An overview of results from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project

The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) collects output from global coupled ocean–atmosphere general circulation models (coupled GCMs). Among other uses, such models are employed both to detect anthropogenic effects in the climate record of the past century and to project future climatic ch...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global and planetary change 2003-06, Vol.37 (1), p.103-133
Hauptverfasser: Covey, Curt, AchutaRao, Krishna M., Cubasch, Ulrich, Jones, Phil, Lambert, Steven J., Mann, Michael E., Phillips, Thomas J., Taylor, Karl E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 133
container_issue 1
container_start_page 103
container_title Global and planetary change
container_volume 37
creator Covey, Curt
AchutaRao, Krishna M.
Cubasch, Ulrich
Jones, Phil
Lambert, Steven J.
Mann, Michael E.
Phillips, Thomas J.
Taylor, Karl E.
description The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) collects output from global coupled ocean–atmosphere general circulation models (coupled GCMs). Among other uses, such models are employed both to detect anthropogenic effects in the climate record of the past century and to project future climatic changes due to human production of greenhouse gases and aerosols. CMIP has archived output from both constant forcing (“control run”) and perturbed (1% per year increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide) simulations. This report summarizes results form 18 CMIP models. A third of the models refrain from employing ad hoc flux adjustments at the ocean–atmosphere interface. The new generation of non-flux-adjusted control runs are nearly as stable as—and agree with observations nearly as well as—the flux-adjusted models. Both flux-adjusted and non-flux-adjusted models simulate an overall level of natural internal climate variability that is within the bounds set by observations. These developments represent significant progress in the state of the art of climate modeling since the Second (1995) Scientific Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC; see Gates et al. [Gates, W.L., et al., 1996. Climate models—Evaluation. Climate Climate 1995: The Science of Climate Change, Houghton, J.T., et al. (Eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 229–284]). In the increasing-CO 2 runs, differences between different models, while substantial, are not as great as one might expect from earlier assessments that relied on equilibrium climate sensitivity.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0921-8181(02)00193-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20611889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0921818102001935</els_id><sourcerecordid>20611889</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a510t-d3642df0b19d8d4a384854f004e24382d2792e22261cd08eb282c6f7dc01fc5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AURQdRsFZ_gjAr0UX0zctHJysppWqhoqCuh3TmDaYkmTiTVPz3pq247eptzr3cdxi7FHArQGR3b5CjiKSQ4hrwBkDkcZQesZGQE4yyOEuO2egfOWVnIawHaAKIIzafNtxtyG9K-ubOck-hr7rArXc17z6Jz1zfVmT4szNU8UXTkdeubgtfBtfwV-_WpLtzdmKLKtDF3x2zj4f5--wpWr48LmbTZVSkArrIDFvQWFiJ3EiTFLFMZJpYgIQwiSUanORIiJgJbUDSCiXqzE6MBmF1SvGYXe17W---egqdqsugqaqKhlwfFEImhJT5QVAkWZbLGAcw3YPauxA8WdX6si78jxKgtnbVzq7aqlOAamdXpUPufp-j4d1BnldBl9RoMqUfhCjjygMNvw5dgJY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14669832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An overview of results from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Covey, Curt ; AchutaRao, Krishna M. ; Cubasch, Ulrich ; Jones, Phil ; Lambert, Steven J. ; Mann, Michael E. ; Phillips, Thomas J. ; Taylor, Karl E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Covey, Curt ; AchutaRao, Krishna M. ; Cubasch, Ulrich ; Jones, Phil ; Lambert, Steven J. ; Mann, Michael E. ; Phillips, Thomas J. ; Taylor, Karl E.</creatorcontrib><description>The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) collects output from global coupled ocean–atmosphere general circulation models (coupled GCMs). Among other uses, such models are employed both to detect anthropogenic effects in the climate record of the past century and to project future climatic changes due to human production of greenhouse gases and aerosols. CMIP has archived output from both constant forcing (“control run”) and perturbed (1% per year increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide) simulations. This report summarizes results form 18 CMIP models. A third of the models refrain from employing ad hoc flux adjustments at the ocean–atmosphere interface. The new generation of non-flux-adjusted control runs are nearly as stable as—and agree with observations nearly as well as—the flux-adjusted models. Both flux-adjusted and non-flux-adjusted models simulate an overall level of natural internal climate variability that is within the bounds set by observations. These developments represent significant progress in the state of the art of climate modeling since the Second (1995) Scientific Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC; see Gates et al. [Gates, W.L., et al., 1996. Climate models—Evaluation. Climate Climate 1995: The Science of Climate Change, Houghton, J.T., et al. (Eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 229–284]). In the increasing-CO 2 runs, differences between different models, while substantial, are not as great as one might expect from earlier assessments that relied on equilibrium climate sensitivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-8181</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6364</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8181(02)00193-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>climate ; CMIP ; GCM</subject><ispartof>Global and planetary change, 2003-06, Vol.37 (1), p.103-133</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a510t-d3642df0b19d8d4a384854f004e24382d2792e22261cd08eb282c6f7dc01fc5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a510t-d3642df0b19d8d4a384854f004e24382d2792e22261cd08eb282c6f7dc01fc5e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(02)00193-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3554,27933,27934,46004</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Covey, Curt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AchutaRao, Krishna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cubasch, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Phil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mann, Michael E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Karl E.</creatorcontrib><title>An overview of results from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project</title><title>Global and planetary change</title><description>The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) collects output from global coupled ocean–atmosphere general circulation models (coupled GCMs). Among other uses, such models are employed both to detect anthropogenic effects in the climate record of the past century and to project future climatic changes due to human production of greenhouse gases and aerosols. CMIP has archived output from both constant forcing (“control run”) and perturbed (1% per year increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide) simulations. This report summarizes results form 18 CMIP models. A third of the models refrain from employing ad hoc flux adjustments at the ocean–atmosphere interface. The new generation of non-flux-adjusted control runs are nearly as stable as—and agree with observations nearly as well as—the flux-adjusted models. Both flux-adjusted and non-flux-adjusted models simulate an overall level of natural internal climate variability that is within the bounds set by observations. These developments represent significant progress in the state of the art of climate modeling since the Second (1995) Scientific Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC; see Gates et al. [Gates, W.L., et al., 1996. Climate models—Evaluation. Climate Climate 1995: The Science of Climate Change, Houghton, J.T., et al. (Eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 229–284]). In the increasing-CO 2 runs, differences between different models, while substantial, are not as great as one might expect from earlier assessments that relied on equilibrium climate sensitivity.</description><subject>climate</subject><subject>CMIP</subject><subject>GCM</subject><issn>0921-8181</issn><issn>1872-6364</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AURQdRsFZ_gjAr0UX0zctHJysppWqhoqCuh3TmDaYkmTiTVPz3pq247eptzr3cdxi7FHArQGR3b5CjiKSQ4hrwBkDkcZQesZGQE4yyOEuO2egfOWVnIawHaAKIIzafNtxtyG9K-ubOck-hr7rArXc17z6Jz1zfVmT4szNU8UXTkdeubgtfBtfwV-_WpLtzdmKLKtDF3x2zj4f5--wpWr48LmbTZVSkArrIDFvQWFiJ3EiTFLFMZJpYgIQwiSUanORIiJgJbUDSCiXqzE6MBmF1SvGYXe17W---egqdqsugqaqKhlwfFEImhJT5QVAkWZbLGAcw3YPauxA8WdX6si78jxKgtnbVzq7aqlOAamdXpUPufp-j4d1BnldBl9RoMqUfhCjjygMNvw5dgJY</recordid><startdate>20030610</startdate><enddate>20030610</enddate><creator>Covey, Curt</creator><creator>AchutaRao, Krishna M.</creator><creator>Cubasch, Ulrich</creator><creator>Jones, Phil</creator><creator>Lambert, Steven J.</creator><creator>Mann, Michael E.</creator><creator>Phillips, Thomas J.</creator><creator>Taylor, Karl E.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030610</creationdate><title>An overview of results from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project</title><author>Covey, Curt ; AchutaRao, Krishna M. ; Cubasch, Ulrich ; Jones, Phil ; Lambert, Steven J. ; Mann, Michael E. ; Phillips, Thomas J. ; Taylor, Karl E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a510t-d3642df0b19d8d4a384854f004e24382d2792e22261cd08eb282c6f7dc01fc5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>climate</topic><topic>CMIP</topic><topic>GCM</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Covey, Curt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AchutaRao, Krishna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cubasch, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Phil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mann, Michael E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Karl E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Global and planetary change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Covey, Curt</au><au>AchutaRao, Krishna M.</au><au>Cubasch, Ulrich</au><au>Jones, Phil</au><au>Lambert, Steven J.</au><au>Mann, Michael E.</au><au>Phillips, Thomas J.</au><au>Taylor, Karl E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An overview of results from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project</atitle><jtitle>Global and planetary change</jtitle><date>2003-06-10</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>133</epage><pages>103-133</pages><issn>0921-8181</issn><eissn>1872-6364</eissn><abstract>The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) collects output from global coupled ocean–atmosphere general circulation models (coupled GCMs). Among other uses, such models are employed both to detect anthropogenic effects in the climate record of the past century and to project future climatic changes due to human production of greenhouse gases and aerosols. CMIP has archived output from both constant forcing (“control run”) and perturbed (1% per year increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide) simulations. This report summarizes results form 18 CMIP models. A third of the models refrain from employing ad hoc flux adjustments at the ocean–atmosphere interface. The new generation of non-flux-adjusted control runs are nearly as stable as—and agree with observations nearly as well as—the flux-adjusted models. Both flux-adjusted and non-flux-adjusted models simulate an overall level of natural internal climate variability that is within the bounds set by observations. These developments represent significant progress in the state of the art of climate modeling since the Second (1995) Scientific Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC; see Gates et al. [Gates, W.L., et al., 1996. Climate models—Evaluation. Climate Climate 1995: The Science of Climate Change, Houghton, J.T., et al. (Eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 229–284]). In the increasing-CO 2 runs, differences between different models, while substantial, are not as great as one might expect from earlier assessments that relied on equilibrium climate sensitivity.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0921-8181(02)00193-5</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-8181
ispartof Global and planetary change, 2003-06, Vol.37 (1), p.103-133
issn 0921-8181
1872-6364
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20611889
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects climate
CMIP
GCM
title An overview of results from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T00%3A07%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20overview%20of%20results%20from%20the%20Coupled%20Model%20Intercomparison%20Project&rft.jtitle=Global%20and%20planetary%20change&rft.au=Covey,%20Curt&rft.date=2003-06-10&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=133&rft.pages=103-133&rft.issn=0921-8181&rft.eissn=1872-6364&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0921-8181(02)00193-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20611889%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14669832&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0921818102001935&rfr_iscdi=true