Effect of Primary Breast Tumor Location on Axillary Nodal Positivity

Background Variables such as tumor size, histology, and grade, tumor biology, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and patient age have been shown to impact likelihood of nodal positivity. The aim of this study is to determine whether primary location of invasive disease within the breast is associa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2018-10, Vol.25 (10), p.3011-3018
Hauptverfasser: Desai, Amita A., Hoskin, Tanya L., Day, Courtney N., Habermann, Elizabeth B., Boughey, Judy C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3018
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3011
container_title Annals of surgical oncology
container_volume 25
creator Desai, Amita A.
Hoskin, Tanya L.
Day, Courtney N.
Habermann, Elizabeth B.
Boughey, Judy C.
description Background Variables such as tumor size, histology, and grade, tumor biology, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and patient age have been shown to impact likelihood of nodal positivity. The aim of this study is to determine whether primary location of invasive disease within the breast is associated with nodal positivity. Patients and Methods Patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing axillary staging from 2010 to 2014 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. Rates of axillary nodal positivity by primary tumor locations were compared, and multivariable analysis performed using logistic regression to control for factors known to impact nodal positivity. Results A total of 599,722 patients met inclusion criteria. Likelihood of nodal positivity was greatest with primary tumors located in the nipple (43.8%), followed by multicentric disease (40.8%), central breast lesions (39.4%), and axillary tail lesions (38.4%). Tumor location remained independently associated with nodal positivity on multivariable analysis adjusting for variables known to affect nodal positivity with odds ratio 2.8 for tumors in the nipple [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5–3.1], 2.2 for central breast (95% CI: 2.2–2.3), and 2.7 for axillary tail (95% CI: 2.4–2.9). When restricted to patients with clinically negative nodes ( n  = 430,949), a similar association was seen. Conclusion Patients with invasive breast cancer located in the nipple, central breast, and axillary tail have the highest risk of positive axillary lymph nodes independent of patient age, tumor grade, biologic subtype, histology, and size. This should be considered along with other factors in preoperative counseling and decision-making regarding plans for axillary lymph node staging.
doi_str_mv 10.1245/s10434-018-6590-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2063712037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2063712037</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a7fb8f1113e2a6e37f3b3a9bdae7e1882db18b2a1214f4ae703aa4f67384a2813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoTqc_wBspeONNNSdpk_RyzvkBQ3cxr0PaJtLRLjNpxf17UzsVBCGQcM6T9xwehM4AXwFJ0msPOKFJjEHELM1wzPfQEaShkjAB--GNmYgzwtIROvZ-hTFwitNDNCJZxgQm_AjdzozRRRtZEy1c1Si3jW6cVr6Nll1jXTS3hWoru47CmXxUdd0TT7ZUdbSwvmqr96rdnqADo2qvT3f3GL3czZbTh3j-fP84nczjgnLSxoqbXBgAoJoopik3NKcqy0uluQYhSJmDyIkCAolJQhFTpRLDOBWJIgLoGF0OuRtn3zrtW9lUvtBhqbW2nZcEM8qBYMoDevEHXdnOrcN2XxTglKd9IAxU4az3Thu5GSRIwLJXLAfFMiiWvWLZJ5_vkru80eXPj2-nASAD4ENr_ard7-j_Uz8B1YeFGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2063105751</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Primary Breast Tumor Location on Axillary Nodal Positivity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Desai, Amita A. ; Hoskin, Tanya L. ; Day, Courtney N. ; Habermann, Elizabeth B. ; Boughey, Judy C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Desai, Amita A. ; Hoskin, Tanya L. ; Day, Courtney N. ; Habermann, Elizabeth B. ; Boughey, Judy C.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Variables such as tumor size, histology, and grade, tumor biology, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and patient age have been shown to impact likelihood of nodal positivity. The aim of this study is to determine whether primary location of invasive disease within the breast is associated with nodal positivity. Patients and Methods Patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing axillary staging from 2010 to 2014 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. Rates of axillary nodal positivity by primary tumor locations were compared, and multivariable analysis performed using logistic regression to control for factors known to impact nodal positivity. Results A total of 599,722 patients met inclusion criteria. Likelihood of nodal positivity was greatest with primary tumors located in the nipple (43.8%), followed by multicentric disease (40.8%), central breast lesions (39.4%), and axillary tail lesions (38.4%). Tumor location remained independently associated with nodal positivity on multivariable analysis adjusting for variables known to affect nodal positivity with odds ratio 2.8 for tumors in the nipple [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5–3.1], 2.2 for central breast (95% CI: 2.2–2.3), and 2.7 for axillary tail (95% CI: 2.4–2.9). When restricted to patients with clinically negative nodes ( n  = 430,949), a similar association was seen. Conclusion Patients with invasive breast cancer located in the nipple, central breast, and axillary tail have the highest risk of positive axillary lymph nodes independent of patient age, tumor grade, biologic subtype, histology, and size. This should be considered along with other factors in preoperative counseling and decision-making regarding plans for axillary lymph node staging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6590-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29968027</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - secondary ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Axilla ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Oncology ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - secondary ; Carcinoma, Lobular - secondary ; Decision making ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Histology ; Humans ; Invasiveness ; Lymph nodes ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Mastectomy ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Oncology ; Patients ; Prognosis ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Tails ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2018-10, Vol.25 (10), p.3011-3018</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2018</rights><rights>Annals of Surgical Oncology is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a7fb8f1113e2a6e37f3b3a9bdae7e1882db18b2a1214f4ae703aa4f67384a2813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a7fb8f1113e2a6e37f3b3a9bdae7e1882db18b2a1214f4ae703aa4f67384a2813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1245/s10434-018-6590-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1245/s10434-018-6590-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29968027$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Desai, Amita A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoskin, Tanya L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Day, Courtney N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habermann, Elizabeth B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boughey, Judy C.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Primary Breast Tumor Location on Axillary Nodal Positivity</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background Variables such as tumor size, histology, and grade, tumor biology, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and patient age have been shown to impact likelihood of nodal positivity. The aim of this study is to determine whether primary location of invasive disease within the breast is associated with nodal positivity. Patients and Methods Patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing axillary staging from 2010 to 2014 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. Rates of axillary nodal positivity by primary tumor locations were compared, and multivariable analysis performed using logistic regression to control for factors known to impact nodal positivity. Results A total of 599,722 patients met inclusion criteria. Likelihood of nodal positivity was greatest with primary tumors located in the nipple (43.8%), followed by multicentric disease (40.8%), central breast lesions (39.4%), and axillary tail lesions (38.4%). Tumor location remained independently associated with nodal positivity on multivariable analysis adjusting for variables known to affect nodal positivity with odds ratio 2.8 for tumors in the nipple [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5–3.1], 2.2 for central breast (95% CI: 2.2–2.3), and 2.7 for axillary tail (95% CI: 2.4–2.9). When restricted to patients with clinically negative nodes ( n  = 430,949), a similar association was seen. Conclusion Patients with invasive breast cancer located in the nipple, central breast, and axillary tail have the highest risk of positive axillary lymph nodes independent of patient age, tumor grade, biologic subtype, histology, and size. This should be considered along with other factors in preoperative counseling and decision-making regarding plans for axillary lymph node staging.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - secondary</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Oncology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - secondary</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Invasiveness</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Tails</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoTqc_wBspeONNNSdpk_RyzvkBQ3cxr0PaJtLRLjNpxf17UzsVBCGQcM6T9xwehM4AXwFJ0msPOKFJjEHELM1wzPfQEaShkjAB--GNmYgzwtIROvZ-hTFwitNDNCJZxgQm_AjdzozRRRtZEy1c1Si3jW6cVr6Nll1jXTS3hWoru47CmXxUdd0TT7ZUdbSwvmqr96rdnqADo2qvT3f3GL3czZbTh3j-fP84nczjgnLSxoqbXBgAoJoopik3NKcqy0uluQYhSJmDyIkCAolJQhFTpRLDOBWJIgLoGF0OuRtn3zrtW9lUvtBhqbW2nZcEM8qBYMoDevEHXdnOrcN2XxTglKd9IAxU4az3Thu5GSRIwLJXLAfFMiiWvWLZJ5_vkru80eXPj2-nASAD4ENr_ard7-j_Uz8B1YeFGA</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Desai, Amita A.</creator><creator>Hoskin, Tanya L.</creator><creator>Day, Courtney N.</creator><creator>Habermann, Elizabeth B.</creator><creator>Boughey, Judy C.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Effect of Primary Breast Tumor Location on Axillary Nodal Positivity</title><author>Desai, Amita A. ; Hoskin, Tanya L. ; Day, Courtney N. ; Habermann, Elizabeth B. ; Boughey, Judy C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a7fb8f1113e2a6e37f3b3a9bdae7e1882db18b2a1214f4ae703aa4f67384a2813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - secondary</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Oncology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - secondary</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Invasiveness</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Tails</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Desai, Amita A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoskin, Tanya L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Day, Courtney N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habermann, Elizabeth B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boughey, Judy C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Desai, Amita A.</au><au>Hoskin, Tanya L.</au><au>Day, Courtney N.</au><au>Habermann, Elizabeth B.</au><au>Boughey, Judy C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Primary Breast Tumor Location on Axillary Nodal Positivity</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3011</spage><epage>3018</epage><pages>3011-3018</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Background Variables such as tumor size, histology, and grade, tumor biology, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and patient age have been shown to impact likelihood of nodal positivity. The aim of this study is to determine whether primary location of invasive disease within the breast is associated with nodal positivity. Patients and Methods Patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing axillary staging from 2010 to 2014 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. Rates of axillary nodal positivity by primary tumor locations were compared, and multivariable analysis performed using logistic regression to control for factors known to impact nodal positivity. Results A total of 599,722 patients met inclusion criteria. Likelihood of nodal positivity was greatest with primary tumors located in the nipple (43.8%), followed by multicentric disease (40.8%), central breast lesions (39.4%), and axillary tail lesions (38.4%). Tumor location remained independently associated with nodal positivity on multivariable analysis adjusting for variables known to affect nodal positivity with odds ratio 2.8 for tumors in the nipple [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5–3.1], 2.2 for central breast (95% CI: 2.2–2.3), and 2.7 for axillary tail (95% CI: 2.4–2.9). When restricted to patients with clinically negative nodes ( n  = 430,949), a similar association was seen. Conclusion Patients with invasive breast cancer located in the nipple, central breast, and axillary tail have the highest risk of positive axillary lymph nodes independent of patient age, tumor grade, biologic subtype, histology, and size. This should be considered along with other factors in preoperative counseling and decision-making regarding plans for axillary lymph node staging.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>29968027</pmid><doi>10.1245/s10434-018-6590-7</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1068-9265
ispartof Annals of surgical oncology, 2018-10, Vol.25 (10), p.3011-3018
issn 1068-9265
1534-4681
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2063712037
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - secondary
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Axilla
Biopsy
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Oncology
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - secondary
Carcinoma, Lobular - secondary
Decision making
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Histology
Humans
Invasiveness
Lymph nodes
Lymph Nodes - pathology
Lymphatic Metastasis
Mastectomy
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Oncology
Patients
Prognosis
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
Tails
Tumors
title Effect of Primary Breast Tumor Location on Axillary Nodal Positivity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T05%3A36%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Primary%20Breast%20Tumor%20Location%20on%20Axillary%20Nodal%20Positivity&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Desai,%20Amita%20A.&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3011&rft.epage=3018&rft.pages=3011-3018&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-018-6590-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2063712037%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2063105751&rft_id=info:pmid/29968027&rfr_iscdi=true