Ileal Continent Reservoir: A Feasible Option for Bladder Augmentation and Urinary Diversion

To present the results of technique of continent urinary diversion, described by Macedo, that allows the configuration of a tunnel with a flap of the ileal tube at the same segment created for the reservoir. From January 2006 to November 2016, 29 patients were underwent a urinary diversion by Macedo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2018-10, Vol.120, p.253-257
Hauptverfasser: Tavares, Patric Machado, Smaniotto, Guilherme Pereira, Bortolini, Tiago, Rosito, Nicolino Cesar, Neto, Brasil Silva, Rosito, Tiago Elias
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 257
container_issue
container_start_page 253
container_title Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)
container_volume 120
creator Tavares, Patric Machado
Smaniotto, Guilherme Pereira
Bortolini, Tiago
Rosito, Nicolino Cesar
Neto, Brasil Silva
Rosito, Tiago Elias
description To present the results of technique of continent urinary diversion, described by Macedo, that allows the configuration of a tunnel with a flap of the ileal tube at the same segment created for the reservoir. From January 2006 to November 2016, 29 patients were underwent a urinary diversion by Macedo's technique. Patients' demographics, hospitalization time, surgical time, follow up, continence rate, reservoir capacity, and postoperative complications were evaluated. Sixty-nine percent were male and the median age was 16.9 years. The main etiology was meningomyelocele (69.1%). The mean surgical time was 4.2 hours (standard deviation [SD] 0.9 range 2.9-6.3). The median length of hospital stay was 10 days (interquartile range: 11.3 range 5-51). The mean follow up was 3.3 years (SD 2.2 range 0.3-9.8). Procedure in the bladder neck was performed in 12 patients (41.3%). A continence rate of the catheterizable conduit was 82.8%.The reservoir capacity increased from 134.4 to 364.4 ml (P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.urology.2018.06.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2062837381</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090429518305843</els_id><sourcerecordid>2062837381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-36e4001a4fe3266de03899ff743981d07db4f82cb69c8971ae970dc170d3df813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtu2zAQJIoWtZP2Exrw2IuUpShRYi6F4zxqwECAIDn1QNDkyqAhiy4pGfDfl3601152gdmZnd0h5BuDnAETt5t8DL7z60NeAGtyEHlCP5Apq4o6k1JWH8kUQEJWFrKakKsYNwAghKg_k0mR5o2s2ZT8WnSoOzr3_eB67Af6ihHD3rtwR2f0CXV0qw7py25wvqetD_S-09ZioLNxvU0CfRro3tL34HodDvTB7THEhH4hn1rdRfx66dfk_enxbf4zW748L-azZWa4qIaMCywBmC5b5IUQFoE3UrZtXXLZMAu1XZVtU5iVkOZ4tEZZgzUsFW7bhvFr8v28dxf87xHjoLYuGuw63aMfoypAFA2v-Ylanakm-BgDtmoX3DZdrRioY65qoy65qmOuCoRKaNLdXCzG1RbtP9XfIBPhx5mA6dG9w6CicdgbtC6gGZT17j8WfwCCQYxs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2062837381</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ileal Continent Reservoir: A Feasible Option for Bladder Augmentation and Urinary Diversion</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Tavares, Patric Machado ; Smaniotto, Guilherme Pereira ; Bortolini, Tiago ; Rosito, Nicolino Cesar ; Neto, Brasil Silva ; Rosito, Tiago Elias</creator><creatorcontrib>Tavares, Patric Machado ; Smaniotto, Guilherme Pereira ; Bortolini, Tiago ; Rosito, Nicolino Cesar ; Neto, Brasil Silva ; Rosito, Tiago Elias</creatorcontrib><description>To present the results of technique of continent urinary diversion, described by Macedo, that allows the configuration of a tunnel with a flap of the ileal tube at the same segment created for the reservoir. From January 2006 to November 2016, 29 patients were underwent a urinary diversion by Macedo's technique. Patients' demographics, hospitalization time, surgical time, follow up, continence rate, reservoir capacity, and postoperative complications were evaluated. Sixty-nine percent were male and the median age was 16.9 years. The main etiology was meningomyelocele (69.1%). The mean surgical time was 4.2 hours (standard deviation [SD] 0.9 range 2.9-6.3). The median length of hospital stay was 10 days (interquartile range: 11.3 range 5-51). The mean follow up was 3.3 years (SD 2.2 range 0.3-9.8). Procedure in the bladder neck was performed in 12 patients (41.3%). A continence rate of the catheterizable conduit was 82.8%.The reservoir capacity increased from 134.4 to 364.4 ml (P &lt;.0001). The continence rate improved significantly (20 vs 74%, P &lt;.0001). There was no change in glomerular filtration rates in the long term (143.1 vs 147, P = .45). Morbidity rate was 58% (25 complications in 17 patients), 72% occurred within the first 60 days and 60% were classified as Clavien-Dindo I or II. Except for publications from the original author, this is the first series described. The outcomes are similar, adding important data with respect to this technique. They show that the ileal reservoir is feasible, reproducible, and with good results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.06.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29958971</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Colon, Sigmoid - surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Ileum - surgery ; Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Meningomyelocele - surgery ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Urinary Diversion - methods ; Urinary Reservoirs, Continent ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2018-10, Vol.120, p.253-257</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-36e4001a4fe3266de03899ff743981d07db4f82cb69c8971ae970dc170d3df813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-36e4001a4fe3266de03899ff743981d07db4f82cb69c8971ae970dc170d3df813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.06.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29958971$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tavares, Patric Machado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smaniotto, Guilherme Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bortolini, Tiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosito, Nicolino Cesar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, Brasil Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosito, Tiago Elias</creatorcontrib><title>Ileal Continent Reservoir: A Feasible Option for Bladder Augmentation and Urinary Diversion</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>To present the results of technique of continent urinary diversion, described by Macedo, that allows the configuration of a tunnel with a flap of the ileal tube at the same segment created for the reservoir. From January 2006 to November 2016, 29 patients were underwent a urinary diversion by Macedo's technique. Patients' demographics, hospitalization time, surgical time, follow up, continence rate, reservoir capacity, and postoperative complications were evaluated. Sixty-nine percent were male and the median age was 16.9 years. The main etiology was meningomyelocele (69.1%). The mean surgical time was 4.2 hours (standard deviation [SD] 0.9 range 2.9-6.3). The median length of hospital stay was 10 days (interquartile range: 11.3 range 5-51). The mean follow up was 3.3 years (SD 2.2 range 0.3-9.8). Procedure in the bladder neck was performed in 12 patients (41.3%). A continence rate of the catheterizable conduit was 82.8%.The reservoir capacity increased from 134.4 to 364.4 ml (P &lt;.0001). The continence rate improved significantly (20 vs 74%, P &lt;.0001). There was no change in glomerular filtration rates in the long term (143.1 vs 147, P = .45). Morbidity rate was 58% (25 complications in 17 patients), 72% occurred within the first 60 days and 60% were classified as Clavien-Dindo I or II. Except for publications from the original author, this is the first series described. The outcomes are similar, adding important data with respect to this technique. They show that the ileal reservoir is feasible, reproducible, and with good results.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Colon, Sigmoid - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ileum - surgery</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meningomyelocele - surgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Urinary Diversion - methods</subject><subject>Urinary Reservoirs, Continent</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMtu2zAQJIoWtZP2Exrw2IuUpShRYi6F4zxqwECAIDn1QNDkyqAhiy4pGfDfl3601152gdmZnd0h5BuDnAETt5t8DL7z60NeAGtyEHlCP5Apq4o6k1JWH8kUQEJWFrKakKsYNwAghKg_k0mR5o2s2ZT8WnSoOzr3_eB67Af6ihHD3rtwR2f0CXV0qw7py25wvqetD_S-09ZioLNxvU0CfRro3tL34HodDvTB7THEhH4hn1rdRfx66dfk_enxbf4zW748L-azZWa4qIaMCywBmC5b5IUQFoE3UrZtXXLZMAu1XZVtU5iVkOZ4tEZZgzUsFW7bhvFr8v28dxf87xHjoLYuGuw63aMfoypAFA2v-Ylanakm-BgDtmoX3DZdrRioY65qoy65qmOuCoRKaNLdXCzG1RbtP9XfIBPhx5mA6dG9w6CicdgbtC6gGZT17j8WfwCCQYxs</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Tavares, Patric Machado</creator><creator>Smaniotto, Guilherme Pereira</creator><creator>Bortolini, Tiago</creator><creator>Rosito, Nicolino Cesar</creator><creator>Neto, Brasil Silva</creator><creator>Rosito, Tiago Elias</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Ileal Continent Reservoir: A Feasible Option for Bladder Augmentation and Urinary Diversion</title><author>Tavares, Patric Machado ; Smaniotto, Guilherme Pereira ; Bortolini, Tiago ; Rosito, Nicolino Cesar ; Neto, Brasil Silva ; Rosito, Tiago Elias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-36e4001a4fe3266de03899ff743981d07db4f82cb69c8971ae970dc170d3df813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Colon, Sigmoid - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ileum - surgery</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meningomyelocele - surgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Urinary Diversion - methods</topic><topic>Urinary Reservoirs, Continent</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tavares, Patric Machado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smaniotto, Guilherme Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bortolini, Tiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosito, Nicolino Cesar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, Brasil Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosito, Tiago Elias</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tavares, Patric Machado</au><au>Smaniotto, Guilherme Pereira</au><au>Bortolini, Tiago</au><au>Rosito, Nicolino Cesar</au><au>Neto, Brasil Silva</au><au>Rosito, Tiago Elias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ileal Continent Reservoir: A Feasible Option for Bladder Augmentation and Urinary Diversion</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>120</volume><spage>253</spage><epage>257</epage><pages>253-257</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><abstract>To present the results of technique of continent urinary diversion, described by Macedo, that allows the configuration of a tunnel with a flap of the ileal tube at the same segment created for the reservoir. From January 2006 to November 2016, 29 patients were underwent a urinary diversion by Macedo's technique. Patients' demographics, hospitalization time, surgical time, follow up, continence rate, reservoir capacity, and postoperative complications were evaluated. Sixty-nine percent were male and the median age was 16.9 years. The main etiology was meningomyelocele (69.1%). The mean surgical time was 4.2 hours (standard deviation [SD] 0.9 range 2.9-6.3). The median length of hospital stay was 10 days (interquartile range: 11.3 range 5-51). The mean follow up was 3.3 years (SD 2.2 range 0.3-9.8). Procedure in the bladder neck was performed in 12 patients (41.3%). A continence rate of the catheterizable conduit was 82.8%.The reservoir capacity increased from 134.4 to 364.4 ml (P &lt;.0001). The continence rate improved significantly (20 vs 74%, P &lt;.0001). There was no change in glomerular filtration rates in the long term (143.1 vs 147, P = .45). Morbidity rate was 58% (25 complications in 17 patients), 72% occurred within the first 60 days and 60% were classified as Clavien-Dindo I or II. Except for publications from the original author, this is the first series described. The outcomes are similar, adding important data with respect to this technique. They show that the ileal reservoir is feasible, reproducible, and with good results.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29958971</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.urology.2018.06.016</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-4295
ispartof Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2018-10, Vol.120, p.253-257
issn 0090-4295
1527-9995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2062837381
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Child
Child, Preschool
Colon, Sigmoid - surgery
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Ileum - surgery
Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data
Male
Meningomyelocele - surgery
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Postoperative Complications
Retrospective Studies
Urinary Diversion - methods
Urinary Reservoirs, Continent
Young Adult
title Ileal Continent Reservoir: A Feasible Option for Bladder Augmentation and Urinary Diversion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A11%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ileal%20Continent%20Reservoir:%20A%20Feasible%20Option%20for%20Bladder%20Augmentation%20and%20Urinary%20Diversion&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Tavares,%20Patric%20Machado&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=120&rft.spage=253&rft.epage=257&rft.pages=253-257&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.urology.2018.06.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2062837381%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2062837381&rft_id=info:pmid/29958971&rft_els_id=S0090429518305843&rfr_iscdi=true