Effect of Primary Breast Tumor Location on Axillary Nodal Positivity
Background Variables such as tumor size, histology, and grade, tumor biology, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and patient age have been shown to impact likelihood of nodal positivity. The aim of this study is to determine whether primary location of invasive disease within the breast is associa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2018-10, Vol.25 (10), p.3011-3018 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3018 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 3011 |
container_title | Annals of surgical oncology |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Desai, Amita A. Hoskin, Tanya L. Day, Courtney N. Habermann, Elizabeth B. Boughey, Judy C. |
description | Background
Variables such as tumor size, histology, and grade, tumor biology, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and patient age have been shown to impact likelihood of nodal positivity. The aim of this study is to determine whether primary location of invasive disease within the breast is associated with nodal positivity.
Patients and Methods
Patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing axillary staging from 2010 to 2014 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. Rates of axillary nodal positivity by primary tumor locations were compared, and multivariable analysis performed using logistic regression to control for factors known to impact nodal positivity.
Results
A total of 599,722 patients met inclusion criteria. Likelihood of nodal positivity was greatest with primary tumors located in the nipple (43.8%), followed by multicentric disease (40.8%), central breast lesions (39.4%), and axillary tail lesions (38.4%). Tumor location remained independently associated with nodal positivity on multivariable analysis adjusting for variables known to affect nodal positivity with odds ratio 2.8 for tumors in the nipple [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5–3.1], 2.2 for central breast (95% CI: 2.2–2.3), and 2.7 for axillary tail (95% CI: 2.4–2.9). When restricted to patients with clinically negative nodes (
n
= 430,949), a similar association was seen.
Conclusion
Patients with invasive breast cancer located in the nipple, central breast, and axillary tail have the highest risk of positive axillary lymph nodes independent of patient age, tumor grade, biologic subtype, histology, and size. This should be considered along with other factors in preoperative counseling and decision-making regarding plans for axillary lymph node staging. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1245/s10434-018-6590-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2063712037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2063712037</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a7fb8f1113e2a6e37f3b3a9bdae7e1882db18b2a1214f4ae703aa4f67384a2813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoTqc_wBspeONNNSdpk_RyzvkBQ3cxr0PaJtLRLjNpxf17UzsVBCGQcM6T9xwehM4AXwFJ0msPOKFJjEHELM1wzPfQEaShkjAB--GNmYgzwtIROvZ-hTFwitNDNCJZxgQm_AjdzozRRRtZEy1c1Si3jW6cVr6Nll1jXTS3hWoru47CmXxUdd0TT7ZUdbSwvmqr96rdnqADo2qvT3f3GL3czZbTh3j-fP84nczjgnLSxoqbXBgAoJoopik3NKcqy0uluQYhSJmDyIkCAolJQhFTpRLDOBWJIgLoGF0OuRtn3zrtW9lUvtBhqbW2nZcEM8qBYMoDevEHXdnOrcN2XxTglKd9IAxU4az3Thu5GSRIwLJXLAfFMiiWvWLZJ5_vkru80eXPj2-nASAD4ENr_ard7-j_Uz8B1YeFGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2063105751</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Primary Breast Tumor Location on Axillary Nodal Positivity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Desai, Amita A. ; Hoskin, Tanya L. ; Day, Courtney N. ; Habermann, Elizabeth B. ; Boughey, Judy C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Desai, Amita A. ; Hoskin, Tanya L. ; Day, Courtney N. ; Habermann, Elizabeth B. ; Boughey, Judy C.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Variables such as tumor size, histology, and grade, tumor biology, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and patient age have been shown to impact likelihood of nodal positivity. The aim of this study is to determine whether primary location of invasive disease within the breast is associated with nodal positivity.
Patients and Methods
Patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing axillary staging from 2010 to 2014 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. Rates of axillary nodal positivity by primary tumor locations were compared, and multivariable analysis performed using logistic regression to control for factors known to impact nodal positivity.
Results
A total of 599,722 patients met inclusion criteria. Likelihood of nodal positivity was greatest with primary tumors located in the nipple (43.8%), followed by multicentric disease (40.8%), central breast lesions (39.4%), and axillary tail lesions (38.4%). Tumor location remained independently associated with nodal positivity on multivariable analysis adjusting for variables known to affect nodal positivity with odds ratio 2.8 for tumors in the nipple [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5–3.1], 2.2 for central breast (95% CI: 2.2–2.3), and 2.7 for axillary tail (95% CI: 2.4–2.9). When restricted to patients with clinically negative nodes (
n
= 430,949), a similar association was seen.
Conclusion
Patients with invasive breast cancer located in the nipple, central breast, and axillary tail have the highest risk of positive axillary lymph nodes independent of patient age, tumor grade, biologic subtype, histology, and size. This should be considered along with other factors in preoperative counseling and decision-making regarding plans for axillary lymph node staging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6590-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29968027</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - secondary ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Axilla ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Oncology ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - secondary ; Carcinoma, Lobular - secondary ; Decision making ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Histology ; Humans ; Invasiveness ; Lymph nodes ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Mastectomy ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Oncology ; Patients ; Prognosis ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Tails ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2018-10, Vol.25 (10), p.3011-3018</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2018</rights><rights>Annals of Surgical Oncology is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a7fb8f1113e2a6e37f3b3a9bdae7e1882db18b2a1214f4ae703aa4f67384a2813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a7fb8f1113e2a6e37f3b3a9bdae7e1882db18b2a1214f4ae703aa4f67384a2813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1245/s10434-018-6590-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1245/s10434-018-6590-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29968027$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Desai, Amita A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoskin, Tanya L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Day, Courtney N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habermann, Elizabeth B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boughey, Judy C.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Primary Breast Tumor Location on Axillary Nodal Positivity</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background
Variables such as tumor size, histology, and grade, tumor biology, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and patient age have been shown to impact likelihood of nodal positivity. The aim of this study is to determine whether primary location of invasive disease within the breast is associated with nodal positivity.
Patients and Methods
Patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing axillary staging from 2010 to 2014 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. Rates of axillary nodal positivity by primary tumor locations were compared, and multivariable analysis performed using logistic regression to control for factors known to impact nodal positivity.
Results
A total of 599,722 patients met inclusion criteria. Likelihood of nodal positivity was greatest with primary tumors located in the nipple (43.8%), followed by multicentric disease (40.8%), central breast lesions (39.4%), and axillary tail lesions (38.4%). Tumor location remained independently associated with nodal positivity on multivariable analysis adjusting for variables known to affect nodal positivity with odds ratio 2.8 for tumors in the nipple [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5–3.1], 2.2 for central breast (95% CI: 2.2–2.3), and 2.7 for axillary tail (95% CI: 2.4–2.9). When restricted to patients with clinically negative nodes (
n
= 430,949), a similar association was seen.
Conclusion
Patients with invasive breast cancer located in the nipple, central breast, and axillary tail have the highest risk of positive axillary lymph nodes independent of patient age, tumor grade, biologic subtype, histology, and size. This should be considered along with other factors in preoperative counseling and decision-making regarding plans for axillary lymph node staging.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - secondary</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Oncology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - secondary</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Invasiveness</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Tails</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoTqc_wBspeONNNSdpk_RyzvkBQ3cxr0PaJtLRLjNpxf17UzsVBCGQcM6T9xwehM4AXwFJ0msPOKFJjEHELM1wzPfQEaShkjAB--GNmYgzwtIROvZ-hTFwitNDNCJZxgQm_AjdzozRRRtZEy1c1Si3jW6cVr6Nll1jXTS3hWoru47CmXxUdd0TT7ZUdbSwvmqr96rdnqADo2qvT3f3GL3czZbTh3j-fP84nczjgnLSxoqbXBgAoJoopik3NKcqy0uluQYhSJmDyIkCAolJQhFTpRLDOBWJIgLoGF0OuRtn3zrtW9lUvtBhqbW2nZcEM8qBYMoDevEHXdnOrcN2XxTglKd9IAxU4az3Thu5GSRIwLJXLAfFMiiWvWLZJ5_vkru80eXPj2-nASAD4ENr_ard7-j_Uz8B1YeFGA</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Desai, Amita A.</creator><creator>Hoskin, Tanya L.</creator><creator>Day, Courtney N.</creator><creator>Habermann, Elizabeth B.</creator><creator>Boughey, Judy C.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Effect of Primary Breast Tumor Location on Axillary Nodal Positivity</title><author>Desai, Amita A. ; Hoskin, Tanya L. ; Day, Courtney N. ; Habermann, Elizabeth B. ; Boughey, Judy C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a7fb8f1113e2a6e37f3b3a9bdae7e1882db18b2a1214f4ae703aa4f67384a2813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - secondary</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Oncology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - secondary</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Invasiveness</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Tails</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Desai, Amita A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoskin, Tanya L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Day, Courtney N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habermann, Elizabeth B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boughey, Judy C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Desai, Amita A.</au><au>Hoskin, Tanya L.</au><au>Day, Courtney N.</au><au>Habermann, Elizabeth B.</au><au>Boughey, Judy C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Primary Breast Tumor Location on Axillary Nodal Positivity</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3011</spage><epage>3018</epage><pages>3011-3018</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Background
Variables such as tumor size, histology, and grade, tumor biology, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and patient age have been shown to impact likelihood of nodal positivity. The aim of this study is to determine whether primary location of invasive disease within the breast is associated with nodal positivity.
Patients and Methods
Patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing axillary staging from 2010 to 2014 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. Rates of axillary nodal positivity by primary tumor locations were compared, and multivariable analysis performed using logistic regression to control for factors known to impact nodal positivity.
Results
A total of 599,722 patients met inclusion criteria. Likelihood of nodal positivity was greatest with primary tumors located in the nipple (43.8%), followed by multicentric disease (40.8%), central breast lesions (39.4%), and axillary tail lesions (38.4%). Tumor location remained independently associated with nodal positivity on multivariable analysis adjusting for variables known to affect nodal positivity with odds ratio 2.8 for tumors in the nipple [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5–3.1], 2.2 for central breast (95% CI: 2.2–2.3), and 2.7 for axillary tail (95% CI: 2.4–2.9). When restricted to patients with clinically negative nodes (
n
= 430,949), a similar association was seen.
Conclusion
Patients with invasive breast cancer located in the nipple, central breast, and axillary tail have the highest risk of positive axillary lymph nodes independent of patient age, tumor grade, biologic subtype, histology, and size. This should be considered along with other factors in preoperative counseling and decision-making regarding plans for axillary lymph node staging.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>29968027</pmid><doi>10.1245/s10434-018-6590-7</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1068-9265 |
ispartof | Annals of surgical oncology, 2018-10, Vol.25 (10), p.3011-3018 |
issn | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2063712037 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - secondary Aged Aged, 80 and over Axilla Biopsy Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - pathology Breast Oncology Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - secondary Carcinoma, Lobular - secondary Decision making Female Follow-Up Studies Histology Humans Invasiveness Lymph nodes Lymph Nodes - pathology Lymphatic Metastasis Mastectomy Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Oncology Patients Prognosis Surgery Surgical Oncology Tails Tumors |
title | Effect of Primary Breast Tumor Location on Axillary Nodal Positivity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T05%3A36%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Primary%20Breast%20Tumor%20Location%20on%20Axillary%20Nodal%20Positivity&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Desai,%20Amita%20A.&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3011&rft.epage=3018&rft.pages=3011-3018&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-018-6590-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2063712037%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2063105751&rft_id=info:pmid/29968027&rfr_iscdi=true |