Is there still a role for renal artery stenting in the management of renovascular hypertension – A single-center experience and where do we stand?
Renal artery (RA) stenosis has been implicated in the pathophysiological mechanism for resistant hypertension. Despite the increasingly diagnosed frequency of hemodynamically significant lesions, the value of RA revascularization remains controversial. Our group had previously demonstrated significa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cardiovascular revascularization medicine 2019-03, Vol.20 (3), p.202-206 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 206 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 202 |
container_title | Cardiovascular revascularization medicine |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Khan, Zubair Tolia, Sunit Sanam, Kumar Gholkar, Gunjan Zughaib, Marc Naik, Sunil Zughaib, Marcel |
description | Renal artery (RA) stenosis has been implicated in the pathophysiological mechanism for resistant hypertension. Despite the increasingly diagnosed frequency of hemodynamically significant lesions, the value of RA revascularization remains controversial. Our group had previously demonstrated significant blood pressure (BP) reduction in a retrospective cohort of appropriately selected patients undergoing RA stenting up to 18-months of follow-up. We herein present long-term clinical outcomes data 5-years post revascularization on 26 subjects who continued follow-up at our institution.
Retrospective analysis was performed on subjects who underwent RA stenting at our institution for hemodynamically significant (≥70%) RA stenosis and systolic hypertension on ≥3 antihypertensive agents. Clinical outcome data for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), creatinine level and number of antihypertensive drugs was assessed prior to and then later at 6–12 months and 3–5 years post RA stenting.
Mean age was 69 ± 9 years; 27% (7/26) were male. Median follow-up was 5.1 years. Blood pressure reduction was sustained at long-term follow-up (135/70 ± 18/11 mmHg) compared to initial reduction noted at 6-months (136/69 ± 16/8 mmHg; p ≤0.01 for both) and from baseline (162/80 ± 24/18 mmHg; p ≤0.001 for both). The number of antihypertensive agents also decreased from 4.1 ± 1.0 to 2.7 ± 2.1 (p = 0.002) at 6-months and was sustained at long-term follow-up, 3.4 ± 1.2 (p = 0.03) with no difference in renal function between short- and long-term follow-up compared to baseline.
This study shows sustained benefit of RA stenting in BP reduction in an appropriately selected cohort with significant stenosis ≥70% and uncontrolled hypertension on multiple medications on long-term follow-up.
•Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) is the leading cause of secondary hypertension.•There remains an unmet need for blood pressure optimization in patients with ARAS despite being on optimal medical regimen.•Multiple RCT's have failed to show any substantial benefit of renal artery stenting but have been criticized for appropriate patient selection.•Renal artery stenting in carefully selected 'real life' patients with uncontrolled hypertension can potentially provide long term sustained blood pressure reduction.•Large RCT’s are warranted to prove benefit of renal revascularization in high-risk patients and overcome the short-comings of earlier studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.06.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2058506561</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1553838918302549</els_id><sourcerecordid>2058506561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f2dc591e2c8ad37502a5b6b7ceb121408b7214f4aa90fac859474a42183f3bfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EoqXwBgj5yCXBf-LEuYCqikKlSlzgbDnOuPUqsZdxdsveeAf6hDwJTrdw5DTW-Pf5G89HyGvOas54-25TO4sI-1owrmvW1ozpJ-SU605XrJf6aTkrJSstdX9CXuS8YUx2ou2ekxPR97JhrTol91eZLreAQPMSpolaimkC6hNShGhLAxfAQ7mFuIR4Q0NceTrbaG9gLk2a_Iqmvc1uN1mkt4ctFFHMIUX6--cvek5zUU5QuYIDUvhRgADRAbVxpHcP9mOid-sQpfPhJXnm7ZTh1WM9I98uP369-Fxdf_l0dXF-XTnZiqXyYnSq5yCctqPsFBNWDe3QORi44A3TQ1eKb6ztmbdOq77pGtsIrqWXgx_lGXl7fHeL6fsO8mLmkB1Mk42QdtkIprQqa2p5QZsj6jDljODNFsNs8WA4M2seZmOOeZg1D8NaU_IosjePDrthhvGf6G8ABXh_BKD8cx8ATXYPqxkDglvMmML_Hf4Ad2ShTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2058506561</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is there still a role for renal artery stenting in the management of renovascular hypertension – A single-center experience and where do we stand?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Khan, Zubair ; Tolia, Sunit ; Sanam, Kumar ; Gholkar, Gunjan ; Zughaib, Marc ; Naik, Sunil ; Zughaib, Marcel</creator><creatorcontrib>Khan, Zubair ; Tolia, Sunit ; Sanam, Kumar ; Gholkar, Gunjan ; Zughaib, Marc ; Naik, Sunil ; Zughaib, Marcel</creatorcontrib><description>Renal artery (RA) stenosis has been implicated in the pathophysiological mechanism for resistant hypertension. Despite the increasingly diagnosed frequency of hemodynamically significant lesions, the value of RA revascularization remains controversial. Our group had previously demonstrated significant blood pressure (BP) reduction in a retrospective cohort of appropriately selected patients undergoing RA stenting up to 18-months of follow-up. We herein present long-term clinical outcomes data 5-years post revascularization on 26 subjects who continued follow-up at our institution.
Retrospective analysis was performed on subjects who underwent RA stenting at our institution for hemodynamically significant (≥70%) RA stenosis and systolic hypertension on ≥3 antihypertensive agents. Clinical outcome data for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), creatinine level and number of antihypertensive drugs was assessed prior to and then later at 6–12 months and 3–5 years post RA stenting.
Mean age was 69 ± 9 years; 27% (7/26) were male. Median follow-up was 5.1 years. Blood pressure reduction was sustained at long-term follow-up (135/70 ± 18/11 mmHg) compared to initial reduction noted at 6-months (136/69 ± 16/8 mmHg; p ≤0.01 for both) and from baseline (162/80 ± 24/18 mmHg; p ≤0.001 for both). The number of antihypertensive agents also decreased from 4.1 ± 1.0 to 2.7 ± 2.1 (p = 0.002) at 6-months and was sustained at long-term follow-up, 3.4 ± 1.2 (p = 0.03) with no difference in renal function between short- and long-term follow-up compared to baseline.
This study shows sustained benefit of RA stenting in BP reduction in an appropriately selected cohort with significant stenosis ≥70% and uncontrolled hypertension on multiple medications on long-term follow-up.
•Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) is the leading cause of secondary hypertension.•There remains an unmet need for blood pressure optimization in patients with ARAS despite being on optimal medical regimen.•Multiple RCT's have failed to show any substantial benefit of renal artery stenting but have been criticized for appropriate patient selection.•Renal artery stenting in carefully selected 'real life' patients with uncontrolled hypertension can potentially provide long term sustained blood pressure reduction.•Large RCT’s are warranted to prove benefit of renal revascularization in high-risk patients and overcome the short-comings of earlier studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0938</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.06.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29934065</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use ; Blood Pressure - drug effects ; Clinical Decision-Making ; Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects ; Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation ; Endovascular Procedures - standards ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension, Renovascular - diagnosis ; Hypertension, Renovascular - etiology ; Hypertension, Renovascular - physiopathology ; Hypertension, Renovascular - therapy ; Male ; Michigan ; Middle Aged ; Patient Selection ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Renal Artery Obstruction - complications ; Renal Artery Obstruction - diagnosis ; Renal Artery Obstruction - physiopathology ; Renal Artery Obstruction - therapy ; Renal artery stenosis ; Renovascular hypertension ; Retrospective Studies ; Stent ; Stents - standards ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Cardiovascular revascularization medicine, 2019-03, Vol.20 (3), p.202-206</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f2dc591e2c8ad37502a5b6b7ceb121408b7214f4aa90fac859474a42183f3bfd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f2dc591e2c8ad37502a5b6b7ceb121408b7214f4aa90fac859474a42183f3bfd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2018.06.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29934065$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khan, Zubair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tolia, Sunit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanam, Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gholkar, Gunjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zughaib, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naik, Sunil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zughaib, Marcel</creatorcontrib><title>Is there still a role for renal artery stenting in the management of renovascular hypertension – A single-center experience and where do we stand?</title><title>Cardiovascular revascularization medicine</title><addtitle>Cardiovasc Revasc Med</addtitle><description>Renal artery (RA) stenosis has been implicated in the pathophysiological mechanism for resistant hypertension. Despite the increasingly diagnosed frequency of hemodynamically significant lesions, the value of RA revascularization remains controversial. Our group had previously demonstrated significant blood pressure (BP) reduction in a retrospective cohort of appropriately selected patients undergoing RA stenting up to 18-months of follow-up. We herein present long-term clinical outcomes data 5-years post revascularization on 26 subjects who continued follow-up at our institution.
Retrospective analysis was performed on subjects who underwent RA stenting at our institution for hemodynamically significant (≥70%) RA stenosis and systolic hypertension on ≥3 antihypertensive agents. Clinical outcome data for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), creatinine level and number of antihypertensive drugs was assessed prior to and then later at 6–12 months and 3–5 years post RA stenting.
Mean age was 69 ± 9 years; 27% (7/26) were male. Median follow-up was 5.1 years. Blood pressure reduction was sustained at long-term follow-up (135/70 ± 18/11 mmHg) compared to initial reduction noted at 6-months (136/69 ± 16/8 mmHg; p ≤0.01 for both) and from baseline (162/80 ± 24/18 mmHg; p ≤0.001 for both). The number of antihypertensive agents also decreased from 4.1 ± 1.0 to 2.7 ± 2.1 (p = 0.002) at 6-months and was sustained at long-term follow-up, 3.4 ± 1.2 (p = 0.03) with no difference in renal function between short- and long-term follow-up compared to baseline.
This study shows sustained benefit of RA stenting in BP reduction in an appropriately selected cohort with significant stenosis ≥70% and uncontrolled hypertension on multiple medications on long-term follow-up.
•Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) is the leading cause of secondary hypertension.•There remains an unmet need for blood pressure optimization in patients with ARAS despite being on optimal medical regimen.•Multiple RCT's have failed to show any substantial benefit of renal artery stenting but have been criticized for appropriate patient selection.•Renal artery stenting in carefully selected 'real life' patients with uncontrolled hypertension can potentially provide long term sustained blood pressure reduction.•Large RCT’s are warranted to prove benefit of renal revascularization in high-risk patients and overcome the short-comings of earlier studies.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>Clinical Decision-Making</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - standards</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension, Renovascular - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hypertension, Renovascular - etiology</subject><subject>Hypertension, Renovascular - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hypertension, Renovascular - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Renal Artery Obstruction - complications</subject><subject>Renal Artery Obstruction - diagnosis</subject><subject>Renal Artery Obstruction - physiopathology</subject><subject>Renal Artery Obstruction - therapy</subject><subject>Renal artery stenosis</subject><subject>Renovascular hypertension</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stent</subject><subject>Stents - standards</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1553-8389</issn><issn>1878-0938</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EoqXwBgj5yCXBf-LEuYCqikKlSlzgbDnOuPUqsZdxdsveeAf6hDwJTrdw5DTW-Pf5G89HyGvOas54-25TO4sI-1owrmvW1ozpJ-SU605XrJf6aTkrJSstdX9CXuS8YUx2ou2ekxPR97JhrTol91eZLreAQPMSpolaimkC6hNShGhLAxfAQ7mFuIR4Q0NceTrbaG9gLk2a_Iqmvc1uN1mkt4ctFFHMIUX6--cvek5zUU5QuYIDUvhRgADRAbVxpHcP9mOid-sQpfPhJXnm7ZTh1WM9I98uP369-Fxdf_l0dXF-XTnZiqXyYnSq5yCctqPsFBNWDe3QORi44A3TQ1eKb6ztmbdOq77pGtsIrqWXgx_lGXl7fHeL6fsO8mLmkB1Mk42QdtkIprQqa2p5QZsj6jDljODNFsNs8WA4M2seZmOOeZg1D8NaU_IosjePDrthhvGf6G8ABXh_BKD8cx8ATXYPqxkDglvMmML_Hf4Ad2ShTQ</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Khan, Zubair</creator><creator>Tolia, Sunit</creator><creator>Sanam, Kumar</creator><creator>Gholkar, Gunjan</creator><creator>Zughaib, Marc</creator><creator>Naik, Sunil</creator><creator>Zughaib, Marcel</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Is there still a role for renal artery stenting in the management of renovascular hypertension – A single-center experience and where do we stand?</title><author>Khan, Zubair ; Tolia, Sunit ; Sanam, Kumar ; Gholkar, Gunjan ; Zughaib, Marc ; Naik, Sunil ; Zughaib, Marcel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f2dc591e2c8ad37502a5b6b7ceb121408b7214f4aa90fac859474a42183f3bfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>Clinical Decision-Making</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - standards</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension, Renovascular - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hypertension, Renovascular - etiology</topic><topic>Hypertension, Renovascular - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hypertension, Renovascular - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Renal Artery Obstruction - complications</topic><topic>Renal Artery Obstruction - diagnosis</topic><topic>Renal Artery Obstruction - physiopathology</topic><topic>Renal Artery Obstruction - therapy</topic><topic>Renal artery stenosis</topic><topic>Renovascular hypertension</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stent</topic><topic>Stents - standards</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khan, Zubair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tolia, Sunit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanam, Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gholkar, Gunjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zughaib, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naik, Sunil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zughaib, Marcel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cardiovascular revascularization medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khan, Zubair</au><au>Tolia, Sunit</au><au>Sanam, Kumar</au><au>Gholkar, Gunjan</au><au>Zughaib, Marc</au><au>Naik, Sunil</au><au>Zughaib, Marcel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is there still a role for renal artery stenting in the management of renovascular hypertension – A single-center experience and where do we stand?</atitle><jtitle>Cardiovascular revascularization medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Cardiovasc Revasc Med</addtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>202</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>202-206</pages><issn>1553-8389</issn><eissn>1878-0938</eissn><abstract>Renal artery (RA) stenosis has been implicated in the pathophysiological mechanism for resistant hypertension. Despite the increasingly diagnosed frequency of hemodynamically significant lesions, the value of RA revascularization remains controversial. Our group had previously demonstrated significant blood pressure (BP) reduction in a retrospective cohort of appropriately selected patients undergoing RA stenting up to 18-months of follow-up. We herein present long-term clinical outcomes data 5-years post revascularization on 26 subjects who continued follow-up at our institution.
Retrospective analysis was performed on subjects who underwent RA stenting at our institution for hemodynamically significant (≥70%) RA stenosis and systolic hypertension on ≥3 antihypertensive agents. Clinical outcome data for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), creatinine level and number of antihypertensive drugs was assessed prior to and then later at 6–12 months and 3–5 years post RA stenting.
Mean age was 69 ± 9 years; 27% (7/26) were male. Median follow-up was 5.1 years. Blood pressure reduction was sustained at long-term follow-up (135/70 ± 18/11 mmHg) compared to initial reduction noted at 6-months (136/69 ± 16/8 mmHg; p ≤0.01 for both) and from baseline (162/80 ± 24/18 mmHg; p ≤0.001 for both). The number of antihypertensive agents also decreased from 4.1 ± 1.0 to 2.7 ± 2.1 (p = 0.002) at 6-months and was sustained at long-term follow-up, 3.4 ± 1.2 (p = 0.03) with no difference in renal function between short- and long-term follow-up compared to baseline.
This study shows sustained benefit of RA stenting in BP reduction in an appropriately selected cohort with significant stenosis ≥70% and uncontrolled hypertension on multiple medications on long-term follow-up.
•Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) is the leading cause of secondary hypertension.•There remains an unmet need for blood pressure optimization in patients with ARAS despite being on optimal medical regimen.•Multiple RCT's have failed to show any substantial benefit of renal artery stenting but have been criticized for appropriate patient selection.•Renal artery stenting in carefully selected 'real life' patients with uncontrolled hypertension can potentially provide long term sustained blood pressure reduction.•Large RCT’s are warranted to prove benefit of renal revascularization in high-risk patients and overcome the short-comings of earlier studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29934065</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.carrev.2018.06.008</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1553-8389 |
ispartof | Cardiovascular revascularization medicine, 2019-03, Vol.20 (3), p.202-206 |
issn | 1553-8389 1878-0938 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2058506561 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use Blood Pressure - drug effects Clinical Decision-Making Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation Endovascular Procedures - standards Female Humans Hypertension, Renovascular - diagnosis Hypertension, Renovascular - etiology Hypertension, Renovascular - physiopathology Hypertension, Renovascular - therapy Male Michigan Middle Aged Patient Selection Practice Guidelines as Topic Renal Artery Obstruction - complications Renal Artery Obstruction - diagnosis Renal Artery Obstruction - physiopathology Renal Artery Obstruction - therapy Renal artery stenosis Renovascular hypertension Retrospective Studies Stent Stents - standards Time Factors Treatment Outcome |
title | Is there still a role for renal artery stenting in the management of renovascular hypertension – A single-center experience and where do we stand? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T23%3A38%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20there%20still%20a%20role%20for%20renal%20artery%20stenting%20in%20the%20management%20of%20renovascular%20hypertension%20%E2%80%93%20A%20single-center%20experience%20and%20where%20do%20we%20stand?&rft.jtitle=Cardiovascular%20revascularization%20medicine&rft.au=Khan,%20Zubair&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=202&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=202-206&rft.issn=1553-8389&rft.eissn=1878-0938&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.carrev.2018.06.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2058506561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2058506561&rft_id=info:pmid/29934065&rft_els_id=S1553838918302549&rfr_iscdi=true |