Mutation rate variation in multicellular eukaryotes: causes and consequences
Key Points Basic knowledge about the rate and range of mutation is central to our understanding of numerous evolutionary processes that include maintaining sexual reproduction and rates of molecular evolution. Although mutation rates are known to vary among species, little is known about the forces...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature reviews. Genetics 2007-08, Vol.8 (8), p.619-631 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 631 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 619 |
container_title | Nature reviews. Genetics |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Baer, Charles F. Miyamoto, Michael M. Denver, Dee R. |
description | Key Points
Basic knowledge about the rate and range of mutation is central to our understanding of numerous evolutionary processes that include maintaining sexual reproduction and rates of molecular evolution. Although mutation rates are known to vary among species, little is known about the forces that underlie this variation at an empirical level, particularly in multicellular eukaryotes.
The theoretical framework for mutational variation is based primarily on the 'cost of fidelity' and 'modifier allele' theories. The former argues that the mutation rate does not evolve to zero, despite the much greater frequency of deleterious mutations, because there is an opposing metabolic cost. The latter models mutational variation as the interaction between a mutator locus that affects the mutation rate for a fitness locus (or loci).
Natural selection can potentially modulate the mutation rate through four main points of control: DNA replication fidelity, mutagen exposure, DNA repair efficiencies and the buffering of mutational effects.
Molecular mutation rates are generally estimated through three approaches: gene-specific methods, mutation-accumulation lines and pedigrees. Although most empirical mutational knowledge derives from the first method, the other two probably provide more accurate estimates. Per-nucleotide mutation rates that are on the order of ∼10
−8
per generation are observed in
Caenorhabditis elegans
and
Drosophila melanogaster
mutation-accumulation experiments.
Studies on the differences in mutation rates within and between genomic systems have the potential to provide a framework for understanding natural mutational variation. Animal mitochondrial genomes experience substitution rates that are much greater than those of nuclear genomes, whereas the situation is reversed for most plant species. Rate variation is also observed across different nuclear genomic regions within a species and might be affected by various forces, including base composition, recombination rate, gene expression, gene density and DNA repair domains.
Estimates of the deleterious genomic mutation rate (
U
) are available for a variety of species that derive from fitness assay data and nucleotide substitution rates. Although according to these approaches
U
varies considerably across groups, the current evidence suggests that this parameter is rarely much less than one in multicellular eukaryotes and that there is as much variation within major lineages as between taxa. The r |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/nrg2158 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20637436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A186101628</galeid><sourcerecordid>A186101628</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-f582e7694e02a1922ec78d7ddc1eae51dff9576c3537ee99cfdb737fccdcbb583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0t1v1SAUAPDGaNycxv_ANBrnfLiTj7a0vi3LdEuuMfHjmXDp4Y7ZwuSA0f9-NG283sX0gQI_OHAORfGcklNKePvOhS2jdfugOKSVoCtCmurh3_-6OSieIN4QQhsq-OPigIqGC8Grw2L9KUUVrXdlUBHKXyrYuWtdOaYhWg3DkAYVSkg_VPjjI-D7UquEgKVyfam9Q_iZwGnAp8UjowaEZ0t7VHz_cPHt_HK1_vzx6vxsvdJ118aVqVsGoukqIEzRjjHQou1F32sKCmraG9PVotG85gKg67TpN4ILo3WvN5u65UfF8bzvbfA5NEY5WpwOqhz4hJKRfL2KNxm-vAdvfAoun00ylknHmcjo1Yy2agBpnfExKD3tKM9o29CcNTbFPP2Pyl8Po81JAGPz-N6Ct3sLsonwO25z6lBeff2yb4__sdeghniNfkhTJXAfvpmhDh4xgJG3wY65LpISOb0EubyELF8sV0-bEfqdW0qfwesFKNRqMEE5bXHn2o4RQlh2J7PDPOW2EHY5vB_zDuboxj4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223749327</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mutation rate variation in multicellular eukaryotes: causes and consequences</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><source>Nature Journals Online</source><creator>Baer, Charles F. ; Miyamoto, Michael M. ; Denver, Dee R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baer, Charles F. ; Miyamoto, Michael M. ; Denver, Dee R.</creatorcontrib><description>Key Points
Basic knowledge about the rate and range of mutation is central to our understanding of numerous evolutionary processes that include maintaining sexual reproduction and rates of molecular evolution. Although mutation rates are known to vary among species, little is known about the forces that underlie this variation at an empirical level, particularly in multicellular eukaryotes.
The theoretical framework for mutational variation is based primarily on the 'cost of fidelity' and 'modifier allele' theories. The former argues that the mutation rate does not evolve to zero, despite the much greater frequency of deleterious mutations, because there is an opposing metabolic cost. The latter models mutational variation as the interaction between a mutator locus that affects the mutation rate for a fitness locus (or loci).
Natural selection can potentially modulate the mutation rate through four main points of control: DNA replication fidelity, mutagen exposure, DNA repair efficiencies and the buffering of mutational effects.
Molecular mutation rates are generally estimated through three approaches: gene-specific methods, mutation-accumulation lines and pedigrees. Although most empirical mutational knowledge derives from the first method, the other two probably provide more accurate estimates. Per-nucleotide mutation rates that are on the order of ∼10
−8
per generation are observed in
Caenorhabditis elegans
and
Drosophila melanogaster
mutation-accumulation experiments.
Studies on the differences in mutation rates within and between genomic systems have the potential to provide a framework for understanding natural mutational variation. Animal mitochondrial genomes experience substitution rates that are much greater than those of nuclear genomes, whereas the situation is reversed for most plant species. Rate variation is also observed across different nuclear genomic regions within a species and might be affected by various forces, including base composition, recombination rate, gene expression, gene density and DNA repair domains.
Estimates of the deleterious genomic mutation rate (
U
) are available for a variety of species that derive from fitness assay data and nucleotide substitution rates. Although according to these approaches
U
varies considerably across groups, the current evidence suggests that this parameter is rarely much less than one in multicellular eukaryotes and that there is as much variation within major lineages as between taxa. The reliability of estimates of
U
from fitness data suffer from the inability to detect mutations that have very small effects; estimates of
U
from DNA sequence data are limited by probable loose and uncertain connections between mutation rates and substitution rates.
All else being equal, the deleterious genomic mutation rate (
U
) should be correlated with the per-nucleotide molecular mutation rate (
μ
). Forces that might cause a decoupling of
U
and
μ
include genetic redundancy, robustness and changes in pleiotropy.
Mutation rate variation is expected to affect evolutionary rate variation. Three main hypotheses for among-lineage substitution rate variation have been proposed that relate to potential points for modulating mutation rates: the generation-time hypothesis (relates to replication), the metabolic-rate hypothesis (relates to mutagen exposure) and the DNA repair hypothesis (relates variation in DNA repair pathways and/or efficiencies). Evolutionary rate variation can also result from varying selection.
Five key questions on the evolution of the mutation rate remain to be answered. First, is the evolution of the mutation rate predictable, given our current theoretical understanding? Second, what is the relationship between
μ
and
U
? Third, how faithfully do estimates of
μ
(and
U
) from comparative genomic data reflect the actual underlying rate and range of new mutations? Fourth, what are the biological mechanisms that underlie variation in mutation rates? Fifth, to what extent do our most recent mutation rate estimates remain inaccurate? We anticipate that tools resulting from the ongoing genomic revolution, coupled with continued theoretical progress and experimental and comparative approaches, will address these unanswered questions and result in landmark advances in our understanding of natural mutational variation both within and among species.
Relatively little is known about what underlies mutation rate variation at an empirical level, particularly in multicellular eukaryotes. The authors review theoretical and empirical results to provide a framework for future studies of why and how mutation rate evolves in multicellular species.
A basic knowledge about mutation rates is central to our understanding of a myriad of evolutionary phenomena, including the maintenance of sex and rates of molecular evolution. Although there is substantial evidence that mutation rates vary among taxa, relatively little is known about the factors that underlie this variation at an empirical level, particularly in multicellular eukaryotes. Here we integrate several disparate lines of theoretical and empirical inquiry into a unified framework to guide future studies that are aimed at understanding why and how mutation rates evolve in multicellular species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-0056</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nrg2158</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17637734</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Animal Genetics and Genomics ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cancer Research ; Cell division ; DNA Repair ; DNA Replication ; Eukaryotes ; Eukaryotic Cells ; Evolution ; Evolution, Molecular ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gene Function ; Gene mutations ; Genetic aspects ; Genetic Variation ; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution ; Genome ; Genomes ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; Insects ; Male ; Models, Genetic ; Mutagens - toxicity ; Mutation ; Pedigree ; Physiological aspects ; review-article ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Nature reviews. Genetics, 2007-08, Vol.8 (8), p.619-631</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2007</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2007 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Aug 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-f582e7694e02a1922ec78d7ddc1eae51dff9576c3537ee99cfdb737fccdcbb583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-f582e7694e02a1922ec78d7ddc1eae51dff9576c3537ee99cfdb737fccdcbb583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/nrg2158$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/nrg2158$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18920002$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17637734$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baer, Charles F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyamoto, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denver, Dee R.</creatorcontrib><title>Mutation rate variation in multicellular eukaryotes: causes and consequences</title><title>Nature reviews. Genetics</title><addtitle>Nat Rev Genet</addtitle><addtitle>Nat Rev Genet</addtitle><description>Key Points
Basic knowledge about the rate and range of mutation is central to our understanding of numerous evolutionary processes that include maintaining sexual reproduction and rates of molecular evolution. Although mutation rates are known to vary among species, little is known about the forces that underlie this variation at an empirical level, particularly in multicellular eukaryotes.
The theoretical framework for mutational variation is based primarily on the 'cost of fidelity' and 'modifier allele' theories. The former argues that the mutation rate does not evolve to zero, despite the much greater frequency of deleterious mutations, because there is an opposing metabolic cost. The latter models mutational variation as the interaction between a mutator locus that affects the mutation rate for a fitness locus (or loci).
Natural selection can potentially modulate the mutation rate through four main points of control: DNA replication fidelity, mutagen exposure, DNA repair efficiencies and the buffering of mutational effects.
Molecular mutation rates are generally estimated through three approaches: gene-specific methods, mutation-accumulation lines and pedigrees. Although most empirical mutational knowledge derives from the first method, the other two probably provide more accurate estimates. Per-nucleotide mutation rates that are on the order of ∼10
−8
per generation are observed in
Caenorhabditis elegans
and
Drosophila melanogaster
mutation-accumulation experiments.
Studies on the differences in mutation rates within and between genomic systems have the potential to provide a framework for understanding natural mutational variation. Animal mitochondrial genomes experience substitution rates that are much greater than those of nuclear genomes, whereas the situation is reversed for most plant species. Rate variation is also observed across different nuclear genomic regions within a species and might be affected by various forces, including base composition, recombination rate, gene expression, gene density and DNA repair domains.
Estimates of the deleterious genomic mutation rate (
U
) are available for a variety of species that derive from fitness assay data and nucleotide substitution rates. Although according to these approaches
U
varies considerably across groups, the current evidence suggests that this parameter is rarely much less than one in multicellular eukaryotes and that there is as much variation within major lineages as between taxa. The reliability of estimates of
U
from fitness data suffer from the inability to detect mutations that have very small effects; estimates of
U
from DNA sequence data are limited by probable loose and uncertain connections between mutation rates and substitution rates.
All else being equal, the deleterious genomic mutation rate (
U
) should be correlated with the per-nucleotide molecular mutation rate (
μ
). Forces that might cause a decoupling of
U
and
μ
include genetic redundancy, robustness and changes in pleiotropy.
Mutation rate variation is expected to affect evolutionary rate variation. Three main hypotheses for among-lineage substitution rate variation have been proposed that relate to potential points for modulating mutation rates: the generation-time hypothesis (relates to replication), the metabolic-rate hypothesis (relates to mutagen exposure) and the DNA repair hypothesis (relates variation in DNA repair pathways and/or efficiencies). Evolutionary rate variation can also result from varying selection.
Five key questions on the evolution of the mutation rate remain to be answered. First, is the evolution of the mutation rate predictable, given our current theoretical understanding? Second, what is the relationship between
μ
and
U
? Third, how faithfully do estimates of
μ
(and
U
) from comparative genomic data reflect the actual underlying rate and range of new mutations? Fourth, what are the biological mechanisms that underlie variation in mutation rates? Fifth, to what extent do our most recent mutation rate estimates remain inaccurate? We anticipate that tools resulting from the ongoing genomic revolution, coupled with continued theoretical progress and experimental and comparative approaches, will address these unanswered questions and result in landmark advances in our understanding of natural mutational variation both within and among species.
Relatively little is known about what underlies mutation rate variation at an empirical level, particularly in multicellular eukaryotes. The authors review theoretical and empirical results to provide a framework for future studies of why and how mutation rate evolves in multicellular species.
A basic knowledge about mutation rates is central to our understanding of a myriad of evolutionary phenomena, including the maintenance of sex and rates of molecular evolution. Although there is substantial evidence that mutation rates vary among taxa, relatively little is known about the factors that underlie this variation at an empirical level, particularly in multicellular eukaryotes. Here we integrate several disparate lines of theoretical and empirical inquiry into a unified framework to guide future studies that are aimed at understanding why and how mutation rates evolve in multicellular species.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Cell division</subject><subject>DNA Repair</subject><subject>DNA Replication</subject><subject>Eukaryotes</subject><subject>Eukaryotic Cells</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gene Function</subject><subject>Gene mutations</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</subject><subject>Genome</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Mutagens - toxicity</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Pedigree</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>review-article</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1471-0056</issn><issn>1471-0064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0t1v1SAUAPDGaNycxv_ANBrnfLiTj7a0vi3LdEuuMfHjmXDp4Y7ZwuSA0f9-NG283sX0gQI_OHAORfGcklNKePvOhS2jdfugOKSVoCtCmurh3_-6OSieIN4QQhsq-OPigIqGC8Grw2L9KUUVrXdlUBHKXyrYuWtdOaYhWg3DkAYVSkg_VPjjI-D7UquEgKVyfam9Q_iZwGnAp8UjowaEZ0t7VHz_cPHt_HK1_vzx6vxsvdJ118aVqVsGoukqIEzRjjHQou1F32sKCmraG9PVotG85gKg67TpN4ILo3WvN5u65UfF8bzvbfA5NEY5WpwOqhz4hJKRfL2KNxm-vAdvfAoun00ylknHmcjo1Yy2agBpnfExKD3tKM9o29CcNTbFPP2Pyl8Po81JAGPz-N6Ct3sLsonwO25z6lBeff2yb4__sdeghniNfkhTJXAfvpmhDh4xgJG3wY65LpISOb0EubyELF8sV0-bEfqdW0qfwesFKNRqMEE5bXHn2o4RQlh2J7PDPOW2EHY5vB_zDuboxj4</recordid><startdate>20070801</startdate><enddate>20070801</enddate><creator>Baer, Charles F.</creator><creator>Miyamoto, Michael M.</creator><creator>Denver, Dee R.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070801</creationdate><title>Mutation rate variation in multicellular eukaryotes: causes and consequences</title><author>Baer, Charles F. ; Miyamoto, Michael M. ; Denver, Dee R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-f582e7694e02a1922ec78d7ddc1eae51dff9576c3537ee99cfdb737fccdcbb583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animal Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Cell division</topic><topic>DNA Repair</topic><topic>DNA Replication</topic><topic>Eukaryotes</topic><topic>Eukaryotic Cells</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gene Function</topic><topic>Gene mutations</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</topic><topic>Genome</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Mutagens - toxicity</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Pedigree</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>review-article</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baer, Charles F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyamoto, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denver, Dee R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Nature reviews. Genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baer, Charles F.</au><au>Miyamoto, Michael M.</au><au>Denver, Dee R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mutation rate variation in multicellular eukaryotes: causes and consequences</atitle><jtitle>Nature reviews. Genetics</jtitle><stitle>Nat Rev Genet</stitle><addtitle>Nat Rev Genet</addtitle><date>2007-08-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>619</spage><epage>631</epage><pages>619-631</pages><issn>1471-0056</issn><eissn>1471-0064</eissn><abstract>Key Points
Basic knowledge about the rate and range of mutation is central to our understanding of numerous evolutionary processes that include maintaining sexual reproduction and rates of molecular evolution. Although mutation rates are known to vary among species, little is known about the forces that underlie this variation at an empirical level, particularly in multicellular eukaryotes.
The theoretical framework for mutational variation is based primarily on the 'cost of fidelity' and 'modifier allele' theories. The former argues that the mutation rate does not evolve to zero, despite the much greater frequency of deleterious mutations, because there is an opposing metabolic cost. The latter models mutational variation as the interaction between a mutator locus that affects the mutation rate for a fitness locus (or loci).
Natural selection can potentially modulate the mutation rate through four main points of control: DNA replication fidelity, mutagen exposure, DNA repair efficiencies and the buffering of mutational effects.
Molecular mutation rates are generally estimated through three approaches: gene-specific methods, mutation-accumulation lines and pedigrees. Although most empirical mutational knowledge derives from the first method, the other two probably provide more accurate estimates. Per-nucleotide mutation rates that are on the order of ∼10
−8
per generation are observed in
Caenorhabditis elegans
and
Drosophila melanogaster
mutation-accumulation experiments.
Studies on the differences in mutation rates within and between genomic systems have the potential to provide a framework for understanding natural mutational variation. Animal mitochondrial genomes experience substitution rates that are much greater than those of nuclear genomes, whereas the situation is reversed for most plant species. Rate variation is also observed across different nuclear genomic regions within a species and might be affected by various forces, including base composition, recombination rate, gene expression, gene density and DNA repair domains.
Estimates of the deleterious genomic mutation rate (
U
) are available for a variety of species that derive from fitness assay data and nucleotide substitution rates. Although according to these approaches
U
varies considerably across groups, the current evidence suggests that this parameter is rarely much less than one in multicellular eukaryotes and that there is as much variation within major lineages as between taxa. The reliability of estimates of
U
from fitness data suffer from the inability to detect mutations that have very small effects; estimates of
U
from DNA sequence data are limited by probable loose and uncertain connections between mutation rates and substitution rates.
All else being equal, the deleterious genomic mutation rate (
U
) should be correlated with the per-nucleotide molecular mutation rate (
μ
). Forces that might cause a decoupling of
U
and
μ
include genetic redundancy, robustness and changes in pleiotropy.
Mutation rate variation is expected to affect evolutionary rate variation. Three main hypotheses for among-lineage substitution rate variation have been proposed that relate to potential points for modulating mutation rates: the generation-time hypothesis (relates to replication), the metabolic-rate hypothesis (relates to mutagen exposure) and the DNA repair hypothesis (relates variation in DNA repair pathways and/or efficiencies). Evolutionary rate variation can also result from varying selection.
Five key questions on the evolution of the mutation rate remain to be answered. First, is the evolution of the mutation rate predictable, given our current theoretical understanding? Second, what is the relationship between
μ
and
U
? Third, how faithfully do estimates of
μ
(and
U
) from comparative genomic data reflect the actual underlying rate and range of new mutations? Fourth, what are the biological mechanisms that underlie variation in mutation rates? Fifth, to what extent do our most recent mutation rate estimates remain inaccurate? We anticipate that tools resulting from the ongoing genomic revolution, coupled with continued theoretical progress and experimental and comparative approaches, will address these unanswered questions and result in landmark advances in our understanding of natural mutational variation both within and among species.
Relatively little is known about what underlies mutation rate variation at an empirical level, particularly in multicellular eukaryotes. The authors review theoretical and empirical results to provide a framework for future studies of why and how mutation rate evolves in multicellular species.
A basic knowledge about mutation rates is central to our understanding of a myriad of evolutionary phenomena, including the maintenance of sex and rates of molecular evolution. Although there is substantial evidence that mutation rates vary among taxa, relatively little is known about the factors that underlie this variation at an empirical level, particularly in multicellular eukaryotes. Here we integrate several disparate lines of theoretical and empirical inquiry into a unified framework to guide future studies that are aimed at understanding why and how mutation rates evolve in multicellular species.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>17637734</pmid><doi>10.1038/nrg2158</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-0056 |
ispartof | Nature reviews. Genetics, 2007-08, Vol.8 (8), p.619-631 |
issn | 1471-0056 1471-0064 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20637436 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Online Journals Complete; Nature Journals Online |
subjects | Agriculture Animal Genetics and Genomics Animals Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Cancer Research Cell division DNA Repair DNA Replication Eukaryotes Eukaryotic Cells Evolution Evolution, Molecular Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gene Function Gene mutations Genetic aspects Genetic Variation Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution Genome Genomes Human Genetics Humans Insects Male Models, Genetic Mutagens - toxicity Mutation Pedigree Physiological aspects review-article Zoology |
title | Mutation rate variation in multicellular eukaryotes: causes and consequences |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T14%3A17%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mutation%20rate%20variation%20in%20multicellular%20eukaryotes:%20causes%20and%20consequences&rft.jtitle=Nature%20reviews.%20Genetics&rft.au=Baer,%20Charles%20F.&rft.date=2007-08-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=619&rft.epage=631&rft.pages=619-631&rft.issn=1471-0056&rft.eissn=1471-0064&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nrg2158&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA186101628%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223749327&rft_id=info:pmid/17637734&rft_galeid=A186101628&rfr_iscdi=true |