Comparing Effects of Nutrients on Algal Biomass in Streams in Two Regions with Different Disturbance Regimes and with Applications for Developing Nutrient Criteria

Issue Title: Theme Advances in Algal Biology: A Commemoration of the Work of Rex Lowe Responses of stream algal biomass to nutrient enrichment were studied in two regions where differences in hydrologic variability cause great differences in herbivory. Around northwestern Kentucky (KY) hydrologic va...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrobiologia 2006-05, Vol.561 (1), p.149-165
Hauptverfasser: Stevenson, R. Jan, Rier, Steven T., Riseng, Catherine M., Schultz, Richard E., Wiley, Michael J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 165
container_issue 1
container_start_page 149
container_title Hydrobiologia
container_volume 561
creator Stevenson, R. Jan
Rier, Steven T.
Riseng, Catherine M.
Schultz, Richard E.
Wiley, Michael J.
description Issue Title: Theme Advances in Algal Biology: A Commemoration of the Work of Rex Lowe Responses of stream algal biomass to nutrient enrichment were studied in two regions where differences in hydrologic variability cause great differences in herbivory. Around northwestern Kentucky (KY) hydrologic variability constrains invertebrate biomass and their effects on algae, but hydrologic stability in Michigan (MI) streams permits accrual of high herbivore densities and herbivory of benthic algae. Multiple indicators of algal biomass and nutrient availability were measured in 104 streams with repeated sampling at each site over a 2-month period. Many measures of algal biomass and nutrient availability were positively correlated in both regions, however the amount of variation explained varied with measures of biomass and nutrient concentration and with region. Indicators of diatom biomass were higher in KY than MI, but were not related to nutrient concentrations in either region. Chl a and % area of substratum covered by Cladophora were positively correlated to nutrient concentrations in both regions. Cladophora responded significantly more to nutrients in MI than KY. Total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN) explained similar amounts of variation in algal biomass, and not significantly more variation in biomass than dissolved nutrient concentrations. Low N:P ratios in the benthic algae indicated N as well as P may be limiting their accrual. Most observed responses in benthic algal biomass occurred in nutrient concentrations between 10 and 30 μg TP l^sup -1^ and between 400 and 1000 μg TN l^sup -1^.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10750-005-1611-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20584583</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2224112951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-7934910be82a45484ab8a679101fb8e8f1681a4e02ff6d95ab23d452f3d36fcf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFO3DAQhq0KpC7QB-jN6qG3FE8cJ85xu9AWaQVSgbPlZMdbrxI72A6I5-FF691tL5zmn9H3z4z0E_IZ2DdgrLmMwBrBCsZEATVAIT6QBYiGFwKgOSELxkAWEoT8SM5i3LHsaUu2IG8rP046WLel18ZgnyL1ht7OKVh0-8bR5bDVA_1u_ahjpNbR-xRQjwf58OLpb9xa7yJ9sekPvbJ5S8jWrGKaQ6ddjwdkxEi12xyx5TQNttfpYDQ-0Ct8xsFP-z_-H6erYBMGqy_IqdFDxE__6jl5_HH9sPpVrO9-3qyW66LnjKeiaXnVAutQlroSlax0J3Xd5BGYTqI0UEvQFbLSmHrTCt2VfFOJ0vANr01v-Dn5etw7Bf80Y0xqtLHHYdAO_RxVyYSshOQZ_PIO3Pk5uPybkiUIaDi0GYIj1AcfY0CjpmBHHV4VMLXPTB0zUzkztc9MCf4XwNWMBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821517319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Effects of Nutrients on Algal Biomass in Streams in Two Regions with Different Disturbance Regimes and with Applications for Developing Nutrient Criteria</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Stevenson, R. Jan ; Rier, Steven T. ; Riseng, Catherine M. ; Schultz, Richard E. ; Wiley, Michael J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, R. Jan ; Rier, Steven T. ; Riseng, Catherine M. ; Schultz, Richard E. ; Wiley, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><description>Issue Title: Theme Advances in Algal Biology: A Commemoration of the Work of Rex Lowe Responses of stream algal biomass to nutrient enrichment were studied in two regions where differences in hydrologic variability cause great differences in herbivory. Around northwestern Kentucky (KY) hydrologic variability constrains invertebrate biomass and their effects on algae, but hydrologic stability in Michigan (MI) streams permits accrual of high herbivore densities and herbivory of benthic algae. Multiple indicators of algal biomass and nutrient availability were measured in 104 streams with repeated sampling at each site over a 2-month period. Many measures of algal biomass and nutrient availability were positively correlated in both regions, however the amount of variation explained varied with measures of biomass and nutrient concentration and with region. Indicators of diatom biomass were higher in KY than MI, but were not related to nutrient concentrations in either region. Chl a and % area of substratum covered by Cladophora were positively correlated to nutrient concentrations in both regions. Cladophora responded significantly more to nutrients in MI than KY. Total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN) explained similar amounts of variation in algal biomass, and not significantly more variation in biomass than dissolved nutrient concentrations. Low N:P ratios in the benthic algae indicated N as well as P may be limiting their accrual. Most observed responses in benthic algal biomass occurred in nutrient concentrations between 10 and 30 μg TP l^sup -1^ and between 400 and 1000 μg TN l^sup -1^.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-005-1611-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Algae ; Bacillariophyceae ; Biomass ; Cladophora ; Freshwater ; Herbivory ; Nutrient availability ; Nutrient concentrations</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2006-05, Vol.561 (1), p.149-165</ispartof><rights>Springer 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-7934910be82a45484ab8a679101fb8e8f1681a4e02ff6d95ab23d452f3d36fcf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-7934910be82a45484ab8a679101fb8e8f1681a4e02ff6d95ab23d452f3d36fcf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, R. Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rier, Steven T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riseng, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Effects of Nutrients on Algal Biomass in Streams in Two Regions with Different Disturbance Regimes and with Applications for Developing Nutrient Criteria</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><description>Issue Title: Theme Advances in Algal Biology: A Commemoration of the Work of Rex Lowe Responses of stream algal biomass to nutrient enrichment were studied in two regions where differences in hydrologic variability cause great differences in herbivory. Around northwestern Kentucky (KY) hydrologic variability constrains invertebrate biomass and their effects on algae, but hydrologic stability in Michigan (MI) streams permits accrual of high herbivore densities and herbivory of benthic algae. Multiple indicators of algal biomass and nutrient availability were measured in 104 streams with repeated sampling at each site over a 2-month period. Many measures of algal biomass and nutrient availability were positively correlated in both regions, however the amount of variation explained varied with measures of biomass and nutrient concentration and with region. Indicators of diatom biomass were higher in KY than MI, but were not related to nutrient concentrations in either region. Chl a and % area of substratum covered by Cladophora were positively correlated to nutrient concentrations in both regions. Cladophora responded significantly more to nutrients in MI than KY. Total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN) explained similar amounts of variation in algal biomass, and not significantly more variation in biomass than dissolved nutrient concentrations. Low N:P ratios in the benthic algae indicated N as well as P may be limiting their accrual. Most observed responses in benthic algal biomass occurred in nutrient concentrations between 10 and 30 μg TP l^sup -1^ and between 400 and 1000 μg TN l^sup -1^.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Bacillariophyceae</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Cladophora</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Nutrient availability</subject><subject>Nutrient concentrations</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkcFO3DAQhq0KpC7QB-jN6qG3FE8cJ85xu9AWaQVSgbPlZMdbrxI72A6I5-FF691tL5zmn9H3z4z0E_IZ2DdgrLmMwBrBCsZEATVAIT6QBYiGFwKgOSELxkAWEoT8SM5i3LHsaUu2IG8rP046WLel18ZgnyL1ht7OKVh0-8bR5bDVA_1u_ahjpNbR-xRQjwf58OLpb9xa7yJ9sekPvbJ5S8jWrGKaQ6ddjwdkxEi12xyx5TQNttfpYDQ-0Ct8xsFP-z_-H6erYBMGqy_IqdFDxE__6jl5_HH9sPpVrO9-3qyW66LnjKeiaXnVAutQlroSlax0J3Xd5BGYTqI0UEvQFbLSmHrTCt2VfFOJ0vANr01v-Dn5etw7Bf80Y0xqtLHHYdAO_RxVyYSshOQZ_PIO3Pk5uPybkiUIaDi0GYIj1AcfY0CjpmBHHV4VMLXPTB0zUzkztc9MCf4XwNWMBQ</recordid><startdate>20060501</startdate><enddate>20060501</enddate><creator>Stevenson, R. Jan</creator><creator>Rier, Steven T.</creator><creator>Riseng, Catherine M.</creator><creator>Schultz, Richard E.</creator><creator>Wiley, Michael J.</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>H96</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060501</creationdate><title>Comparing Effects of Nutrients on Algal Biomass in Streams in Two Regions with Different Disturbance Regimes and with Applications for Developing Nutrient Criteria</title><author>Stevenson, R. Jan ; Rier, Steven T. ; Riseng, Catherine M. ; Schultz, Richard E. ; Wiley, Michael J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-7934910be82a45484ab8a679101fb8e8f1681a4e02ff6d95ab23d452f3d36fcf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Bacillariophyceae</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Cladophora</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Nutrient availability</topic><topic>Nutrient concentrations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, R. Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rier, Steven T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riseng, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stevenson, R. Jan</au><au>Rier, Steven T.</au><au>Riseng, Catherine M.</au><au>Schultz, Richard E.</au><au>Wiley, Michael J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing Effects of Nutrients on Algal Biomass in Streams in Two Regions with Different Disturbance Regimes and with Applications for Developing Nutrient Criteria</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><date>2006-05-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>561</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>149-165</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><abstract>Issue Title: Theme Advances in Algal Biology: A Commemoration of the Work of Rex Lowe Responses of stream algal biomass to nutrient enrichment were studied in two regions where differences in hydrologic variability cause great differences in herbivory. Around northwestern Kentucky (KY) hydrologic variability constrains invertebrate biomass and their effects on algae, but hydrologic stability in Michigan (MI) streams permits accrual of high herbivore densities and herbivory of benthic algae. Multiple indicators of algal biomass and nutrient availability were measured in 104 streams with repeated sampling at each site over a 2-month period. Many measures of algal biomass and nutrient availability were positively correlated in both regions, however the amount of variation explained varied with measures of biomass and nutrient concentration and with region. Indicators of diatom biomass were higher in KY than MI, but were not related to nutrient concentrations in either region. Chl a and % area of substratum covered by Cladophora were positively correlated to nutrient concentrations in both regions. Cladophora responded significantly more to nutrients in MI than KY. Total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN) explained similar amounts of variation in algal biomass, and not significantly more variation in biomass than dissolved nutrient concentrations. Low N:P ratios in the benthic algae indicated N as well as P may be limiting their accrual. Most observed responses in benthic algal biomass occurred in nutrient concentrations between 10 and 30 μg TP l^sup -1^ and between 400 and 1000 μg TN l^sup -1^.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-005-1611-5</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-8158
ispartof Hydrobiologia, 2006-05, Vol.561 (1), p.149-165
issn 0018-8158
1573-5117
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20584583
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Algae
Bacillariophyceae
Biomass
Cladophora
Freshwater
Herbivory
Nutrient availability
Nutrient concentrations
title Comparing Effects of Nutrients on Algal Biomass in Streams in Two Regions with Different Disturbance Regimes and with Applications for Developing Nutrient Criteria
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A24%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Effects%20of%20Nutrients%20on%20Algal%20Biomass%20in%20Streams%20in%20Two%20Regions%20with%20Different%20Disturbance%20Regimes%20and%20with%20Applications%20for%20Developing%20Nutrient%20Criteria&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=Stevenson,%20R.%20Jan&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.volume=561&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=149-165&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-005-1611-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2224112951%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821517319&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true