How do local habitat management and landscape structure at different spatial scales affect fritillary butterfly distribution on fragmented wetlands

Habitat fragmentation, patch quality and landscape structure are important predictors for species richness. However, conservation strategies targeting single species mainly focus on habitat patches and neglect possible effects of the surrounding landscape. This project assesses the impact of managem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Landscape ecology 2008-03, Vol.23 (3), p.269-283
Hauptverfasser: Cozzi, Gabriele, Müller, Christine B, Krauss, Jochen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 283
container_issue 3
container_start_page 269
container_title Landscape ecology
container_volume 23
creator Cozzi, Gabriele
Müller, Christine B
Krauss, Jochen
description Habitat fragmentation, patch quality and landscape structure are important predictors for species richness. However, conservation strategies targeting single species mainly focus on habitat patches and neglect possible effects of the surrounding landscape. This project assesses the impact of management, habitat fragmentation and landscape structure at different spatial scales on the distribution of three endangered butterfly species, Boloria selene, Boloria titania and Brenthis ino. We selected 36 study sites in the Swiss Alps differing in (1) the proportion of suitable habitat (i.e., wetlands); (2) the proportion of potential dispersal barriers (forest) in the surrounding landscape; (3) altitude; (4) habitat area and (5) management (mowing versus grazing). Three surveys per study site were conducted during the adult flight period to estimate occurrence and density of each species. For the best disperser B. selene the probability of occurrence was positively related to increasing proportion of wetland on a large spatial scale (radius: 4,000 m), for the medium disperser B. ino on an intermediate spatial scale (2,000 m) and for the poorest disperser B. titania on a small spatial scale (1,000 m). Nearby forest did not negatively affect butterfly species distribution but instead enhanced the probability of occurrence and the population density of B. titania. The fen-specialist B. selene had a higher probability of occurrence and higher population densities on grazed compared to mown fens. The altitude of the habitat patches affected the occurrence of the three species and increasing habitat area enhanced the probability of occurrence of B. selene and B. ino. We conclude that, the surrounding landscape is of relevance for species distribution, but management and habitat fragmentation are often more important. We suggest that butterfly conservation should not focus only on a patch scale, but also on a landscape scale, taking into account species-specific dispersal abilities.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10980-007-9178-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20602550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20602550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-8cb7f116f173c3155062ccb31e459bfd0557f965ad12363a43b2e931db563e2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd9uFSEQxjdGE4_VB_BKYqJ3qwMcYLk0TbVNmnihvSYsOxxp9uwegU3T5_CFnXUbTbxowp8Bft_HwDTNaw4fOID5WDjYDloKW8tN18onzY4rI1prNH_a7MAK3gpr5PPmRSm3ACAlwK75dTnfsWFm4xz8yH74PlVf2dFP_oBHnCrz08BGGkrwJ2Sl5iXUJSMjakgxYl6hcvI1kZ6gEQvztB8qiznVNI4-37N-qRVzHO9JRB6J1mmeGLWY_WG9CAd2h_XPTS-bZ9GPBV89zGfNzeeL7-eX7fXXL1fnn67bsNe6tl3oTeRcR25kkFwp0CKEXnLcK9vHAZQy0WrlBy6kln4ve4FW8qFXWqJAeda833xPef65YKnumEpAynjCeSlOgAZBtgS-_Q-8nZc8UW5OcG2oa0MQ36CQ51IyRnfK6UiPdxzcWiO31cit4VojJ0nz7sHYr19HfzGFVP4KBQjYW9sRJzau0NF0wPwvgcfM32yi6GfnD5mMb74J4FT3zigLQv4GIE-tLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216721667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How do local habitat management and landscape structure at different spatial scales affect fritillary butterfly distribution on fragmented wetlands</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Cozzi, Gabriele ; Müller, Christine B ; Krauss, Jochen</creator><creatorcontrib>Cozzi, Gabriele ; Müller, Christine B ; Krauss, Jochen</creatorcontrib><description>Habitat fragmentation, patch quality and landscape structure are important predictors for species richness. However, conservation strategies targeting single species mainly focus on habitat patches and neglect possible effects of the surrounding landscape. This project assesses the impact of management, habitat fragmentation and landscape structure at different spatial scales on the distribution of three endangered butterfly species, Boloria selene, Boloria titania and Brenthis ino. We selected 36 study sites in the Swiss Alps differing in (1) the proportion of suitable habitat (i.e., wetlands); (2) the proportion of potential dispersal barriers (forest) in the surrounding landscape; (3) altitude; (4) habitat area and (5) management (mowing versus grazing). Three surveys per study site were conducted during the adult flight period to estimate occurrence and density of each species. For the best disperser B. selene the probability of occurrence was positively related to increasing proportion of wetland on a large spatial scale (radius: 4,000 m), for the medium disperser B. ino on an intermediate spatial scale (2,000 m) and for the poorest disperser B. titania on a small spatial scale (1,000 m). Nearby forest did not negatively affect butterfly species distribution but instead enhanced the probability of occurrence and the population density of B. titania. The fen-specialist B. selene had a higher probability of occurrence and higher population densities on grazed compared to mown fens. The altitude of the habitat patches affected the occurrence of the three species and increasing habitat area enhanced the probability of occurrence of B. selene and B. ino. We conclude that, the surrounding landscape is of relevance for species distribution, but management and habitat fragmentation are often more important. We suggest that butterfly conservation should not focus only on a patch scale, but also on a landscape scale, taking into account species-specific dispersal abilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-2973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9761</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10980-007-9178-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Altitude ; Animal populations ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Boloria selene ; Boloria titania ; Brenthis ino ; Butterflies &amp; moths ; Ecology ; Endangered species ; Environmental Management ; Fens ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Habitat fragmentation ; Habitats ; Insecta ; Invertebrates ; Landscape ; Landscape Ecology ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; Life Sciences ; Nature Conservation ; Population density ; Research Article ; Selene ; Species richness ; Sustainable Development ; Wetlands ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Landscape ecology, 2008-03, Vol.23 (3), p.269-283</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-8cb7f116f173c3155062ccb31e459bfd0557f965ad12363a43b2e931db563e2e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-8cb7f116f173c3155062ccb31e459bfd0557f965ad12363a43b2e931db563e2e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10980-007-9178-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10980-007-9178-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20204998$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cozzi, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Christine B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krauss, Jochen</creatorcontrib><title>How do local habitat management and landscape structure at different spatial scales affect fritillary butterfly distribution on fragmented wetlands</title><title>Landscape ecology</title><addtitle>Landscape Ecol</addtitle><description>Habitat fragmentation, patch quality and landscape structure are important predictors for species richness. However, conservation strategies targeting single species mainly focus on habitat patches and neglect possible effects of the surrounding landscape. This project assesses the impact of management, habitat fragmentation and landscape structure at different spatial scales on the distribution of three endangered butterfly species, Boloria selene, Boloria titania and Brenthis ino. We selected 36 study sites in the Swiss Alps differing in (1) the proportion of suitable habitat (i.e., wetlands); (2) the proportion of potential dispersal barriers (forest) in the surrounding landscape; (3) altitude; (4) habitat area and (5) management (mowing versus grazing). Three surveys per study site were conducted during the adult flight period to estimate occurrence and density of each species. For the best disperser B. selene the probability of occurrence was positively related to increasing proportion of wetland on a large spatial scale (radius: 4,000 m), for the medium disperser B. ino on an intermediate spatial scale (2,000 m) and for the poorest disperser B. titania on a small spatial scale (1,000 m). Nearby forest did not negatively affect butterfly species distribution but instead enhanced the probability of occurrence and the population density of B. titania. The fen-specialist B. selene had a higher probability of occurrence and higher population densities on grazed compared to mown fens. The altitude of the habitat patches affected the occurrence of the three species and increasing habitat area enhanced the probability of occurrence of B. selene and B. ino. We conclude that, the surrounding landscape is of relevance for species distribution, but management and habitat fragmentation are often more important. We suggest that butterfly conservation should not focus only on a patch scale, but also on a landscape scale, taking into account species-specific dispersal abilities.</description><subject>Altitude</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Boloria selene</subject><subject>Boloria titania</subject><subject>Brenthis ino</subject><subject>Butterflies &amp; moths</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Fens</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Insecta</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Landscape Ecology</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Selene</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0921-2973</issn><issn>1572-9761</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd9uFSEQxjdGE4_VB_BKYqJ3qwMcYLk0TbVNmnihvSYsOxxp9uwegU3T5_CFnXUbTbxowp8Bft_HwDTNaw4fOID5WDjYDloKW8tN18onzY4rI1prNH_a7MAK3gpr5PPmRSm3ACAlwK75dTnfsWFm4xz8yH74PlVf2dFP_oBHnCrz08BGGkrwJ2Sl5iXUJSMjakgxYl6hcvI1kZ6gEQvztB8qiznVNI4-37N-qRVzHO9JRB6J1mmeGLWY_WG9CAd2h_XPTS-bZ9GPBV89zGfNzeeL7-eX7fXXL1fnn67bsNe6tl3oTeRcR25kkFwp0CKEXnLcK9vHAZQy0WrlBy6kln4ve4FW8qFXWqJAeda833xPef65YKnumEpAynjCeSlOgAZBtgS-_Q-8nZc8UW5OcG2oa0MQ36CQ51IyRnfK6UiPdxzcWiO31cit4VojJ0nz7sHYr19HfzGFVP4KBQjYW9sRJzau0NF0wPwvgcfM32yi6GfnD5mMb74J4FT3zigLQv4GIE-tLA</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Cozzi, Gabriele</creator><creator>Müller, Christine B</creator><creator>Krauss, Jochen</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>How do local habitat management and landscape structure at different spatial scales affect fritillary butterfly distribution on fragmented wetlands</title><author>Cozzi, Gabriele ; Müller, Christine B ; Krauss, Jochen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-8cb7f116f173c3155062ccb31e459bfd0557f965ad12363a43b2e931db563e2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Altitude</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Boloria selene</topic><topic>Boloria titania</topic><topic>Brenthis ino</topic><topic>Butterflies &amp; moths</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Fens</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Insecta</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Landscape Ecology</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Selene</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cozzi, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Christine B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krauss, Jochen</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cozzi, Gabriele</au><au>Müller, Christine B</au><au>Krauss, Jochen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How do local habitat management and landscape structure at different spatial scales affect fritillary butterfly distribution on fragmented wetlands</atitle><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle><stitle>Landscape Ecol</stitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>283</epage><pages>269-283</pages><issn>0921-2973</issn><eissn>1572-9761</eissn><abstract>Habitat fragmentation, patch quality and landscape structure are important predictors for species richness. However, conservation strategies targeting single species mainly focus on habitat patches and neglect possible effects of the surrounding landscape. This project assesses the impact of management, habitat fragmentation and landscape structure at different spatial scales on the distribution of three endangered butterfly species, Boloria selene, Boloria titania and Brenthis ino. We selected 36 study sites in the Swiss Alps differing in (1) the proportion of suitable habitat (i.e., wetlands); (2) the proportion of potential dispersal barriers (forest) in the surrounding landscape; (3) altitude; (4) habitat area and (5) management (mowing versus grazing). Three surveys per study site were conducted during the adult flight period to estimate occurrence and density of each species. For the best disperser B. selene the probability of occurrence was positively related to increasing proportion of wetland on a large spatial scale (radius: 4,000 m), for the medium disperser B. ino on an intermediate spatial scale (2,000 m) and for the poorest disperser B. titania on a small spatial scale (1,000 m). Nearby forest did not negatively affect butterfly species distribution but instead enhanced the probability of occurrence and the population density of B. titania. The fen-specialist B. selene had a higher probability of occurrence and higher population densities on grazed compared to mown fens. The altitude of the habitat patches affected the occurrence of the three species and increasing habitat area enhanced the probability of occurrence of B. selene and B. ino. We conclude that, the surrounding landscape is of relevance for species distribution, but management and habitat fragmentation are often more important. We suggest that butterfly conservation should not focus only on a patch scale, but also on a landscape scale, taking into account species-specific dispersal abilities.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10980-007-9178-3</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-2973
ispartof Landscape ecology, 2008-03, Vol.23 (3), p.269-283
issn 0921-2973
1572-9761
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20602550
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Altitude
Animal populations
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Boloria selene
Boloria titania
Brenthis ino
Butterflies & moths
Ecology
Endangered species
Environmental Management
Fens
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Habitat fragmentation
Habitats
Insecta
Invertebrates
Landscape
Landscape Ecology
Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning
Life Sciences
Nature Conservation
Population density
Research Article
Selene
Species richness
Sustainable Development
Wetlands
Wildlife conservation
Wildlife management
title How do local habitat management and landscape structure at different spatial scales affect fritillary butterfly distribution on fragmented wetlands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T15%3A34%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20do%20local%20habitat%20management%20and%20landscape%20structure%20at%20different%20spatial%20scales%20affect%20fritillary%20butterfly%20distribution%20on%20fragmented%20wetlands&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20ecology&rft.au=Cozzi,%20Gabriele&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=283&rft.pages=269-283&rft.issn=0921-2973&rft.eissn=1572-9761&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10980-007-9178-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20602550%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216721667&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true