Factors associated with complications during endoscopic esophageal dilation
endoscopic dilation is considered as the treatment of choice for esophageal strictures. However, there are no studies in our region that have assessed the safety of the procedure. to assess the safety of esophageal dilation and the factors associated with the development of complications. a retrospe...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Revista española de enfermedades digestivas 2018-07, Vol.110 (7), p.440-445 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng ; spa |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 445 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 440 |
| container_title | Revista española de enfermedades digestivas |
| container_volume | 110 |
| creator | Benites Goñi, Harold Eduardo Arcana López, Ronald Bustamante Robles, Katherine Yelenia Burgos García, Aurora Cervera Caballero, Luis Vera Calderón, Augusto Dávalos Moscol, Milagros |
| description | endoscopic dilation is considered as the treatment of choice for esophageal strictures. However, there are no studies in our region that have assessed the safety of the procedure.
to assess the safety of esophageal dilation and the factors associated with the development of complications.
a retrospective cohort was studied. All patients referred for esophageal dilation between January 2015 and June 2017 were included in the study. A complication rate was obtained and the association between nonadherence to the "rule of 3" and the development of complications was determined. Other predictive factors associated with complication development were also analyzed.
a total of 164 patients that underwent 474 dilations were included in the study. Surgical anastomosis stricture was the most prevalent etiology. A total of six complications occurred, including three perforations (0.63%), two bleeding events (0.42%) and one episode of significant pain that required post-procedure observation (0.21%). Endoscopic esophageal dilation without adherence to the "rule of 3" was not associated with a higher risk of complications. Balloon dilation was the only predictive factor for complications.
esophageal dilation is a safe procedure. Nonadherence to the "rule of 3" does not appear to be associated with a higher risk of complications, including esophageal perforation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.17235/reed.2018.5375/2017 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2066475604</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A553402420</galeid><sourcerecordid>A553402420</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-7b325bca0f75be649e3a610980ddfa410778219fec3c3259c3a3919d29350f8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1r3DAQhnVoaJJt_0EphkLoZTejL8s6hpC0pYFe2rPQSuNdBdtyJJuQfx95N4EGgg4apOcdmHkI-UJhQxXj8jIh-g0D2mwkV_KyVOoDOaOUwxooNKfkPOd7AMFryT6SU6a1qkGJM_L71ropplzZnKMLdkJfPYZpX7nYj11wdgpxyJWfUxh2FQ4-ZhfH4CrMcdzbHdqu8qE7YJ_ISWu7jJ9f7hX5d3vz9_rn-u7Pj1_XV3drJySd1mrLmdw6C62SW6yFRm5rCroB71srKCjVMKpbdNwVUjtuuabaM80ltI3nK_L92HdM8WHGPJk-ZIddZweMczYM6looWZdxV-TbEd3ZDk0Y2jgl6xbcXEnJBTDBoFCbd6hyPPbBxQHbUN7fBC7-C-zLEqZ9jt18WNZbUBxBl2LOCVszptDb9GQomIM6s6gzizqzqFsqVWJfXyact335fg29euPPJ5GVcQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2066475604</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors associated with complications during endoscopic esophageal dilation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Benites Goñi, Harold Eduardo ; Arcana López, Ronald ; Bustamante Robles, Katherine Yelenia ; Burgos García, Aurora ; Cervera Caballero, Luis ; Vera Calderón, Augusto ; Dávalos Moscol, Milagros</creator><creatorcontrib>Benites Goñi, Harold Eduardo ; Arcana López, Ronald ; Bustamante Robles, Katherine Yelenia ; Burgos García, Aurora ; Cervera Caballero, Luis ; Vera Calderón, Augusto ; Dávalos Moscol, Milagros</creatorcontrib><description>endoscopic dilation is considered as the treatment of choice for esophageal strictures. However, there are no studies in our region that have assessed the safety of the procedure.
to assess the safety of esophageal dilation and the factors associated with the development of complications.
a retrospective cohort was studied. All patients referred for esophageal dilation between January 2015 and June 2017 were included in the study. A complication rate was obtained and the association between nonadherence to the "rule of 3" and the development of complications was determined. Other predictive factors associated with complication development were also analyzed.
a total of 164 patients that underwent 474 dilations were included in the study. Surgical anastomosis stricture was the most prevalent etiology. A total of six complications occurred, including three perforations (0.63%), two bleeding events (0.42%) and one episode of significant pain that required post-procedure observation (0.21%). Endoscopic esophageal dilation without adherence to the "rule of 3" was not associated with a higher risk of complications. Balloon dilation was the only predictive factor for complications.
esophageal dilation is a safe procedure. Nonadherence to the "rule of 3" does not appear to be associated with a higher risk of complications, including esophageal perforation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1130-0108</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5375/2017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29976074</identifier><language>eng ; spa</language><publisher>Spain: Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestivas</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cohort Studies ; Dilatation - adverse effects ; Esophageal Perforation - etiology ; Esophageal Stenosis - surgery ; Esophagoscopy - adverse effects ; Esophagoscopy - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - therapy ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Retrospective Studies ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Revista española de enfermedades digestivas, 2018-07, Vol.110 (7), p.440-445</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestivas</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-7b325bca0f75be649e3a610980ddfa410778219fec3c3259c3a3919d29350f8d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-7b325bca0f75be649e3a610980ddfa410778219fec3c3259c3a3919d29350f8d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,861,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29976074$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Benites Goñi, Harold Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arcana López, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bustamante Robles, Katherine Yelenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgos García, Aurora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cervera Caballero, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vera Calderón, Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dávalos Moscol, Milagros</creatorcontrib><title>Factors associated with complications during endoscopic esophageal dilation</title><title>Revista española de enfermedades digestivas</title><addtitle>Rev Esp Enferm Dig</addtitle><description>endoscopic dilation is considered as the treatment of choice for esophageal strictures. However, there are no studies in our region that have assessed the safety of the procedure.
to assess the safety of esophageal dilation and the factors associated with the development of complications.
a retrospective cohort was studied. All patients referred for esophageal dilation between January 2015 and June 2017 were included in the study. A complication rate was obtained and the association between nonadherence to the "rule of 3" and the development of complications was determined. Other predictive factors associated with complication development were also analyzed.
a total of 164 patients that underwent 474 dilations were included in the study. Surgical anastomosis stricture was the most prevalent etiology. A total of six complications occurred, including three perforations (0.63%), two bleeding events (0.42%) and one episode of significant pain that required post-procedure observation (0.21%). Endoscopic esophageal dilation without adherence to the "rule of 3" was not associated with a higher risk of complications. Balloon dilation was the only predictive factor for complications.
esophageal dilation is a safe procedure. Nonadherence to the "rule of 3" does not appear to be associated with a higher risk of complications, including esophageal perforation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Dilatation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Esophageal Perforation - etiology</subject><subject>Esophageal Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Esophagoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Esophagoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - therapy</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1130-0108</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU1r3DAQhnVoaJJt_0EphkLoZTejL8s6hpC0pYFe2rPQSuNdBdtyJJuQfx95N4EGgg4apOcdmHkI-UJhQxXj8jIh-g0D2mwkV_KyVOoDOaOUwxooNKfkPOd7AMFryT6SU6a1qkGJM_L71ropplzZnKMLdkJfPYZpX7nYj11wdgpxyJWfUxh2FQ4-ZhfH4CrMcdzbHdqu8qE7YJ_ISWu7jJ9f7hX5d3vz9_rn-u7Pj1_XV3drJySd1mrLmdw6C62SW6yFRm5rCroB71srKCjVMKpbdNwVUjtuuabaM80ltI3nK_L92HdM8WHGPJk-ZIddZweMczYM6looWZdxV-TbEd3ZDk0Y2jgl6xbcXEnJBTDBoFCbd6hyPPbBxQHbUN7fBC7-C-zLEqZ9jt18WNZbUBxBl2LOCVszptDb9GQomIM6s6gzizqzqFsqVWJfXyact335fg29euPPJ5GVcQ</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Benites Goñi, Harold Eduardo</creator><creator>Arcana López, Ronald</creator><creator>Bustamante Robles, Katherine Yelenia</creator><creator>Burgos García, Aurora</creator><creator>Cervera Caballero, Luis</creator><creator>Vera Calderón, Augusto</creator><creator>Dávalos Moscol, Milagros</creator><general>Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestivas</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>INF</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>Factors associated with complications during endoscopic esophageal dilation</title><author>Benites Goñi, Harold Eduardo ; Arcana López, Ronald ; Bustamante Robles, Katherine Yelenia ; Burgos García, Aurora ; Cervera Caballero, Luis ; Vera Calderón, Augusto ; Dávalos Moscol, Milagros</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-7b325bca0f75be649e3a610980ddfa410778219fec3c3259c3a3919d29350f8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; spa</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Dilatation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Esophageal Perforation - etiology</topic><topic>Esophageal Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Esophagoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Esophagoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - therapy</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Benites Goñi, Harold Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arcana López, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bustamante Robles, Katherine Yelenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgos García, Aurora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cervera Caballero, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vera Calderón, Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dávalos Moscol, Milagros</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: Informe Academico</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revista española de enfermedades digestivas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Benites Goñi, Harold Eduardo</au><au>Arcana López, Ronald</au><au>Bustamante Robles, Katherine Yelenia</au><au>Burgos García, Aurora</au><au>Cervera Caballero, Luis</au><au>Vera Calderón, Augusto</au><au>Dávalos Moscol, Milagros</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors associated with complications during endoscopic esophageal dilation</atitle><jtitle>Revista española de enfermedades digestivas</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Esp Enferm Dig</addtitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>440</spage><epage>445</epage><pages>440-445</pages><issn>1130-0108</issn><abstract>endoscopic dilation is considered as the treatment of choice for esophageal strictures. However, there are no studies in our region that have assessed the safety of the procedure.
to assess the safety of esophageal dilation and the factors associated with the development of complications.
a retrospective cohort was studied. All patients referred for esophageal dilation between January 2015 and June 2017 were included in the study. A complication rate was obtained and the association between nonadherence to the "rule of 3" and the development of complications was determined. Other predictive factors associated with complication development were also analyzed.
a total of 164 patients that underwent 474 dilations were included in the study. Surgical anastomosis stricture was the most prevalent etiology. A total of six complications occurred, including three perforations (0.63%), two bleeding events (0.42%) and one episode of significant pain that required post-procedure observation (0.21%). Endoscopic esophageal dilation without adherence to the "rule of 3" was not associated with a higher risk of complications. Balloon dilation was the only predictive factor for complications.
esophageal dilation is a safe procedure. Nonadherence to the "rule of 3" does not appear to be associated with a higher risk of complications, including esophageal perforation.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pub>Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestivas</pub><pmid>29976074</pmid><doi>10.17235/reed.2018.5375/2017</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1130-0108 |
| ispartof | Revista española de enfermedades digestivas, 2018-07, Vol.110 (7), p.440-445 |
| issn | 1130-0108 |
| language | eng ; spa |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2066475604 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Cohort Studies Dilatation - adverse effects Esophageal Perforation - etiology Esophageal Stenosis - surgery Esophagoscopy - adverse effects Esophagoscopy - methods Female Humans Male Middle Aged Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - therapy Predictive Value of Tests Retrospective Studies Young Adult |
| title | Factors associated with complications during endoscopic esophageal dilation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A00%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20associated%20with%20complications%20during%20endoscopic%20esophageal%20dilation&rft.jtitle=Revista%20espa%C3%B1ola%20de%20enfermedades%20digestivas&rft.au=Benites%20Go%C3%B1i,%20Harold%20Eduardo&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=440&rft.epage=445&rft.pages=440-445&rft.issn=1130-0108&rft_id=info:doi/10.17235/reed.2018.5375/2017&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA553402420%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2066475604&rft_id=info:pmid/29976074&rft_galeid=A553402420&rfr_iscdi=true |