Comparing Effects of Nutrients on Algal Biomass in Streams in Two Regions with Different Disturbance Regimes and with Applications for Developing Nutrient Criteria
Issue Title: Theme Advances in Algal Biology: A Commemoration of the Work of Rex Lowe Responses of stream algal biomass to nutrient enrichment were studied in two regions where differences in hydrologic variability cause great differences in herbivory. Around northwestern Kentucky (KY) hydrologic va...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hydrobiologia 2006-05, Vol.561 (1), p.149-165 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 165 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 149 |
container_title | Hydrobiologia |
container_volume | 561 |
creator | Stevenson, R. Jan Rier, Steven T. Riseng, Catherine M. Schultz, Richard E. Wiley, Michael J. |
description | Issue Title: Theme Advances in Algal Biology: A Commemoration of the Work of Rex Lowe Responses of stream algal biomass to nutrient enrichment were studied in two regions where differences in hydrologic variability cause great differences in herbivory. Around northwestern Kentucky (KY) hydrologic variability constrains invertebrate biomass and their effects on algae, but hydrologic stability in Michigan (MI) streams permits accrual of high herbivore densities and herbivory of benthic algae. Multiple indicators of algal biomass and nutrient availability were measured in 104 streams with repeated sampling at each site over a 2-month period. Many measures of algal biomass and nutrient availability were positively correlated in both regions, however the amount of variation explained varied with measures of biomass and nutrient concentration and with region. Indicators of diatom biomass were higher in KY than MI, but were not related to nutrient concentrations in either region. Chl a and % area of substratum covered by Cladophora were positively correlated to nutrient concentrations in both regions. Cladophora responded significantly more to nutrients in MI than KY. Total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN) explained similar amounts of variation in algal biomass, and not significantly more variation in biomass than dissolved nutrient concentrations. Low N:P ratios in the benthic algae indicated N as well as P may be limiting their accrual. Most observed responses in benthic algal biomass occurred in nutrient concentrations between 10 and 30 μg TP l^sup -1^ and between 400 and 1000 μg TN l^sup -1^.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10750-005-1611-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20584583</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2224112951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-7934910be82a45484ab8a679101fb8e8f1681a4e02ff6d95ab23d452f3d36fcf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFO3DAQhq0KpC7QB-jN6qG3FE8cJ85xu9AWaQVSgbPlZMdbrxI72A6I5-FF691tL5zmn9H3z4z0E_IZ2DdgrLmMwBrBCsZEATVAIT6QBYiGFwKgOSELxkAWEoT8SM5i3LHsaUu2IG8rP046WLel18ZgnyL1ht7OKVh0-8bR5bDVA_1u_ahjpNbR-xRQjwf58OLpb9xa7yJ9sekPvbJ5S8jWrGKaQ6ddjwdkxEi12xyx5TQNttfpYDQ-0Ct8xsFP-z_-H6erYBMGqy_IqdFDxE__6jl5_HH9sPpVrO9-3qyW66LnjKeiaXnVAutQlroSlax0J3Xd5BGYTqI0UEvQFbLSmHrTCt2VfFOJ0vANr01v-Dn5etw7Bf80Y0xqtLHHYdAO_RxVyYSshOQZ_PIO3Pk5uPybkiUIaDi0GYIj1AcfY0CjpmBHHV4VMLXPTB0zUzkztc9MCf4XwNWMBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821517319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Effects of Nutrients on Algal Biomass in Streams in Two Regions with Different Disturbance Regimes and with Applications for Developing Nutrient Criteria</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Stevenson, R. Jan ; Rier, Steven T. ; Riseng, Catherine M. ; Schultz, Richard E. ; Wiley, Michael J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, R. Jan ; Rier, Steven T. ; Riseng, Catherine M. ; Schultz, Richard E. ; Wiley, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><description>Issue Title: Theme Advances in Algal Biology: A Commemoration of the Work of Rex Lowe Responses of stream algal biomass to nutrient enrichment were studied in two regions where differences in hydrologic variability cause great differences in herbivory. Around northwestern Kentucky (KY) hydrologic variability constrains invertebrate biomass and their effects on algae, but hydrologic stability in Michigan (MI) streams permits accrual of high herbivore densities and herbivory of benthic algae. Multiple indicators of algal biomass and nutrient availability were measured in 104 streams with repeated sampling at each site over a 2-month period. Many measures of algal biomass and nutrient availability were positively correlated in both regions, however the amount of variation explained varied with measures of biomass and nutrient concentration and with region. Indicators of diatom biomass were higher in KY than MI, but were not related to nutrient concentrations in either region. Chl a and % area of substratum covered by Cladophora were positively correlated to nutrient concentrations in both regions. Cladophora responded significantly more to nutrients in MI than KY. Total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN) explained similar amounts of variation in algal biomass, and not significantly more variation in biomass than dissolved nutrient concentrations. Low N:P ratios in the benthic algae indicated N as well as P may be limiting their accrual. Most observed responses in benthic algal biomass occurred in nutrient concentrations between 10 and 30 μg TP l^sup -1^ and between 400 and 1000 μg TN l^sup -1^.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-005-1611-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Algae ; Bacillariophyceae ; Biomass ; Cladophora ; Freshwater ; Herbivory ; Nutrient availability ; Nutrient concentrations</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2006-05, Vol.561 (1), p.149-165</ispartof><rights>Springer 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-7934910be82a45484ab8a679101fb8e8f1681a4e02ff6d95ab23d452f3d36fcf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-7934910be82a45484ab8a679101fb8e8f1681a4e02ff6d95ab23d452f3d36fcf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, R. Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rier, Steven T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riseng, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Effects of Nutrients on Algal Biomass in Streams in Two Regions with Different Disturbance Regimes and with Applications for Developing Nutrient Criteria</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><description>Issue Title: Theme Advances in Algal Biology: A Commemoration of the Work of Rex Lowe Responses of stream algal biomass to nutrient enrichment were studied in two regions where differences in hydrologic variability cause great differences in herbivory. Around northwestern Kentucky (KY) hydrologic variability constrains invertebrate biomass and their effects on algae, but hydrologic stability in Michigan (MI) streams permits accrual of high herbivore densities and herbivory of benthic algae. Multiple indicators of algal biomass and nutrient availability were measured in 104 streams with repeated sampling at each site over a 2-month period. Many measures of algal biomass and nutrient availability were positively correlated in both regions, however the amount of variation explained varied with measures of biomass and nutrient concentration and with region. Indicators of diatom biomass were higher in KY than MI, but were not related to nutrient concentrations in either region. Chl a and % area of substratum covered by Cladophora were positively correlated to nutrient concentrations in both regions. Cladophora responded significantly more to nutrients in MI than KY. Total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN) explained similar amounts of variation in algal biomass, and not significantly more variation in biomass than dissolved nutrient concentrations. Low N:P ratios in the benthic algae indicated N as well as P may be limiting their accrual. Most observed responses in benthic algal biomass occurred in nutrient concentrations between 10 and 30 μg TP l^sup -1^ and between 400 and 1000 μg TN l^sup -1^.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Bacillariophyceae</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Cladophora</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Nutrient availability</subject><subject>Nutrient concentrations</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkcFO3DAQhq0KpC7QB-jN6qG3FE8cJ85xu9AWaQVSgbPlZMdbrxI72A6I5-FF691tL5zmn9H3z4z0E_IZ2DdgrLmMwBrBCsZEATVAIT6QBYiGFwKgOSELxkAWEoT8SM5i3LHsaUu2IG8rP046WLel18ZgnyL1ht7OKVh0-8bR5bDVA_1u_ahjpNbR-xRQjwf58OLpb9xa7yJ9sekPvbJ5S8jWrGKaQ6ddjwdkxEi12xyx5TQNttfpYDQ-0Ct8xsFP-z_-H6erYBMGqy_IqdFDxE__6jl5_HH9sPpVrO9-3qyW66LnjKeiaXnVAutQlroSlax0J3Xd5BGYTqI0UEvQFbLSmHrTCt2VfFOJ0vANr01v-Dn5etw7Bf80Y0xqtLHHYdAO_RxVyYSshOQZ_PIO3Pk5uPybkiUIaDi0GYIj1AcfY0CjpmBHHV4VMLXPTB0zUzkztc9MCf4XwNWMBQ</recordid><startdate>20060501</startdate><enddate>20060501</enddate><creator>Stevenson, R. Jan</creator><creator>Rier, Steven T.</creator><creator>Riseng, Catherine M.</creator><creator>Schultz, Richard E.</creator><creator>Wiley, Michael J.</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>H96</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060501</creationdate><title>Comparing Effects of Nutrients on Algal Biomass in Streams in Two Regions with Different Disturbance Regimes and with Applications for Developing Nutrient Criteria</title><author>Stevenson, R. Jan ; Rier, Steven T. ; Riseng, Catherine M. ; Schultz, Richard E. ; Wiley, Michael J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-7934910be82a45484ab8a679101fb8e8f1681a4e02ff6d95ab23d452f3d36fcf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Bacillariophyceae</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Cladophora</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Nutrient availability</topic><topic>Nutrient concentrations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, R. Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rier, Steven T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riseng, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stevenson, R. Jan</au><au>Rier, Steven T.</au><au>Riseng, Catherine M.</au><au>Schultz, Richard E.</au><au>Wiley, Michael J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing Effects of Nutrients on Algal Biomass in Streams in Two Regions with Different Disturbance Regimes and with Applications for Developing Nutrient Criteria</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><date>2006-05-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>561</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>149-165</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><abstract>Issue Title: Theme Advances in Algal Biology: A Commemoration of the Work of Rex Lowe Responses of stream algal biomass to nutrient enrichment were studied in two regions where differences in hydrologic variability cause great differences in herbivory. Around northwestern Kentucky (KY) hydrologic variability constrains invertebrate biomass and their effects on algae, but hydrologic stability in Michigan (MI) streams permits accrual of high herbivore densities and herbivory of benthic algae. Multiple indicators of algal biomass and nutrient availability were measured in 104 streams with repeated sampling at each site over a 2-month period. Many measures of algal biomass and nutrient availability were positively correlated in both regions, however the amount of variation explained varied with measures of biomass and nutrient concentration and with region. Indicators of diatom biomass were higher in KY than MI, but were not related to nutrient concentrations in either region. Chl a and % area of substratum covered by Cladophora were positively correlated to nutrient concentrations in both regions. Cladophora responded significantly more to nutrients in MI than KY. Total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN) explained similar amounts of variation in algal biomass, and not significantly more variation in biomass than dissolved nutrient concentrations. Low N:P ratios in the benthic algae indicated N as well as P may be limiting their accrual. Most observed responses in benthic algal biomass occurred in nutrient concentrations between 10 and 30 μg TP l^sup -1^ and between 400 and 1000 μg TN l^sup -1^.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-005-1611-5</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-8158 |
ispartof | Hydrobiologia, 2006-05, Vol.561 (1), p.149-165 |
issn | 0018-8158 1573-5117 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20584583 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Algae Bacillariophyceae Biomass Cladophora Freshwater Herbivory Nutrient availability Nutrient concentrations |
title | Comparing Effects of Nutrients on Algal Biomass in Streams in Two Regions with Different Disturbance Regimes and with Applications for Developing Nutrient Criteria |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A24%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Effects%20of%20Nutrients%20on%20Algal%20Biomass%20in%20Streams%20in%20Two%20Regions%20with%20Different%20Disturbance%20Regimes%20and%20with%20Applications%20for%20Developing%20Nutrient%20Criteria&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=Stevenson,%20R.%20Jan&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.volume=561&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=149-165&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-005-1611-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2224112951%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821517319&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |