Response of ecosystem carbon exchange to warming and nitrogen addition during two hydrologically contrasting growing seasons in a temperate steppe

A large remaining source of uncertainty in global model predictions of future climate is how ecosystem carbon (C) cycle feedbacks to climate change. We conducted a field manipulative experiment of warming and nitrogen (N) addition in a temperate steppe in northern China during two contrasting hydrol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global change biology 2009-06, Vol.15 (6), p.1544-1556
Hauptverfasser: XIA, JIANYANG, NIU, SHULI, WAN, SHIQIANG
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1556
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1544
container_title Global change biology
container_volume 15
creator XIA, JIANYANG
NIU, SHULI
WAN, SHIQIANG
description A large remaining source of uncertainty in global model predictions of future climate is how ecosystem carbon (C) cycle feedbacks to climate change. We conducted a field manipulative experiment of warming and nitrogen (N) addition in a temperate steppe in northern China during two contrasting hydrological growing seasons in 2006 [wet with total precipitation 11.2% above the long-term mean (348 mm)] and 2007 (dry with total precipitation 46.7% below the long-term mean). Irrespective of strong intra- and interannual variations in ecosystem C fluxes, responses of ecosystem C fluxes to warming and N addition did not change between the two growing seasons, suggesting independence of warming and N responses of net ecosystem C exchange (NEE) upon hydrological variations in the temperate steppe. Warming had no effect on NEE or its two components, gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) and ecosystem respiration (ER), whereas N addition stimulated GEP but did not affect ER, leading to positive responses of NEE. Similar responses of NEE between the two growing seasons were due to changes in both biotic and abiotic factors and their impacts on ER and GEP. In the wet growing season, NEE was positively correlated with soil moisture and forb biomass. Negative effects of warming-induced water depletion could be ameliorated by higher forb biomass in the warmed plots. N addition increased forb biomass but did not affect soil moisture, leading to positive effect on NEE. In the dry growing season, NEE showed positive dependence on grass biomass but negative dependence on forb biomass. No changes in NEE in response to warming could result from water limitation on both GEP and ER as well as little responses of either grass or forb biomass. N addition stimulated grass biomass but reduced forb biomass, leading to the increase in NEE. Our findings highlight the importance of changes in abiotic (soil moisture, N availability) and biotic (growth of different plant functional types) in mediating the responses of NEE to climatic warming and N enrichment in the semiarid temperate steppe in northern China.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01807.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20592730</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1701613671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4637-3374895596164478ef593660d52d64a174b618f25bf62b217578b3b79af8984d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc-O0zAQxiMEEsvCM2AhwS3B_-0cOEAFhVUFYmEFN8tJnKxLamftVG1egyfGpqseOOHLjDS_b2Y8X1EABCuU3utthQhnJaaSVxhCWUEkoaiOD4qLc-FhzhktEUTkcfEkxi2EkGDIL4rf1yZO3kUDfA9M6-MSZ7MDrQ6Nd8Ac21vtBgNmDw467KwbgHYdcHYOfjAO6K6zs01ktw-5OB88uF264Ec_2FaP4wJa7-ag45zLQ_CHHKPRMQ0FNnUAad5kgp4NSKOnyTwtHvV6jObZfbwsbj68_776WG6-rD-t3m7KlnIiSkIElTVjNUecUiFNz2rCOewY7jjVSNCGI9lj1vQcNxgJJmRDGlHrXtaSduSyeHXqOwV_tzdxVjsbWzOO2hm_jwpDVmNBYAJf_ANu_T64tFtmME4HRwmSJ6gNPsZgejUFu9NhUQiq7JTaqmyIyoao7JT665Q6JunL-_46ppv1QbvWxrMeIyoolixxb07cwY5m-e_-ar16l7OkL096mw59POt1-KW4IIKpH5_XanN9tbqC-Kf6mvjnJ77XXukhpJ1uvuH0V4g4FrQm5A_AB8CC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205221801</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response of ecosystem carbon exchange to warming and nitrogen addition during two hydrologically contrasting growing seasons in a temperate steppe</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>XIA, JIANYANG ; NIU, SHULI ; WAN, SHIQIANG</creator><creatorcontrib>XIA, JIANYANG ; NIU, SHULI ; WAN, SHIQIANG</creatorcontrib><description>A large remaining source of uncertainty in global model predictions of future climate is how ecosystem carbon (C) cycle feedbacks to climate change. We conducted a field manipulative experiment of warming and nitrogen (N) addition in a temperate steppe in northern China during two contrasting hydrological growing seasons in 2006 [wet with total precipitation 11.2% above the long-term mean (348 mm)] and 2007 (dry with total precipitation 46.7% below the long-term mean). Irrespective of strong intra- and interannual variations in ecosystem C fluxes, responses of ecosystem C fluxes to warming and N addition did not change between the two growing seasons, suggesting independence of warming and N responses of net ecosystem C exchange (NEE) upon hydrological variations in the temperate steppe. Warming had no effect on NEE or its two components, gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) and ecosystem respiration (ER), whereas N addition stimulated GEP but did not affect ER, leading to positive responses of NEE. Similar responses of NEE between the two growing seasons were due to changes in both biotic and abiotic factors and their impacts on ER and GEP. In the wet growing season, NEE was positively correlated with soil moisture and forb biomass. Negative effects of warming-induced water depletion could be ameliorated by higher forb biomass in the warmed plots. N addition increased forb biomass but did not affect soil moisture, leading to positive effect on NEE. In the dry growing season, NEE showed positive dependence on grass biomass but negative dependence on forb biomass. No changes in NEE in response to warming could result from water limitation on both GEP and ER as well as little responses of either grass or forb biomass. N addition stimulated grass biomass but reduced forb biomass, leading to the increase in NEE. Our findings highlight the importance of changes in abiotic (soil moisture, N availability) and biotic (growth of different plant functional types) in mediating the responses of NEE to climatic warming and N enrichment in the semiarid temperate steppe in northern China.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01807.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; carbon ; Carbon sequestration ; Climate change ; climatic warming ; Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change ; Earth, ocean, space ; Ecosystem studies ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Global warming ; grassland ; grasslands ; Meteorology ; nitrogen ; plant functional type ; Precipitation ; respiration ; soil moisture ; soil water ; Synecology ; temperature ; Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2009-06, Vol.15 (6), p.1544-1556</ispartof><rights>2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2009 Blackwell Publishing</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4637-3374895596164478ef593660d52d64a174b618f25bf62b217578b3b79af8984d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4637-3374895596164478ef593660d52d64a174b618f25bf62b217578b3b79af8984d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2486.2008.01807.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2486.2008.01807.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21474285$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>XIA, JIANYANG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NIU, SHULI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WAN, SHIQIANG</creatorcontrib><title>Response of ecosystem carbon exchange to warming and nitrogen addition during two hydrologically contrasting growing seasons in a temperate steppe</title><title>Global change biology</title><description>A large remaining source of uncertainty in global model predictions of future climate is how ecosystem carbon (C) cycle feedbacks to climate change. We conducted a field manipulative experiment of warming and nitrogen (N) addition in a temperate steppe in northern China during two contrasting hydrological growing seasons in 2006 [wet with total precipitation 11.2% above the long-term mean (348 mm)] and 2007 (dry with total precipitation 46.7% below the long-term mean). Irrespective of strong intra- and interannual variations in ecosystem C fluxes, responses of ecosystem C fluxes to warming and N addition did not change between the two growing seasons, suggesting independence of warming and N responses of net ecosystem C exchange (NEE) upon hydrological variations in the temperate steppe. Warming had no effect on NEE or its two components, gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) and ecosystem respiration (ER), whereas N addition stimulated GEP but did not affect ER, leading to positive responses of NEE. Similar responses of NEE between the two growing seasons were due to changes in both biotic and abiotic factors and their impacts on ER and GEP. In the wet growing season, NEE was positively correlated with soil moisture and forb biomass. Negative effects of warming-induced water depletion could be ameliorated by higher forb biomass in the warmed plots. N addition increased forb biomass but did not affect soil moisture, leading to positive effect on NEE. In the dry growing season, NEE showed positive dependence on grass biomass but negative dependence on forb biomass. No changes in NEE in response to warming could result from water limitation on both GEP and ER as well as little responses of either grass or forb biomass. N addition stimulated grass biomass but reduced forb biomass, leading to the increase in NEE. Our findings highlight the importance of changes in abiotic (soil moisture, N availability) and biotic (growth of different plant functional types) in mediating the responses of NEE to climatic warming and N enrichment in the semiarid temperate steppe in northern China.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>carbon</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>climatic warming</subject><subject>Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Ecosystem studies</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>grassland</subject><subject>grasslands</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>plant functional type</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>respiration</subject><subject>soil moisture</subject><subject>soil water</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>temperature</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc-O0zAQxiMEEsvCM2AhwS3B_-0cOEAFhVUFYmEFN8tJnKxLamftVG1egyfGpqseOOHLjDS_b2Y8X1EABCuU3utthQhnJaaSVxhCWUEkoaiOD4qLc-FhzhktEUTkcfEkxi2EkGDIL4rf1yZO3kUDfA9M6-MSZ7MDrQ6Nd8Ac21vtBgNmDw467KwbgHYdcHYOfjAO6K6zs01ktw-5OB88uF264Ec_2FaP4wJa7-ag45zLQ_CHHKPRMQ0FNnUAad5kgp4NSKOnyTwtHvV6jObZfbwsbj68_776WG6-rD-t3m7KlnIiSkIElTVjNUecUiFNz2rCOewY7jjVSNCGI9lj1vQcNxgJJmRDGlHrXtaSduSyeHXqOwV_tzdxVjsbWzOO2hm_jwpDVmNBYAJf_ANu_T64tFtmME4HRwmSJ6gNPsZgejUFu9NhUQiq7JTaqmyIyoao7JT665Q6JunL-_46ppv1QbvWxrMeIyoolixxb07cwY5m-e_-ar16l7OkL096mw59POt1-KW4IIKpH5_XanN9tbqC-Kf6mvjnJ77XXukhpJ1uvuH0V4g4FrQm5A_AB8CC</recordid><startdate>200906</startdate><enddate>200906</enddate><creator>XIA, JIANYANG</creator><creator>NIU, SHULI</creator><creator>WAN, SHIQIANG</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200906</creationdate><title>Response of ecosystem carbon exchange to warming and nitrogen addition during two hydrologically contrasting growing seasons in a temperate steppe</title><author>XIA, JIANYANG ; NIU, SHULI ; WAN, SHIQIANG</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4637-3374895596164478ef593660d52d64a174b618f25bf62b217578b3b79af8984d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>carbon</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>climatic warming</topic><topic>Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Ecosystem studies</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>grassland</topic><topic>grasslands</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>plant functional type</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>respiration</topic><topic>soil moisture</topic><topic>soil water</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>temperature</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>XIA, JIANYANG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NIU, SHULI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WAN, SHIQIANG</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>XIA, JIANYANG</au><au>NIU, SHULI</au><au>WAN, SHIQIANG</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response of ecosystem carbon exchange to warming and nitrogen addition during two hydrologically contrasting growing seasons in a temperate steppe</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><date>2009-06</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1544</spage><epage>1556</epage><pages>1544-1556</pages><issn>1354-1013</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>A large remaining source of uncertainty in global model predictions of future climate is how ecosystem carbon (C) cycle feedbacks to climate change. We conducted a field manipulative experiment of warming and nitrogen (N) addition in a temperate steppe in northern China during two contrasting hydrological growing seasons in 2006 [wet with total precipitation 11.2% above the long-term mean (348 mm)] and 2007 (dry with total precipitation 46.7% below the long-term mean). Irrespective of strong intra- and interannual variations in ecosystem C fluxes, responses of ecosystem C fluxes to warming and N addition did not change between the two growing seasons, suggesting independence of warming and N responses of net ecosystem C exchange (NEE) upon hydrological variations in the temperate steppe. Warming had no effect on NEE or its two components, gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) and ecosystem respiration (ER), whereas N addition stimulated GEP but did not affect ER, leading to positive responses of NEE. Similar responses of NEE between the two growing seasons were due to changes in both biotic and abiotic factors and their impacts on ER and GEP. In the wet growing season, NEE was positively correlated with soil moisture and forb biomass. Negative effects of warming-induced water depletion could be ameliorated by higher forb biomass in the warmed plots. N addition increased forb biomass but did not affect soil moisture, leading to positive effect on NEE. In the dry growing season, NEE showed positive dependence on grass biomass but negative dependence on forb biomass. No changes in NEE in response to warming could result from water limitation on both GEP and ER as well as little responses of either grass or forb biomass. N addition stimulated grass biomass but reduced forb biomass, leading to the increase in NEE. Our findings highlight the importance of changes in abiotic (soil moisture, N availability) and biotic (growth of different plant functional types) in mediating the responses of NEE to climatic warming and N enrichment in the semiarid temperate steppe in northern China.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01807.x</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1354-1013
ispartof Global change biology, 2009-06, Vol.15 (6), p.1544-1556
issn 1354-1013
1365-2486
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20592730
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
carbon
Carbon sequestration
Climate change
climatic warming
Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change
Earth, ocean, space
Ecosystem studies
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Global warming
grassland
grasslands
Meteorology
nitrogen
plant functional type
Precipitation
respiration
soil moisture
soil water
Synecology
temperature
Terrestrial ecosystems
title Response of ecosystem carbon exchange to warming and nitrogen addition during two hydrologically contrasting growing seasons in a temperate steppe
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T08%3A41%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20of%20ecosystem%20carbon%20exchange%20to%20warming%20and%20nitrogen%20addition%20during%20two%20hydrologically%20contrasting%20growing%20seasons%20in%20a%20temperate%20steppe&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=XIA,%20JIANYANG&rft.date=2009-06&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1544&rft.epage=1556&rft.pages=1544-1556&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01807.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1701613671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205221801&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true