Consensus for the measurement of the camptocormia angle in the standing patient

Camptocormia is characterized by a pathological forward flexion of the trunk, which is reversible when lying and worsened by standing and walking. So far there is no consensus on how to measure the angle of flexion, and studies therefore give differing results. Harmonization is needed for both resea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Parkinsonism & related disorders 2018-07, Vol.52, p.1-5
Hauptverfasser: Margraf, Nils G., Wolke, Robin, Granert, Oliver, Berardelli, Alfredo, Bloem, Bastian R., Djaldetti, Ruth, Espay, Alberto J., Fasano, Alfonso, Furusawa, Yoshihiko, Giladi, Nir, Hallett, Mark, Jankovic, Joseph, Murata, Miho, Tinazzi, Michele, Volkmann, Jens, Berg, Daniela, Deuschl, Günther
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Parkinsonism & related disorders
container_volume 52
creator Margraf, Nils G.
Wolke, Robin
Granert, Oliver
Berardelli, Alfredo
Bloem, Bastian R.
Djaldetti, Ruth
Espay, Alberto J.
Fasano, Alfonso
Furusawa, Yoshihiko
Giladi, Nir
Hallett, Mark
Jankovic, Joseph
Murata, Miho
Tinazzi, Michele
Volkmann, Jens
Berg, Daniela
Deuschl, Günther
description Camptocormia is characterized by a pathological forward flexion of the trunk, which is reversible when lying and worsened by standing and walking. So far there is no consensus on how to measure the angle of flexion, and studies therefore give differing results. Harmonization is needed for both research and clinical practice. Orthopedic measures are not useful for this purpose. Two expert raters independently analyzed the photographs of 39 Parkinson patients with camptocormia while standing. They used four different methods to determine the camptocormia angle. The results were compared statistically. An international Consensus Group reviewed the results and drafted recommendations. The four methods yielded camptocormia angles that differed by up to 50% in the same patient. Inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability also differed, but were satisfactory to excellent. This Consensus Group concluded that two of the methods qualified as reliable measures of the trunk angles in standing patients based on their clinimetric properties. They propose that the ‘total camptocomia angle’ be the angle between the line from the lateral malleolus to the L5 spinous process and the line between the L5 spinous process and the spinous process of C7. They also propose that the ‘upper camptocormia angle’ be the angle of the lines between the vertebral fulcrum to the spinous processes of L5 and C7, respectively. An app is provided on the web for these measurements (http://www.neurologie.uni-kiel.de/de/axial-posturale-stoerungen/camptoapp). •There is no agreement on how to measure the camptocormia angle. Therefore studies on camptocormia are not comparable.•In this paper four different methods of angle assessment were empirically evaluated regarding reliability and face validity.•A consensus could be reached to measure a total camptocormia angle and an upper camptocormia angle.•Apps are available to measure these angles (http://www.neurologie.uni-kiel.de/de/axial-posturale-stoerungen/camptoapp).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.06.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2056394122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1353802018302724</els_id><sourcerecordid>2056394122</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3db5a4c0be5dae73c99b4b7083238d158f1788f181ef5bff85de832f178478fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1v3DAMhoUgQb7_QuGxi11Ksmx5bA9JWyBAlmYWZIm66GpbrmQHyL-PLndtxi4kQb4vCT6EFBQqCrT5sqtmHX9HHKxPFQMqK2gqoPyEXFLZ8lJQ1pzmmgteSmBwQa5S2gFAK4CfkwvWddBy1l2Sx02YEk5pTYULsViesRhRpzXiiNNSBPfeMnqcl2BCHL0u9LQdsPDT-yQterJ-2hazXnx23JAzp4eEt8d8TZ7u735tfpQPj99_br4-lKauYSm57YWuDfQorMaWm67r674FyRmXlgrpaCtzkBSd6J2TwmKe7bt1K53m1-TzYe8cw58V06JGnwwOg54wrEkxEA3vaspYlsqD1MSQUkSn5uhHHV8VBbXHqXbqA6fa41TQqIwzWz8dr6z9iPaf8S-_LPh2EGD-9cVjVMlkDAatj2gWZYP__5U3y0OMcg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2056394122</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consensus for the measurement of the camptocormia angle in the standing patient</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Margraf, Nils G. ; Wolke, Robin ; Granert, Oliver ; Berardelli, Alfredo ; Bloem, Bastian R. ; Djaldetti, Ruth ; Espay, Alberto J. ; Fasano, Alfonso ; Furusawa, Yoshihiko ; Giladi, Nir ; Hallett, Mark ; Jankovic, Joseph ; Murata, Miho ; Tinazzi, Michele ; Volkmann, Jens ; Berg, Daniela ; Deuschl, Günther</creator><creatorcontrib>Margraf, Nils G. ; Wolke, Robin ; Granert, Oliver ; Berardelli, Alfredo ; Bloem, Bastian R. ; Djaldetti, Ruth ; Espay, Alberto J. ; Fasano, Alfonso ; Furusawa, Yoshihiko ; Giladi, Nir ; Hallett, Mark ; Jankovic, Joseph ; Murata, Miho ; Tinazzi, Michele ; Volkmann, Jens ; Berg, Daniela ; Deuschl, Günther</creatorcontrib><description>Camptocormia is characterized by a pathological forward flexion of the trunk, which is reversible when lying and worsened by standing and walking. So far there is no consensus on how to measure the angle of flexion, and studies therefore give differing results. Harmonization is needed for both research and clinical practice. Orthopedic measures are not useful for this purpose. Two expert raters independently analyzed the photographs of 39 Parkinson patients with camptocormia while standing. They used four different methods to determine the camptocormia angle. The results were compared statistically. An international Consensus Group reviewed the results and drafted recommendations. The four methods yielded camptocormia angles that differed by up to 50% in the same patient. Inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability also differed, but were satisfactory to excellent. This Consensus Group concluded that two of the methods qualified as reliable measures of the trunk angles in standing patients based on their clinimetric properties. They propose that the ‘total camptocomia angle’ be the angle between the line from the lateral malleolus to the L5 spinous process and the line between the L5 spinous process and the spinous process of C7. They also propose that the ‘upper camptocormia angle’ be the angle of the lines between the vertebral fulcrum to the spinous processes of L5 and C7, respectively. An app is provided on the web for these measurements (http://www.neurologie.uni-kiel.de/de/axial-posturale-stoerungen/camptoapp). •There is no agreement on how to measure the camptocormia angle. Therefore studies on camptocormia are not comparable.•In this paper four different methods of angle assessment were empirically evaluated regarding reliability and face validity.•A consensus could be reached to measure a total camptocormia angle and an upper camptocormia angle.•Apps are available to measure these angles (http://www.neurologie.uni-kiel.de/de/axial-posturale-stoerungen/camptoapp).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1353-8020</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.06.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29907329</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Angle measurement ; Bent spine syndrome ; Camptocormia ; Clinical studies</subject><ispartof>Parkinsonism &amp; related disorders, 2018-07, Vol.52, p.1-5</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3db5a4c0be5dae73c99b4b7083238d158f1788f181ef5bff85de832f178478fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3db5a4c0be5dae73c99b4b7083238d158f1788f181ef5bff85de832f178478fa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5346-0180 ; 0000-0003-1482-8522 ; 0000-0002-3180-6811</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.06.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29907329$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Margraf, Nils G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolke, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granert, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berardelli, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloem, Bastian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djaldetti, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espay, Alberto J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasano, Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furusawa, Yoshihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giladi, Nir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallett, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jankovic, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murata, Miho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinazzi, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volkmann, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deuschl, Günther</creatorcontrib><title>Consensus for the measurement of the camptocormia angle in the standing patient</title><title>Parkinsonism &amp; related disorders</title><addtitle>Parkinsonism Relat Disord</addtitle><description>Camptocormia is characterized by a pathological forward flexion of the trunk, which is reversible when lying and worsened by standing and walking. So far there is no consensus on how to measure the angle of flexion, and studies therefore give differing results. Harmonization is needed for both research and clinical practice. Orthopedic measures are not useful for this purpose. Two expert raters independently analyzed the photographs of 39 Parkinson patients with camptocormia while standing. They used four different methods to determine the camptocormia angle. The results were compared statistically. An international Consensus Group reviewed the results and drafted recommendations. The four methods yielded camptocormia angles that differed by up to 50% in the same patient. Inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability also differed, but were satisfactory to excellent. This Consensus Group concluded that two of the methods qualified as reliable measures of the trunk angles in standing patients based on their clinimetric properties. They propose that the ‘total camptocomia angle’ be the angle between the line from the lateral malleolus to the L5 spinous process and the line between the L5 spinous process and the spinous process of C7. They also propose that the ‘upper camptocormia angle’ be the angle of the lines between the vertebral fulcrum to the spinous processes of L5 and C7, respectively. An app is provided on the web for these measurements (http://www.neurologie.uni-kiel.de/de/axial-posturale-stoerungen/camptoapp). •There is no agreement on how to measure the camptocormia angle. Therefore studies on camptocormia are not comparable.•In this paper four different methods of angle assessment were empirically evaluated regarding reliability and face validity.•A consensus could be reached to measure a total camptocormia angle and an upper camptocormia angle.•Apps are available to measure these angles (http://www.neurologie.uni-kiel.de/de/axial-posturale-stoerungen/camptoapp).</description><subject>Angle measurement</subject><subject>Bent spine syndrome</subject><subject>Camptocormia</subject><subject>Clinical studies</subject><issn>1353-8020</issn><issn>1873-5126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkD1v3DAMhoUgQb7_QuGxi11Ksmx5bA9JWyBAlmYWZIm66GpbrmQHyL-PLndtxi4kQb4vCT6EFBQqCrT5sqtmHX9HHKxPFQMqK2gqoPyEXFLZ8lJQ1pzmmgteSmBwQa5S2gFAK4CfkwvWddBy1l2Sx02YEk5pTYULsViesRhRpzXiiNNSBPfeMnqcl2BCHL0u9LQdsPDT-yQterJ-2hazXnx23JAzp4eEt8d8TZ7u735tfpQPj99_br4-lKauYSm57YWuDfQorMaWm67r674FyRmXlgrpaCtzkBSd6J2TwmKe7bt1K53m1-TzYe8cw58V06JGnwwOg54wrEkxEA3vaspYlsqD1MSQUkSn5uhHHV8VBbXHqXbqA6fa41TQqIwzWz8dr6z9iPaf8S-_LPh2EGD-9cVjVMlkDAatj2gWZYP__5U3y0OMcg</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Margraf, Nils G.</creator><creator>Wolke, Robin</creator><creator>Granert, Oliver</creator><creator>Berardelli, Alfredo</creator><creator>Bloem, Bastian R.</creator><creator>Djaldetti, Ruth</creator><creator>Espay, Alberto J.</creator><creator>Fasano, Alfonso</creator><creator>Furusawa, Yoshihiko</creator><creator>Giladi, Nir</creator><creator>Hallett, Mark</creator><creator>Jankovic, Joseph</creator><creator>Murata, Miho</creator><creator>Tinazzi, Michele</creator><creator>Volkmann, Jens</creator><creator>Berg, Daniela</creator><creator>Deuschl, Günther</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5346-0180</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1482-8522</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3180-6811</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Consensus for the measurement of the camptocormia angle in the standing patient</title><author>Margraf, Nils G. ; Wolke, Robin ; Granert, Oliver ; Berardelli, Alfredo ; Bloem, Bastian R. ; Djaldetti, Ruth ; Espay, Alberto J. ; Fasano, Alfonso ; Furusawa, Yoshihiko ; Giladi, Nir ; Hallett, Mark ; Jankovic, Joseph ; Murata, Miho ; Tinazzi, Michele ; Volkmann, Jens ; Berg, Daniela ; Deuschl, Günther</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3db5a4c0be5dae73c99b4b7083238d158f1788f181ef5bff85de832f178478fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Angle measurement</topic><topic>Bent spine syndrome</topic><topic>Camptocormia</topic><topic>Clinical studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Margraf, Nils G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolke, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granert, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berardelli, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloem, Bastian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djaldetti, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espay, Alberto J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasano, Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furusawa, Yoshihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giladi, Nir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallett, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jankovic, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murata, Miho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinazzi, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volkmann, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deuschl, Günther</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Parkinsonism &amp; related disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Margraf, Nils G.</au><au>Wolke, Robin</au><au>Granert, Oliver</au><au>Berardelli, Alfredo</au><au>Bloem, Bastian R.</au><au>Djaldetti, Ruth</au><au>Espay, Alberto J.</au><au>Fasano, Alfonso</au><au>Furusawa, Yoshihiko</au><au>Giladi, Nir</au><au>Hallett, Mark</au><au>Jankovic, Joseph</au><au>Murata, Miho</au><au>Tinazzi, Michele</au><au>Volkmann, Jens</au><au>Berg, Daniela</au><au>Deuschl, Günther</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consensus for the measurement of the camptocormia angle in the standing patient</atitle><jtitle>Parkinsonism &amp; related disorders</jtitle><addtitle>Parkinsonism Relat Disord</addtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>52</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>5</epage><pages>1-5</pages><issn>1353-8020</issn><eissn>1873-5126</eissn><abstract>Camptocormia is characterized by a pathological forward flexion of the trunk, which is reversible when lying and worsened by standing and walking. So far there is no consensus on how to measure the angle of flexion, and studies therefore give differing results. Harmonization is needed for both research and clinical practice. Orthopedic measures are not useful for this purpose. Two expert raters independently analyzed the photographs of 39 Parkinson patients with camptocormia while standing. They used four different methods to determine the camptocormia angle. The results were compared statistically. An international Consensus Group reviewed the results and drafted recommendations. The four methods yielded camptocormia angles that differed by up to 50% in the same patient. Inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability also differed, but were satisfactory to excellent. This Consensus Group concluded that two of the methods qualified as reliable measures of the trunk angles in standing patients based on their clinimetric properties. They propose that the ‘total camptocomia angle’ be the angle between the line from the lateral malleolus to the L5 spinous process and the line between the L5 spinous process and the spinous process of C7. They also propose that the ‘upper camptocormia angle’ be the angle of the lines between the vertebral fulcrum to the spinous processes of L5 and C7, respectively. An app is provided on the web for these measurements (http://www.neurologie.uni-kiel.de/de/axial-posturale-stoerungen/camptoapp). •There is no agreement on how to measure the camptocormia angle. Therefore studies on camptocormia are not comparable.•In this paper four different methods of angle assessment were empirically evaluated regarding reliability and face validity.•A consensus could be reached to measure a total camptocormia angle and an upper camptocormia angle.•Apps are available to measure these angles (http://www.neurologie.uni-kiel.de/de/axial-posturale-stoerungen/camptoapp).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29907329</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.06.013</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5346-0180</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1482-8522</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3180-6811</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1353-8020
ispartof Parkinsonism & related disorders, 2018-07, Vol.52, p.1-5
issn 1353-8020
1873-5126
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2056394122
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Angle measurement
Bent spine syndrome
Camptocormia
Clinical studies
title Consensus for the measurement of the camptocormia angle in the standing patient
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T17%3A04%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consensus%20for%20the%20measurement%20of%20the%20camptocormia%20angle%20in%20the%20standing%20patient&rft.jtitle=Parkinsonism%20&%20related%20disorders&rft.au=Margraf,%20Nils%20G.&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=52&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=5&rft.pages=1-5&rft.issn=1353-8020&rft.eissn=1873-5126&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.06.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2056394122%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2056394122&rft_id=info:pmid/29907329&rft_els_id=S1353802018302724&rfr_iscdi=true