Core outcome sets for prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage: an international Delphi consensus study

Objective To develop core outcome sets (COS) for studies evaluating interventions for (1) prevention and (2) treatment of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), and recommendations on how to report the COS. Design A two‐round Delphi survey and face‐to‐face meeting. Population Healthcare professionals and wom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2019-01, Vol.126 (1), p.83-93
Hauptverfasser: Meher, S, Cuthbert, A, Kirkham, JJ, Williamson, P, Abalos, E, Aflaifel, N, Bhutta, ZA, Bishop, A, Blum, J, Collins, P, Devane, D, Ducloy‐Bouthors, A‐S, Fawole, B, Gülmezoglu, AM, Gutteridge, K, Gyte, G, Homer, CSE, Mallaiah, S, Smith, JM, Weeks, AD, Alfirevic, Z
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 93
container_issue 1
container_start_page 83
container_title BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
container_volume 126
creator Meher, S
Cuthbert, A
Kirkham, JJ
Williamson, P
Abalos, E
Aflaifel, N
Bhutta, ZA
Bishop, A
Blum, J
Collins, P
Devane, D
Ducloy‐Bouthors, A‐S
Fawole, B
Gülmezoglu, AM
Gutteridge, K
Gyte, G
Homer, CSE
Mallaiah, S
Smith, JM
Weeks, AD
Alfirevic, Z
description Objective To develop core outcome sets (COS) for studies evaluating interventions for (1) prevention and (2) treatment of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), and recommendations on how to report the COS. Design A two‐round Delphi survey and face‐to‐face meeting. Population Healthcare professionals and women's representatives. Methods Outcomes were identified from systematic reviews of PPH studies and stakeholder consultation. Participants scored each outcome in the Delphi on a Likert scale between 1 (not important) and 9 (critically important). Results were discussed at the face‐to‐face meeting to agree the final COS. Consensus at the meeting was defined as ≥ 70% of participants scoring the outcome as critically important (7–9). Lectures, discussion and voting were used to agree how to report COS outcomes. Main outcome measures Outcomes from systematic reviews and consultations. Results Both Delphi rounds were completed by 152/205 (74%) participants for prevention and 143/197 (73%) for treatment. For prevention of PPH, nine core outcomes were selected: blood loss, shock, maternal death, use of additional uterotonics, blood transfusion, transfer for higher level of care, women's sense of wellbeing, acceptability and satisfaction with the intervention, breastfeeding, and adverse effects. For treatment of PPH, 12 core outcomes were selected: blood loss, shock, coagulopathy, hysterectomy, organ dysfunction, maternal death, blood transfusion, use of additional haemostatic intervention, transfer for higher level of care, women's sense of wellbeing, acceptability and satisfaction with the intervention, breastfeeding, and adverse effects. Recommendations were developed on how to report these outcomes where possible. Conclusions These COS will help standardise outcome reporting in PPH trials. Tweetable Core outcome sets for PPH: nine core outcomes for PPH prevention and 12 core outcomes for PPH treatment. Tweetable Core outcome sets for PPH: nine core outcomes for PPH prevention and 12 core outcomes for PPH treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1471-0528.15335
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2057443979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2057443979</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-b3ec5b1284ef89e45f8304a9203d3338f70ffefa80b052d8533dc1b6b0c0939d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTlPxDAQhS0EYmGhpkOWaGgCPlmHDpZbSDRQW04yZrNK4mA7oP33eA8oaJjGo9E3T35vEDqi5IymOqdiQjMimTqjknO5hfZ-J9urnmSEMzVC-yHMCaEXjPBdNGJ5zkhO2R76mDoP2A2xdC3gADFg6zzuPXxCF2vXYdNVOHowsU0D7CzuXYi98XFo8cxA67yfmXe4TCCuuwi-M8s90-AbaPpZjUvXBejCEHCIQ7U4QDvWNAEON-8Yvd3dvk4fsueX-8fp1XNWCspkVnAoZUGZEmBVDkJaxYkw6d-84pwrOyHWgjWKFMltpZL9qqTFRUFKkvO84mN0utbtvfsYIETd1qGEpjEduCFoRuRECJ5P8oSe_EHnbkg-mkRRKYQShKtEna-p0rsQPFjd-7o1fqEp0ctr6GX2epm9Xl0jbRxvdIeiheqX_4k_AXINfNUNLP7T09dPL2vhb9zHlO4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2154484038</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Core outcome sets for prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage: an international Delphi consensus study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Meher, S ; Cuthbert, A ; Kirkham, JJ ; Williamson, P ; Abalos, E ; Aflaifel, N ; Bhutta, ZA ; Bishop, A ; Blum, J ; Collins, P ; Devane, D ; Ducloy‐Bouthors, A‐S ; Fawole, B ; Gülmezoglu, AM ; Gutteridge, K ; Gyte, G ; Homer, CSE ; Mallaiah, S ; Smith, JM ; Weeks, AD ; Alfirevic, Z</creator><creatorcontrib>Meher, S ; Cuthbert, A ; Kirkham, JJ ; Williamson, P ; Abalos, E ; Aflaifel, N ; Bhutta, ZA ; Bishop, A ; Blum, J ; Collins, P ; Devane, D ; Ducloy‐Bouthors, A‐S ; Fawole, B ; Gülmezoglu, AM ; Gutteridge, K ; Gyte, G ; Homer, CSE ; Mallaiah, S ; Smith, JM ; Weeks, AD ; Alfirevic, Z</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To develop core outcome sets (COS) for studies evaluating interventions for (1) prevention and (2) treatment of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), and recommendations on how to report the COS. Design A two‐round Delphi survey and face‐to‐face meeting. Population Healthcare professionals and women's representatives. Methods Outcomes were identified from systematic reviews of PPH studies and stakeholder consultation. Participants scored each outcome in the Delphi on a Likert scale between 1 (not important) and 9 (critically important). Results were discussed at the face‐to‐face meeting to agree the final COS. Consensus at the meeting was defined as ≥ 70% of participants scoring the outcome as critically important (7–9). Lectures, discussion and voting were used to agree how to report COS outcomes. Main outcome measures Outcomes from systematic reviews and consultations. Results Both Delphi rounds were completed by 152/205 (74%) participants for prevention and 143/197 (73%) for treatment. For prevention of PPH, nine core outcomes were selected: blood loss, shock, maternal death, use of additional uterotonics, blood transfusion, transfer for higher level of care, women's sense of wellbeing, acceptability and satisfaction with the intervention, breastfeeding, and adverse effects. For treatment of PPH, 12 core outcomes were selected: blood loss, shock, coagulopathy, hysterectomy, organ dysfunction, maternal death, blood transfusion, use of additional haemostatic intervention, transfer for higher level of care, women's sense of wellbeing, acceptability and satisfaction with the intervention, breastfeeding, and adverse effects. Recommendations were developed on how to report these outcomes where possible. Conclusions These COS will help standardise outcome reporting in PPH trials. Tweetable Core outcome sets for PPH: nine core outcomes for PPH prevention and 12 core outcomes for PPH treatment. Tweetable Core outcome sets for PPH: nine core outcomes for PPH prevention and 12 core outcomes for PPH treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-0328</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15335</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29920912</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Blood transfusion ; Blood transfusions ; Breast feeding ; Breastfeeding &amp; lactation ; Consensus ; Core outcomes ; Delphi ; Delphi Technique ; Female ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; International Cooperation ; Intervention ; Maternal mortality ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; Patient Satisfaction ; Postpartum ; postpartum haemorrhage ; Postpartum Hemorrhage - prevention &amp; control ; Postpartum Hemorrhage - therapy ; Pregnancy ; Prevention ; Side effects ; Women</subject><ispartof>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2019-01, Vol.126 (1), p.83-93</ispartof><rights>2018 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</rights><rights>2018 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-b3ec5b1284ef89e45f8304a9203d3338f70ffefa80b052d8533dc1b6b0c0939d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-b3ec5b1284ef89e45f8304a9203d3338f70ffefa80b052d8533dc1b6b0c0939d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1471-0528.15335$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1471-0528.15335$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29920912$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meher, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuthbert, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkham, JJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abalos, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aflaifel, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhutta, ZA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bishop, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blum, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devane, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducloy‐Bouthors, A‐S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fawole, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gülmezoglu, AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutteridge, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gyte, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Homer, CSE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallaiah, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, JM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weeks, AD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfirevic, Z</creatorcontrib><title>Core outcome sets for prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage: an international Delphi consensus study</title><title>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><description>Objective To develop core outcome sets (COS) for studies evaluating interventions for (1) prevention and (2) treatment of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), and recommendations on how to report the COS. Design A two‐round Delphi survey and face‐to‐face meeting. Population Healthcare professionals and women's representatives. Methods Outcomes were identified from systematic reviews of PPH studies and stakeholder consultation. Participants scored each outcome in the Delphi on a Likert scale between 1 (not important) and 9 (critically important). Results were discussed at the face‐to‐face meeting to agree the final COS. Consensus at the meeting was defined as ≥ 70% of participants scoring the outcome as critically important (7–9). Lectures, discussion and voting were used to agree how to report COS outcomes. Main outcome measures Outcomes from systematic reviews and consultations. Results Both Delphi rounds were completed by 152/205 (74%) participants for prevention and 143/197 (73%) for treatment. For prevention of PPH, nine core outcomes were selected: blood loss, shock, maternal death, use of additional uterotonics, blood transfusion, transfer for higher level of care, women's sense of wellbeing, acceptability and satisfaction with the intervention, breastfeeding, and adverse effects. For treatment of PPH, 12 core outcomes were selected: blood loss, shock, coagulopathy, hysterectomy, organ dysfunction, maternal death, blood transfusion, use of additional haemostatic intervention, transfer for higher level of care, women's sense of wellbeing, acceptability and satisfaction with the intervention, breastfeeding, and adverse effects. Recommendations were developed on how to report these outcomes where possible. Conclusions These COS will help standardise outcome reporting in PPH trials. Tweetable Core outcome sets for PPH: nine core outcomes for PPH prevention and 12 core outcomes for PPH treatment. Tweetable Core outcome sets for PPH: nine core outcomes for PPH prevention and 12 core outcomes for PPH treatment.</description><subject>Blood transfusion</subject><subject>Blood transfusions</subject><subject>Breast feeding</subject><subject>Breastfeeding &amp; lactation</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Core outcomes</subject><subject>Delphi</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemorrhage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Maternal mortality</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Postpartum</subject><subject>postpartum haemorrhage</subject><subject>Postpartum Hemorrhage - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Postpartum Hemorrhage - therapy</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkTlPxDAQhS0EYmGhpkOWaGgCPlmHDpZbSDRQW04yZrNK4mA7oP33eA8oaJjGo9E3T35vEDqi5IymOqdiQjMimTqjknO5hfZ-J9urnmSEMzVC-yHMCaEXjPBdNGJ5zkhO2R76mDoP2A2xdC3gADFg6zzuPXxCF2vXYdNVOHowsU0D7CzuXYi98XFo8cxA67yfmXe4TCCuuwi-M8s90-AbaPpZjUvXBejCEHCIQ7U4QDvWNAEON-8Yvd3dvk4fsueX-8fp1XNWCspkVnAoZUGZEmBVDkJaxYkw6d-84pwrOyHWgjWKFMltpZL9qqTFRUFKkvO84mN0utbtvfsYIETd1qGEpjEduCFoRuRECJ5P8oSe_EHnbkg-mkRRKYQShKtEna-p0rsQPFjd-7o1fqEp0ctr6GX2epm9Xl0jbRxvdIeiheqX_4k_AXINfNUNLP7T09dPL2vhb9zHlO4</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Meher, S</creator><creator>Cuthbert, A</creator><creator>Kirkham, JJ</creator><creator>Williamson, P</creator><creator>Abalos, E</creator><creator>Aflaifel, N</creator><creator>Bhutta, ZA</creator><creator>Bishop, A</creator><creator>Blum, J</creator><creator>Collins, P</creator><creator>Devane, D</creator><creator>Ducloy‐Bouthors, A‐S</creator><creator>Fawole, B</creator><creator>Gülmezoglu, AM</creator><creator>Gutteridge, K</creator><creator>Gyte, G</creator><creator>Homer, CSE</creator><creator>Mallaiah, S</creator><creator>Smith, JM</creator><creator>Weeks, AD</creator><creator>Alfirevic, Z</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Core outcome sets for prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage: an international Delphi consensus study</title><author>Meher, S ; Cuthbert, A ; Kirkham, JJ ; Williamson, P ; Abalos, E ; Aflaifel, N ; Bhutta, ZA ; Bishop, A ; Blum, J ; Collins, P ; Devane, D ; Ducloy‐Bouthors, A‐S ; Fawole, B ; Gülmezoglu, AM ; Gutteridge, K ; Gyte, G ; Homer, CSE ; Mallaiah, S ; Smith, JM ; Weeks, AD ; Alfirevic, Z</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-b3ec5b1284ef89e45f8304a9203d3338f70ffefa80b052d8533dc1b6b0c0939d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Blood transfusion</topic><topic>Blood transfusions</topic><topic>Breast feeding</topic><topic>Breastfeeding &amp; lactation</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Core outcomes</topic><topic>Delphi</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemorrhage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Maternal mortality</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Postpartum</topic><topic>postpartum haemorrhage</topic><topic>Postpartum Hemorrhage - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Postpartum Hemorrhage - therapy</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meher, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuthbert, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkham, JJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abalos, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aflaifel, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhutta, ZA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bishop, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blum, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devane, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducloy‐Bouthors, A‐S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fawole, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gülmezoglu, AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutteridge, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gyte, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Homer, CSE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallaiah, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, JM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weeks, AD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfirevic, Z</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meher, S</au><au>Cuthbert, A</au><au>Kirkham, JJ</au><au>Williamson, P</au><au>Abalos, E</au><au>Aflaifel, N</au><au>Bhutta, ZA</au><au>Bishop, A</au><au>Blum, J</au><au>Collins, P</au><au>Devane, D</au><au>Ducloy‐Bouthors, A‐S</au><au>Fawole, B</au><au>Gülmezoglu, AM</au><au>Gutteridge, K</au><au>Gyte, G</au><au>Homer, CSE</au><au>Mallaiah, S</au><au>Smith, JM</au><au>Weeks, AD</au><au>Alfirevic, Z</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Core outcome sets for prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage: an international Delphi consensus study</atitle><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>83</spage><epage>93</epage><pages>83-93</pages><issn>1470-0328</issn><eissn>1471-0528</eissn><abstract>Objective To develop core outcome sets (COS) for studies evaluating interventions for (1) prevention and (2) treatment of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), and recommendations on how to report the COS. Design A two‐round Delphi survey and face‐to‐face meeting. Population Healthcare professionals and women's representatives. Methods Outcomes were identified from systematic reviews of PPH studies and stakeholder consultation. Participants scored each outcome in the Delphi on a Likert scale between 1 (not important) and 9 (critically important). Results were discussed at the face‐to‐face meeting to agree the final COS. Consensus at the meeting was defined as ≥ 70% of participants scoring the outcome as critically important (7–9). Lectures, discussion and voting were used to agree how to report COS outcomes. Main outcome measures Outcomes from systematic reviews and consultations. Results Both Delphi rounds were completed by 152/205 (74%) participants for prevention and 143/197 (73%) for treatment. For prevention of PPH, nine core outcomes were selected: blood loss, shock, maternal death, use of additional uterotonics, blood transfusion, transfer for higher level of care, women's sense of wellbeing, acceptability and satisfaction with the intervention, breastfeeding, and adverse effects. For treatment of PPH, 12 core outcomes were selected: blood loss, shock, coagulopathy, hysterectomy, organ dysfunction, maternal death, blood transfusion, use of additional haemostatic intervention, transfer for higher level of care, women's sense of wellbeing, acceptability and satisfaction with the intervention, breastfeeding, and adverse effects. Recommendations were developed on how to report these outcomes where possible. Conclusions These COS will help standardise outcome reporting in PPH trials. Tweetable Core outcome sets for PPH: nine core outcomes for PPH prevention and 12 core outcomes for PPH treatment. Tweetable Core outcome sets for PPH: nine core outcomes for PPH prevention and 12 core outcomes for PPH treatment.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29920912</pmid><doi>10.1111/1471-0528.15335</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-0328
ispartof BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2019-01, Vol.126 (1), p.83-93
issn 1470-0328
1471-0528
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2057443979
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Blood transfusion
Blood transfusions
Breast feeding
Breastfeeding & lactation
Consensus
Core outcomes
Delphi
Delphi Technique
Female
Hemorrhage
Humans
Hysterectomy
International Cooperation
Intervention
Maternal mortality
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Patient Satisfaction
Postpartum
postpartum haemorrhage
Postpartum Hemorrhage - prevention & control
Postpartum Hemorrhage - therapy
Pregnancy
Prevention
Side effects
Women
title Core outcome sets for prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage: an international Delphi consensus study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T09%3A49%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Core%20outcome%20sets%20for%20prevention%20and%20treatment%20of%20postpartum%20haemorrhage:%20an%20international%20Delphi%20consensus%20study&rft.jtitle=BJOG%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Meher,%20S&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=93&rft.pages=83-93&rft.issn=1470-0328&rft.eissn=1471-0528&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1471-0528.15335&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2057443979%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2154484038&rft_id=info:pmid/29920912&rfr_iscdi=true