ADMET in silico modelling: towards prediction paradise?
Key Points There is an increasing need for good predictive tools of ADMET properties to serve two key aims — first, at the design stage of new compounds and compound libraries so as to reduce the risk of late-stage attrition, and second, to optimize the screening and testing by looking at only the m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature reviews. Drug discovery 2003-03, Vol.2 (3), p.192-204 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 204 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 192 |
container_title | Nature reviews. Drug discovery |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | van de Waterbeemd, Han Gifford, Eric |
description | Key Points
There is an increasing need for good predictive tools of ADMET properties to serve two key aims — first, at the design stage of new compounds and compound libraries so as to reduce the risk of late-stage attrition, and second, to optimize the screening and testing by looking at only the most promising compounds.
We want to predict properties that provide information about dose size and dose frequency, such as oral absorption, bioavailability, brain penetration, clearance (for exposure) and volume of distribution (for frequency).
Two types of compuational approaches are used: molecular modelling and data modelling.
Molecular modelling use quantum mechanical methods to assess the potential for interaction between the small molecules under consideration and proteins known to be involved in ADME processes, such as cytochrome P450s.
For data modelling, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) approaches are typically applied. These use statistical tools to search for correlations between a given property and a set of molecular and structural descriptors of the molecules in question.
Good predictive models for ADMET parameters depend crucially on selecting the right mathematical approach, the right molecular descriptors for the particular ADMET endpoint, and a sufficiently large set of experimental data relating to this endpoint for the validation of the model.
This article describes recent advances in the prediction of physicochemical properties relevant to ADME (such as lipophilicity), ADME properties themselves (such as absorption), and toxicity issues (such as drug–drug interactions).
In the next 10 years or so, the degree of automation in traditional drug metabolism departments will continue to increase and fully automated medium- and high-throughput
in vitro
assays will be used alongside
in silico
modelling and data interpretation.
Following studies in the late 1990s that indicated that poor pharmacokinetics and toxicity were important causes of costly late-stage failures in drug development, it has become widely appreciated that these areas should be considered as early as possible in the drug discovery process. However, in recent years, combinatorial chemistry and high-throughput screening have significantly increased the number of compounds for which early data on absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion (ADME) and toxicity (T) are needed, which has in turn driven the development of a variety of medium and high-throughput
in |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/nrd1032 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20638099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A185693837</galeid><sourcerecordid>A185693837</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-9737a9f35d8ae7e8b4ed147f4befd7e41f187bbc0c105f81871870ba76d08af23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1LxDAQhoMofuMvUIoH9bKatGmTepFl_YQVL3ouaTNZIm2yJi3iv3ekq4KSgUkyz0zevIQcMHrOaCYvXNCY0zWyzbjgEyYkX__Zi2KL7MT4SikrmEg3yRZLCwyebxMxvX68eU6sS6JtbeOTzmtoW-sWl0nv31XQMVkG0LbprXfJUgWlbYSrPbJhVBthf5V3ycvtzfPsfjJ_unuYTeeThqdlPylFJlRpslxLBQJkzUGjKsNrMFoAZ4ZJUdcNbRjNjcQDBq2VKDSVyqTZLjkZ5y6Dfxsg9lVnY4MKlQM_xCqlRSZpWSJ4_Ad89UNwqK1KU4omcJojdD5CC9VCZZ3xfVANLg0dft6BsXg_ZTIvykxmAhtOx4Ym-BgDmGoZbKfCR8Vo9eV8tXIeyaPV-0Pdgf7lVlYjcDYCEUtuAeFX4P9ZhyPqVD8E-Jn1Xf8EJeCTyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220177405</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ADMET in silico modelling: towards prediction paradise?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>van de Waterbeemd, Han ; Gifford, Eric</creator><creatorcontrib>van de Waterbeemd, Han ; Gifford, Eric</creatorcontrib><description>Key Points
There is an increasing need for good predictive tools of ADMET properties to serve two key aims — first, at the design stage of new compounds and compound libraries so as to reduce the risk of late-stage attrition, and second, to optimize the screening and testing by looking at only the most promising compounds.
We want to predict properties that provide information about dose size and dose frequency, such as oral absorption, bioavailability, brain penetration, clearance (for exposure) and volume of distribution (for frequency).
Two types of compuational approaches are used: molecular modelling and data modelling.
Molecular modelling use quantum mechanical methods to assess the potential for interaction between the small molecules under consideration and proteins known to be involved in ADME processes, such as cytochrome P450s.
For data modelling, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) approaches are typically applied. These use statistical tools to search for correlations between a given property and a set of molecular and structural descriptors of the molecules in question.
Good predictive models for ADMET parameters depend crucially on selecting the right mathematical approach, the right molecular descriptors for the particular ADMET endpoint, and a sufficiently large set of experimental data relating to this endpoint for the validation of the model.
This article describes recent advances in the prediction of physicochemical properties relevant to ADME (such as lipophilicity), ADME properties themselves (such as absorption), and toxicity issues (such as drug–drug interactions).
In the next 10 years or so, the degree of automation in traditional drug metabolism departments will continue to increase and fully automated medium- and high-throughput
in vitro
assays will be used alongside
in silico
modelling and data interpretation.
Following studies in the late 1990s that indicated that poor pharmacokinetics and toxicity were important causes of costly late-stage failures in drug development, it has become widely appreciated that these areas should be considered as early as possible in the drug discovery process. However, in recent years, combinatorial chemistry and high-throughput screening have significantly increased the number of compounds for which early data on absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion (ADME) and toxicity (T) are needed, which has in turn driven the development of a variety of medium and high-throughput
in vitro
ADMET screens. Here, we describe how
in silico
approaches will further increase our ability to predict and model the most relevant pharmacokinetic, metabolic and toxicity endpoints, thereby accelerating the drug discovery process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1474-1776</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1474-1784</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-1784</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nrd1032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12612645</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological Availability ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Biotechnology ; Blood-Brain Barrier ; Cancer Research ; Chemical Phenomena ; Chemistry, Physical ; Computer Simulation ; Drug Design ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Drugs ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Medicinal Chemistry ; Models, Biological ; Molecular Medicine ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmacokinetics ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Product development ; Protein Binding ; Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship ; review-article ; Software ; Tissue Distribution</subject><ispartof>Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2003-03, Vol.2 (3), p.192-204</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2003</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2003 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Mar 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-9737a9f35d8ae7e8b4ed147f4befd7e41f187bbc0c105f81871870ba76d08af23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-9737a9f35d8ae7e8b4ed147f4befd7e41f187bbc0c105f81871870ba76d08af23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/nrd1032$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/nrd1032$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2727,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12612645$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van de Waterbeemd, Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gifford, Eric</creatorcontrib><title>ADMET in silico modelling: towards prediction paradise?</title><title>Nature reviews. Drug discovery</title><addtitle>Nat Rev Drug Discov</addtitle><addtitle>Nat Rev Drug Discov</addtitle><description>Key Points
There is an increasing need for good predictive tools of ADMET properties to serve two key aims — first, at the design stage of new compounds and compound libraries so as to reduce the risk of late-stage attrition, and second, to optimize the screening and testing by looking at only the most promising compounds.
We want to predict properties that provide information about dose size and dose frequency, such as oral absorption, bioavailability, brain penetration, clearance (for exposure) and volume of distribution (for frequency).
Two types of compuational approaches are used: molecular modelling and data modelling.
Molecular modelling use quantum mechanical methods to assess the potential for interaction between the small molecules under consideration and proteins known to be involved in ADME processes, such as cytochrome P450s.
For data modelling, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) approaches are typically applied. These use statistical tools to search for correlations between a given property and a set of molecular and structural descriptors of the molecules in question.
Good predictive models for ADMET parameters depend crucially on selecting the right mathematical approach, the right molecular descriptors for the particular ADMET endpoint, and a sufficiently large set of experimental data relating to this endpoint for the validation of the model.
This article describes recent advances in the prediction of physicochemical properties relevant to ADME (such as lipophilicity), ADME properties themselves (such as absorption), and toxicity issues (such as drug–drug interactions).
In the next 10 years or so, the degree of automation in traditional drug metabolism departments will continue to increase and fully automated medium- and high-throughput
in vitro
assays will be used alongside
in silico
modelling and data interpretation.
Following studies in the late 1990s that indicated that poor pharmacokinetics and toxicity were important causes of costly late-stage failures in drug development, it has become widely appreciated that these areas should be considered as early as possible in the drug discovery process. However, in recent years, combinatorial chemistry and high-throughput screening have significantly increased the number of compounds for which early data on absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion (ADME) and toxicity (T) are needed, which has in turn driven the development of a variety of medium and high-throughput
in vitro
ADMET screens. Here, we describe how
in silico
approaches will further increase our ability to predict and model the most relevant pharmacokinetic, metabolic and toxicity endpoints, thereby accelerating the drug discovery process.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological Availability</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Blood-Brain Barrier</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Chemical Phenomena</subject><subject>Chemistry, Physical</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Drug Design</subject><subject>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicinal Chemistry</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Molecular Medicine</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Protein Binding</subject><subject>Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship</subject><subject>review-article</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Tissue Distribution</subject><issn>1474-1776</issn><issn>1474-1784</issn><issn>1474-1784</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNplkE1LxDAQhoMofuMvUIoH9bKatGmTepFl_YQVL3ouaTNZIm2yJi3iv3ekq4KSgUkyz0zevIQcMHrOaCYvXNCY0zWyzbjgEyYkX__Zi2KL7MT4SikrmEg3yRZLCwyebxMxvX68eU6sS6JtbeOTzmtoW-sWl0nv31XQMVkG0LbprXfJUgWlbYSrPbJhVBthf5V3ycvtzfPsfjJ_unuYTeeThqdlPylFJlRpslxLBQJkzUGjKsNrMFoAZ4ZJUdcNbRjNjcQDBq2VKDSVyqTZLjkZ5y6Dfxsg9lVnY4MKlQM_xCqlRSZpWSJ4_Ad89UNwqK1KU4omcJojdD5CC9VCZZ3xfVANLg0dft6BsXg_ZTIvykxmAhtOx4Ym-BgDmGoZbKfCR8Vo9eV8tXIeyaPV-0Pdgf7lVlYjcDYCEUtuAeFX4P9ZhyPqVD8E-Jn1Xf8EJeCTyA</recordid><startdate>20030301</startdate><enddate>20030301</enddate><creator>van de Waterbeemd, Han</creator><creator>Gifford, Eric</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030301</creationdate><title>ADMET in silico modelling: towards prediction paradise?</title><author>van de Waterbeemd, Han ; Gifford, Eric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-9737a9f35d8ae7e8b4ed147f4befd7e41f187bbc0c105f81871870ba76d08af23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological Availability</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Blood-Brain Barrier</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Chemical Phenomena</topic><topic>Chemistry, Physical</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Drug Design</topic><topic>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicinal Chemistry</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Molecular Medicine</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Protein Binding</topic><topic>Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship</topic><topic>review-article</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Tissue Distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van de Waterbeemd, Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gifford, Eric</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Nature reviews. Drug discovery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van de Waterbeemd, Han</au><au>Gifford, Eric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ADMET in silico modelling: towards prediction paradise?</atitle><jtitle>Nature reviews. Drug discovery</jtitle><stitle>Nat Rev Drug Discov</stitle><addtitle>Nat Rev Drug Discov</addtitle><date>2003-03-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>192</spage><epage>204</epage><pages>192-204</pages><issn>1474-1776</issn><issn>1474-1784</issn><eissn>1474-1784</eissn><abstract>Key Points
There is an increasing need for good predictive tools of ADMET properties to serve two key aims — first, at the design stage of new compounds and compound libraries so as to reduce the risk of late-stage attrition, and second, to optimize the screening and testing by looking at only the most promising compounds.
We want to predict properties that provide information about dose size and dose frequency, such as oral absorption, bioavailability, brain penetration, clearance (for exposure) and volume of distribution (for frequency).
Two types of compuational approaches are used: molecular modelling and data modelling.
Molecular modelling use quantum mechanical methods to assess the potential for interaction between the small molecules under consideration and proteins known to be involved in ADME processes, such as cytochrome P450s.
For data modelling, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) approaches are typically applied. These use statistical tools to search for correlations between a given property and a set of molecular and structural descriptors of the molecules in question.
Good predictive models for ADMET parameters depend crucially on selecting the right mathematical approach, the right molecular descriptors for the particular ADMET endpoint, and a sufficiently large set of experimental data relating to this endpoint for the validation of the model.
This article describes recent advances in the prediction of physicochemical properties relevant to ADME (such as lipophilicity), ADME properties themselves (such as absorption), and toxicity issues (such as drug–drug interactions).
In the next 10 years or so, the degree of automation in traditional drug metabolism departments will continue to increase and fully automated medium- and high-throughput
in vitro
assays will be used alongside
in silico
modelling and data interpretation.
Following studies in the late 1990s that indicated that poor pharmacokinetics and toxicity were important causes of costly late-stage failures in drug development, it has become widely appreciated that these areas should be considered as early as possible in the drug discovery process. However, in recent years, combinatorial chemistry and high-throughput screening have significantly increased the number of compounds for which early data on absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion (ADME) and toxicity (T) are needed, which has in turn driven the development of a variety of medium and high-throughput
in vitro
ADMET screens. Here, we describe how
in silico
approaches will further increase our ability to predict and model the most relevant pharmacokinetic, metabolic and toxicity endpoints, thereby accelerating the drug discovery process.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>12612645</pmid><doi>10.1038/nrd1032</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1474-1776 |
ispartof | Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2003-03, Vol.2 (3), p.192-204 |
issn | 1474-1776 1474-1784 1474-1784 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20638099 |
source | MEDLINE; Nature; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Animals Biological Availability Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Biotechnology Blood-Brain Barrier Cancer Research Chemical Phenomena Chemistry, Physical Computer Simulation Drug Design Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions Drugs Health aspects Humans Medicinal Chemistry Models, Biological Molecular Medicine Pharmaceutical industry Pharmacokinetics Pharmacology/Toxicology Product development Protein Binding Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship review-article Software Tissue Distribution |
title | ADMET in silico modelling: towards prediction paradise? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T07%3A38%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ADMET%20in%20silico%20modelling:%20towards%20prediction%20paradise?&rft.jtitle=Nature%20reviews.%20Drug%20discovery&rft.au=van%20de%20Waterbeemd,%20Han&rft.date=2003-03-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=192&rft.epage=204&rft.pages=192-204&rft.issn=1474-1776&rft.eissn=1474-1784&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nrd1032&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA185693837%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220177405&rft_id=info:pmid/12612645&rft_galeid=A185693837&rfr_iscdi=true |