Is there still a role for renal artery stenting in the management of renovascular hypertension – A single-center experience and where do we stand?

Renal artery (RA) stenosis has been implicated in the pathophysiological mechanism for resistant hypertension. Despite the increasingly diagnosed frequency of hemodynamically significant lesions, the value of RA revascularization remains controversial. Our group had previously demonstrated significa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cardiovascular revascularization medicine 2019-03, Vol.20 (3), p.202-206
Hauptverfasser: Khan, Zubair, Tolia, Sunit, Sanam, Kumar, Gholkar, Gunjan, Zughaib, Marc, Naik, Sunil, Zughaib, Marcel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 206
container_issue 3
container_start_page 202
container_title Cardiovascular revascularization medicine
container_volume 20
creator Khan, Zubair
Tolia, Sunit
Sanam, Kumar
Gholkar, Gunjan
Zughaib, Marc
Naik, Sunil
Zughaib, Marcel
description Renal artery (RA) stenosis has been implicated in the pathophysiological mechanism for resistant hypertension. Despite the increasingly diagnosed frequency of hemodynamically significant lesions, the value of RA revascularization remains controversial. Our group had previously demonstrated significant blood pressure (BP) reduction in a retrospective cohort of appropriately selected patients undergoing RA stenting up to 18-months of follow-up. We herein present long-term clinical outcomes data 5-years post revascularization on 26 subjects who continued follow-up at our institution. Retrospective analysis was performed on subjects who underwent RA stenting at our institution for hemodynamically significant (≥70%) RA stenosis and systolic hypertension on ≥3 antihypertensive agents. Clinical outcome data for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), creatinine level and number of antihypertensive drugs was assessed prior to and then later at 6–12 months and 3–5 years post RA stenting. Mean age was 69 ± 9 years; 27% (7/26) were male. Median follow-up was 5.1 years. Blood pressure reduction was sustained at long-term follow-up (135/70 ± 18/11 mmHg) compared to initial reduction noted at 6-months (136/69 ± 16/8 mmHg; p ≤0.01 for both) and from baseline (162/80 ± 24/18 mmHg; p ≤0.001 for both). The number of antihypertensive agents also decreased from 4.1 ± 1.0 to 2.7 ± 2.1 (p = 0.002) at 6-months and was sustained at long-term follow-up, 3.4 ± 1.2 (p = 0.03) with no difference in renal function between short- and long-term follow-up compared to baseline. This study shows sustained benefit of RA stenting in BP reduction in an appropriately selected cohort with significant stenosis ≥70% and uncontrolled hypertension on multiple medications on long-term follow-up. •Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) is the leading cause of secondary hypertension.•There remains an unmet need for blood pressure optimization in patients with ARAS despite being on optimal medical regimen.•Multiple RCT's have failed to show any substantial benefit of renal artery stenting but have been criticized for appropriate patient selection.•Renal artery stenting in carefully selected 'real life' patients with uncontrolled hypertension can potentially provide long term sustained blood pressure reduction.•Large RCT’s are warranted to prove benefit of renal revascularization in high-risk patients and overcome the short-comings of earlier studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.06.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2058506561</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1553838918302549</els_id><sourcerecordid>2058506561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f2dc591e2c8ad37502a5b6b7ceb121408b7214f4aa90fac859474a42183f3bfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EoqXwBgj5yCXBf-LEuYCqikKlSlzgbDnOuPUqsZdxdsveeAf6hDwJTrdw5DTW-Pf5G89HyGvOas54-25TO4sI-1owrmvW1ozpJ-SU605XrJf6aTkrJSstdX9CXuS8YUx2ou2ekxPR97JhrTol91eZLreAQPMSpolaimkC6hNShGhLAxfAQ7mFuIR4Q0NceTrbaG9gLk2a_Iqmvc1uN1mkt4ctFFHMIUX6--cvek5zUU5QuYIDUvhRgADRAbVxpHcP9mOid-sQpfPhJXnm7ZTh1WM9I98uP369-Fxdf_l0dXF-XTnZiqXyYnSq5yCctqPsFBNWDe3QORi44A3TQ1eKb6ztmbdOq77pGtsIrqWXgx_lGXl7fHeL6fsO8mLmkB1Mk42QdtkIprQqa2p5QZsj6jDljODNFsNs8WA4M2seZmOOeZg1D8NaU_IosjePDrthhvGf6G8ABXh_BKD8cx8ATXYPqxkDglvMmML_Hf4Ad2ShTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2058506561</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is there still a role for renal artery stenting in the management of renovascular hypertension – A single-center experience and where do we stand?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Khan, Zubair ; Tolia, Sunit ; Sanam, Kumar ; Gholkar, Gunjan ; Zughaib, Marc ; Naik, Sunil ; Zughaib, Marcel</creator><creatorcontrib>Khan, Zubair ; Tolia, Sunit ; Sanam, Kumar ; Gholkar, Gunjan ; Zughaib, Marc ; Naik, Sunil ; Zughaib, Marcel</creatorcontrib><description>Renal artery (RA) stenosis has been implicated in the pathophysiological mechanism for resistant hypertension. Despite the increasingly diagnosed frequency of hemodynamically significant lesions, the value of RA revascularization remains controversial. Our group had previously demonstrated significant blood pressure (BP) reduction in a retrospective cohort of appropriately selected patients undergoing RA stenting up to 18-months of follow-up. We herein present long-term clinical outcomes data 5-years post revascularization on 26 subjects who continued follow-up at our institution. Retrospective analysis was performed on subjects who underwent RA stenting at our institution for hemodynamically significant (≥70%) RA stenosis and systolic hypertension on ≥3 antihypertensive agents. Clinical outcome data for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), creatinine level and number of antihypertensive drugs was assessed prior to and then later at 6–12 months and 3–5 years post RA stenting. Mean age was 69 ± 9 years; 27% (7/26) were male. Median follow-up was 5.1 years. Blood pressure reduction was sustained at long-term follow-up (135/70 ± 18/11 mmHg) compared to initial reduction noted at 6-months (136/69 ± 16/8 mmHg; p ≤0.01 for both) and from baseline (162/80 ± 24/18 mmHg; p ≤0.001 for both). The number of antihypertensive agents also decreased from 4.1 ± 1.0 to 2.7 ± 2.1 (p = 0.002) at 6-months and was sustained at long-term follow-up, 3.4 ± 1.2 (p = 0.03) with no difference in renal function between short- and long-term follow-up compared to baseline. This study shows sustained benefit of RA stenting in BP reduction in an appropriately selected cohort with significant stenosis ≥70% and uncontrolled hypertension on multiple medications on long-term follow-up. •Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) is the leading cause of secondary hypertension.•There remains an unmet need for blood pressure optimization in patients with ARAS despite being on optimal medical regimen.•Multiple RCT's have failed to show any substantial benefit of renal artery stenting but have been criticized for appropriate patient selection.•Renal artery stenting in carefully selected 'real life' patients with uncontrolled hypertension can potentially provide long term sustained blood pressure reduction.•Large RCT’s are warranted to prove benefit of renal revascularization in high-risk patients and overcome the short-comings of earlier studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0938</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.06.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29934065</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use ; Blood Pressure - drug effects ; Clinical Decision-Making ; Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects ; Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation ; Endovascular Procedures - standards ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension, Renovascular - diagnosis ; Hypertension, Renovascular - etiology ; Hypertension, Renovascular - physiopathology ; Hypertension, Renovascular - therapy ; Male ; Michigan ; Middle Aged ; Patient Selection ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Renal Artery Obstruction - complications ; Renal Artery Obstruction - diagnosis ; Renal Artery Obstruction - physiopathology ; Renal Artery Obstruction - therapy ; Renal artery stenosis ; Renovascular hypertension ; Retrospective Studies ; Stent ; Stents - standards ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Cardiovascular revascularization medicine, 2019-03, Vol.20 (3), p.202-206</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f2dc591e2c8ad37502a5b6b7ceb121408b7214f4aa90fac859474a42183f3bfd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f2dc591e2c8ad37502a5b6b7ceb121408b7214f4aa90fac859474a42183f3bfd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2018.06.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29934065$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khan, Zubair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tolia, Sunit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanam, Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gholkar, Gunjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zughaib, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naik, Sunil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zughaib, Marcel</creatorcontrib><title>Is there still a role for renal artery stenting in the management of renovascular hypertension – A single-center experience and where do we stand?</title><title>Cardiovascular revascularization medicine</title><addtitle>Cardiovasc Revasc Med</addtitle><description>Renal artery (RA) stenosis has been implicated in the pathophysiological mechanism for resistant hypertension. Despite the increasingly diagnosed frequency of hemodynamically significant lesions, the value of RA revascularization remains controversial. Our group had previously demonstrated significant blood pressure (BP) reduction in a retrospective cohort of appropriately selected patients undergoing RA stenting up to 18-months of follow-up. We herein present long-term clinical outcomes data 5-years post revascularization on 26 subjects who continued follow-up at our institution. Retrospective analysis was performed on subjects who underwent RA stenting at our institution for hemodynamically significant (≥70%) RA stenosis and systolic hypertension on ≥3 antihypertensive agents. Clinical outcome data for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), creatinine level and number of antihypertensive drugs was assessed prior to and then later at 6–12 months and 3–5 years post RA stenting. Mean age was 69 ± 9 years; 27% (7/26) were male. Median follow-up was 5.1 years. Blood pressure reduction was sustained at long-term follow-up (135/70 ± 18/11 mmHg) compared to initial reduction noted at 6-months (136/69 ± 16/8 mmHg; p ≤0.01 for both) and from baseline (162/80 ± 24/18 mmHg; p ≤0.001 for both). The number of antihypertensive agents also decreased from 4.1 ± 1.0 to 2.7 ± 2.1 (p = 0.002) at 6-months and was sustained at long-term follow-up, 3.4 ± 1.2 (p = 0.03) with no difference in renal function between short- and long-term follow-up compared to baseline. This study shows sustained benefit of RA stenting in BP reduction in an appropriately selected cohort with significant stenosis ≥70% and uncontrolled hypertension on multiple medications on long-term follow-up. •Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) is the leading cause of secondary hypertension.•There remains an unmet need for blood pressure optimization in patients with ARAS despite being on optimal medical regimen.•Multiple RCT's have failed to show any substantial benefit of renal artery stenting but have been criticized for appropriate patient selection.•Renal artery stenting in carefully selected 'real life' patients with uncontrolled hypertension can potentially provide long term sustained blood pressure reduction.•Large RCT’s are warranted to prove benefit of renal revascularization in high-risk patients and overcome the short-comings of earlier studies.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>Clinical Decision-Making</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - standards</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension, Renovascular - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hypertension, Renovascular - etiology</subject><subject>Hypertension, Renovascular - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hypertension, Renovascular - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Renal Artery Obstruction - complications</subject><subject>Renal Artery Obstruction - diagnosis</subject><subject>Renal Artery Obstruction - physiopathology</subject><subject>Renal Artery Obstruction - therapy</subject><subject>Renal artery stenosis</subject><subject>Renovascular hypertension</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stent</subject><subject>Stents - standards</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1553-8389</issn><issn>1878-0938</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EoqXwBgj5yCXBf-LEuYCqikKlSlzgbDnOuPUqsZdxdsveeAf6hDwJTrdw5DTW-Pf5G89HyGvOas54-25TO4sI-1owrmvW1ozpJ-SU605XrJf6aTkrJSstdX9CXuS8YUx2ou2ekxPR97JhrTol91eZLreAQPMSpolaimkC6hNShGhLAxfAQ7mFuIR4Q0NceTrbaG9gLk2a_Iqmvc1uN1mkt4ctFFHMIUX6--cvek5zUU5QuYIDUvhRgADRAbVxpHcP9mOid-sQpfPhJXnm7ZTh1WM9I98uP369-Fxdf_l0dXF-XTnZiqXyYnSq5yCctqPsFBNWDe3QORi44A3TQ1eKb6ztmbdOq77pGtsIrqWXgx_lGXl7fHeL6fsO8mLmkB1Mk42QdtkIprQqa2p5QZsj6jDljODNFsNs8WA4M2seZmOOeZg1D8NaU_IosjePDrthhvGf6G8ABXh_BKD8cx8ATXYPqxkDglvMmML_Hf4Ad2ShTQ</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Khan, Zubair</creator><creator>Tolia, Sunit</creator><creator>Sanam, Kumar</creator><creator>Gholkar, Gunjan</creator><creator>Zughaib, Marc</creator><creator>Naik, Sunil</creator><creator>Zughaib, Marcel</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Is there still a role for renal artery stenting in the management of renovascular hypertension – A single-center experience and where do we stand?</title><author>Khan, Zubair ; Tolia, Sunit ; Sanam, Kumar ; Gholkar, Gunjan ; Zughaib, Marc ; Naik, Sunil ; Zughaib, Marcel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f2dc591e2c8ad37502a5b6b7ceb121408b7214f4aa90fac859474a42183f3bfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>Clinical Decision-Making</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - standards</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension, Renovascular - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hypertension, Renovascular - etiology</topic><topic>Hypertension, Renovascular - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hypertension, Renovascular - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Renal Artery Obstruction - complications</topic><topic>Renal Artery Obstruction - diagnosis</topic><topic>Renal Artery Obstruction - physiopathology</topic><topic>Renal Artery Obstruction - therapy</topic><topic>Renal artery stenosis</topic><topic>Renovascular hypertension</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stent</topic><topic>Stents - standards</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khan, Zubair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tolia, Sunit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanam, Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gholkar, Gunjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zughaib, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naik, Sunil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zughaib, Marcel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cardiovascular revascularization medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khan, Zubair</au><au>Tolia, Sunit</au><au>Sanam, Kumar</au><au>Gholkar, Gunjan</au><au>Zughaib, Marc</au><au>Naik, Sunil</au><au>Zughaib, Marcel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is there still a role for renal artery stenting in the management of renovascular hypertension – A single-center experience and where do we stand?</atitle><jtitle>Cardiovascular revascularization medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Cardiovasc Revasc Med</addtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>202</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>202-206</pages><issn>1553-8389</issn><eissn>1878-0938</eissn><abstract>Renal artery (RA) stenosis has been implicated in the pathophysiological mechanism for resistant hypertension. Despite the increasingly diagnosed frequency of hemodynamically significant lesions, the value of RA revascularization remains controversial. Our group had previously demonstrated significant blood pressure (BP) reduction in a retrospective cohort of appropriately selected patients undergoing RA stenting up to 18-months of follow-up. We herein present long-term clinical outcomes data 5-years post revascularization on 26 subjects who continued follow-up at our institution. Retrospective analysis was performed on subjects who underwent RA stenting at our institution for hemodynamically significant (≥70%) RA stenosis and systolic hypertension on ≥3 antihypertensive agents. Clinical outcome data for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), creatinine level and number of antihypertensive drugs was assessed prior to and then later at 6–12 months and 3–5 years post RA stenting. Mean age was 69 ± 9 years; 27% (7/26) were male. Median follow-up was 5.1 years. Blood pressure reduction was sustained at long-term follow-up (135/70 ± 18/11 mmHg) compared to initial reduction noted at 6-months (136/69 ± 16/8 mmHg; p ≤0.01 for both) and from baseline (162/80 ± 24/18 mmHg; p ≤0.001 for both). The number of antihypertensive agents also decreased from 4.1 ± 1.0 to 2.7 ± 2.1 (p = 0.002) at 6-months and was sustained at long-term follow-up, 3.4 ± 1.2 (p = 0.03) with no difference in renal function between short- and long-term follow-up compared to baseline. This study shows sustained benefit of RA stenting in BP reduction in an appropriately selected cohort with significant stenosis ≥70% and uncontrolled hypertension on multiple medications on long-term follow-up. •Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) is the leading cause of secondary hypertension.•There remains an unmet need for blood pressure optimization in patients with ARAS despite being on optimal medical regimen.•Multiple RCT's have failed to show any substantial benefit of renal artery stenting but have been criticized for appropriate patient selection.•Renal artery stenting in carefully selected 'real life' patients with uncontrolled hypertension can potentially provide long term sustained blood pressure reduction.•Large RCT’s are warranted to prove benefit of renal revascularization in high-risk patients and overcome the short-comings of earlier studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29934065</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.carrev.2018.06.008</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1553-8389
ispartof Cardiovascular revascularization medicine, 2019-03, Vol.20 (3), p.202-206
issn 1553-8389
1878-0938
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2058506561
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use
Blood Pressure - drug effects
Clinical Decision-Making
Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects
Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation
Endovascular Procedures - standards
Female
Humans
Hypertension, Renovascular - diagnosis
Hypertension, Renovascular - etiology
Hypertension, Renovascular - physiopathology
Hypertension, Renovascular - therapy
Male
Michigan
Middle Aged
Patient Selection
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Renal Artery Obstruction - complications
Renal Artery Obstruction - diagnosis
Renal Artery Obstruction - physiopathology
Renal Artery Obstruction - therapy
Renal artery stenosis
Renovascular hypertension
Retrospective Studies
Stent
Stents - standards
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Is there still a role for renal artery stenting in the management of renovascular hypertension – A single-center experience and where do we stand?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T23%3A38%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20there%20still%20a%20role%20for%20renal%20artery%20stenting%20in%20the%20management%20of%20renovascular%20hypertension%20%E2%80%93%20A%20single-center%20experience%20and%20where%20do%20we%20stand?&rft.jtitle=Cardiovascular%20revascularization%20medicine&rft.au=Khan,%20Zubair&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=202&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=202-206&rft.issn=1553-8389&rft.eissn=1878-0938&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.carrev.2018.06.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2058506561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2058506561&rft_id=info:pmid/29934065&rft_els_id=S1553838918302549&rfr_iscdi=true