Biological complications of removable dental prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition: a systematic literature review
Objectives The aim of the present study was a systematic review and subsequent meta-analysis on biological complications of removable prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition. Materials and methods A systematic literature search in established medical databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, SciSea...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral investigations 2018-09, Vol.22 (7), p.2439-2461 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2461 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 2439 |
| container_title | Clinical oral investigations |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Moldovan, Ovidiu Rudolph, Heike Luthardt, Ralph G. |
| description | Objectives
The aim of the present study was a systematic review and subsequent meta-analysis on biological complications of removable prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition.
Materials and methods
A systematic literature search in established medical databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, SciSearch, Cochrane, FIZ Technik Web) and a hand search of relevant dental journals was conducted. The search terms were relevant MeSH terms, free search terms, and combinations of the two. The search included randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective studies with data on biological complications of removable dental prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition with at least 15 participants, an observation period of at least 2 years, and a drop-out rate of less than 25%. The selection of relevant publications was carried out at the title, abstract, and full-text level by at least two of the authors involved. The publications included were tabulated and analyzed.
Results
Of the original 12,994 matches, 1923 were analyzed by title, 650 by abstract, and 111 according to the full text. A total of 42 publications were ultimately included. The following parameters were evaluated.
Tooth loss
Results varied, depending on the observation period, between 0 and 18.1% for clasp-retained removable dental prostheses (RDPs), between 5.5 and 29% for attachment-retained RDPs, and between 5.5 and 51.7% for double crown-retained RDPs.
Caries
Results varied, depending on the observation period, between 0 and 32.7% for clasp-retained RDPs, between 1.8 and 29% for attachment-retained RDPs, and between 1.8 and 16.4% for double crown-retained RDPs.
Endodontic treatment
Results varied, depending on the observation period, between 3.5 and 19.2% for clasp-retained RDPs, between 6.9 and 16.4% for attachment-retained RDPs, and between 0.6 and 13.9% for double crown-retained RDPs.
Tooth fracture
Results varied, depending on the observation period, between 1.7 and 5.3% for clasp-retained RDPs, between 12.7 and 40% for attachment-retained RDPs, and between 0.4 and 4.4% for double crown-retained RDPs.
Tooth mobility
There were no changes or improvements for clasp-retained RDPs. The better the pre-treatment and supportive care is, the smaller the differences are. For double crown-retained RDPs, a slight increase was found in one study. The results for the parameters probing depth and radiological bone loss were inconclusive.
Gingival recession
Gingival recession seemed to be favored |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00784-018-2522-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2062835666</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2061699881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-947f3f8c1f2850579891d24cc2770ab57687b707097b54d78510e6ff8b1aeb9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1r1zAUxoMo7kU_gDcS8MabziRt87I7HW4TBt7odUjT05mRNv8l7Ubxy3u6_9xAkMDJA-d3nhzyEPKOsxPOmPpUsOimYlxXohWiWl-QQ97UsqqV4i8ftKik0fyAHJVywxhvpKpfkwNhTItHHpLfX0KK6Tp4F6lP4y6imkOaCk0DzTCmO9dFoD1MMxK7nMr8CwoUGiaKio6ph-xmiCvS_eKhf2DD5nFKHS1rmWFES09jmDd0yYDoXYD7N-TV4GKBt4_3Mfl5_vXH2WV19f3i29nnq8o3tZ4r06ihHrTng9Ata5XRhvei8V4oxVzXKqlVp5hiRnVt0yvdcgZyGHTHHXSmr4_Jx70vrn-7QJntGIqHGN0EaSlWMCl03UopEf3wD3qTljzhdhvFpTFac6T4nvL4HyXDYHc5jC6vljO7JWP3yVhMxm7J2BVn3j86L90I_dPE3ygQEHugYGu6hvz89P9d_wC695tf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2061699881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biological complications of removable dental prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition: a systematic literature review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>Moldovan, Ovidiu ; Rudolph, Heike ; Luthardt, Ralph G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moldovan, Ovidiu ; Rudolph, Heike ; Luthardt, Ralph G.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
The aim of the present study was a systematic review and subsequent meta-analysis on biological complications of removable prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition.
Materials and methods
A systematic literature search in established medical databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, SciSearch, Cochrane, FIZ Technik Web) and a hand search of relevant dental journals was conducted. The search terms were relevant MeSH terms, free search terms, and combinations of the two. The search included randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective studies with data on biological complications of removable dental prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition with at least 15 participants, an observation period of at least 2 years, and a drop-out rate of less than 25%. The selection of relevant publications was carried out at the title, abstract, and full-text level by at least two of the authors involved. The publications included were tabulated and analyzed.
Results
Of the original 12,994 matches, 1923 were analyzed by title, 650 by abstract, and 111 according to the full text. A total of 42 publications were ultimately included. The following parameters were evaluated.
Tooth loss
Results varied, depending on the observation period, between 0 and 18.1% for clasp-retained removable dental prostheses (RDPs), between 5.5 and 29% for attachment-retained RDPs, and between 5.5 and 51.7% for double crown-retained RDPs.
Caries
Results varied, depending on the observation period, between 0 and 32.7% for clasp-retained RDPs, between 1.8 and 29% for attachment-retained RDPs, and between 1.8 and 16.4% for double crown-retained RDPs.
Endodontic treatment
Results varied, depending on the observation period, between 3.5 and 19.2% for clasp-retained RDPs, between 6.9 and 16.4% for attachment-retained RDPs, and between 0.6 and 13.9% for double crown-retained RDPs.
Tooth fracture
Results varied, depending on the observation period, between 1.7 and 5.3% for clasp-retained RDPs, between 12.7 and 40% for attachment-retained RDPs, and between 0.4 and 4.4% for double crown-retained RDPs.
Tooth mobility
There were no changes or improvements for clasp-retained RDPs. The better the pre-treatment and supportive care is, the smaller the differences are. For double crown-retained RDPs, a slight increase was found in one study. The results for the parameters probing depth and radiological bone loss were inconclusive.
Gingival recession
Gingival recession seemed to be favored by a mandibular sublingual bar. Compared to fixed restorations, removable restorations seemed to be associated with a more pronounced need for dental treatment. Stringent pre-treatment and supportive care reduced the complication rates.
Conclusions
Heterogeneous study designs and data analyses rendered a meta-analysis impossible, so that an evaluation at the highest level of evidence could not be performed.
Clinical relevance
Within the limitations of this study, it would be correct to state that removable dental prostheses require intensive maintenance. Suitable pre-treatment and supportive care can lower the complication rates, in the absence of which they constitute trigger factors for (additional) biological complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-6981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-3771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2522-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29959596</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Bone loss ; Clinical trials ; Data processing ; Dental caries ; Dental crowns ; Dental implants ; Dental Prosthesis Retention ; Dental prosthetics ; Dentistry ; Dentition ; Denture, Partial, Removable - adverse effects ; Endodontics ; Humans ; Jaw, Edentulous, Partially ; Literature reviews ; Mandible ; Medicine ; Meta-analysis ; Prostheses ; Review ; Systematic review ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral investigations, 2018-09, Vol.22 (7), p.2439-2461</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Clinical Oral Investigations is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-947f3f8c1f2850579891d24cc2770ab57687b707097b54d78510e6ff8b1aeb9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-947f3f8c1f2850579891d24cc2770ab57687b707097b54d78510e6ff8b1aeb9d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6898-5377</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00784-018-2522-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00784-018-2522-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29959596$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moldovan, Ovidiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudolph, Heike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luthardt, Ralph G.</creatorcontrib><title>Biological complications of removable dental prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition: a systematic literature review</title><title>Clinical oral investigations</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Invest</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><description>Objectives
The aim of the present study was a systematic review and subsequent meta-analysis on biological complications of removable prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition.
Materials and methods
A systematic literature search in established medical databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, SciSearch, Cochrane, FIZ Technik Web) and a hand search of relevant dental journals was conducted. The search terms were relevant MeSH terms, free search terms, and combinations of the two. The search included randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective studies with data on biological complications of removable dental prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition with at least 15 participants, an observation period of at least 2 years, and a drop-out rate of less than 25%. The selection of relevant publications was carried out at the title, abstract, and full-text level by at least two of the authors involved. The publications included were tabulated and analyzed.
Results
Of the original 12,994 matches, 1923 were analyzed by title, 650 by abstract, and 111 according to the full text. A total of 42 publications were ultimately included. The following parameters were evaluated.
Tooth loss
Results varied, depending on the observation period, between 0 and 18.1% for clasp-retained removable dental prostheses (RDPs), between 5.5 and 29% for attachment-retained RDPs, and between 5.5 and 51.7% for double crown-retained RDPs.
Caries
Results varied, depending on the observation period, between 0 and 32.7% for clasp-retained RDPs, between 1.8 and 29% for attachment-retained RDPs, and between 1.8 and 16.4% for double crown-retained RDPs.
Endodontic treatment
Results varied, depending on the observation period, between 3.5 and 19.2% for clasp-retained RDPs, between 6.9 and 16.4% for attachment-retained RDPs, and between 0.6 and 13.9% for double crown-retained RDPs.
Tooth fracture
Results varied, depending on the observation period, between 1.7 and 5.3% for clasp-retained RDPs, between 12.7 and 40% for attachment-retained RDPs, and between 0.4 and 4.4% for double crown-retained RDPs.
Tooth mobility
There were no changes or improvements for clasp-retained RDPs. The better the pre-treatment and supportive care is, the smaller the differences are. For double crown-retained RDPs, a slight increase was found in one study. The results for the parameters probing depth and radiological bone loss were inconclusive.
Gingival recession
Gingival recession seemed to be favored by a mandibular sublingual bar. Compared to fixed restorations, removable restorations seemed to be associated with a more pronounced need for dental treatment. Stringent pre-treatment and supportive care reduced the complication rates.
Conclusions
Heterogeneous study designs and data analyses rendered a meta-analysis impossible, so that an evaluation at the highest level of evidence could not be performed.
Clinical relevance
Within the limitations of this study, it would be correct to state that removable dental prostheses require intensive maintenance. Suitable pre-treatment and supportive care can lower the complication rates, in the absence of which they constitute trigger factors for (additional) biological complications.</description><subject>Bone loss</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Dental caries</subject><subject>Dental crowns</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Retention</subject><subject>Dental prosthetics</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dentition</subject><subject>Denture, Partial, Removable - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endodontics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>1432-6981</issn><issn>1436-3771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1r1zAUxoMo7kU_gDcS8MabziRt87I7HW4TBt7odUjT05mRNv8l7Ubxy3u6_9xAkMDJA-d3nhzyEPKOsxPOmPpUsOimYlxXohWiWl-QQ97UsqqV4i8ftKik0fyAHJVywxhvpKpfkwNhTItHHpLfX0KK6Tp4F6lP4y6imkOaCk0DzTCmO9dFoD1MMxK7nMr8CwoUGiaKio6ph-xmiCvS_eKhf2DD5nFKHS1rmWFES09jmDd0yYDoXYD7N-TV4GKBt4_3Mfl5_vXH2WV19f3i29nnq8o3tZ4r06ihHrTng9Ata5XRhvei8V4oxVzXKqlVp5hiRnVt0yvdcgZyGHTHHXSmr4_Jx70vrn-7QJntGIqHGN0EaSlWMCl03UopEf3wD3qTljzhdhvFpTFac6T4nvL4HyXDYHc5jC6vljO7JWP3yVhMxm7J2BVn3j86L90I_dPE3ygQEHugYGu6hvz89P9d_wC695tf</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Moldovan, Ovidiu</creator><creator>Rudolph, Heike</creator><creator>Luthardt, Ralph G.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6898-5377</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Biological complications of removable dental prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition: a systematic literature review</title><author>Moldovan, Ovidiu ; Rudolph, Heike ; Luthardt, Ralph G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-947f3f8c1f2850579891d24cc2770ab57687b707097b54d78510e6ff8b1aeb9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bone loss</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Dental caries</topic><topic>Dental crowns</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Retention</topic><topic>Dental prosthetics</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dentition</topic><topic>Denture, Partial, Removable - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endodontics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moldovan, Ovidiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudolph, Heike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luthardt, Ralph G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Health & Medical Complete</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moldovan, Ovidiu</au><au>Rudolph, Heike</au><au>Luthardt, Ralph G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biological complications of removable dental prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition: a systematic literature review</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle><stitle>Clin Oral Invest</stitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2439</spage><epage>2461</epage><pages>2439-2461</pages><issn>1432-6981</issn><eissn>1436-3771</eissn><abstract>Objectives
The aim of the present study was a systematic review and subsequent meta-analysis on biological complications of removable prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition.
Materials and methods
A systematic literature search in established medical databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, SciSearch, Cochrane, FIZ Technik Web) and a hand search of relevant dental journals was conducted. The search terms were relevant MeSH terms, free search terms, and combinations of the two. The search included randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective studies with data on biological complications of removable dental prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition with at least 15 participants, an observation period of at least 2 years, and a drop-out rate of less than 25%. The selection of relevant publications was carried out at the title, abstract, and full-text level by at least two of the authors involved. The publications included were tabulated and analyzed.
Results
Of the original 12,994 matches, 1923 were analyzed by title, 650 by abstract, and 111 according to the full text. A total of 42 publications were ultimately included. The following parameters were evaluated.
Tooth loss
Results varied, depending on the observation period, between 0 and 18.1% for clasp-retained removable dental prostheses (RDPs), between 5.5 and 29% for attachment-retained RDPs, and between 5.5 and 51.7% for double crown-retained RDPs.
Caries
Results varied, depending on the observation period, between 0 and 32.7% for clasp-retained RDPs, between 1.8 and 29% for attachment-retained RDPs, and between 1.8 and 16.4% for double crown-retained RDPs.
Endodontic treatment
Results varied, depending on the observation period, between 3.5 and 19.2% for clasp-retained RDPs, between 6.9 and 16.4% for attachment-retained RDPs, and between 0.6 and 13.9% for double crown-retained RDPs.
Tooth fracture
Results varied, depending on the observation period, between 1.7 and 5.3% for clasp-retained RDPs, between 12.7 and 40% for attachment-retained RDPs, and between 0.4 and 4.4% for double crown-retained RDPs.
Tooth mobility
There were no changes or improvements for clasp-retained RDPs. The better the pre-treatment and supportive care is, the smaller the differences are. For double crown-retained RDPs, a slight increase was found in one study. The results for the parameters probing depth and radiological bone loss were inconclusive.
Gingival recession
Gingival recession seemed to be favored by a mandibular sublingual bar. Compared to fixed restorations, removable restorations seemed to be associated with a more pronounced need for dental treatment. Stringent pre-treatment and supportive care reduced the complication rates.
Conclusions
Heterogeneous study designs and data analyses rendered a meta-analysis impossible, so that an evaluation at the highest level of evidence could not be performed.
Clinical relevance
Within the limitations of this study, it would be correct to state that removable dental prostheses require intensive maintenance. Suitable pre-treatment and supportive care can lower the complication rates, in the absence of which they constitute trigger factors for (additional) biological complications.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>29959596</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00784-018-2522-y</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6898-5377</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1432-6981 |
| ispartof | Clinical oral investigations, 2018-09, Vol.22 (7), p.2439-2461 |
| issn | 1432-6981 1436-3771 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2062835666 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink (Online service) |
| subjects | Bone loss Clinical trials Data processing Dental caries Dental crowns Dental implants Dental Prosthesis Retention Dental prosthetics Dentistry Dentition Denture, Partial, Removable - adverse effects Endodontics Humans Jaw, Edentulous, Partially Literature reviews Mandible Medicine Meta-analysis Prostheses Review Systematic review Teeth |
| title | Biological complications of removable dental prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition: a systematic literature review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T07%3A08%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biological%20complications%20of%20removable%20dental%20prostheses%20in%20the%20moderately%20reduced%20dentition:%20a%20systematic%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20investigations&rft.au=Moldovan,%20Ovidiu&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2439&rft.epage=2461&rft.pages=2439-2461&rft.issn=1432-6981&rft.eissn=1436-3771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00784-018-2522-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2061699881%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2061699881&rft_id=info:pmid/29959596&rfr_iscdi=true |