Measuring the economic value of alternative clam fishing management practices in the Venice Lagoon: results from a conjoint valuation application

This article focuses on the economic valuation of alternative clam management practices in the Venice Lagoon. The proposed valuation method is characterized by the design of a survey questionnaire applied to the fishermen population. In each questionnaire, two fishing alternatives are described. The...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of marine systems 2004-11, Vol.51 (1), p.309-320
Hauptverfasser: Nunes, Paulo A.L.D., Rossetto, Luca, de Blaeij, Arianne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 320
container_issue 1
container_start_page 309
container_title Journal of marine systems
container_volume 51
creator Nunes, Paulo A.L.D.
Rossetto, Luca
de Blaeij, Arianne
description This article focuses on the economic valuation of alternative clam management practices in the Venice Lagoon. The proposed valuation method is characterized by the design of a survey questionnaire applied to the fishermen population. In each questionnaire, two fishing alternatives are described. The respondent is asked to choose one of them. This valuation method, referred in the article as conjoint valuation, gives sufficient flexibility to set, alter, and combine the valuation of different clam management practices. Furthermore, this approach presents an important advantage to the well-known contingent valuation method since it makes the monetary valuation of each management attribute possible. Estimation results show that all three attributes used in the questionnaire to describe and value different clam management practices—price of the annual permit and fishing technological system—are statistically robust, indicating that fishermen bear a utility change whenever these attributes change. In particular, fishermen's willingness to pay for a larger clam fishing area ranges between 568 and 811 € per year. In addition, an individual's willingness to pay for a fishing practice exclusively based on the vibrant rake system ranges between 1005 and 2456 €. Finally, the adoption of a clam fish management practice in the Venice Lagoon that is exclusively based on the use of manual rakes, which is associated with the lowest damage to the lagoon ecosystem, will represent a welfare loss of 5904 € per fisherman per year. Combining such a value estimate with the total number of fishermen currently operating in the Lagoon of Venice, the welfare loss associated with the adoption of this type of clam management policy amounts to 11.8 € million per year. This figure can be regarded as an upper bound to the cost of implementation of a clam fishing system anchored in the use of manual, ecosystem friendly rakes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2004.05.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20637391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0924796304001903</els_id><sourcerecordid>20637391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-36fcb9b98be7daeca811761720669092d799db9800f4ce220217ac3a299273403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcGO1DAMhiMEEsPCIyDlxK3FaaZNwwWhFQtIg7gA18iTurOp2qQk6Uj7GLwxmZ29c4oj__9n2T9jbwXUAkT3fqqnBWN6SHUDsK-hrUH0z9hO9EpXolXyOduBbvaV0p18yV6lNAFAJ_p2x_5-J0xbdP7E8z1xssGHxVl-xnkjHkaOc6boMbszcTvjwkeX7i_yBT2eaCGf-RrRZmcpcecfMb_Jly8_4CkE_4FHStucEx9jWDjyMmMKrvguQwo5eI7rOjv7WL9mL0acE715em_Yr7vPP2-_VocfX77dfjpUVso-V7Ib7VEfdX8kNSBZ7IVQnVANdJ0u2w5K66G0Aca9paaBRii0EhutGyX3IG_Yuyt3jeHPRimbxSVL84yewpZMAUkltSjC9iq0MaQUaTRrdOXgD0aAuQRgJvMUgLkEYKA1JYDi-3j1Udni7CiaZB15S4OLZLMZgvsP4R_l0pUP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20637391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring the economic value of alternative clam fishing management practices in the Venice Lagoon: results from a conjoint valuation application</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Nunes, Paulo A.L.D. ; Rossetto, Luca ; de Blaeij, Arianne</creator><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Paulo A.L.D. ; Rossetto, Luca ; de Blaeij, Arianne</creatorcontrib><description>This article focuses on the economic valuation of alternative clam management practices in the Venice Lagoon. The proposed valuation method is characterized by the design of a survey questionnaire applied to the fishermen population. In each questionnaire, two fishing alternatives are described. The respondent is asked to choose one of them. This valuation method, referred in the article as conjoint valuation, gives sufficient flexibility to set, alter, and combine the valuation of different clam management practices. Furthermore, this approach presents an important advantage to the well-known contingent valuation method since it makes the monetary valuation of each management attribute possible. Estimation results show that all three attributes used in the questionnaire to describe and value different clam management practices—price of the annual permit and fishing technological system—are statistically robust, indicating that fishermen bear a utility change whenever these attributes change. In particular, fishermen's willingness to pay for a larger clam fishing area ranges between 568 and 811 € per year. In addition, an individual's willingness to pay for a fishing practice exclusively based on the vibrant rake system ranges between 1005 and 2456 €. Finally, the adoption of a clam fish management practice in the Venice Lagoon that is exclusively based on the use of manual rakes, which is associated with the lowest damage to the lagoon ecosystem, will represent a welfare loss of 5904 € per fisherman per year. Combining such a value estimate with the total number of fishermen currently operating in the Lagoon of Venice, the welfare loss associated with the adoption of this type of clam management policy amounts to 11.8 € million per year. This figure can be regarded as an upper bound to the cost of implementation of a clam fishing system anchored in the use of manual, ecosystem friendly rakes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0924-7963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1573</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2004.05.018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Exotic marine species ; Fishing effort ; Fishing rakes ; Manila clam ; Marine ; Open access ; Permit price ; Policy guidance ; Welfare damages</subject><ispartof>Journal of marine systems, 2004-11, Vol.51 (1), p.309-320</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-36fcb9b98be7daeca811761720669092d799db9800f4ce220217ac3a299273403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-36fcb9b98be7daeca811761720669092d799db9800f4ce220217ac3a299273403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924796304001903$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Paulo A.L.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossetto, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Blaeij, Arianne</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring the economic value of alternative clam fishing management practices in the Venice Lagoon: results from a conjoint valuation application</title><title>Journal of marine systems</title><description>This article focuses on the economic valuation of alternative clam management practices in the Venice Lagoon. The proposed valuation method is characterized by the design of a survey questionnaire applied to the fishermen population. In each questionnaire, two fishing alternatives are described. The respondent is asked to choose one of them. This valuation method, referred in the article as conjoint valuation, gives sufficient flexibility to set, alter, and combine the valuation of different clam management practices. Furthermore, this approach presents an important advantage to the well-known contingent valuation method since it makes the monetary valuation of each management attribute possible. Estimation results show that all three attributes used in the questionnaire to describe and value different clam management practices—price of the annual permit and fishing technological system—are statistically robust, indicating that fishermen bear a utility change whenever these attributes change. In particular, fishermen's willingness to pay for a larger clam fishing area ranges between 568 and 811 € per year. In addition, an individual's willingness to pay for a fishing practice exclusively based on the vibrant rake system ranges between 1005 and 2456 €. Finally, the adoption of a clam fish management practice in the Venice Lagoon that is exclusively based on the use of manual rakes, which is associated with the lowest damage to the lagoon ecosystem, will represent a welfare loss of 5904 € per fisherman per year. Combining such a value estimate with the total number of fishermen currently operating in the Lagoon of Venice, the welfare loss associated with the adoption of this type of clam management policy amounts to 11.8 € million per year. This figure can be regarded as an upper bound to the cost of implementation of a clam fishing system anchored in the use of manual, ecosystem friendly rakes.</description><subject>Exotic marine species</subject><subject>Fishing effort</subject><subject>Fishing rakes</subject><subject>Manila clam</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Open access</subject><subject>Permit price</subject><subject>Policy guidance</subject><subject>Welfare damages</subject><issn>0924-7963</issn><issn>1879-1573</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcGO1DAMhiMEEsPCIyDlxK3FaaZNwwWhFQtIg7gA18iTurOp2qQk6Uj7GLwxmZ29c4oj__9n2T9jbwXUAkT3fqqnBWN6SHUDsK-hrUH0z9hO9EpXolXyOduBbvaV0p18yV6lNAFAJ_p2x_5-J0xbdP7E8z1xssGHxVl-xnkjHkaOc6boMbszcTvjwkeX7i_yBT2eaCGf-RrRZmcpcecfMb_Jly8_4CkE_4FHStucEx9jWDjyMmMKrvguQwo5eI7rOjv7WL9mL0acE715em_Yr7vPP2-_VocfX77dfjpUVso-V7Ib7VEfdX8kNSBZ7IVQnVANdJ0u2w5K66G0Aca9paaBRii0EhutGyX3IG_Yuyt3jeHPRimbxSVL84yewpZMAUkltSjC9iq0MaQUaTRrdOXgD0aAuQRgJvMUgLkEYKA1JYDi-3j1Udni7CiaZB15S4OLZLMZgvsP4R_l0pUP</recordid><startdate>20041101</startdate><enddate>20041101</enddate><creator>Nunes, Paulo A.L.D.</creator><creator>Rossetto, Luca</creator><creator>de Blaeij, Arianne</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041101</creationdate><title>Measuring the economic value of alternative clam fishing management practices in the Venice Lagoon: results from a conjoint valuation application</title><author>Nunes, Paulo A.L.D. ; Rossetto, Luca ; de Blaeij, Arianne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-36fcb9b98be7daeca811761720669092d799db9800f4ce220217ac3a299273403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Exotic marine species</topic><topic>Fishing effort</topic><topic>Fishing rakes</topic><topic>Manila clam</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Open access</topic><topic>Permit price</topic><topic>Policy guidance</topic><topic>Welfare damages</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Paulo A.L.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossetto, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Blaeij, Arianne</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of marine systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nunes, Paulo A.L.D.</au><au>Rossetto, Luca</au><au>de Blaeij, Arianne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring the economic value of alternative clam fishing management practices in the Venice Lagoon: results from a conjoint valuation application</atitle><jtitle>Journal of marine systems</jtitle><date>2004-11-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>320</epage><pages>309-320</pages><issn>0924-7963</issn><eissn>1879-1573</eissn><abstract>This article focuses on the economic valuation of alternative clam management practices in the Venice Lagoon. The proposed valuation method is characterized by the design of a survey questionnaire applied to the fishermen population. In each questionnaire, two fishing alternatives are described. The respondent is asked to choose one of them. This valuation method, referred in the article as conjoint valuation, gives sufficient flexibility to set, alter, and combine the valuation of different clam management practices. Furthermore, this approach presents an important advantage to the well-known contingent valuation method since it makes the monetary valuation of each management attribute possible. Estimation results show that all three attributes used in the questionnaire to describe and value different clam management practices—price of the annual permit and fishing technological system—are statistically robust, indicating that fishermen bear a utility change whenever these attributes change. In particular, fishermen's willingness to pay for a larger clam fishing area ranges between 568 and 811 € per year. In addition, an individual's willingness to pay for a fishing practice exclusively based on the vibrant rake system ranges between 1005 and 2456 €. Finally, the adoption of a clam fish management practice in the Venice Lagoon that is exclusively based on the use of manual rakes, which is associated with the lowest damage to the lagoon ecosystem, will represent a welfare loss of 5904 € per fisherman per year. Combining such a value estimate with the total number of fishermen currently operating in the Lagoon of Venice, the welfare loss associated with the adoption of this type of clam management policy amounts to 11.8 € million per year. This figure can be regarded as an upper bound to the cost of implementation of a clam fishing system anchored in the use of manual, ecosystem friendly rakes.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jmarsys.2004.05.018</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0924-7963
ispartof Journal of marine systems, 2004-11, Vol.51 (1), p.309-320
issn 0924-7963
1879-1573
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20637391
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Exotic marine species
Fishing effort
Fishing rakes
Manila clam
Marine
Open access
Permit price
Policy guidance
Welfare damages
title Measuring the economic value of alternative clam fishing management practices in the Venice Lagoon: results from a conjoint valuation application
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T07%3A34%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20the%20economic%20value%20of%20alternative%20clam%20fishing%20management%20practices%20in%20the%20Venice%20Lagoon:%20results%20from%20a%20conjoint%20valuation%20application&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20marine%20systems&rft.au=Nunes,%20Paulo%20A.L.D.&rft.date=2004-11-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=320&rft.pages=309-320&rft.issn=0924-7963&rft.eissn=1879-1573&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2004.05.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20637391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20637391&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0924796304001903&rfr_iscdi=true