Conservation of Transmission Phenotype of Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) Strains Among Dermacentor and Rhipicephalus Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae)

Before the eradication of Boophilus ticks from the United States, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Canestrini) and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus (Say) were important biological vectors of the cattle pathogen Anaplasma marginale Theiler. In the absence of Boophilus ticks, A. marginale conti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical entomology 2007-05, Vol.44 (3), p.484-491
Hauptverfasser: Scoles, Glen A., Ueti, Massaro W., Noh, Susan M., Knowles, Donald P., Palmer, Guy H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 491
container_issue 3
container_start_page 484
container_title Journal of medical entomology
container_volume 44
creator Scoles, Glen A.
Ueti, Massaro W.
Noh, Susan M.
Knowles, Donald P.
Palmer, Guy H.
description Before the eradication of Boophilus ticks from the United States, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Canestrini) and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus (Say) were important biological vectors of the cattle pathogen Anaplasma marginale Theiler. In the absence of Boophilus ticks, A. marginale continues to be transmitted by Dermacentor ticks. However, a few U.S. strains are not transmissible by Dermacentor andersoni Stiles, Dermacentor variabilis (Say), or both, raising the question of how these strains evolved and how they are maintained. We hypothesize that the U.S. non-Dermacentor-transmissible strains of A. marginale were formerly Boophilus-transmitted strains that have been maintained by a combination of persistent infection and mechanical transmission since the eradication of their biological vector from the United States. To test this hypothesis, we attempted to transmit a well-documented non-Dermacentor-transmissible A. marginale strain (Florida), by using D. andersoni and the two Boophilus species that formerly occurred in the United States. For comparison, we examined tick-borne transmission of a strain of A. marginale (Puerto Rico), which has previously been shown to be transmissible by both D. andersoni and B. microplus. All three species of tick transmitted the Puerto Rico strain, and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis confirmed the presence of A. marginale colonies in their salivary glands. All three tick species failed to transmit the Florida strain. Although both D. andersoni and B. microplus acquired transient midgut and salivary gland infections after acquisition feeding, we were unable to detect colonies of the Florida strain in the salivary glands with IHC. This demonstrates that the transmission phenotype of A. marginale strains is conserved among tick species, and it suggests that the failure of the Florida strain to be transmitted by ticks is related to a general inability to efficiently invade or replicate in tick cells, rather than to a failure to invade or replicate in cells of a specific tick species.
doi_str_mv 10.1603/0022-2585(2007)44[484:COTPOA]2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20639178</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20639178</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-27eca596c077bfd7fa28be3088934c7c06dc5344ec28f44a9eb8225c0297d8943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkc1O3DAUhaOqSKXAO3hVDYsMjuNMnGEVpfxJSIPosKoq645zw7gkdrA9FbwOT4qjQW1X91ydo7P4TpKkGZ1nC5qfUcpYygpRzBil5SnnP7ngy2a1vlvVv9iczpvVOfuUHP7Nff5Pf0m-ev-bUioyXh0mb401Ht0fCNoaYjuydmD8oL2f_rstGhteR5yc2sDYgx-ADOAetYEeyexeqycMwev4-eW_TACFgKfkR3CgjSf1YM0j-Y5uiIYJ1hEwLbnf6lErHLfQ7zxZxy5PZrUCp5fk5sW2uo0dx8lBB73Hk497lDxcXqyb6_R2dXXT1LepYnkWUlaigqJaKFqWm64tO2BigzkVosq5KhVdtKrIOUfFRMc5VLgRjBWKsqpsRcXzo-Tbvnd09nmHPsiIQWHfg0G785LRRV5lpYjBi31QOeu9w06OTkcmrzKjclpITrTlRFtOC0nOZVxI7heSTNIoJcvfASs_isE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20639178</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conservation of Transmission Phenotype of Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) Strains Among Dermacentor and Rhipicephalus Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae)</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Scoles, Glen A. ; Ueti, Massaro W. ; Noh, Susan M. ; Knowles, Donald P. ; Palmer, Guy H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Scoles, Glen A. ; Ueti, Massaro W. ; Noh, Susan M. ; Knowles, Donald P. ; Palmer, Guy H.</creatorcontrib><description>Before the eradication of Boophilus ticks from the United States, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Canestrini) and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus (Say) were important biological vectors of the cattle pathogen Anaplasma marginale Theiler. In the absence of Boophilus ticks, A. marginale continues to be transmitted by Dermacentor ticks. However, a few U.S. strains are not transmissible by Dermacentor andersoni Stiles, Dermacentor variabilis (Say), or both, raising the question of how these strains evolved and how they are maintained. We hypothesize that the U.S. non-Dermacentor-transmissible strains of A. marginale were formerly Boophilus-transmitted strains that have been maintained by a combination of persistent infection and mechanical transmission since the eradication of their biological vector from the United States. To test this hypothesis, we attempted to transmit a well-documented non-Dermacentor-transmissible A. marginale strain (Florida), by using D. andersoni and the two Boophilus species that formerly occurred in the United States. For comparison, we examined tick-borne transmission of a strain of A. marginale (Puerto Rico), which has previously been shown to be transmissible by both D. andersoni and B. microplus. All three species of tick transmitted the Puerto Rico strain, and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis confirmed the presence of A. marginale colonies in their salivary glands. All three tick species failed to transmit the Florida strain. Although both D. andersoni and B. microplus acquired transient midgut and salivary gland infections after acquisition feeding, we were unable to detect colonies of the Florida strain in the salivary glands with IHC. This demonstrates that the transmission phenotype of A. marginale strains is conserved among tick species, and it suggests that the failure of the Florida strain to be transmitted by ticks is related to a general inability to efficiently invade or replicate in tick cells, rather than to a failure to invade or replicate in cells of a specific tick species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0022-2585</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1603/0022-2585(2007)44[484:COTPOA]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Acari ; Anaplasma marginale ; Boophilus ; Boophilus annulatus ; Boophilus microplus ; Dermacentor ; Dermacentor andersoni ; Dermacentor variabilis ; Ixodidae ; Rhipicephalus ; Rickettsiales</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical entomology, 2007-05, Vol.44 (3), p.484-491</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-27eca596c077bfd7fa28be3088934c7c06dc5344ec28f44a9eb8225c0297d8943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-27eca596c077bfd7fa28be3088934c7c06dc5344ec28f44a9eb8225c0297d8943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scoles, Glen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueti, Massaro W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noh, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowles, Donald P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Guy H.</creatorcontrib><title>Conservation of Transmission Phenotype of Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) Strains Among Dermacentor and Rhipicephalus Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae)</title><title>Journal of medical entomology</title><description>Before the eradication of Boophilus ticks from the United States, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Canestrini) and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus (Say) were important biological vectors of the cattle pathogen Anaplasma marginale Theiler. In the absence of Boophilus ticks, A. marginale continues to be transmitted by Dermacentor ticks. However, a few U.S. strains are not transmissible by Dermacentor andersoni Stiles, Dermacentor variabilis (Say), or both, raising the question of how these strains evolved and how they are maintained. We hypothesize that the U.S. non-Dermacentor-transmissible strains of A. marginale were formerly Boophilus-transmitted strains that have been maintained by a combination of persistent infection and mechanical transmission since the eradication of their biological vector from the United States. To test this hypothesis, we attempted to transmit a well-documented non-Dermacentor-transmissible A. marginale strain (Florida), by using D. andersoni and the two Boophilus species that formerly occurred in the United States. For comparison, we examined tick-borne transmission of a strain of A. marginale (Puerto Rico), which has previously been shown to be transmissible by both D. andersoni and B. microplus. All three species of tick transmitted the Puerto Rico strain, and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis confirmed the presence of A. marginale colonies in their salivary glands. All three tick species failed to transmit the Florida strain. Although both D. andersoni and B. microplus acquired transient midgut and salivary gland infections after acquisition feeding, we were unable to detect colonies of the Florida strain in the salivary glands with IHC. This demonstrates that the transmission phenotype of A. marginale strains is conserved among tick species, and it suggests that the failure of the Florida strain to be transmitted by ticks is related to a general inability to efficiently invade or replicate in tick cells, rather than to a failure to invade or replicate in cells of a specific tick species.</description><subject>Acari</subject><subject>Anaplasma marginale</subject><subject>Boophilus</subject><subject>Boophilus annulatus</subject><subject>Boophilus microplus</subject><subject>Dermacentor</subject><subject>Dermacentor andersoni</subject><subject>Dermacentor variabilis</subject><subject>Ixodidae</subject><subject>Rhipicephalus</subject><subject>Rickettsiales</subject><issn>0022-2585</issn><issn>0022-2585</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkc1O3DAUhaOqSKXAO3hVDYsMjuNMnGEVpfxJSIPosKoq645zw7gkdrA9FbwOT4qjQW1X91ydo7P4TpKkGZ1nC5qfUcpYygpRzBil5SnnP7ngy2a1vlvVv9iczpvVOfuUHP7Nff5Pf0m-ev-bUioyXh0mb401Ht0fCNoaYjuydmD8oL2f_rstGhteR5yc2sDYgx-ADOAetYEeyexeqycMwev4-eW_TACFgKfkR3CgjSf1YM0j-Y5uiIYJ1hEwLbnf6lErHLfQ7zxZxy5PZrUCp5fk5sW2uo0dx8lBB73Hk497lDxcXqyb6_R2dXXT1LepYnkWUlaigqJaKFqWm64tO2BigzkVosq5KhVdtKrIOUfFRMc5VLgRjBWKsqpsRcXzo-Tbvnd09nmHPsiIQWHfg0G785LRRV5lpYjBi31QOeu9w06OTkcmrzKjclpITrTlRFtOC0nOZVxI7heSTNIoJcvfASs_isE</recordid><startdate>200705</startdate><enddate>200705</enddate><creator>Scoles, Glen A.</creator><creator>Ueti, Massaro W.</creator><creator>Noh, Susan M.</creator><creator>Knowles, Donald P.</creator><creator>Palmer, Guy H.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200705</creationdate><title>Conservation of Transmission Phenotype of Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) Strains Among Dermacentor and Rhipicephalus Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae)</title><author>Scoles, Glen A. ; Ueti, Massaro W. ; Noh, Susan M. ; Knowles, Donald P. ; Palmer, Guy H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-27eca596c077bfd7fa28be3088934c7c06dc5344ec28f44a9eb8225c0297d8943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Acari</topic><topic>Anaplasma marginale</topic><topic>Boophilus</topic><topic>Boophilus annulatus</topic><topic>Boophilus microplus</topic><topic>Dermacentor</topic><topic>Dermacentor andersoni</topic><topic>Dermacentor variabilis</topic><topic>Ixodidae</topic><topic>Rhipicephalus</topic><topic>Rickettsiales</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scoles, Glen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueti, Massaro W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noh, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowles, Donald P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Guy H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scoles, Glen A.</au><au>Ueti, Massaro W.</au><au>Noh, Susan M.</au><au>Knowles, Donald P.</au><au>Palmer, Guy H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conservation of Transmission Phenotype of Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) Strains Among Dermacentor and Rhipicephalus Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical entomology</jtitle><date>2007-05</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>484</spage><epage>491</epage><pages>484-491</pages><issn>0022-2585</issn><eissn>0022-2585</eissn><abstract>Before the eradication of Boophilus ticks from the United States, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Canestrini) and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus (Say) were important biological vectors of the cattle pathogen Anaplasma marginale Theiler. In the absence of Boophilus ticks, A. marginale continues to be transmitted by Dermacentor ticks. However, a few U.S. strains are not transmissible by Dermacentor andersoni Stiles, Dermacentor variabilis (Say), or both, raising the question of how these strains evolved and how they are maintained. We hypothesize that the U.S. non-Dermacentor-transmissible strains of A. marginale were formerly Boophilus-transmitted strains that have been maintained by a combination of persistent infection and mechanical transmission since the eradication of their biological vector from the United States. To test this hypothesis, we attempted to transmit a well-documented non-Dermacentor-transmissible A. marginale strain (Florida), by using D. andersoni and the two Boophilus species that formerly occurred in the United States. For comparison, we examined tick-borne transmission of a strain of A. marginale (Puerto Rico), which has previously been shown to be transmissible by both D. andersoni and B. microplus. All three species of tick transmitted the Puerto Rico strain, and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis confirmed the presence of A. marginale colonies in their salivary glands. All three tick species failed to transmit the Florida strain. Although both D. andersoni and B. microplus acquired transient midgut and salivary gland infections after acquisition feeding, we were unable to detect colonies of the Florida strain in the salivary glands with IHC. This demonstrates that the transmission phenotype of A. marginale strains is conserved among tick species, and it suggests that the failure of the Florida strain to be transmitted by ticks is related to a general inability to efficiently invade or replicate in tick cells, rather than to a failure to invade or replicate in cells of a specific tick species.</abstract><doi>10.1603/0022-2585(2007)44[484:COTPOA]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2585
ispartof Journal of medical entomology, 2007-05, Vol.44 (3), p.484-491
issn 0022-2585
0022-2585
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20639178
source BioOne Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Acari
Anaplasma marginale
Boophilus
Boophilus annulatus
Boophilus microplus
Dermacentor
Dermacentor andersoni
Dermacentor variabilis
Ixodidae
Rhipicephalus
Rickettsiales
title Conservation of Transmission Phenotype of Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) Strains Among Dermacentor and Rhipicephalus Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T09%3A50%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conservation%20of%20Transmission%20Phenotype%20of%20Anaplasma%20marginale%20(Rickettsiales:%20Anaplasmataceae)%20Strains%20Among%20Dermacentor%20and%20Rhipicephalus%20Ticks%20(Acari:%20Ixodidae)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20entomology&rft.au=Scoles,%20Glen%20A.&rft.date=2007-05&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=484&rft.epage=491&rft.pages=484-491&rft.issn=0022-2585&rft.eissn=0022-2585&rft_id=info:doi/10.1603/0022-2585(2007)44%5B484:COTPOA%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20639178%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20639178&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true