Managing aesthetic referrals in NHS Scotland: Outcomes from 1122 patients in the East of Scotland
The Adult Exceptional Aesthetic Referral Protocol (AEARP) encompasses a series of aesthetic procedures which, as they do not treat an underlying disease process, are not routinely available within the National Health Service. Provision of these services can only be provided on an exceptional basis....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2018-08, Vol.71 (8), p.1174-1180 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1180 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1174 |
container_title | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Ibrahim, Abdulla Nassar, Mahmoud K. Jordan, Daniel J. Sinha, Manish Hogg, Fiona J. |
description | The Adult Exceptional Aesthetic Referral Protocol (AEARP) encompasses a series of aesthetic procedures which, as they do not treat an underlying disease process, are not routinely available within the National Health Service. Provision of these services can only be provided on an exceptional basis.
In this prospective study, we evaluated the referral process and outcomes of 1122 patients referred under the AEARP over a 3.5-year period. Referrals were screened by a vetting panel comprising of a plastic surgeon, clinical nurse specialist, and clinical psychologist. Following initial vetting, supported patients underwent psychological assessment. Patients supported by psychology were assessed in clinic, and if deemed clinically suitable, were offered surgery.
Overall, 20% (225/1122) of referrals were supported for surgery. Following primary vetting, 57% (640/1,122) of referrals were supported, 40% (197/492) of referrals to clinical psychology were supported, and 65% (225/345) of the remaining cases referred for consultation were supported for surgery. Unsupported referrals included those not fulfilling the referral guidelines or those with contraindications.
The AEARP is simple and effective to implement, and has been instrumental in streamlining the referral-to-outcome process in a centralised, transparent, and fair manner. It reduces a potential high number of clinic appointments where patients do not meet the aesthetic criteria and/or fail to attend – thereby helping to streamline other surgical pathways by improving clinic efficiency. Moreover, it aids referring clinicians and patient education around aesthetic issues including a holistic approach. Wide adoption of such standards may reduce waiting times, facilitate cost savings, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.04.016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2056759025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1748681518301499</els_id><sourcerecordid>2056759025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-96c0b973b98055ccbfe75b6e0842dca35e6732fa026c81de66ee9147e9ec1bad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1P3DAQxS1UxMfSf6AH5GMvScdO_IW4IEQLErAH6NlynAn1apNsbS9S_3u8XcqxpxmN3nua9yPkC4OaAZPfVnW32qSaA9M1tHU5HZATppWuQDTmU9lVqyupmTgmpymtANqGteKIHHNjQGslToh7cJN7CdMLdZjyL8zB04gDxujWiYaJPt4-0Sc_57Wb-gu63GY_j5joEOeRMsY53bgccMp_xSWA3riU6Tx8mM7I4VCy8PP7XJCf32-er2-r--WPu-ur-8o3oHJlpIfOqKYzGoTwvhtQiU4i6Jb33jUCpWr44IBLr1mPUiIa1io06Fnn-mZBvu5zN3H-vS1l7BiSx3X5AedtshyEVMIAF0XK91If55RKXbuJYXTxj2Vgd2jtyu7Q2h1aC60tp2I6f8_fdiP2H5Z_LIvgci_A0vI1YLTJFzIe-xDRZ9vP4X_5b30vihg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2056759025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Managing aesthetic referrals in NHS Scotland: Outcomes from 1122 patients in the East of Scotland</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Ibrahim, Abdulla ; Nassar, Mahmoud K. ; Jordan, Daniel J. ; Sinha, Manish ; Hogg, Fiona J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Abdulla ; Nassar, Mahmoud K. ; Jordan, Daniel J. ; Sinha, Manish ; Hogg, Fiona J.</creatorcontrib><description>The Adult Exceptional Aesthetic Referral Protocol (AEARP) encompasses a series of aesthetic procedures which, as they do not treat an underlying disease process, are not routinely available within the National Health Service. Provision of these services can only be provided on an exceptional basis.
In this prospective study, we evaluated the referral process and outcomes of 1122 patients referred under the AEARP over a 3.5-year period. Referrals were screened by a vetting panel comprising of a plastic surgeon, clinical nurse specialist, and clinical psychologist. Following initial vetting, supported patients underwent psychological assessment. Patients supported by psychology were assessed in clinic, and if deemed clinically suitable, were offered surgery.
Overall, 20% (225/1122) of referrals were supported for surgery. Following primary vetting, 57% (640/1,122) of referrals were supported, 40% (197/492) of referrals to clinical psychology were supported, and 65% (225/345) of the remaining cases referred for consultation were supported for surgery. Unsupported referrals included those not fulfilling the referral guidelines or those with contraindications.
The AEARP is simple and effective to implement, and has been instrumental in streamlining the referral-to-outcome process in a centralised, transparent, and fair manner. It reduces a potential high number of clinic appointments where patients do not meet the aesthetic criteria and/or fail to attend – thereby helping to streamline other surgical pathways by improving clinic efficiency. Moreover, it aids referring clinicians and patient education around aesthetic issues including a holistic approach. Wide adoption of such standards may reduce waiting times, facilitate cost savings, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-6815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.04.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29908875</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aesthetic surgery ; Complications ; Cosmetic surgery ; Esthetics ; Female ; Guidelines ; Humans ; Male ; National Health Programs ; Personal Satisfaction ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prospective Studies ; Protocols ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - standards ; Referral and Consultation ; Scotland ; Self Efficacy</subject><ispartof>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2018-08, Vol.71 (8), p.1174-1180</ispartof><rights>2018 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-96c0b973b98055ccbfe75b6e0842dca35e6732fa026c81de66ee9147e9ec1bad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2018.04.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29908875$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Abdulla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassar, Mahmoud K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogg, Fiona J.</creatorcontrib><title>Managing aesthetic referrals in NHS Scotland: Outcomes from 1122 patients in the East of Scotland</title><title>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</title><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><description>The Adult Exceptional Aesthetic Referral Protocol (AEARP) encompasses a series of aesthetic procedures which, as they do not treat an underlying disease process, are not routinely available within the National Health Service. Provision of these services can only be provided on an exceptional basis.
In this prospective study, we evaluated the referral process and outcomes of 1122 patients referred under the AEARP over a 3.5-year period. Referrals were screened by a vetting panel comprising of a plastic surgeon, clinical nurse specialist, and clinical psychologist. Following initial vetting, supported patients underwent psychological assessment. Patients supported by psychology were assessed in clinic, and if deemed clinically suitable, were offered surgery.
Overall, 20% (225/1122) of referrals were supported for surgery. Following primary vetting, 57% (640/1,122) of referrals were supported, 40% (197/492) of referrals to clinical psychology were supported, and 65% (225/345) of the remaining cases referred for consultation were supported for surgery. Unsupported referrals included those not fulfilling the referral guidelines or those with contraindications.
The AEARP is simple and effective to implement, and has been instrumental in streamlining the referral-to-outcome process in a centralised, transparent, and fair manner. It reduces a potential high number of clinic appointments where patients do not meet the aesthetic criteria and/or fail to attend – thereby helping to streamline other surgical pathways by improving clinic efficiency. Moreover, it aids referring clinicians and patient education around aesthetic issues including a holistic approach. Wide adoption of such standards may reduce waiting times, facilitate cost savings, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aesthetic surgery</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Cosmetic surgery</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>National Health Programs</subject><subject>Personal Satisfaction</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Protocols</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - standards</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Scotland</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><issn>1748-6815</issn><issn>1878-0539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1P3DAQxS1UxMfSf6AH5GMvScdO_IW4IEQLErAH6NlynAn1apNsbS9S_3u8XcqxpxmN3nua9yPkC4OaAZPfVnW32qSaA9M1tHU5HZATppWuQDTmU9lVqyupmTgmpymtANqGteKIHHNjQGslToh7cJN7CdMLdZjyL8zB04gDxujWiYaJPt4-0Sc_57Wb-gu63GY_j5joEOeRMsY53bgccMp_xSWA3riU6Tx8mM7I4VCy8PP7XJCf32-er2-r--WPu-ur-8o3oHJlpIfOqKYzGoTwvhtQiU4i6Jb33jUCpWr44IBLr1mPUiIa1io06Fnn-mZBvu5zN3H-vS1l7BiSx3X5AedtshyEVMIAF0XK91If55RKXbuJYXTxj2Vgd2jtyu7Q2h1aC60tp2I6f8_fdiP2H5Z_LIvgci_A0vI1YLTJFzIe-xDRZ9vP4X_5b30vihg</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Ibrahim, Abdulla</creator><creator>Nassar, Mahmoud K.</creator><creator>Jordan, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Sinha, Manish</creator><creator>Hogg, Fiona J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>Managing aesthetic referrals in NHS Scotland: Outcomes from 1122 patients in the East of Scotland</title><author>Ibrahim, Abdulla ; Nassar, Mahmoud K. ; Jordan, Daniel J. ; Sinha, Manish ; Hogg, Fiona J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-96c0b973b98055ccbfe75b6e0842dca35e6732fa026c81de66ee9147e9ec1bad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aesthetic surgery</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Cosmetic surgery</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>National Health Programs</topic><topic>Personal Satisfaction</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Protocols</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - standards</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Scotland</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Abdulla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassar, Mahmoud K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogg, Fiona J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ibrahim, Abdulla</au><au>Nassar, Mahmoud K.</au><au>Jordan, Daniel J.</au><au>Sinha, Manish</au><au>Hogg, Fiona J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Managing aesthetic referrals in NHS Scotland: Outcomes from 1122 patients in the East of Scotland</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1174</spage><epage>1180</epage><pages>1174-1180</pages><issn>1748-6815</issn><eissn>1878-0539</eissn><abstract>The Adult Exceptional Aesthetic Referral Protocol (AEARP) encompasses a series of aesthetic procedures which, as they do not treat an underlying disease process, are not routinely available within the National Health Service. Provision of these services can only be provided on an exceptional basis.
In this prospective study, we evaluated the referral process and outcomes of 1122 patients referred under the AEARP over a 3.5-year period. Referrals were screened by a vetting panel comprising of a plastic surgeon, clinical nurse specialist, and clinical psychologist. Following initial vetting, supported patients underwent psychological assessment. Patients supported by psychology were assessed in clinic, and if deemed clinically suitable, were offered surgery.
Overall, 20% (225/1122) of referrals were supported for surgery. Following primary vetting, 57% (640/1,122) of referrals were supported, 40% (197/492) of referrals to clinical psychology were supported, and 65% (225/345) of the remaining cases referred for consultation were supported for surgery. Unsupported referrals included those not fulfilling the referral guidelines or those with contraindications.
The AEARP is simple and effective to implement, and has been instrumental in streamlining the referral-to-outcome process in a centralised, transparent, and fair manner. It reduces a potential high number of clinic appointments where patients do not meet the aesthetic criteria and/or fail to attend – thereby helping to streamline other surgical pathways by improving clinic efficiency. Moreover, it aids referring clinicians and patient education around aesthetic issues including a holistic approach. Wide adoption of such standards may reduce waiting times, facilitate cost savings, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29908875</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjps.2018.04.016</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-6815 |
ispartof | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2018-08, Vol.71 (8), p.1174-1180 |
issn | 1748-6815 1878-0539 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2056759025 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult Aesthetic surgery Complications Cosmetic surgery Esthetics Female Guidelines Humans Male National Health Programs Personal Satisfaction Practice Guidelines as Topic Prospective Studies Protocols Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - standards Referral and Consultation Scotland Self Efficacy |
title | Managing aesthetic referrals in NHS Scotland: Outcomes from 1122 patients in the East of Scotland |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T01%3A34%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Managing%20aesthetic%20referrals%20in%20NHS%20Scotland:%20Outcomes%20from%201122%20patients%20in%20the%20East%20of%20Scotland&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plastic,%20reconstructive%20&%20aesthetic%20surgery&rft.au=Ibrahim,%20Abdulla&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1174&rft.epage=1180&rft.pages=1174-1180&rft.issn=1748-6815&rft.eissn=1878-0539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjps.2018.04.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2056759025%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2056759025&rft_id=info:pmid/29908875&rft_els_id=S1748681518301499&rfr_iscdi=true |