Seed mass, abundance and breeding system among tropical forest species: do dioecious species exhibit compensatory reproduction or abundances?

1. Dioecious species may suffer a reproductive handicap compared to sympatric cosexual (hermaphroditic or monoecious) species of equal abundance simply because populations of dioecious species contain fewer seed-producing individuals. To compensate for this population-level disadvantage, natural sel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of ecology 2009-05, Vol.97 (3), p.555-566
Hauptverfasser: Queenborough, Simon A., Mazer, Susan J., Vamosi, Steven M., Garwood, Nancy C., Valencia, Renato, Freckleton, Rob P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 566
container_issue 3
container_start_page 555
container_title The Journal of ecology
container_volume 97
creator Queenborough, Simon A.
Mazer, Susan J.
Vamosi, Steven M.
Garwood, Nancy C.
Valencia, Renato
Freckleton, Rob P.
description 1. Dioecious species may suffer a reproductive handicap compared to sympatric cosexual (hermaphroditic or monoecious) species of equal abundance simply because populations of dioecious species contain fewer seed-producing individuals. To compensate for this population-level disadvantage, natural selection in dioecious populations should favour females that reallocate those reproductive resources, that in cosexual individuals are invested in male function, towards the production of higher quality or more seeds, potentially leading to a higher density of established individuals. 2. We tested for two compensatory fitness advantages (heavier seeds and higher population densities) in dioecious species in the flora of a high-diversity tropical forest in Western Amazonia. Using a phylogenetically corrected generalized linear modelling approach, we examined the phylogenetic dependence (Pagel's λ) of seed mass, abundance, growth form and wood-specific gravity for 641 species from Yasuní National Park, Ecuador. Seed mass was highly correlated with phylogeny, but abundance was not. We then used AIC values to test for models (including breeding system) that best explained seed mass and species abundance, using the maximum likelihood values of λ. 3. Contrary to expectations, dioecious species exhibited no advantage with respect to either seed mass or population density; there was no difference in mean seed mass or abundance between dioecious species and their most closely related cosexual species. 4. We compared our results with those from a similar forest in the Tambopata Wildlife Reserve, Peru. There, dioecious shrubs had larger seeds than hermaphroditic shrubs, but (as for Yasuní) there was no difference between breeding systems in seed size among trees. Differences in the composition of species sampled may have contributed to differences in the results between the two sites. 5. We suggest that other individual fitness advantages, such as reduced inbreeding, increased dispersal, superior seed quality (e.g. better defences) or increased seed number contribute to the persistence of dioecious populations at Yasuní. 6. Synthesis. Similarities in the statistical models of seed mass and abundance for plant species in a Western Amazonian rain forest indicate that selective pressures on the seed-producing individuals are similar, despite variation in sexual system. Therefore, breeding system may play a more limited role in community assembly of tropical forests than was pre
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01485.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20575368</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20528883</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20528883</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5635-9a41ed80ca28e00069f3a5dc19557c65112032889457d78be94801b3adee73113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUduK1TAULaLgcfQTxCDokz3m0rSpICKH8caAD-M8hzTZHVPapiYtnvMR_rO7dpwBn8xLsrPXWvuysowwumd4Xnd7JkqZ86qQe05pvaesUHJ_vJftbhP3sx2lnOe0qKqH2aOUOkppWUm6y35dAjgymJReEdMsozOjBWJGR5qIGT9ek3RKMwzEDAGDOYbJW9OTNkRIM0kTWA_pDXGBOB8wCEv6-0vg-N03fiY2DBOMycwhnkiEKQa32NmHkYR4Vza9e5w9aE2f4MnNfZZdfTj_dviUX3z9-Pnw_iK3shQyr03BwClqDVewjlK3wkhnWS1lZUvJGKeCK1UXsnKVaqAuFGWNMA6gEoyJs-zlpoud_FhwDj34ZKHvzQjYv-ZUVlKUCoHP_wF2YYkj9oYYVeNWZY0gtYFsDClFaPUU_WDiSTOqV5N0p1cv9OqFXk3Sf0zSR6S-uNE3CbfaRtyDT7d8zgSXBVtLvN1wP30Pp__W11_OD-sL-U83fpfQgzt9KnFNSmD-2ZZvTdDmOmIPV5ecMkFZyUpeU_Eb1pO5BQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208900259</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seed mass, abundance and breeding system among tropical forest species: do dioecious species exhibit compensatory reproduction or abundances?</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Queenborough, Simon A. ; Mazer, Susan J. ; Vamosi, Steven M. ; Garwood, Nancy C. ; Valencia, Renato ; Freckleton, Rob P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Queenborough, Simon A. ; Mazer, Susan J. ; Vamosi, Steven M. ; Garwood, Nancy C. ; Valencia, Renato ; Freckleton, Rob P.</creatorcontrib><description>1. Dioecious species may suffer a reproductive handicap compared to sympatric cosexual (hermaphroditic or monoecious) species of equal abundance simply because populations of dioecious species contain fewer seed-producing individuals. To compensate for this population-level disadvantage, natural selection in dioecious populations should favour females that reallocate those reproductive resources, that in cosexual individuals are invested in male function, towards the production of higher quality or more seeds, potentially leading to a higher density of established individuals. 2. We tested for two compensatory fitness advantages (heavier seeds and higher population densities) in dioecious species in the flora of a high-diversity tropical forest in Western Amazonia. Using a phylogenetically corrected generalized linear modelling approach, we examined the phylogenetic dependence (Pagel's λ) of seed mass, abundance, growth form and wood-specific gravity for 641 species from Yasuní National Park, Ecuador. Seed mass was highly correlated with phylogeny, but abundance was not. We then used AIC values to test for models (including breeding system) that best explained seed mass and species abundance, using the maximum likelihood values of λ. 3. Contrary to expectations, dioecious species exhibited no advantage with respect to either seed mass or population density; there was no difference in mean seed mass or abundance between dioecious species and their most closely related cosexual species. 4. We compared our results with those from a similar forest in the Tambopata Wildlife Reserve, Peru. There, dioecious shrubs had larger seeds than hermaphroditic shrubs, but (as for Yasuní) there was no difference between breeding systems in seed size among trees. Differences in the composition of species sampled may have contributed to differences in the results between the two sites. 5. We suggest that other individual fitness advantages, such as reduced inbreeding, increased dispersal, superior seed quality (e.g. better defences) or increased seed number contribute to the persistence of dioecious populations at Yasuní. 6. Synthesis. Similarities in the statistical models of seed mass and abundance for plant species in a Western Amazonian rain forest indicate that selective pressures on the seed-producing individuals are similar, despite variation in sexual system. Therefore, breeding system may play a more limited role in community assembly of tropical forests than was previously considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01485.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JECOAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Amazonia ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological taxonomies ; Breeding ; breeding system ; Dioecy ; Ecology ; Evolution &amp; development ; Forest ecology ; Forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; General forest ecology ; Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology ; hermaphrodite ; Maximum likelihood method ; Nonnative species ; Phylogenetics ; Plant ecology ; Plant populations ; Plants ; reproductive biology ; Reproductive Ecology ; Seed size ; Seeds ; Species ; Trees</subject><ispartof>The Journal of ecology, 2009-05, Vol.97 (3), p.555-566</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. May 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5635-9a41ed80ca28e00069f3a5dc19557c65112032889457d78be94801b3adee73113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5635-9a41ed80ca28e00069f3a5dc19557c65112032889457d78be94801b3adee73113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20528883$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20528883$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21325419$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Queenborough, Simon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazer, Susan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vamosi, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garwood, Nancy C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valencia, Renato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freckleton, Rob P.</creatorcontrib><title>Seed mass, abundance and breeding system among tropical forest species: do dioecious species exhibit compensatory reproduction or abundances?</title><title>The Journal of ecology</title><description>1. Dioecious species may suffer a reproductive handicap compared to sympatric cosexual (hermaphroditic or monoecious) species of equal abundance simply because populations of dioecious species contain fewer seed-producing individuals. To compensate for this population-level disadvantage, natural selection in dioecious populations should favour females that reallocate those reproductive resources, that in cosexual individuals are invested in male function, towards the production of higher quality or more seeds, potentially leading to a higher density of established individuals. 2. We tested for two compensatory fitness advantages (heavier seeds and higher population densities) in dioecious species in the flora of a high-diversity tropical forest in Western Amazonia. Using a phylogenetically corrected generalized linear modelling approach, we examined the phylogenetic dependence (Pagel's λ) of seed mass, abundance, growth form and wood-specific gravity for 641 species from Yasuní National Park, Ecuador. Seed mass was highly correlated with phylogeny, but abundance was not. We then used AIC values to test for models (including breeding system) that best explained seed mass and species abundance, using the maximum likelihood values of λ. 3. Contrary to expectations, dioecious species exhibited no advantage with respect to either seed mass or population density; there was no difference in mean seed mass or abundance between dioecious species and their most closely related cosexual species. 4. We compared our results with those from a similar forest in the Tambopata Wildlife Reserve, Peru. There, dioecious shrubs had larger seeds than hermaphroditic shrubs, but (as for Yasuní) there was no difference between breeding systems in seed size among trees. Differences in the composition of species sampled may have contributed to differences in the results between the two sites. 5. We suggest that other individual fitness advantages, such as reduced inbreeding, increased dispersal, superior seed quality (e.g. better defences) or increased seed number contribute to the persistence of dioecious populations at Yasuní. 6. Synthesis. Similarities in the statistical models of seed mass and abundance for plant species in a Western Amazonian rain forest indicate that selective pressures on the seed-producing individuals are similar, despite variation in sexual system. Therefore, breeding system may play a more limited role in community assembly of tropical forests than was previously considered.</description><subject>Amazonia</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological taxonomies</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>breeding system</subject><subject>Dioecy</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Evolution &amp; development</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>General forest ecology</subject><subject>Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology</subject><subject>hermaphrodite</subject><subject>Maximum likelihood method</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Plant ecology</subject><subject>Plant populations</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>reproductive biology</subject><subject>Reproductive Ecology</subject><subject>Seed size</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0022-0477</issn><issn>1365-2745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUduK1TAULaLgcfQTxCDokz3m0rSpICKH8caAD-M8hzTZHVPapiYtnvMR_rO7dpwBn8xLsrPXWvuysowwumd4Xnd7JkqZ86qQe05pvaesUHJ_vJftbhP3sx2lnOe0qKqH2aOUOkppWUm6y35dAjgymJReEdMsozOjBWJGR5qIGT9ek3RKMwzEDAGDOYbJW9OTNkRIM0kTWA_pDXGBOB8wCEv6-0vg-N03fiY2DBOMycwhnkiEKQa32NmHkYR4Vza9e5w9aE2f4MnNfZZdfTj_dviUX3z9-Pnw_iK3shQyr03BwClqDVewjlK3wkhnWS1lZUvJGKeCK1UXsnKVaqAuFGWNMA6gEoyJs-zlpoud_FhwDj34ZKHvzQjYv-ZUVlKUCoHP_wF2YYkj9oYYVeNWZY0gtYFsDClFaPUU_WDiSTOqV5N0p1cv9OqFXk3Sf0zSR6S-uNE3CbfaRtyDT7d8zgSXBVtLvN1wP30Pp__W11_OD-sL-U83fpfQgzt9KnFNSmD-2ZZvTdDmOmIPV5ecMkFZyUpeU_Eb1pO5BQ</recordid><startdate>200905</startdate><enddate>200905</enddate><creator>Queenborough, Simon A.</creator><creator>Mazer, Susan J.</creator><creator>Vamosi, Steven M.</creator><creator>Garwood, Nancy C.</creator><creator>Valencia, Renato</creator><creator>Freckleton, Rob P.</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200905</creationdate><title>Seed mass, abundance and breeding system among tropical forest species: do dioecious species exhibit compensatory reproduction or abundances?</title><author>Queenborough, Simon A. ; Mazer, Susan J. ; Vamosi, Steven M. ; Garwood, Nancy C. ; Valencia, Renato ; Freckleton, Rob P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5635-9a41ed80ca28e00069f3a5dc19557c65112032889457d78be94801b3adee73113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Amazonia</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological taxonomies</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>breeding system</topic><topic>Dioecy</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Evolution &amp; development</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>General forest ecology</topic><topic>Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology</topic><topic>hermaphrodite</topic><topic>Maximum likelihood method</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Plant ecology</topic><topic>Plant populations</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>reproductive biology</topic><topic>Reproductive Ecology</topic><topic>Seed size</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Queenborough, Simon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazer, Susan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vamosi, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garwood, Nancy C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valencia, Renato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freckleton, Rob P.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Queenborough, Simon A.</au><au>Mazer, Susan J.</au><au>Vamosi, Steven M.</au><au>Garwood, Nancy C.</au><au>Valencia, Renato</au><au>Freckleton, Rob P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seed mass, abundance and breeding system among tropical forest species: do dioecious species exhibit compensatory reproduction or abundances?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle><date>2009-05</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>555</spage><epage>566</epage><pages>555-566</pages><issn>0022-0477</issn><eissn>1365-2745</eissn><coden>JECOAB</coden><abstract>1. Dioecious species may suffer a reproductive handicap compared to sympatric cosexual (hermaphroditic or monoecious) species of equal abundance simply because populations of dioecious species contain fewer seed-producing individuals. To compensate for this population-level disadvantage, natural selection in dioecious populations should favour females that reallocate those reproductive resources, that in cosexual individuals are invested in male function, towards the production of higher quality or more seeds, potentially leading to a higher density of established individuals. 2. We tested for two compensatory fitness advantages (heavier seeds and higher population densities) in dioecious species in the flora of a high-diversity tropical forest in Western Amazonia. Using a phylogenetically corrected generalized linear modelling approach, we examined the phylogenetic dependence (Pagel's λ) of seed mass, abundance, growth form and wood-specific gravity for 641 species from Yasuní National Park, Ecuador. Seed mass was highly correlated with phylogeny, but abundance was not. We then used AIC values to test for models (including breeding system) that best explained seed mass and species abundance, using the maximum likelihood values of λ. 3. Contrary to expectations, dioecious species exhibited no advantage with respect to either seed mass or population density; there was no difference in mean seed mass or abundance between dioecious species and their most closely related cosexual species. 4. We compared our results with those from a similar forest in the Tambopata Wildlife Reserve, Peru. There, dioecious shrubs had larger seeds than hermaphroditic shrubs, but (as for Yasuní) there was no difference between breeding systems in seed size among trees. Differences in the composition of species sampled may have contributed to differences in the results between the two sites. 5. We suggest that other individual fitness advantages, such as reduced inbreeding, increased dispersal, superior seed quality (e.g. better defences) or increased seed number contribute to the persistence of dioecious populations at Yasuní. 6. Synthesis. Similarities in the statistical models of seed mass and abundance for plant species in a Western Amazonian rain forest indicate that selective pressures on the seed-producing individuals are similar, despite variation in sexual system. Therefore, breeding system may play a more limited role in community assembly of tropical forests than was previously considered.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01485.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0477
ispartof The Journal of ecology, 2009-05, Vol.97 (3), p.555-566
issn 0022-0477
1365-2745
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20575368
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects Amazonia
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biodiversity
Biological and medical sciences
Biological taxonomies
Breeding
breeding system
Dioecy
Ecology
Evolution & development
Forest ecology
Forestry
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
General forest ecology
Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology
hermaphrodite
Maximum likelihood method
Nonnative species
Phylogenetics
Plant ecology
Plant populations
Plants
reproductive biology
Reproductive Ecology
Seed size
Seeds
Species
Trees
title Seed mass, abundance and breeding system among tropical forest species: do dioecious species exhibit compensatory reproduction or abundances?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T02%3A44%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seed%20mass,%20abundance%20and%20breeding%20system%20among%20tropical%20forest%20species:%20do%20dioecious%20species%20exhibit%20compensatory%20reproduction%20or%20abundances?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20ecology&rft.au=Queenborough,%20Simon%20A.&rft.date=2009-05&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=555&rft.epage=566&rft.pages=555-566&rft.issn=0022-0477&rft.eissn=1365-2745&rft.coden=JECOAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01485.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20528883%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208900259&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20528883&rfr_iscdi=true