Characterisation of biomass resources in Nepal and assessment of potential for increased charcoal production

Characterisation of 27 types of biomass was performed together with an assessment of regional resource availability. Charcoal was produced under two conditions from all samples and their yields were compared. Sugarcane bagasse, sal and pine produced the best charcoal with a low volatile matter and h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental management 2018-10, Vol.223, p.358-370
Hauptverfasser: Hammerton, J., Joshi, L.R., Ross, A.B., Pariyar, B., Lovett, J.C., Shrestha, K.K., Rijal, B., Li, H., Gasson, P.E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 370
container_issue
container_start_page 358
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 223
creator Hammerton, J.
Joshi, L.R.
Ross, A.B.
Pariyar, B.
Lovett, J.C.
Shrestha, K.K.
Rijal, B.
Li, H.
Gasson, P.E.
description Characterisation of 27 types of biomass was performed together with an assessment of regional resource availability. Charcoal was produced under two conditions from all samples and their yields were compared. Sugarcane bagasse, sal and pine produced the best charcoal with a low volatile matter and high calorific value. The amount of high-quality charcoal which can be made within Nepal from the biomass types tested is equivalent to 8,073,000 tonnes of firewood a year or 51% of the yearly demand. The areas which would benefit the most from charcoal making facilities are the Mid-hills of the Western, Central and Eastern Development Regions, as well as the Terai in the Central and Eastern Development Regions. The main potential benefit is to convert agricultural residues which are underutilised because, in their original form, produce large quantities of smoke, to cleaner burning charcoal. The conversion of agricultural residues to charcoal is also a viable alternative to anaerobic digestion in the Mid-hills. •The total amount of good charcoal that can be produced is equivalent to 51% of energy demand.•Producing charcoal from underused agricultural residues is particularly beneficial.•Charcoal making is particularly useful in the Central and Eastern Regions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2059039022</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479718306704</els_id><sourcerecordid>2059039022</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-110e26f0b2a95c0b6ad143dc46ec8107dcecb5b3bc03143b0ca89754436dbdef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFv1DAQhS1ERbeFnwDKkUvC2E6c-ITQqkClil7as2WPJ8KrJF7spBL_Hq924cpprHnfvCc_xt5zaDhw9enQHGh5me3SCOBDA6oBMbxiOw66qwcl4TXbgQRet73ur9lNzgcAkIL3b9i10Foq2eodm_Y_bbK4UgrZriEuVRwrF-Jsc64S5bglpFyFpfpBRztVdvFVkSjnmZb1BB_jWl6haGNMBcRENpOvsBhjLOtjin7Dk_dbdjXaKdO7y7xlz1_vnvbf64fHb_f7Lw81tlysNedAQo3ghNUdglPW81Z6bBXhwKH3SOg6Jx2CLIIDtIPuu7aVyjtPo7xlH8--JfrXRnk1c8hI02QXils2AjoNUoMQBe3OKKaYc6LRHFOYbfptOJhT0eZgLkWbU9EGlClFl7sPl4jNzeT_Xf1ttgCfzwCVj74ESiZjoAXJh0S4Gh_DfyL-AMQGlHc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2059039022</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterisation of biomass resources in Nepal and assessment of potential for increased charcoal production</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hammerton, J. ; Joshi, L.R. ; Ross, A.B. ; Pariyar, B. ; Lovett, J.C. ; Shrestha, K.K. ; Rijal, B. ; Li, H. ; Gasson, P.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hammerton, J. ; Joshi, L.R. ; Ross, A.B. ; Pariyar, B. ; Lovett, J.C. ; Shrestha, K.K. ; Rijal, B. ; Li, H. ; Gasson, P.E.</creatorcontrib><description>Characterisation of 27 types of biomass was performed together with an assessment of regional resource availability. Charcoal was produced under two conditions from all samples and their yields were compared. Sugarcane bagasse, sal and pine produced the best charcoal with a low volatile matter and high calorific value. The amount of high-quality charcoal which can be made within Nepal from the biomass types tested is equivalent to 8,073,000 tonnes of firewood a year or 51% of the yearly demand. The areas which would benefit the most from charcoal making facilities are the Mid-hills of the Western, Central and Eastern Development Regions, as well as the Terai in the Central and Eastern Development Regions. The main potential benefit is to convert agricultural residues which are underutilised because, in their original form, produce large quantities of smoke, to cleaner burning charcoal. The conversion of agricultural residues to charcoal is also a viable alternative to anaerobic digestion in the Mid-hills. •The total amount of good charcoal that can be produced is equivalent to 51% of energy demand.•Producing charcoal from underused agricultural residues is particularly beneficial.•Charcoal making is particularly useful in the Central and Eastern Regions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29936349</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2018-10, Vol.223, p.358-370</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-110e26f0b2a95c0b6ad143dc46ec8107dcecb5b3bc03143b0ca89754436dbdef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-110e26f0b2a95c0b6ad143dc46ec8107dcecb5b3bc03143b0ca89754436dbdef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7179-3544 ; 0000-0001-5952-9142 ; 0000-0002-5233-8199</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.028$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29936349$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hammerton, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joshi, L.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, A.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pariyar, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovett, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrestha, K.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rijal, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasson, P.E.</creatorcontrib><title>Characterisation of biomass resources in Nepal and assessment of potential for increased charcoal production</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>Characterisation of 27 types of biomass was performed together with an assessment of regional resource availability. Charcoal was produced under two conditions from all samples and their yields were compared. Sugarcane bagasse, sal and pine produced the best charcoal with a low volatile matter and high calorific value. The amount of high-quality charcoal which can be made within Nepal from the biomass types tested is equivalent to 8,073,000 tonnes of firewood a year or 51% of the yearly demand. The areas which would benefit the most from charcoal making facilities are the Mid-hills of the Western, Central and Eastern Development Regions, as well as the Terai in the Central and Eastern Development Regions. The main potential benefit is to convert agricultural residues which are underutilised because, in their original form, produce large quantities of smoke, to cleaner burning charcoal. The conversion of agricultural residues to charcoal is also a viable alternative to anaerobic digestion in the Mid-hills. •The total amount of good charcoal that can be produced is equivalent to 51% of energy demand.•Producing charcoal from underused agricultural residues is particularly beneficial.•Charcoal making is particularly useful in the Central and Eastern Regions.</description><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFv1DAQhS1ERbeFnwDKkUvC2E6c-ITQqkClil7as2WPJ8KrJF7spBL_Hq924cpprHnfvCc_xt5zaDhw9enQHGh5me3SCOBDA6oBMbxiOw66qwcl4TXbgQRet73ur9lNzgcAkIL3b9i10Foq2eodm_Y_bbK4UgrZriEuVRwrF-Jsc64S5bglpFyFpfpBRztVdvFVkSjnmZb1BB_jWl6haGNMBcRENpOvsBhjLOtjin7Dk_dbdjXaKdO7y7xlz1_vnvbf64fHb_f7Lw81tlysNedAQo3ghNUdglPW81Z6bBXhwKH3SOg6Jx2CLIIDtIPuu7aVyjtPo7xlH8--JfrXRnk1c8hI02QXils2AjoNUoMQBe3OKKaYc6LRHFOYbfptOJhT0eZgLkWbU9EGlClFl7sPl4jNzeT_Xf1ttgCfzwCVj74ESiZjoAXJh0S4Gh_DfyL-AMQGlHc</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Hammerton, J.</creator><creator>Joshi, L.R.</creator><creator>Ross, A.B.</creator><creator>Pariyar, B.</creator><creator>Lovett, J.C.</creator><creator>Shrestha, K.K.</creator><creator>Rijal, B.</creator><creator>Li, H.</creator><creator>Gasson, P.E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7179-3544</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5952-9142</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5233-8199</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Characterisation of biomass resources in Nepal and assessment of potential for increased charcoal production</title><author>Hammerton, J. ; Joshi, L.R. ; Ross, A.B. ; Pariyar, B. ; Lovett, J.C. ; Shrestha, K.K. ; Rijal, B. ; Li, H. ; Gasson, P.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-110e26f0b2a95c0b6ad143dc46ec8107dcecb5b3bc03143b0ca89754436dbdef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hammerton, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joshi, L.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, A.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pariyar, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovett, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrestha, K.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rijal, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasson, P.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hammerton, J.</au><au>Joshi, L.R.</au><au>Ross, A.B.</au><au>Pariyar, B.</au><au>Lovett, J.C.</au><au>Shrestha, K.K.</au><au>Rijal, B.</au><au>Li, H.</au><au>Gasson, P.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterisation of biomass resources in Nepal and assessment of potential for increased charcoal production</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>223</volume><spage>358</spage><epage>370</epage><pages>358-370</pages><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>Characterisation of 27 types of biomass was performed together with an assessment of regional resource availability. Charcoal was produced under two conditions from all samples and their yields were compared. Sugarcane bagasse, sal and pine produced the best charcoal with a low volatile matter and high calorific value. The amount of high-quality charcoal which can be made within Nepal from the biomass types tested is equivalent to 8,073,000 tonnes of firewood a year or 51% of the yearly demand. The areas which would benefit the most from charcoal making facilities are the Mid-hills of the Western, Central and Eastern Development Regions, as well as the Terai in the Central and Eastern Development Regions. The main potential benefit is to convert agricultural residues which are underutilised because, in their original form, produce large quantities of smoke, to cleaner burning charcoal. The conversion of agricultural residues to charcoal is also a viable alternative to anaerobic digestion in the Mid-hills. •The total amount of good charcoal that can be produced is equivalent to 51% of energy demand.•Producing charcoal from underused agricultural residues is particularly beneficial.•Charcoal making is particularly useful in the Central and Eastern Regions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29936349</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.028</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7179-3544</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5952-9142</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5233-8199</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2018-10, Vol.223, p.358-370
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2059039022
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings
title Characterisation of biomass resources in Nepal and assessment of potential for increased charcoal production
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T16%3A40%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterisation%20of%20biomass%20resources%20in%20Nepal%20and%20assessment%20of%20potential%20for%20increased%20charcoal%20production&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Hammerton,%20J.&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=223&rft.spage=358&rft.epage=370&rft.pages=358-370&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2059039022%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2059039022&rft_id=info:pmid/29936349&rft_els_id=S0301479718306704&rfr_iscdi=true