Role of organic and conventional field boundaries on boreal bumblebees and butterflies
This study examined how field boundary habitat quality and farming system (organic or conventional) affect species richness and abundance of diurnal lepidopterans and bumblebees in boreal agricultural landscapes. The results showed positive effects of field boundary area on lepidopteran diversity, a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Agriculture, ecosystems & environment ecosystems & environment, 2008-04, Vol.124 (3), p.155-159 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 159 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 155 |
| container_title | Agriculture, ecosystems & environment |
| container_volume | 124 |
| creator | Ekroos, Johan Piha, Markus Tiainen, Juha |
| description | This study examined how field boundary habitat quality and farming system (organic or conventional) affect species richness and abundance of diurnal lepidopterans and bumblebees in boreal agricultural landscapes. The results showed positive effects of field boundary area on lepidopteran diversity, as well as positive effects of nectar flower abundance on lepidopterans and bumblebee abundance. Organic farming did not show any significant effects on lepidopteran diversity. The results suggested that a successful conservation strategy for lepidopterans occurring in boreal agroecosystems depend on proper management of field boundaries, irrespective of farming regime. As bumblebee diversity tended to be higher at organic plots it is concluded that these important pollinators might be able to react on even small changes in habitat quality of cultivated lands. The results concord with a general hypothesis that effects of organic farming might be overpowered by effects of landscape structure in heterogeneous landscapes. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.agee.2007.09.003 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20598458</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167880907002320</els_id><sourcerecordid>14861015</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-ac67a8510b08368b85897a68c93b35252425218b97dbc20cb86111a0e23882e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1rHSEUhqWk0Jvb_oFuOptkN9OjzocD2YTQLwgU2qZbUedM8OLVVGcC_fc9ww1dJoLI0ed9Pb4y9p5Dw4H3Hw-NuUdsBMDQwNgAyFdsx9UgayGhO2M7goZaKRjfsPNSDkBDSLVjv3-kgFWaq5TvTfSuMnGqXIqPGBefognV7DFMlU1rnEz2WKoUqcpIR3Y92oAWaXOT2XVZMM-BoLfs9WxCwXdP657dff706-Zrffv9y7eb69vatbxfauP6waiOgwUle2VVp8bB9MqN0spOdKKlyZUdh8k6Ac6qnnNuAKl3JVDJPbs8-T7k9GfFsuijLw5DMBHTWrSAblRt9zLIW7IG3hEoTqDLqZSMs37I_mjyX81Bb1nrg96y1lvWGkZNWZPo4sndFGfCnE10vvxXCqBHbIHv2YcTN5tELpmYu58CuASgv2phu_7qRCCl9ugx6-I8RoeTz-gWPSX_XCP_AGjanJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14861015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of organic and conventional field boundaries on boreal bumblebees and butterflies</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ekroos, Johan ; Piha, Markus ; Tiainen, Juha</creator><creatorcontrib>Ekroos, Johan ; Piha, Markus ; Tiainen, Juha</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined how field boundary habitat quality and farming system (organic or conventional) affect species richness and abundance of diurnal lepidopterans and bumblebees in boreal agricultural landscapes. The results showed positive effects of field boundary area on lepidopteran diversity, as well as positive effects of nectar flower abundance on lepidopterans and bumblebee abundance. Organic farming did not show any significant effects on lepidopteran diversity. The results suggested that a successful conservation strategy for lepidopterans occurring in boreal agroecosystems depend on proper management of field boundaries, irrespective of farming regime. As bumblebee diversity tended to be higher at organic plots it is concluded that these important pollinators might be able to react on even small changes in habitat quality of cultivated lands. The results concord with a general hypothesis that effects of organic farming might be overpowered by effects of landscape structure in heterogeneous landscapes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8809</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2007.09.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AEENDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bombus ; Boreal agroecosystem ; Bumblebee ; butterflies ; Butterfly ; Diurnal lepidopterans ; edge effects ; farming systems ; fields ; Flower abundance ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agroecology ; General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping ; General agronomy. Plant production ; General aspects ; Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development ; Habitat area ; habitats ; insect communities ; Insecta ; Invertebrates ; Lepidoptera ; Organic farming ; organic production ; pollinating insects ; species diversity ; Synecology</subject><ispartof>Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2008-04, Vol.124 (3), p.155-159</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-ac67a8510b08368b85897a68c93b35252425218b97dbc20cb86111a0e23882e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-ac67a8510b08368b85897a68c93b35252425218b97dbc20cb86111a0e23882e83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880907002320$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20218002$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ekroos, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piha, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiainen, Juha</creatorcontrib><title>Role of organic and conventional field boundaries on boreal bumblebees and butterflies</title><title>Agriculture, ecosystems & environment</title><description>This study examined how field boundary habitat quality and farming system (organic or conventional) affect species richness and abundance of diurnal lepidopterans and bumblebees in boreal agricultural landscapes. The results showed positive effects of field boundary area on lepidopteran diversity, as well as positive effects of nectar flower abundance on lepidopterans and bumblebee abundance. Organic farming did not show any significant effects on lepidopteran diversity. The results suggested that a successful conservation strategy for lepidopterans occurring in boreal agroecosystems depend on proper management of field boundaries, irrespective of farming regime. As bumblebee diversity tended to be higher at organic plots it is concluded that these important pollinators might be able to react on even small changes in habitat quality of cultivated lands. The results concord with a general hypothesis that effects of organic farming might be overpowered by effects of landscape structure in heterogeneous landscapes.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bombus</subject><subject>Boreal agroecosystem</subject><subject>Bumblebee</subject><subject>butterflies</subject><subject>Butterfly</subject><subject>Diurnal lepidopterans</subject><subject>edge effects</subject><subject>farming systems</subject><subject>fields</subject><subject>Flower abundance</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agroecology</subject><subject>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</subject><subject>Habitat area</subject><subject>habitats</subject><subject>insect communities</subject><subject>Insecta</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Lepidoptera</subject><subject>Organic farming</subject><subject>organic production</subject><subject>pollinating insects</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><issn>0167-8809</issn><issn>1873-2305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1rHSEUhqWk0Jvb_oFuOptkN9OjzocD2YTQLwgU2qZbUedM8OLVVGcC_fc9ww1dJoLI0ed9Pb4y9p5Dw4H3Hw-NuUdsBMDQwNgAyFdsx9UgayGhO2M7goZaKRjfsPNSDkBDSLVjv3-kgFWaq5TvTfSuMnGqXIqPGBefognV7DFMlU1rnEz2WKoUqcpIR3Y92oAWaXOT2XVZMM-BoLfs9WxCwXdP657dff706-Zrffv9y7eb69vatbxfauP6waiOgwUle2VVp8bB9MqN0spOdKKlyZUdh8k6Ac6qnnNuAKl3JVDJPbs8-T7k9GfFsuijLw5DMBHTWrSAblRt9zLIW7IG3hEoTqDLqZSMs37I_mjyX81Bb1nrg96y1lvWGkZNWZPo4sndFGfCnE10vvxXCqBHbIHv2YcTN5tELpmYu58CuASgv2phu_7qRCCl9ugx6-I8RoeTz-gWPSX_XCP_AGjanJQ</recordid><startdate>20080401</startdate><enddate>20080401</enddate><creator>Ekroos, Johan</creator><creator>Piha, Markus</creator><creator>Tiainen, Juha</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080401</creationdate><title>Role of organic and conventional field boundaries on boreal bumblebees and butterflies</title><author>Ekroos, Johan ; Piha, Markus ; Tiainen, Juha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-ac67a8510b08368b85897a68c93b35252425218b97dbc20cb86111a0e23882e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bombus</topic><topic>Boreal agroecosystem</topic><topic>Bumblebee</topic><topic>butterflies</topic><topic>Butterfly</topic><topic>Diurnal lepidopterans</topic><topic>edge effects</topic><topic>farming systems</topic><topic>fields</topic><topic>Flower abundance</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agroecology</topic><topic>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</topic><topic>Habitat area</topic><topic>habitats</topic><topic>insect communities</topic><topic>Insecta</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Lepidoptera</topic><topic>Organic farming</topic><topic>organic production</topic><topic>pollinating insects</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ekroos, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piha, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiainen, Juha</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agriculture, ecosystems & environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ekroos, Johan</au><au>Piha, Markus</au><au>Tiainen, Juha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of organic and conventional field boundaries on boreal bumblebees and butterflies</atitle><jtitle>Agriculture, ecosystems & environment</jtitle><date>2008-04-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>155-159</pages><issn>0167-8809</issn><eissn>1873-2305</eissn><coden>AEENDO</coden><abstract>This study examined how field boundary habitat quality and farming system (organic or conventional) affect species richness and abundance of diurnal lepidopterans and bumblebees in boreal agricultural landscapes. The results showed positive effects of field boundary area on lepidopteran diversity, as well as positive effects of nectar flower abundance on lepidopterans and bumblebee abundance. Organic farming did not show any significant effects on lepidopteran diversity. The results suggested that a successful conservation strategy for lepidopterans occurring in boreal agroecosystems depend on proper management of field boundaries, irrespective of farming regime. As bumblebee diversity tended to be higher at organic plots it is concluded that these important pollinators might be able to react on even small changes in habitat quality of cultivated lands. The results concord with a general hypothesis that effects of organic farming might be overpowered by effects of landscape structure in heterogeneous landscapes.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agee.2007.09.003</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0167-8809 |
| ispartof | Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2008-04, Vol.124 (3), p.155-159 |
| issn | 0167-8809 1873-2305 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20598458 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences Bombus Boreal agroecosystem Bumblebee butterflies Butterfly Diurnal lepidopterans edge effects farming systems fields Flower abundance Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agroecology General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping General agronomy. Plant production General aspects Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development Habitat area habitats insect communities Insecta Invertebrates Lepidoptera Organic farming organic production pollinating insects species diversity Synecology |
| title | Role of organic and conventional field boundaries on boreal bumblebees and butterflies |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T16%3A11%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20organic%20and%20conventional%20field%20boundaries%20on%20boreal%20bumblebees%20and%20butterflies&rft.jtitle=Agriculture,%20ecosystems%20&%20environment&rft.au=Ekroos,%20Johan&rft.date=2008-04-01&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=155-159&rft.issn=0167-8809&rft.eissn=1873-2305&rft.coden=AEENDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agee.2007.09.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14861015%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14861015&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167880907002320&rfr_iscdi=true |