Sensory Lexicon for Fresh Squeezed and Processed Orange Juices

The aim of this study was to develop a flavor vocabulary (odor, aroma basic tastes and trigeminal/tactile sensations) to describe both fresh-squeezed and thermally processed (commercial) orange juices. Two independent panels located in different countries (Spain and USA) selected a common lexicon us...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food science and technology international 2008-10, Vol.14 (5), p.131-141
Hauptverfasser: Pérez-Cacho, P. Ruiz, Galan-Soldevilla, H, Mahattanatawee, K, Elston, A, Rouseff, R.L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 141
container_issue 5
container_start_page 131
container_title Food science and technology international
container_volume 14
creator Pérez-Cacho, P. Ruiz
Galan-Soldevilla, H
Mahattanatawee, K
Elston, A
Rouseff, R.L
description The aim of this study was to develop a flavor vocabulary (odor, aroma basic tastes and trigeminal/tactile sensations) to describe both fresh-squeezed and thermally processed (commercial) orange juices. Two independent panels located in different countries (Spain and USA) selected a common lexicon using multivariate analysis. Two sets of samples were selected and evaluated independently: the American sensory panel analyzed 40 orange juices varied in processing technology (pasteurized, refrigerated from concentrated, frozen concentrated and canned juices) and cultivars (Valencia, Temple, Navel, Hamlin, and Amber Sweet). The Spanish panel analyzed 26 samples that included thermally processed juices (pasteurized and refrigerated from concentrated) and unheated, hand squeezed juices (Valencia and Navel). A total of 34 common attributes were selected (15 for odor, 12 for aroma, 3 for basic tastes and 4 for trigeminal/tactile sensations). Data obtained were analyzed by geometric means, principal components analysis (PCA) and by Kruskal-Wallis test. Significant differences between the major categories of commercial juices were observed for all attributes in both countries and were also observed between fresh-squeezed and processed orange juices.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1082013208094723
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20657508</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1082013208094723</sage_id><sourcerecordid>20657508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-c30c3e5d2ff7e4014762982d4217b157a7bb411fb19955f9a7cb5e50374745e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhiMEEqWws5EFtsCdHcfOgoQqyocqFal0jhz3XFK1cbEbifLrcdWKgYHlPp97dXdJcolwiyjlHYJigJyBgjKXjB8lPRScZSi5Oo5xbGe7_mlyFsICABCk6iX3E2qD89t0RF-NcW1qnU-HnsJHOvnsiL5plup2lr55ZyiEmI29bueUvnZNLJwnJ1YvA10cfD-ZDh_fB8_ZaPz0MngYZYYXxSZaMJzEjFkrKQfMZcFKxWY5Q1mjkFrWdY5oayxLIWyppakFCeAyl7kgzvvJzV537V1cK2yqVRMMLZe6JdeFikEhpAAVQdiDxrsQPNlq7ZuV9tsKodo9qvr7qDhyfdDWweiljfeZJvzOMUQsZZFHLttzQc-pWrjOt_Hk_3Sv9rzVrtJzHzWnkx0CKBQqJfgPHJV7sQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20657508</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensory Lexicon for Fresh Squeezed and Processed Orange Juices</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Pérez-Cacho, P. Ruiz ; Galan-Soldevilla, H ; Mahattanatawee, K ; Elston, A ; Rouseff, R.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Cacho, P. Ruiz ; Galan-Soldevilla, H ; Mahattanatawee, K ; Elston, A ; Rouseff, R.L</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to develop a flavor vocabulary (odor, aroma basic tastes and trigeminal/tactile sensations) to describe both fresh-squeezed and thermally processed (commercial) orange juices. Two independent panels located in different countries (Spain and USA) selected a common lexicon using multivariate analysis. Two sets of samples were selected and evaluated independently: the American sensory panel analyzed 40 orange juices varied in processing technology (pasteurized, refrigerated from concentrated, frozen concentrated and canned juices) and cultivars (Valencia, Temple, Navel, Hamlin, and Amber Sweet). The Spanish panel analyzed 26 samples that included thermally processed juices (pasteurized and refrigerated from concentrated) and unheated, hand squeezed juices (Valencia and Navel). A total of 34 common attributes were selected (15 for odor, 12 for aroma, 3 for basic tastes and 4 for trigeminal/tactile sensations). Data obtained were analyzed by geometric means, principal components analysis (PCA) and by Kruskal-Wallis test. Significant differences between the major categories of commercial juices were observed for all attributes in both countries and were also observed between fresh-squeezed and processed orange juices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1082-0132</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1082013208094723</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Citrus ; Food industries ; Fruit and vegetable industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><ispartof>Food science and technology international, 2008-10, Vol.14 (5), p.131-141</ispartof><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-c30c3e5d2ff7e4014762982d4217b157a7bb411fb19955f9a7cb5e50374745e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-c30c3e5d2ff7e4014762982d4217b157a7bb411fb19955f9a7cb5e50374745e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1082013208094723$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1082013208094723$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21119764$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Cacho, P. Ruiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galan-Soldevilla, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahattanatawee, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elston, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouseff, R.L</creatorcontrib><title>Sensory Lexicon for Fresh Squeezed and Processed Orange Juices</title><title>Food science and technology international</title><description>The aim of this study was to develop a flavor vocabulary (odor, aroma basic tastes and trigeminal/tactile sensations) to describe both fresh-squeezed and thermally processed (commercial) orange juices. Two independent panels located in different countries (Spain and USA) selected a common lexicon using multivariate analysis. Two sets of samples were selected and evaluated independently: the American sensory panel analyzed 40 orange juices varied in processing technology (pasteurized, refrigerated from concentrated, frozen concentrated and canned juices) and cultivars (Valencia, Temple, Navel, Hamlin, and Amber Sweet). The Spanish panel analyzed 26 samples that included thermally processed juices (pasteurized and refrigerated from concentrated) and unheated, hand squeezed juices (Valencia and Navel). A total of 34 common attributes were selected (15 for odor, 12 for aroma, 3 for basic tastes and 4 for trigeminal/tactile sensations). Data obtained were analyzed by geometric means, principal components analysis (PCA) and by Kruskal-Wallis test. Significant differences between the major categories of commercial juices were observed for all attributes in both countries and were also observed between fresh-squeezed and processed orange juices.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Citrus</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fruit and vegetable industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><issn>1082-0132</issn><issn>1532-1738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhiMEEqWws5EFtsCdHcfOgoQqyocqFal0jhz3XFK1cbEbifLrcdWKgYHlPp97dXdJcolwiyjlHYJigJyBgjKXjB8lPRScZSi5Oo5xbGe7_mlyFsICABCk6iX3E2qD89t0RF-NcW1qnU-HnsJHOvnsiL5plup2lr55ZyiEmI29bueUvnZNLJwnJ1YvA10cfD-ZDh_fB8_ZaPz0MngYZYYXxSZaMJzEjFkrKQfMZcFKxWY5Q1mjkFrWdY5oayxLIWyppakFCeAyl7kgzvvJzV537V1cK2yqVRMMLZe6JdeFikEhpAAVQdiDxrsQPNlq7ZuV9tsKodo9qvr7qDhyfdDWweiljfeZJvzOMUQsZZFHLttzQc-pWrjOt_Hk_3Sv9rzVrtJzHzWnkx0CKBQqJfgPHJV7sQ</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Pérez-Cacho, P. Ruiz</creator><creator>Galan-Soldevilla, H</creator><creator>Mahattanatawee, K</creator><creator>Elston, A</creator><creator>Rouseff, R.L</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>Sensory Lexicon for Fresh Squeezed and Processed Orange Juices</title><author>Pérez-Cacho, P. Ruiz ; Galan-Soldevilla, H ; Mahattanatawee, K ; Elston, A ; Rouseff, R.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-c30c3e5d2ff7e4014762982d4217b157a7bb411fb19955f9a7cb5e50374745e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Citrus</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fruit and vegetable industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Cacho, P. Ruiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galan-Soldevilla, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahattanatawee, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elston, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouseff, R.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Food science and technology international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pérez-Cacho, P. Ruiz</au><au>Galan-Soldevilla, H</au><au>Mahattanatawee, K</au><au>Elston, A</au><au>Rouseff, R.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensory Lexicon for Fresh Squeezed and Processed Orange Juices</atitle><jtitle>Food science and technology international</jtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>131-141</pages><issn>1082-0132</issn><eissn>1532-1738</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to develop a flavor vocabulary (odor, aroma basic tastes and trigeminal/tactile sensations) to describe both fresh-squeezed and thermally processed (commercial) orange juices. Two independent panels located in different countries (Spain and USA) selected a common lexicon using multivariate analysis. Two sets of samples were selected and evaluated independently: the American sensory panel analyzed 40 orange juices varied in processing technology (pasteurized, refrigerated from concentrated, frozen concentrated and canned juices) and cultivars (Valencia, Temple, Navel, Hamlin, and Amber Sweet). The Spanish panel analyzed 26 samples that included thermally processed juices (pasteurized and refrigerated from concentrated) and unheated, hand squeezed juices (Valencia and Navel). A total of 34 common attributes were selected (15 for odor, 12 for aroma, 3 for basic tastes and 4 for trigeminal/tactile sensations). Data obtained were analyzed by geometric means, principal components analysis (PCA) and by Kruskal-Wallis test. Significant differences between the major categories of commercial juices were observed for all attributes in both countries and were also observed between fresh-squeezed and processed orange juices.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1082013208094723</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1082-0132
ispartof Food science and technology international, 2008-10, Vol.14 (5), p.131-141
issn 1082-0132
1532-1738
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20657508
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Citrus
Food industries
Fruit and vegetable industries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
title Sensory Lexicon for Fresh Squeezed and Processed Orange Juices
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A27%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensory%20Lexicon%20for%20Fresh%20Squeezed%20and%20Processed%20Orange%20Juices&rft.jtitle=Food%20science%20and%20technology%20international&rft.au=P%C3%A9rez-Cacho,%20P.%20Ruiz&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=131-141&rft.issn=1082-0132&rft.eissn=1532-1738&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1082013208094723&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20657508%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20657508&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1082013208094723&rfr_iscdi=true