Local Vancomycin Effectively Reduces Surgical Site Infection at Implant Site in Rodents

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESInfected implantable devices represent a clinical challenge, because the customary option is to surgically remove the device, and that is associated with substantial cost and morbidity to the patient, along with patient dissatisfaction with the physician. Although prophylact...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Regional anesthesia and pain medicine 2018-10, Vol.43 (7), p.795-804
Hauptverfasser: Kroin, Jeffrey S, Li, Jinyuan, Shafikhani, Sasha, Gupta, Kajal H, Moric, Mario, Buvanendran, Asokumar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 804
container_issue 7
container_start_page 795
container_title Regional anesthesia and pain medicine
container_volume 43
creator Kroin, Jeffrey S
Li, Jinyuan
Shafikhani, Sasha
Gupta, Kajal H
Moric, Mario
Buvanendran, Asokumar
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESInfected implantable devices represent a clinical challenge, because the customary option is to surgically remove the device, and that is associated with substantial cost and morbidity to the patient, along with patient dissatisfaction with the physician. Although prophylactic systemic antibiotics and sterile technique are the mainstay of prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) after implant, the incidence of SSI remains relatively high. Although some surgeons add local antibiotic at implant site during surgery, there is no scientific research to demonstrate if there is a benefit. METHODSRats and mice were randomly assigned to 4 treatment groupssystemic vancomycin alone, local vancomycin alone, combined systemic and local vancomycin, and untreated. After systemic vancomycin or saline preinjection, a surgical incision was performed for placement of a metal disc, and local vancomycin or saline was injected in the superficial tissue pocket created. The metal disc (implant) was placed in that space, followed by local injection of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria and wound closure. After 1 and 6 days, samples of the tissue surrounding the disc implant, the disc itself, and the spleen (systemic infection marker) were processed, and bacterial levels assayed. RESULTSIn both mice and rats, local vancomycin was more potent in reducing tissue SSI, implant infection, and spleen infection than systemic vancomycin at 1 day after induction of bacteria to a surgical wound. At 6 days, in both mice and rats, local vancomycin was again more potent in reducing tissue SSI than systemic vancomycin. CONCLUSIONSThis study suggests that local vancomycin should be added to systemic vancomycin to reduce SSI with cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, implantable pulse generator of neurostimulator, or intrathecal pump implants.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000820
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2056399725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2056399725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3840-adebe4fcb017ed221b95b01f4d82614e9cf96dc54739c6cdc560a3f66e3310ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAYhYMoTqf_QKTgjTed-WjT5nKMqYOBsvlxGbL0retsm5m0jv17MzdFdmFuciDPOZwchC4I7hEskpt-_7GH_56U4gN0QmJGw5TH5NBrLNIwYUx00Klziw2TRPwYdagQOOZUnKDXsdGqDF5UrU211kUdDPMcdFN8QrkOJpC1Glwwbe1bseGmRQPBqP4mTB2oJhhVy1LVzfbF2ycmg7pxZ-goV6WD893dRc-3w6fBfTh-uBsN-uNQszTCocpgBlGuZ5gkkFFKZiL2Oo-ylHISgdC54JmOo4QJzbVXHCuWcw6MEQwZ66Lrbe7Smo8WXCOrwmkofScwrZPU_5MJkdDYo1d76MK0tvbtJI1jH-c7cE9FW0pb45yFXC5tUSm7lgTLzfDSDy_3h_e2y114O6sg-zX9LO2BdAusTNmAde9luwIr56DKZv5_9he9GY43</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2553100176</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Local Vancomycin Effectively Reduces Surgical Site Infection at Implant Site in Rodents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Kroin, Jeffrey S ; Li, Jinyuan ; Shafikhani, Sasha ; Gupta, Kajal H ; Moric, Mario ; Buvanendran, Asokumar</creator><creatorcontrib>Kroin, Jeffrey S ; Li, Jinyuan ; Shafikhani, Sasha ; Gupta, Kajal H ; Moric, Mario ; Buvanendran, Asokumar</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESInfected implantable devices represent a clinical challenge, because the customary option is to surgically remove the device, and that is associated with substantial cost and morbidity to the patient, along with patient dissatisfaction with the physician. Although prophylactic systemic antibiotics and sterile technique are the mainstay of prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) after implant, the incidence of SSI remains relatively high. Although some surgeons add local antibiotic at implant site during surgery, there is no scientific research to demonstrate if there is a benefit. METHODSRats and mice were randomly assigned to 4 treatment groupssystemic vancomycin alone, local vancomycin alone, combined systemic and local vancomycin, and untreated. After systemic vancomycin or saline preinjection, a surgical incision was performed for placement of a metal disc, and local vancomycin or saline was injected in the superficial tissue pocket created. The metal disc (implant) was placed in that space, followed by local injection of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria and wound closure. After 1 and 6 days, samples of the tissue surrounding the disc implant, the disc itself, and the spleen (systemic infection marker) were processed, and bacterial levels assayed. RESULTSIn both mice and rats, local vancomycin was more potent in reducing tissue SSI, implant infection, and spleen infection than systemic vancomycin at 1 day after induction of bacteria to a surgical wound. At 6 days, in both mice and rats, local vancomycin was again more potent in reducing tissue SSI than systemic vancomycin. CONCLUSIONSThis study suggests that local vancomycin should be added to systemic vancomycin to reduce SSI with cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, implantable pulse generator of neurostimulator, or intrathecal pump implants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-7339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8651</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000820</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29905629</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Copyright by American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Antibiotics ; Electrodes, Implanted - adverse effects ; Female ; Injections, Spinal ; Male ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Random Allocation ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Regional anesthesia ; Rodentia ; Surgical site infections ; Surgical Wound Infection - drug therapy ; Surgical Wound Infection - etiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Treatment Outcome ; Vancomycin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><ispartof>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2018-10, Vol.43 (7), p.795-804</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 by American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 by American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3840-adebe4fcb017ed221b95b01f4d82614e9cf96dc54739c6cdc560a3f66e3310ed3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29905629$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kroin, Jeffrey S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jinyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shafikhani, Sasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Kajal H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moric, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buvanendran, Asokumar</creatorcontrib><title>Local Vancomycin Effectively Reduces Surgical Site Infection at Implant Site in Rodents</title><title>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine</title><addtitle>Reg Anesth Pain Med</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESInfected implantable devices represent a clinical challenge, because the customary option is to surgically remove the device, and that is associated with substantial cost and morbidity to the patient, along with patient dissatisfaction with the physician. Although prophylactic systemic antibiotics and sterile technique are the mainstay of prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) after implant, the incidence of SSI remains relatively high. Although some surgeons add local antibiotic at implant site during surgery, there is no scientific research to demonstrate if there is a benefit. METHODSRats and mice were randomly assigned to 4 treatment groupssystemic vancomycin alone, local vancomycin alone, combined systemic and local vancomycin, and untreated. After systemic vancomycin or saline preinjection, a surgical incision was performed for placement of a metal disc, and local vancomycin or saline was injected in the superficial tissue pocket created. The metal disc (implant) was placed in that space, followed by local injection of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria and wound closure. After 1 and 6 days, samples of the tissue surrounding the disc implant, the disc itself, and the spleen (systemic infection marker) were processed, and bacterial levels assayed. RESULTSIn both mice and rats, local vancomycin was more potent in reducing tissue SSI, implant infection, and spleen infection than systemic vancomycin at 1 day after induction of bacteria to a surgical wound. At 6 days, in both mice and rats, local vancomycin was again more potent in reducing tissue SSI than systemic vancomycin. CONCLUSIONSThis study suggests that local vancomycin should be added to systemic vancomycin to reduce SSI with cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, implantable pulse generator of neurostimulator, or intrathecal pump implants.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Electrodes, Implanted - adverse effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Injections, Spinal</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred C57BL</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Regional anesthesia</subject><subject>Rodentia</subject><subject>Surgical site infections</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - drug therapy</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vancomycin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><issn>1098-7339</issn><issn>1532-8651</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAYhYMoTqf_QKTgjTed-WjT5nKMqYOBsvlxGbL0retsm5m0jv17MzdFdmFuciDPOZwchC4I7hEskpt-_7GH_56U4gN0QmJGw5TH5NBrLNIwYUx00Klziw2TRPwYdagQOOZUnKDXsdGqDF5UrU211kUdDPMcdFN8QrkOJpC1Glwwbe1bseGmRQPBqP4mTB2oJhhVy1LVzfbF2ycmg7pxZ-goV6WD893dRc-3w6fBfTh-uBsN-uNQszTCocpgBlGuZ5gkkFFKZiL2Oo-ylHISgdC54JmOo4QJzbVXHCuWcw6MEQwZ66Lrbe7Smo8WXCOrwmkofScwrZPU_5MJkdDYo1d76MK0tvbtJI1jH-c7cE9FW0pb45yFXC5tUSm7lgTLzfDSDy_3h_e2y114O6sg-zX9LO2BdAusTNmAde9luwIr56DKZv5_9he9GY43</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Kroin, Jeffrey S</creator><creator>Li, Jinyuan</creator><creator>Shafikhani, Sasha</creator><creator>Gupta, Kajal H</creator><creator>Moric, Mario</creator><creator>Buvanendran, Asokumar</creator><general>Copyright by American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Local Vancomycin Effectively Reduces Surgical Site Infection at Implant Site in Rodents</title><author>Kroin, Jeffrey S ; Li, Jinyuan ; Shafikhani, Sasha ; Gupta, Kajal H ; Moric, Mario ; Buvanendran, Asokumar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3840-adebe4fcb017ed221b95b01f4d82614e9cf96dc54739c6cdc560a3f66e3310ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Electrodes, Implanted - adverse effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Injections, Spinal</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred C57BL</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Regional anesthesia</topic><topic>Rodentia</topic><topic>Surgical site infections</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - drug therapy</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vancomycin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kroin, Jeffrey S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jinyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shafikhani, Sasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Kajal H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moric, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buvanendran, Asokumar</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kroin, Jeffrey S</au><au>Li, Jinyuan</au><au>Shafikhani, Sasha</au><au>Gupta, Kajal H</au><au>Moric, Mario</au><au>Buvanendran, Asokumar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Local Vancomycin Effectively Reduces Surgical Site Infection at Implant Site in Rodents</atitle><jtitle>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Reg Anesth Pain Med</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>795</spage><epage>804</epage><pages>795-804</pages><issn>1098-7339</issn><eissn>1532-8651</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESInfected implantable devices represent a clinical challenge, because the customary option is to surgically remove the device, and that is associated with substantial cost and morbidity to the patient, along with patient dissatisfaction with the physician. Although prophylactic systemic antibiotics and sterile technique are the mainstay of prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) after implant, the incidence of SSI remains relatively high. Although some surgeons add local antibiotic at implant site during surgery, there is no scientific research to demonstrate if there is a benefit. METHODSRats and mice were randomly assigned to 4 treatment groupssystemic vancomycin alone, local vancomycin alone, combined systemic and local vancomycin, and untreated. After systemic vancomycin or saline preinjection, a surgical incision was performed for placement of a metal disc, and local vancomycin or saline was injected in the superficial tissue pocket created. The metal disc (implant) was placed in that space, followed by local injection of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria and wound closure. After 1 and 6 days, samples of the tissue surrounding the disc implant, the disc itself, and the spleen (systemic infection marker) were processed, and bacterial levels assayed. RESULTSIn both mice and rats, local vancomycin was more potent in reducing tissue SSI, implant infection, and spleen infection than systemic vancomycin at 1 day after induction of bacteria to a surgical wound. At 6 days, in both mice and rats, local vancomycin was again more potent in reducing tissue SSI than systemic vancomycin. CONCLUSIONSThis study suggests that local vancomycin should be added to systemic vancomycin to reduce SSI with cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, implantable pulse generator of neurostimulator, or intrathecal pump implants.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Copyright by American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine</pub><pmid>29905629</pmid><doi>10.1097/AAP.0000000000000820</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-7339
ispartof Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2018-10, Vol.43 (7), p.795-804
issn 1098-7339
1532-8651
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2056399725
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Animals
Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage
Antibiotics
Electrodes, Implanted - adverse effects
Female
Injections, Spinal
Male
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Random Allocation
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Regional anesthesia
Rodentia
Surgical site infections
Surgical Wound Infection - drug therapy
Surgical Wound Infection - etiology
Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology
Transplants & implants
Treatment Outcome
Vancomycin - administration & dosage
title Local Vancomycin Effectively Reduces Surgical Site Infection at Implant Site in Rodents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A54%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Local%20Vancomycin%20Effectively%20Reduces%20Surgical%20Site%20Infection%20at%20Implant%20Site%20in%20Rodents&rft.jtitle=Regional%20anesthesia%20and%20pain%20medicine&rft.au=Kroin,%20Jeffrey%20S&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=795&rft.epage=804&rft.pages=795-804&rft.issn=1098-7339&rft.eissn=1532-8651&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/AAP.0000000000000820&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2056399725%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2553100176&rft_id=info:pmid/29905629&rfr_iscdi=true