Analyzing the feasibility of discriminating between collagen types I and II using polarization‐resolved second harmonic generation

According to previous studies, the nonlinear susceptibility tensor ratio χ33/χ31 obtained from polarization‐resolved second harmonic generation (P‐SHG) under the assumption of cylindrical symmetry can be used to distinguish between fibrillar collagen types. Discriminating between collagen fibrils of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biophotonics 2019-01, Vol.12 (1), p.e201800090-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Romijn, Elisabeth I., Finnøy, Andreas, Lilledahl, Magnus B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page e201800090
container_title Journal of biophotonics
container_volume 12
creator Romijn, Elisabeth I.
Finnøy, Andreas
Lilledahl, Magnus B.
description According to previous studies, the nonlinear susceptibility tensor ratio χ33/χ31 obtained from polarization‐resolved second harmonic generation (P‐SHG) under the assumption of cylindrical symmetry can be used to distinguish between fibrillar collagen types. Discriminating between collagen fibrils of types I and II is important in tissue engineering of cartilage. However, cartilage has a random organization of collagen fibrils, and the assumption of cylindrical symmetry may be incorrect. In this study, we simulated the P‐SHG response from different collagen organizations and demonstrated a possible method to exclude areas where cylindrical symmetry is not fulfilled and where fibrils are located in the imaging plane. The χ33/χ31‐ratio for collagen type I in tendon and collagen type II in cartilage was estimated to be 1.33 and 1.36, respectively, using this method. These ratios are now much closer than what has been reported previously in the literature, and the larger reported differences between collagen types can be explained by variation in the structural organization. According to previous studies, the susceptibility tensor ratio χ33/χ31 obtained from polarization‐resolved second harmonic generation, assuming cylindrical symmetry, can be used to distinguish collagen types. In this study, we demonstrate a method of excluding regions that do not fulfill cylindrical symmetry. Thereby, the lowest χ33/χ31‐value is unaffected by orientation. However, the results indicate that the χ33/χ31‐values for collagen types I and II are very close and difficult to distinguish.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jbio.201800090
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2064249809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2064249809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4130-953746d39a6fa25e63e5619906705b9487eed7c1881cd89c2759b190896be8003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1P3DAQhq2qVflorz1Wlnrhsss4dhz7CIhCEBKXVuotcpwJeJWNt3YCCqce-gP6G_kleFnYSlw4zRyeeaR5X0K-MJgzgOxwUTs_z4ApANDwjuwyJcUMpFDvtzv_tUP2YlwASOA5_0h2Mq0LprnYJX-PetNN966_psMN0hZNdLXr3DBR39LGRRvc0vVmWBM1DneIPbW-68x1WoZphZGW1PQNLUs6xjW18p0J7j6d-P7hz7-A0Xe32NCI1ifuxoSl752lSYDhifpEPrSmi_j5ee6Tn99Pf5yczy6vzsqTo8uZFYzDTOe8ELLh2sjWZDlKjrlkWoMsIK-1UAViU1imFLON0jYrcl0zDUrLGlNAfJ8cbLyr4H-PGIdqmR7E9EyPfoxVlnLLhFagE_rtFbrwY0hZJYpJIQolc5mo-YaywccYsK1WKS4TpopBte6nWvdTbftJB1-ftWO9xGaLvxSSAL0B7lyH0xu66uK4vPovfwQzB56A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2164478656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analyzing the feasibility of discriminating between collagen types I and II using polarization‐resolved second harmonic generation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Romijn, Elisabeth I. ; Finnøy, Andreas ; Lilledahl, Magnus B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Romijn, Elisabeth I. ; Finnøy, Andreas ; Lilledahl, Magnus B.</creatorcontrib><description>According to previous studies, the nonlinear susceptibility tensor ratio χ33/χ31 obtained from polarization‐resolved second harmonic generation (P‐SHG) under the assumption of cylindrical symmetry can be used to distinguish between fibrillar collagen types. Discriminating between collagen fibrils of types I and II is important in tissue engineering of cartilage. However, cartilage has a random organization of collagen fibrils, and the assumption of cylindrical symmetry may be incorrect. In this study, we simulated the P‐SHG response from different collagen organizations and demonstrated a possible method to exclude areas where cylindrical symmetry is not fulfilled and where fibrils are located in the imaging plane. The χ33/χ31‐ratio for collagen type I in tendon and collagen type II in cartilage was estimated to be 1.33 and 1.36, respectively, using this method. These ratios are now much closer than what has been reported previously in the literature, and the larger reported differences between collagen types can be explained by variation in the structural organization. According to previous studies, the susceptibility tensor ratio χ33/χ31 obtained from polarization‐resolved second harmonic generation, assuming cylindrical symmetry, can be used to distinguish collagen types. In this study, we demonstrate a method of excluding regions that do not fulfill cylindrical symmetry. Thereby, the lowest χ33/χ31‐value is unaffected by orientation. However, the results indicate that the χ33/χ31‐values for collagen types I and II are very close and difficult to distinguish.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1864-063X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1864-0648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbio.201800090</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29971934</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cartilage ; Cartilage - metabolism ; Chickens ; Collagen ; Collagen (type I) ; Collagen (type II) ; Collagen Type I - chemistry ; Collagen Type I - metabolism ; Collagen Type II - chemistry ; Collagen Type II - metabolism ; Feasibility Studies ; Fibrils ; Nonlinear Dynamics ; nonlinear optical microscopy ; Optical Phenomena ; Polarization ; Second harmonic generation ; second harmonic generation microscopy ; Swine ; Symmetry ; tendon ; Tendons - metabolism ; Tensors ; Tissue engineering</subject><ispartof>Journal of biophotonics, 2019-01, Vol.12 (1), p.e201800090-n/a</ispartof><rights>2018 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><rights>2018 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim.</rights><rights>2019 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4130-953746d39a6fa25e63e5619906705b9487eed7c1881cd89c2759b190896be8003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4130-953746d39a6fa25e63e5619906705b9487eed7c1881cd89c2759b190896be8003</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6303-859X ; 0000-0002-5296-4501 ; 0000-0002-5404-2033</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjbio.201800090$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjbio.201800090$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27915,27916,45565,45566</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971934$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Romijn, Elisabeth I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finnøy, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilledahl, Magnus B.</creatorcontrib><title>Analyzing the feasibility of discriminating between collagen types I and II using polarization‐resolved second harmonic generation</title><title>Journal of biophotonics</title><addtitle>J Biophotonics</addtitle><description>According to previous studies, the nonlinear susceptibility tensor ratio χ33/χ31 obtained from polarization‐resolved second harmonic generation (P‐SHG) under the assumption of cylindrical symmetry can be used to distinguish between fibrillar collagen types. Discriminating between collagen fibrils of types I and II is important in tissue engineering of cartilage. However, cartilage has a random organization of collagen fibrils, and the assumption of cylindrical symmetry may be incorrect. In this study, we simulated the P‐SHG response from different collagen organizations and demonstrated a possible method to exclude areas where cylindrical symmetry is not fulfilled and where fibrils are located in the imaging plane. The χ33/χ31‐ratio for collagen type I in tendon and collagen type II in cartilage was estimated to be 1.33 and 1.36, respectively, using this method. These ratios are now much closer than what has been reported previously in the literature, and the larger reported differences between collagen types can be explained by variation in the structural organization. According to previous studies, the susceptibility tensor ratio χ33/χ31 obtained from polarization‐resolved second harmonic generation, assuming cylindrical symmetry, can be used to distinguish collagen types. In this study, we demonstrate a method of excluding regions that do not fulfill cylindrical symmetry. Thereby, the lowest χ33/χ31‐value is unaffected by orientation. However, the results indicate that the χ33/χ31‐values for collagen types I and II are very close and difficult to distinguish.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cartilage</subject><subject>Cartilage - metabolism</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Collagen</subject><subject>Collagen (type I)</subject><subject>Collagen (type II)</subject><subject>Collagen Type I - chemistry</subject><subject>Collagen Type I - metabolism</subject><subject>Collagen Type II - chemistry</subject><subject>Collagen Type II - metabolism</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Fibrils</subject><subject>Nonlinear Dynamics</subject><subject>nonlinear optical microscopy</subject><subject>Optical Phenomena</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>Second harmonic generation</subject><subject>second harmonic generation microscopy</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Symmetry</subject><subject>tendon</subject><subject>Tendons - metabolism</subject><subject>Tensors</subject><subject>Tissue engineering</subject><issn>1864-063X</issn><issn>1864-0648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1P3DAQhq2qVflorz1Wlnrhsss4dhz7CIhCEBKXVuotcpwJeJWNt3YCCqce-gP6G_kleFnYSlw4zRyeeaR5X0K-MJgzgOxwUTs_z4ApANDwjuwyJcUMpFDvtzv_tUP2YlwASOA5_0h2Mq0LprnYJX-PetNN966_psMN0hZNdLXr3DBR39LGRRvc0vVmWBM1DneIPbW-68x1WoZphZGW1PQNLUs6xjW18p0J7j6d-P7hz7-A0Xe32NCI1ifuxoSl752lSYDhifpEPrSmi_j5ee6Tn99Pf5yczy6vzsqTo8uZFYzDTOe8ELLh2sjWZDlKjrlkWoMsIK-1UAViU1imFLON0jYrcl0zDUrLGlNAfJ8cbLyr4H-PGIdqmR7E9EyPfoxVlnLLhFagE_rtFbrwY0hZJYpJIQolc5mo-YaywccYsK1WKS4TpopBte6nWvdTbftJB1-ftWO9xGaLvxSSAL0B7lyH0xu66uK4vPovfwQzB56A</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Romijn, Elisabeth I.</creator><creator>Finnøy, Andreas</creator><creator>Lilledahl, Magnus B.</creator><general>WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6303-859X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5296-4501</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5404-2033</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Analyzing the feasibility of discriminating between collagen types I and II using polarization‐resolved second harmonic generation</title><author>Romijn, Elisabeth I. ; Finnøy, Andreas ; Lilledahl, Magnus B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4130-953746d39a6fa25e63e5619906705b9487eed7c1881cd89c2759b190896be8003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cartilage</topic><topic>Cartilage - metabolism</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Collagen</topic><topic>Collagen (type I)</topic><topic>Collagen (type II)</topic><topic>Collagen Type I - chemistry</topic><topic>Collagen Type I - metabolism</topic><topic>Collagen Type II - chemistry</topic><topic>Collagen Type II - metabolism</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Fibrils</topic><topic>Nonlinear Dynamics</topic><topic>nonlinear optical microscopy</topic><topic>Optical Phenomena</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>Second harmonic generation</topic><topic>second harmonic generation microscopy</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Symmetry</topic><topic>tendon</topic><topic>Tendons - metabolism</topic><topic>Tensors</topic><topic>Tissue engineering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Romijn, Elisabeth I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finnøy, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilledahl, Magnus B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biophotonics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Romijn, Elisabeth I.</au><au>Finnøy, Andreas</au><au>Lilledahl, Magnus B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analyzing the feasibility of discriminating between collagen types I and II using polarization‐resolved second harmonic generation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biophotonics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biophotonics</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e201800090</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e201800090-n/a</pages><issn>1864-063X</issn><eissn>1864-0648</eissn><abstract>According to previous studies, the nonlinear susceptibility tensor ratio χ33/χ31 obtained from polarization‐resolved second harmonic generation (P‐SHG) under the assumption of cylindrical symmetry can be used to distinguish between fibrillar collagen types. Discriminating between collagen fibrils of types I and II is important in tissue engineering of cartilage. However, cartilage has a random organization of collagen fibrils, and the assumption of cylindrical symmetry may be incorrect. In this study, we simulated the P‐SHG response from different collagen organizations and demonstrated a possible method to exclude areas where cylindrical symmetry is not fulfilled and where fibrils are located in the imaging plane. The χ33/χ31‐ratio for collagen type I in tendon and collagen type II in cartilage was estimated to be 1.33 and 1.36, respectively, using this method. These ratios are now much closer than what has been reported previously in the literature, and the larger reported differences between collagen types can be explained by variation in the structural organization. According to previous studies, the susceptibility tensor ratio χ33/χ31 obtained from polarization‐resolved second harmonic generation, assuming cylindrical symmetry, can be used to distinguish collagen types. In this study, we demonstrate a method of excluding regions that do not fulfill cylindrical symmetry. Thereby, the lowest χ33/χ31‐value is unaffected by orientation. However, the results indicate that the χ33/χ31‐values for collagen types I and II are very close and difficult to distinguish.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA</pub><pmid>29971934</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbio.201800090</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6303-859X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5296-4501</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5404-2033</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1864-063X
ispartof Journal of biophotonics, 2019-01, Vol.12 (1), p.e201800090-n/a
issn 1864-063X
1864-0648
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2064249809
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library
subjects Animals
Cartilage
Cartilage - metabolism
Chickens
Collagen
Collagen (type I)
Collagen (type II)
Collagen Type I - chemistry
Collagen Type I - metabolism
Collagen Type II - chemistry
Collagen Type II - metabolism
Feasibility Studies
Fibrils
Nonlinear Dynamics
nonlinear optical microscopy
Optical Phenomena
Polarization
Second harmonic generation
second harmonic generation microscopy
Swine
Symmetry
tendon
Tendons - metabolism
Tensors
Tissue engineering
title Analyzing the feasibility of discriminating between collagen types I and II using polarization‐resolved second harmonic generation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T17%3A35%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analyzing%20the%20feasibility%20of%20discriminating%20between%20collagen%20types%20I%20and%20II%20using%20polarization%E2%80%90resolved%20second%20harmonic%20generation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biophotonics&rft.au=Romijn,%20Elisabeth%20I.&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e201800090&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e201800090-n/a&rft.issn=1864-063X&rft.eissn=1864-0648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbio.201800090&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2064249809%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2164478656&rft_id=info:pmid/29971934&rfr_iscdi=true