Threats to oral polio vaccine acceptance in Somalia: Polling in an outbreak
Using a survey conducted during the 2013–2014 polio outbreak in Somalia, this study examines attitudinal and knowledge-based threats to oral polio vaccine acceptance and commitment. Findings address a key gap, as most prior research focuses on endemic settings. Between November 19 and December 21, 2...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2018-07, Vol.36 (31), p.4716-4724 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4724 |
---|---|
container_issue | 31 |
container_start_page | 4716 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | SteelFisher, Gillian K. Blendon, Robert J. Haydarov, Rustam Lodge, William Caporello, Hannah Guirguis, Sherine Anand, Saumya Birungi, Julianne Williams, Matthew R. Ben-Porath, Eran N. O'Reilly, Denise Sahm, Christoph |
description | Using a survey conducted during the 2013–2014 polio outbreak in Somalia, this study examines attitudinal and knowledge-based threats to oral polio vaccine acceptance and commitment. Findings address a key gap, as most prior research focuses on endemic settings.
Between November 19 and December 21, 2013, we conducted interviews among 2003 caregivers of children under 5 years in select districts at high risk for polio transmission. Within each district, sample was drawn via a multi-stage cluster design with random route household selection. We calculated the percentage of caregivers who could not confirm recent vaccination and those uncommitted to future vaccination. We compared these percentages among caregivers with varying knowledge and attitudes, focusing on variables identified as threats in endemic settings, using controlled and uncontrolled comparisons. We also examined absolute levels of threat variables.
Only 10% of caregivers could not confirm recent vaccination, but 32% were uncommitted to future vaccination. Being unvaccinated or uncommitted were related to multiple threat variables. For example, compared with relevant counterparts, caregivers were more likely to be unconfirmed and uncommitted if they did not trust vaccinators “a great deal” (unconfirmed: 9% vs. 2%; uncommitted: 49% vs. 28%), which is also true in endemic settings. Unlike endemic settings, symptom knowledge was related to commitment while rumor awareness was low and unrelated to past acceptance or commitment. Levels of trust and perceptions of OPV effectiveness were high, though perceptions of community support and awareness of logistics were lower.
As in endemic settings, outbreak responses will benefit from communications strategies focused on enhancing trust in vaccinators, institutions and the vaccine, alongside making community support visible. Disease facts may help motivate acceptance, and enhanced logistics information may help facilitate caregiver availability at the door. Quelling rumors early may be important to prevent them from becoming threats. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.06.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2062837309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X18308144</els_id><sourcerecordid>2063674655</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-e68545125b0ef2294ee4d117df5c8766ef0a208ddc68d1e5fe0a89b878a17d7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFq3DAQhkVoSLZJHqFF0EsudkaSJcu9lBLSJiSQQBPITWilcaut19pKdqBvXy277aGXnAaG7_9n-Ah5x6BmwNTFqn6xzoURaw5M16BqAHFAFky3ouKS6TdkAVw1VcPg-Zi8zXkFAFKw7ogc866ThdMLcvv4I6GdMp0ijckOdBOHEOm-m5aBm8mODmkY6be4tkOwH-lDHIYwft_u7EjjPC1Lyc9TctjbIePZfp6Qpy9Xj5fX1d3915vLz3eVE52YKlRaNpJxuQTsOe8axMYz1vpeOt0qhT1YDtp7p7RnKHsEq7ulbrUtUOvFCTnf9W5S_DVjnsw6ZIfDYEeMczYcFNeiFdAV9MN_6CrOaSzfbSmh2kZJWSi5o1yKOSfszSaFtU2_DQOztW1WZm_EbG0bUKbYLrn3-_Z5uUb_L_VXbwE-7QAsOl4CJpNdwGLTh4RuMj6GV078AS1Dkfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2063674655</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Threats to oral polio vaccine acceptance in Somalia: Polling in an outbreak</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>SteelFisher, Gillian K. ; Blendon, Robert J. ; Haydarov, Rustam ; Lodge, William ; Caporello, Hannah ; Guirguis, Sherine ; Anand, Saumya ; Birungi, Julianne ; Williams, Matthew R. ; Ben-Porath, Eran N. ; O'Reilly, Denise ; Sahm, Christoph</creator><creatorcontrib>SteelFisher, Gillian K. ; Blendon, Robert J. ; Haydarov, Rustam ; Lodge, William ; Caporello, Hannah ; Guirguis, Sherine ; Anand, Saumya ; Birungi, Julianne ; Williams, Matthew R. ; Ben-Porath, Eran N. ; O'Reilly, Denise ; Sahm, Christoph</creatorcontrib><description>Using a survey conducted during the 2013–2014 polio outbreak in Somalia, this study examines attitudinal and knowledge-based threats to oral polio vaccine acceptance and commitment. Findings address a key gap, as most prior research focuses on endemic settings.
Between November 19 and December 21, 2013, we conducted interviews among 2003 caregivers of children under 5 years in select districts at high risk for polio transmission. Within each district, sample was drawn via a multi-stage cluster design with random route household selection. We calculated the percentage of caregivers who could not confirm recent vaccination and those uncommitted to future vaccination. We compared these percentages among caregivers with varying knowledge and attitudes, focusing on variables identified as threats in endemic settings, using controlled and uncontrolled comparisons. We also examined absolute levels of threat variables.
Only 10% of caregivers could not confirm recent vaccination, but 32% were uncommitted to future vaccination. Being unvaccinated or uncommitted were related to multiple threat variables. For example, compared with relevant counterparts, caregivers were more likely to be unconfirmed and uncommitted if they did not trust vaccinators “a great deal” (unconfirmed: 9% vs. 2%; uncommitted: 49% vs. 28%), which is also true in endemic settings. Unlike endemic settings, symptom knowledge was related to commitment while rumor awareness was low and unrelated to past acceptance or commitment. Levels of trust and perceptions of OPV effectiveness were high, though perceptions of community support and awareness of logistics were lower.
As in endemic settings, outbreak responses will benefit from communications strategies focused on enhancing trust in vaccinators, institutions and the vaccine, alongside making community support visible. Disease facts may help motivate acceptance, and enhanced logistics information may help facilitate caregiver availability at the door. Quelling rumors early may be important to prevent them from becoming threats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.06.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29958738</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Caregivers ; Children ; Children & youth ; Communities ; Community ; Community involvement ; Disease transmission ; Field study ; Households ; Immunization ; Logistics ; Neighborhoods ; Outbreak ; Outbreaks ; Perceptions ; Polio ; Poliomyelitis ; Public health ; Questionnaires ; Route selection ; Somalia ; Trust ; Vaccination ; Vaccine ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2018-07, Vol.36 (31), p.4716-4724</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2018. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-e68545125b0ef2294ee4d117df5c8766ef0a208ddc68d1e5fe0a89b878a17d7d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-e68545125b0ef2294ee4d117df5c8766ef0a208ddc68d1e5fe0a89b878a17d7d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2063674655?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,46002,64392,64394,64396,72476</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29958738$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SteelFisher, Gillian K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blendon, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haydarov, Rustam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lodge, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caporello, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guirguis, Sherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anand, Saumya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birungi, Julianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Matthew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben-Porath, Eran N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Reilly, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahm, Christoph</creatorcontrib><title>Threats to oral polio vaccine acceptance in Somalia: Polling in an outbreak</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Using a survey conducted during the 2013–2014 polio outbreak in Somalia, this study examines attitudinal and knowledge-based threats to oral polio vaccine acceptance and commitment. Findings address a key gap, as most prior research focuses on endemic settings.
Between November 19 and December 21, 2013, we conducted interviews among 2003 caregivers of children under 5 years in select districts at high risk for polio transmission. Within each district, sample was drawn via a multi-stage cluster design with random route household selection. We calculated the percentage of caregivers who could not confirm recent vaccination and those uncommitted to future vaccination. We compared these percentages among caregivers with varying knowledge and attitudes, focusing on variables identified as threats in endemic settings, using controlled and uncontrolled comparisons. We also examined absolute levels of threat variables.
Only 10% of caregivers could not confirm recent vaccination, but 32% were uncommitted to future vaccination. Being unvaccinated or uncommitted were related to multiple threat variables. For example, compared with relevant counterparts, caregivers were more likely to be unconfirmed and uncommitted if they did not trust vaccinators “a great deal” (unconfirmed: 9% vs. 2%; uncommitted: 49% vs. 28%), which is also true in endemic settings. Unlike endemic settings, symptom knowledge was related to commitment while rumor awareness was low and unrelated to past acceptance or commitment. Levels of trust and perceptions of OPV effectiveness were high, though perceptions of community support and awareness of logistics were lower.
As in endemic settings, outbreak responses will benefit from communications strategies focused on enhancing trust in vaccinators, institutions and the vaccine, alongside making community support visible. Disease facts may help motivate acceptance, and enhanced logistics information may help facilitate caregiver availability at the door. Quelling rumors early may be important to prevent them from becoming threats.</description><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Community involvement</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Field study</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Outbreak</subject><subject>Outbreaks</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Polio</subject><subject>Poliomyelitis</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Route selection</subject><subject>Somalia</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccine</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFq3DAQhkVoSLZJHqFF0EsudkaSJcu9lBLSJiSQQBPITWilcaut19pKdqBvXy277aGXnAaG7_9n-Ah5x6BmwNTFqn6xzoURaw5M16BqAHFAFky3ouKS6TdkAVw1VcPg-Zi8zXkFAFKw7ogc866ThdMLcvv4I6GdMp0ijckOdBOHEOm-m5aBm8mODmkY6be4tkOwH-lDHIYwft_u7EjjPC1Lyc9TctjbIePZfp6Qpy9Xj5fX1d3915vLz3eVE52YKlRaNpJxuQTsOe8axMYz1vpeOt0qhT1YDtp7p7RnKHsEq7ulbrUtUOvFCTnf9W5S_DVjnsw6ZIfDYEeMczYcFNeiFdAV9MN_6CrOaSzfbSmh2kZJWSi5o1yKOSfszSaFtU2_DQOztW1WZm_EbG0bUKbYLrn3-_Z5uUb_L_VXbwE-7QAsOl4CJpNdwGLTh4RuMj6GV078AS1Dkfw</recordid><startdate>20180725</startdate><enddate>20180725</enddate><creator>SteelFisher, Gillian K.</creator><creator>Blendon, Robert J.</creator><creator>Haydarov, Rustam</creator><creator>Lodge, William</creator><creator>Caporello, Hannah</creator><creator>Guirguis, Sherine</creator><creator>Anand, Saumya</creator><creator>Birungi, Julianne</creator><creator>Williams, Matthew R.</creator><creator>Ben-Porath, Eran N.</creator><creator>O'Reilly, Denise</creator><creator>Sahm, Christoph</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180725</creationdate><title>Threats to oral polio vaccine acceptance in Somalia: Polling in an outbreak</title><author>SteelFisher, Gillian K. ; Blendon, Robert J. ; Haydarov, Rustam ; Lodge, William ; Caporello, Hannah ; Guirguis, Sherine ; Anand, Saumya ; Birungi, Julianne ; Williams, Matthew R. ; Ben-Porath, Eran N. ; O'Reilly, Denise ; Sahm, Christoph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-e68545125b0ef2294ee4d117df5c8766ef0a208ddc68d1e5fe0a89b878a17d7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Community involvement</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Field study</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Outbreak</topic><topic>Outbreaks</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Polio</topic><topic>Poliomyelitis</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Route selection</topic><topic>Somalia</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccine</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SteelFisher, Gillian K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blendon, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haydarov, Rustam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lodge, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caporello, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guirguis, Sherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anand, Saumya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birungi, Julianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Matthew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben-Porath, Eran N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Reilly, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahm, Christoph</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SteelFisher, Gillian K.</au><au>Blendon, Robert J.</au><au>Haydarov, Rustam</au><au>Lodge, William</au><au>Caporello, Hannah</au><au>Guirguis, Sherine</au><au>Anand, Saumya</au><au>Birungi, Julianne</au><au>Williams, Matthew R.</au><au>Ben-Porath, Eran N.</au><au>O'Reilly, Denise</au><au>Sahm, Christoph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Threats to oral polio vaccine acceptance in Somalia: Polling in an outbreak</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2018-07-25</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>31</issue><spage>4716</spage><epage>4724</epage><pages>4716-4724</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>Using a survey conducted during the 2013–2014 polio outbreak in Somalia, this study examines attitudinal and knowledge-based threats to oral polio vaccine acceptance and commitment. Findings address a key gap, as most prior research focuses on endemic settings.
Between November 19 and December 21, 2013, we conducted interviews among 2003 caregivers of children under 5 years in select districts at high risk for polio transmission. Within each district, sample was drawn via a multi-stage cluster design with random route household selection. We calculated the percentage of caregivers who could not confirm recent vaccination and those uncommitted to future vaccination. We compared these percentages among caregivers with varying knowledge and attitudes, focusing on variables identified as threats in endemic settings, using controlled and uncontrolled comparisons. We also examined absolute levels of threat variables.
Only 10% of caregivers could not confirm recent vaccination, but 32% were uncommitted to future vaccination. Being unvaccinated or uncommitted were related to multiple threat variables. For example, compared with relevant counterparts, caregivers were more likely to be unconfirmed and uncommitted if they did not trust vaccinators “a great deal” (unconfirmed: 9% vs. 2%; uncommitted: 49% vs. 28%), which is also true in endemic settings. Unlike endemic settings, symptom knowledge was related to commitment while rumor awareness was low and unrelated to past acceptance or commitment. Levels of trust and perceptions of OPV effectiveness were high, though perceptions of community support and awareness of logistics were lower.
As in endemic settings, outbreak responses will benefit from communications strategies focused on enhancing trust in vaccinators, institutions and the vaccine, alongside making community support visible. Disease facts may help motivate acceptance, and enhanced logistics information may help facilitate caregiver availability at the door. Quelling rumors early may be important to prevent them from becoming threats.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29958738</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.06.003</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2018-07, Vol.36 (31), p.4716-4724 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2062837309 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Caregivers Children Children & youth Communities Community Community involvement Disease transmission Field study Households Immunization Logistics Neighborhoods Outbreak Outbreaks Perceptions Polio Poliomyelitis Public health Questionnaires Route selection Somalia Trust Vaccination Vaccine Vaccines |
title | Threats to oral polio vaccine acceptance in Somalia: Polling in an outbreak |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T03%3A38%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Threats%20to%20oral%20polio%20vaccine%20acceptance%20in%20Somalia:%20Polling%20in%20an%20outbreak&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=SteelFisher,%20Gillian%20K.&rft.date=2018-07-25&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=31&rft.spage=4716&rft.epage=4724&rft.pages=4716-4724&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.06.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2063674655%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2063674655&rft_id=info:pmid/29958738&rft_els_id=S0264410X18308144&rfr_iscdi=true |