Managing aesthetic referrals in NHS Scotland: Outcomes from 1122 patients in the East of Scotland

The Adult Exceptional Aesthetic Referral Protocol (AEARP) encompasses a series of aesthetic procedures which, as they do not treat an underlying disease process, are not routinely available within the National Health Service. Provision of these services can only be provided on an exceptional basis....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2018-08, Vol.71 (8), p.1174-1180
Hauptverfasser: Ibrahim, Abdulla, Nassar, Mahmoud K., Jordan, Daniel J., Sinha, Manish, Hogg, Fiona J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1180
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1174
container_title Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery
container_volume 71
creator Ibrahim, Abdulla
Nassar, Mahmoud K.
Jordan, Daniel J.
Sinha, Manish
Hogg, Fiona J.
description The Adult Exceptional Aesthetic Referral Protocol (AEARP) encompasses a series of aesthetic procedures which, as they do not treat an underlying disease process, are not routinely available within the National Health Service. Provision of these services can only be provided on an exceptional basis. In this prospective study, we evaluated the referral process and outcomes of 1122 patients referred under the AEARP over a 3.5-year period. Referrals were screened by a vetting panel comprising of a plastic surgeon, clinical nurse specialist, and clinical psychologist. Following initial vetting, supported patients underwent psychological assessment. Patients supported by psychology were assessed in clinic, and if deemed clinically suitable, were offered surgery. Overall, 20% (225/1122) of referrals were supported for surgery. Following primary vetting, 57% (640/1,122) of referrals were supported, 40% (197/492) of referrals to clinical psychology were supported, and 65% (225/345) of the remaining cases referred for consultation were supported for surgery. Unsupported referrals included those not fulfilling the referral guidelines or those with contraindications. The AEARP is simple and effective to implement, and has been instrumental in streamlining the referral-to-outcome process in a centralised, transparent, and fair manner. It reduces a potential high number of clinic appointments where patients do not meet the aesthetic criteria and/or fail to attend – thereby helping to streamline other surgical pathways by improving clinic efficiency. Moreover, it aids referring clinicians and patient education around aesthetic issues including a holistic approach. Wide adoption of such standards may reduce waiting times, facilitate cost savings, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.04.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2056759025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1748681518301499</els_id><sourcerecordid>2056759025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-96c0b973b98055ccbfe75b6e0842dca35e6732fa026c81de66ee9147e9ec1bad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1P3DAQxS1UxMfSf6AH5GMvScdO_IW4IEQLErAH6NlynAn1apNsbS9S_3u8XcqxpxmN3nua9yPkC4OaAZPfVnW32qSaA9M1tHU5HZATppWuQDTmU9lVqyupmTgmpymtANqGteKIHHNjQGslToh7cJN7CdMLdZjyL8zB04gDxujWiYaJPt4-0Sc_57Wb-gu63GY_j5joEOeRMsY53bgccMp_xSWA3riU6Tx8mM7I4VCy8PP7XJCf32-er2-r--WPu-ur-8o3oHJlpIfOqKYzGoTwvhtQiU4i6Jb33jUCpWr44IBLr1mPUiIa1io06Fnn-mZBvu5zN3H-vS1l7BiSx3X5AedtshyEVMIAF0XK91If55RKXbuJYXTxj2Vgd2jtyu7Q2h1aC60tp2I6f8_fdiP2H5Z_LIvgci_A0vI1YLTJFzIe-xDRZ9vP4X_5b30vihg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2056759025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Managing aesthetic referrals in NHS Scotland: Outcomes from 1122 patients in the East of Scotland</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Ibrahim, Abdulla ; Nassar, Mahmoud K. ; Jordan, Daniel J. ; Sinha, Manish ; Hogg, Fiona J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Abdulla ; Nassar, Mahmoud K. ; Jordan, Daniel J. ; Sinha, Manish ; Hogg, Fiona J.</creatorcontrib><description>The Adult Exceptional Aesthetic Referral Protocol (AEARP) encompasses a series of aesthetic procedures which, as they do not treat an underlying disease process, are not routinely available within the National Health Service. Provision of these services can only be provided on an exceptional basis. In this prospective study, we evaluated the referral process and outcomes of 1122 patients referred under the AEARP over a 3.5-year period. Referrals were screened by a vetting panel comprising of a plastic surgeon, clinical nurse specialist, and clinical psychologist. Following initial vetting, supported patients underwent psychological assessment. Patients supported by psychology were assessed in clinic, and if deemed clinically suitable, were offered surgery. Overall, 20% (225/1122) of referrals were supported for surgery. Following primary vetting, 57% (640/1,122) of referrals were supported, 40% (197/492) of referrals to clinical psychology were supported, and 65% (225/345) of the remaining cases referred for consultation were supported for surgery. Unsupported referrals included those not fulfilling the referral guidelines or those with contraindications. The AEARP is simple and effective to implement, and has been instrumental in streamlining the referral-to-outcome process in a centralised, transparent, and fair manner. It reduces a potential high number of clinic appointments where patients do not meet the aesthetic criteria and/or fail to attend – thereby helping to streamline other surgical pathways by improving clinic efficiency. Moreover, it aids referring clinicians and patient education around aesthetic issues including a holistic approach. Wide adoption of such standards may reduce waiting times, facilitate cost savings, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-6815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.04.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29908875</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aesthetic surgery ; Complications ; Cosmetic surgery ; Esthetics ; Female ; Guidelines ; Humans ; Male ; National Health Programs ; Personal Satisfaction ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prospective Studies ; Protocols ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - standards ; Referral and Consultation ; Scotland ; Self Efficacy</subject><ispartof>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery, 2018-08, Vol.71 (8), p.1174-1180</ispartof><rights>2018 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-96c0b973b98055ccbfe75b6e0842dca35e6732fa026c81de66ee9147e9ec1bad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2018.04.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29908875$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Abdulla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassar, Mahmoud K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogg, Fiona J.</creatorcontrib><title>Managing aesthetic referrals in NHS Scotland: Outcomes from 1122 patients in the East of Scotland</title><title>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</title><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><description>The Adult Exceptional Aesthetic Referral Protocol (AEARP) encompasses a series of aesthetic procedures which, as they do not treat an underlying disease process, are not routinely available within the National Health Service. Provision of these services can only be provided on an exceptional basis. In this prospective study, we evaluated the referral process and outcomes of 1122 patients referred under the AEARP over a 3.5-year period. Referrals were screened by a vetting panel comprising of a plastic surgeon, clinical nurse specialist, and clinical psychologist. Following initial vetting, supported patients underwent psychological assessment. Patients supported by psychology were assessed in clinic, and if deemed clinically suitable, were offered surgery. Overall, 20% (225/1122) of referrals were supported for surgery. Following primary vetting, 57% (640/1,122) of referrals were supported, 40% (197/492) of referrals to clinical psychology were supported, and 65% (225/345) of the remaining cases referred for consultation were supported for surgery. Unsupported referrals included those not fulfilling the referral guidelines or those with contraindications. The AEARP is simple and effective to implement, and has been instrumental in streamlining the referral-to-outcome process in a centralised, transparent, and fair manner. It reduces a potential high number of clinic appointments where patients do not meet the aesthetic criteria and/or fail to attend – thereby helping to streamline other surgical pathways by improving clinic efficiency. Moreover, it aids referring clinicians and patient education around aesthetic issues including a holistic approach. Wide adoption of such standards may reduce waiting times, facilitate cost savings, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aesthetic surgery</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Cosmetic surgery</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>National Health Programs</subject><subject>Personal Satisfaction</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Protocols</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - standards</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Scotland</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><issn>1748-6815</issn><issn>1878-0539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1P3DAQxS1UxMfSf6AH5GMvScdO_IW4IEQLErAH6NlynAn1apNsbS9S_3u8XcqxpxmN3nua9yPkC4OaAZPfVnW32qSaA9M1tHU5HZATppWuQDTmU9lVqyupmTgmpymtANqGteKIHHNjQGslToh7cJN7CdMLdZjyL8zB04gDxujWiYaJPt4-0Sc_57Wb-gu63GY_j5joEOeRMsY53bgccMp_xSWA3riU6Tx8mM7I4VCy8PP7XJCf32-er2-r--WPu-ur-8o3oHJlpIfOqKYzGoTwvhtQiU4i6Jb33jUCpWr44IBLr1mPUiIa1io06Fnn-mZBvu5zN3H-vS1l7BiSx3X5AedtshyEVMIAF0XK91If55RKXbuJYXTxj2Vgd2jtyu7Q2h1aC60tp2I6f8_fdiP2H5Z_LIvgci_A0vI1YLTJFzIe-xDRZ9vP4X_5b30vihg</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Ibrahim, Abdulla</creator><creator>Nassar, Mahmoud K.</creator><creator>Jordan, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Sinha, Manish</creator><creator>Hogg, Fiona J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>Managing aesthetic referrals in NHS Scotland: Outcomes from 1122 patients in the East of Scotland</title><author>Ibrahim, Abdulla ; Nassar, Mahmoud K. ; Jordan, Daniel J. ; Sinha, Manish ; Hogg, Fiona J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-96c0b973b98055ccbfe75b6e0842dca35e6732fa026c81de66ee9147e9ec1bad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aesthetic surgery</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Cosmetic surgery</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>National Health Programs</topic><topic>Personal Satisfaction</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Protocols</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - standards</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Scotland</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Abdulla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassar, Mahmoud K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogg, Fiona J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ibrahim, Abdulla</au><au>Nassar, Mahmoud K.</au><au>Jordan, Daniel J.</au><au>Sinha, Manish</au><au>Hogg, Fiona J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Managing aesthetic referrals in NHS Scotland: Outcomes from 1122 patients in the East of Scotland</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1174</spage><epage>1180</epage><pages>1174-1180</pages><issn>1748-6815</issn><eissn>1878-0539</eissn><abstract>The Adult Exceptional Aesthetic Referral Protocol (AEARP) encompasses a series of aesthetic procedures which, as they do not treat an underlying disease process, are not routinely available within the National Health Service. Provision of these services can only be provided on an exceptional basis. In this prospective study, we evaluated the referral process and outcomes of 1122 patients referred under the AEARP over a 3.5-year period. Referrals were screened by a vetting panel comprising of a plastic surgeon, clinical nurse specialist, and clinical psychologist. Following initial vetting, supported patients underwent psychological assessment. Patients supported by psychology were assessed in clinic, and if deemed clinically suitable, were offered surgery. Overall, 20% (225/1122) of referrals were supported for surgery. Following primary vetting, 57% (640/1,122) of referrals were supported, 40% (197/492) of referrals to clinical psychology were supported, and 65% (225/345) of the remaining cases referred for consultation were supported for surgery. Unsupported referrals included those not fulfilling the referral guidelines or those with contraindications. The AEARP is simple and effective to implement, and has been instrumental in streamlining the referral-to-outcome process in a centralised, transparent, and fair manner. It reduces a potential high number of clinic appointments where patients do not meet the aesthetic criteria and/or fail to attend – thereby helping to streamline other surgical pathways by improving clinic efficiency. Moreover, it aids referring clinicians and patient education around aesthetic issues including a holistic approach. Wide adoption of such standards may reduce waiting times, facilitate cost savings, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29908875</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjps.2018.04.016</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-6815
ispartof Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2018-08, Vol.71 (8), p.1174-1180
issn 1748-6815
1878-0539
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2056759025
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Aesthetic surgery
Complications
Cosmetic surgery
Esthetics
Female
Guidelines
Humans
Male
National Health Programs
Personal Satisfaction
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prospective Studies
Protocols
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - standards
Referral and Consultation
Scotland
Self Efficacy
title Managing aesthetic referrals in NHS Scotland: Outcomes from 1122 patients in the East of Scotland
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T01%3A34%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Managing%20aesthetic%20referrals%20in%20NHS%20Scotland:%20Outcomes%20from%201122%20patients%20in%20the%20East%20of%20Scotland&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plastic,%20reconstructive%20&%20aesthetic%20surgery&rft.au=Ibrahim,%20Abdulla&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1174&rft.epage=1180&rft.pages=1174-1180&rft.issn=1748-6815&rft.eissn=1878-0539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjps.2018.04.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2056759025%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2056759025&rft_id=info:pmid/29908875&rft_els_id=S1748681518301499&rfr_iscdi=true