOgWGlCeN6WQdDv3RMhCMcH30H5KM0LoaEj4LtpjSklKGB8g81i3xnY4ePwMwbhZ_22aDo8_oQ7dJ0TTLnBo8E0Ek_LaNBYifu2rbtHCJb4NkDZT9pjmA7Bp3BmeepzCGZ6En6tDtOPNPMHRuh6g9_u7t_GkeHp5eBxfPxWWKdEVngrhSlo55hiAd9aPFFeSMeZAGgFWgbHKSOulqXiVG8eVsCMrAZgf8uEBOl3ltjF89ZA6XU-ThfncNBD6pBkRopSScpqldCW1MaQUwes2TmsTF5oSvSSrV2R1JquXZPXSc7KO76sa3J9jgzIL2EqQ8imDiHoW-tjkl_9J_QVXn4RL</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>De La Cruz, Lucy M.</creator><creator>Harhay, Michael O.</creator><creator>Zhang, Paul</creator><creator>Ugras, Stacy</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Breast Cancer Subtype: Does Subtype Change and, if so, How?</title><author>De La Cruz, Lucy M. ; Harhay, Michael O. ; Zhang, Paul ; Ugras, Stacy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-f166d41bd2d2eefdcf79598222de8a6ec9eac9a8cf8ab5ba8cd596c7c8ee2f353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Oncology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - metabolism</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - metabolism</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</topic><topic>Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De La Cruz, Lucy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harhay, Michael O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ugras, Stacy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De La Cruz, Lucy M.</au><au>Harhay, Michael O.</au><au>Zhang, Paul</au><au>Ugras, Stacy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Breast Cancer Subtype: Does Subtype Change and, if so, How?: IHC Profile and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3535</spage><epage>3540</epage><pages>3535-3540</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Background Breast cancer subtype, as determined by the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), together defined as hormone receptor (HR) status, and the HER2/ neu receptor (HER2), is important in predicting prognosis and guiding therapy. Knowledge regarding how tumors evolve during treatment and whether subtype is influenced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) is limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the HR and HER2 status between core needle biopsy and residual tumor after surgery of breast cancer patients treated with nCT and to evaluate the impact of status change on therapeutic management. Methods After institutional review board approval, we performed a retrospective review of all patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer who received nCT and had their initial biopsy and post-nCT surgical specimens evaluated for tumor subtype between January 2009 and December 2014 at our institution. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of ER, PR, HER2, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for HER2 expression, when indicated, was performed using identical technique and measured by a single pathologist who specializes in breast pathology. Pre- and post-nCT subtype was cross-tabulated to assess change. Standard diagnostic metrics were computed. Results Fifty-two patients with 54 cancers were identified to have their initial biopsy and post-nCT surgical specimens evaluated for tumor subtype in identical fashion. There was a complete pathologic response after nCT in 23 cancers (42.6%). Residual disease was noted in 31 cancers (57.4%). Five of these (16.1%) had a change in tumor subtype, of which four changes were based on IHC. HR status changed from positive to negative in two cases and from negative to positive in one case. HER2 status changed from positive to negative in one case and from negative to positive in one case. Subtype change led to treatment change in all five cases, with either the addition or discontinuation of adjuvant therapies. Conclusions Patients with breast cancer may experience alterations in their tumor subtype after nCT. At our institution, this led to a change in adjuvant treatment in 100% of such patients. This implies that retesting receptor status of residual tumors after nCT should be routinely performed to tailor adjuvant therapy after nCT.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>29981025</pmid><doi>10.1245/s10434-018-6608-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1068-9265
ispartof Annals of surgical oncology, 2018-11, Vol.25 (12), p.3535-3540
issn 1068-9265
1534-4681
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2066488151
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism
Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy
Breast Neoplasms - metabolism
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Oncology
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - drug therapy
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - metabolism
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology
Carcinoma, Lobular - drug therapy
Carcinoma, Lobular - metabolism
Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Oncology
Prognosis
Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism
Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism
Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
title Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Breast Cancer Subtype: Does Subtype Change and, if so, How?: IHC Profile and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A04%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Neoadjuvant%20Chemotherapy%20on%20Breast%20Cancer%20Subtype:%20Does%20Subtype%20Change%20and,%20if%20so,%20How?:%20IHC%20Profile%20and%20Neoadjuvant%20Chemotherapy&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=De%20La%20Cruz,%20Lucy%20M.&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3535&rft.epage=3540&rft.pages=3535-3540&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-018-6608-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2066488151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2066488151&rft_id=info:pmid/29981025&rfr_iscdi=true