Relational processing in conceptual combination and analogy
We evaluate whether evidence from conceptual combination supports the relational priming model of analogy. Representing relations implicitly as patterns of activation distributed across the semantic network provides a natural and parsimonious explanation of several key phenomena observed in conceptu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Behavioral and brain sciences 2008-08, Vol.31 (4), p.385-386 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 386 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 385 |
container_title | The Behavioral and brain sciences |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Estes, Zachary Jones, Lara L. |
description | We evaluate whether evidence from conceptual combination supports the relational priming model of analogy. Representing relations implicitly as patterns of activation distributed across the semantic network provides a natural and parsimonious explanation of several key phenomena observed in conceptual combination. Although an additional mechanism for role resolution may be required, relational priming offers a promising approach to analogy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0140525X08004548 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20653733</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0140525X08004548</cupid><sourcerecordid>20653733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-6543ddf070fcdfa9e643e1045b75d55e3fd7c3214e65b29e6cf35f01ae817dfc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMotlZ_gLsBwd1oMnlNcSXFtkrxLbgLmUxSUmcmNZkB--9NbVFQXFzu4nzn3sMB4BjBMwQRP3-CiECa0VeYQ0goyXdAHxE2TFGe0V3QX8vpWu-BgxAWEEJK6HAf9FDOWEYI7oOLR13J1rpGVsnSO6VDsM08sU2iXKP0su2ioFxd2OYLS2RTxpGVm68OwZ6RVdBH2z0AL-Or59E0nd1NrkeXs1ThnLUpowSXpYEcGlUaOdSMYI1i3oLTklKNTckVzhDRjBZZlJXB1EAkdY54aRQegNPN3RjwvdOhFbUNSleVbLTrgsggo5hjHMGTX-DCdT6GjQyLBMJDkkcKbSjlXQheG7H0tpZ-JRAU617Fn16jJ914bGj1x7dB-jfBOOZUsMmDyG6m_P52TMQo8nj7Q9aFt-Vc_0T5_8snbVaG3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2637313948</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relational processing in conceptual combination and analogy</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Estes, Zachary ; Jones, Lara L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Estes, Zachary ; Jones, Lara L.</creatorcontrib><description>We evaluate whether evidence from conceptual combination supports the relational priming model of analogy. Representing relations implicitly as patterns of activation distributed across the semantic network provides a natural and parsimonious explanation of several key phenomena observed in conceptual combination. Although an additional mechanism for role resolution may be required, relational priming offers a promising approach to analogy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-525X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-1825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X08004548</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18662443</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><ispartof>The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2008-08, Vol.31 (4), p.385-386</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-6543ddf070fcdfa9e643e1045b75d55e3fd7c3214e65b29e6cf35f01ae817dfc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-6543ddf070fcdfa9e643e1045b75d55e3fd7c3214e65b29e6cf35f01ae817dfc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0140525X08004548/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Estes, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Lara L.</creatorcontrib><title>Relational processing in conceptual combination and analogy</title><title>The Behavioral and brain sciences</title><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><description>We evaluate whether evidence from conceptual combination supports the relational priming model of analogy. Representing relations implicitly as patterns of activation distributed across the semantic network provides a natural and parsimonious explanation of several key phenomena observed in conceptual combination. Although an additional mechanism for role resolution may be required, relational priming offers a promising approach to analogy.</description><issn>0140-525X</issn><issn>1469-1825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMotlZ_gLsBwd1oMnlNcSXFtkrxLbgLmUxSUmcmNZkB--9NbVFQXFzu4nzn3sMB4BjBMwQRP3-CiECa0VeYQ0goyXdAHxE2TFGe0V3QX8vpWu-BgxAWEEJK6HAf9FDOWEYI7oOLR13J1rpGVsnSO6VDsM08sU2iXKP0su2ioFxd2OYLS2RTxpGVm68OwZ6RVdBH2z0AL-Or59E0nd1NrkeXs1ThnLUpowSXpYEcGlUaOdSMYI1i3oLTklKNTckVzhDRjBZZlJXB1EAkdY54aRQegNPN3RjwvdOhFbUNSleVbLTrgsggo5hjHMGTX-DCdT6GjQyLBMJDkkcKbSjlXQheG7H0tpZ-JRAU617Fn16jJ914bGj1x7dB-jfBOOZUsMmDyG6m_P52TMQo8nj7Q9aFt-Vc_0T5_8snbVaG3w</recordid><startdate>20080801</startdate><enddate>20080801</enddate><creator>Estes, Zachary</creator><creator>Jones, Lara L.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080801</creationdate><title>Relational processing in conceptual combination and analogy</title><author>Estes, Zachary ; Jones, Lara L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-6543ddf070fcdfa9e643e1045b75d55e3fd7c3214e65b29e6cf35f01ae817dfc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Estes, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Lara L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Estes, Zachary</au><au>Jones, Lara L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relational processing in conceptual combination and analogy</atitle><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><date>2008-08-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>385</spage><epage>386</epage><pages>385-386</pages><issn>0140-525X</issn><eissn>1469-1825</eissn><abstract>We evaluate whether evidence from conceptual combination supports the relational priming model of analogy. Representing relations implicitly as patterns of activation distributed across the semantic network provides a natural and parsimonious explanation of several key phenomena observed in conceptual combination. Although an additional mechanism for role resolution may be required, relational priming offers a promising approach to analogy.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>18662443</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0140525X08004548</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-525X |
ispartof | The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2008-08, Vol.31 (4), p.385-386 |
issn | 0140-525X 1469-1825 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20653733 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
title | Relational processing in conceptual combination and analogy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T22%3A43%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relational%20processing%20in%20conceptual%20combination%20and%20analogy&rft.jtitle=The%20Behavioral%20and%20brain%20sciences&rft.au=Estes,%20Zachary&rft.date=2008-08-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=386&rft.pages=385-386&rft.issn=0140-525X&rft.eissn=1469-1825&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0140525X08004548&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20653733%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2637313948&rft_id=info:pmid/18662443&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0140525X08004548&rfr_iscdi=true |