ZOOPLANKTON ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION IN TIDAL MARSHES IMPOUNDED FOR MOSQUITO CONTROL
Impounded marshes under different reconnection plans (open vs. RIM) were examined at the culverts and within the interior perimeter ditch to determine if the flow regime influenced the availability of zooplankton. Management plans had no effect on zooplankton abundance, but a significant effect was...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Florida scientist 2007-10, Vol.70 (4), p.476-488 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 488 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 476 |
| container_title | Florida scientist |
| container_volume | 70 |
| creator | Sloan, N. J. B. Goodfriend, E. Johnson, K. B. |
| description | Impounded marshes under different reconnection plans (open vs. RIM) were examined at the culverts and within the interior perimeter ditch to determine if the flow regime influenced the availability of zooplankton. Management plans had no effect on zooplankton abundance, but a significant effect was found with the location within the perimeter ditch, with culverts having a higher overall abundance compared to interior points. The six most abundant taxa, in declining order of abundance, were juvenile flatworms, copepods, nauplii, rotifers, gastropod veligers, and nematodes. Specifically, juvenile flatworms, copepods, nauplii, and nematodes were more abundant at culverts. Dye diffusion studies revealed that areas with the lowest flow rates always had the highest species diversity and 'Evenness' was always higher in the interior of perimeter ditches. Impoundments appear to have the highest zooplankton densities recorded in the literature for any habitat. Canonical Correspondence Analysis of environmental data suggests that different water masses (coastal vs. estuarine) may distinguish the impoundments and drive species differences, while flow into an impoundment is correlated with zooplankton diversity and abundance. We hypothesize that zooplankton may accumulate within the impoundment ditches via migration behaviors (e.g., "selective tidal stream transport"). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1043/0098-4590(2007)70[476:ZAADIT]2.0.CO;2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20550390</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24321673</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24321673</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j800-36b627d3f171bb54092527d0e3cf6c44bbfc6830b03044036a3b231be7880eb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdzkFPgzAYBuAeNHFOf4JJ48HogfnRFgp66oC5RkYndB5mDKEIics2JmwH_70kMx48fXnzPnnzIWTZMLKB0XsA37OY48MtAeB3HN4Ydx-WQoRSv5MRjAL1SE7Q4M-dofOuWwEQx2HOAL0ulZrHInnWKsFivEhCkQQRFkmIQ5npVI4XWvaVTLCWoYjxTKTZNMqwnM1Vr6MQT1SKZyp7WUitcKASnar4Ap3WxbqrLn_vEOlJpIOpFasnGYjYWnkAFnWNS_gHrW1uG-Mw8InTZ6hoWbslY8bUpetRMECBMaBuQQ2htqm450FlbDpEN8fZXdt8Hapun28-u7Jar4tt1Ry6nIDjAPWhh9f_4Ko5tNv-tZy70BPCeI-ujmjV7Zs237Wfm6L9zgmjxHY5pT8IxmO_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>760039247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ZOOPLANKTON ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION IN TIDAL MARSHES IMPOUNDED FOR MOSQUITO CONTROL</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Sloan, N. J. B. ; Goodfriend, E. ; Johnson, K. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sloan, N. J. B. ; Goodfriend, E. ; Johnson, K. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Impounded marshes under different reconnection plans (open vs. RIM) were examined at the culverts and within the interior perimeter ditch to determine if the flow regime influenced the availability of zooplankton. Management plans had no effect on zooplankton abundance, but a significant effect was found with the location within the perimeter ditch, with culverts having a higher overall abundance compared to interior points. The six most abundant taxa, in declining order of abundance, were juvenile flatworms, copepods, nauplii, rotifers, gastropod veligers, and nematodes. Specifically, juvenile flatworms, copepods, nauplii, and nematodes were more abundant at culverts. Dye diffusion studies revealed that areas with the lowest flow rates always had the highest species diversity and 'Evenness' was always higher in the interior of perimeter ditches. Impoundments appear to have the highest zooplankton densities recorded in the literature for any habitat. Canonical Correspondence Analysis of environmental data suggests that different water masses (coastal vs. estuarine) may distinguish the impoundments and drive species differences, while flow into an impoundment is correlated with zooplankton diversity and abundance. We hypothesize that zooplankton may accumulate within the impoundment ditches via migration behaviors (e.g., "selective tidal stream transport").</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-4590</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1043/0098-4590(2007)70[476:ZAADIT]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Orlando: The Florida Academy of Sciences, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal organs ; Brackish ; Copepoda ; Culicidae ; Culverts ; Ditches ; Gastropoda ; Impoundment ; Inlets ; Nematoda ; Nematodes ; Rotifera ; Salinity ; Salt marshes ; Taxa ; Zooplankton</subject><ispartof>Florida scientist, 2007-10, Vol.70 (4), p.476-488</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Florida Academy of Sciences, Inc. 2007</rights><rights>Copyright Florida Academy of Sciences, Inc. Autumn 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24321673$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24321673$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sloan, N. J. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodfriend, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, K. B.</creatorcontrib><title>ZOOPLANKTON ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION IN TIDAL MARSHES IMPOUNDED FOR MOSQUITO CONTROL</title><title>Florida scientist</title><description>Impounded marshes under different reconnection plans (open vs. RIM) were examined at the culverts and within the interior perimeter ditch to determine if the flow regime influenced the availability of zooplankton. Management plans had no effect on zooplankton abundance, but a significant effect was found with the location within the perimeter ditch, with culverts having a higher overall abundance compared to interior points. The six most abundant taxa, in declining order of abundance, were juvenile flatworms, copepods, nauplii, rotifers, gastropod veligers, and nematodes. Specifically, juvenile flatworms, copepods, nauplii, and nematodes were more abundant at culverts. Dye diffusion studies revealed that areas with the lowest flow rates always had the highest species diversity and 'Evenness' was always higher in the interior of perimeter ditches. Impoundments appear to have the highest zooplankton densities recorded in the literature for any habitat. Canonical Correspondence Analysis of environmental data suggests that different water masses (coastal vs. estuarine) may distinguish the impoundments and drive species differences, while flow into an impoundment is correlated with zooplankton diversity and abundance. We hypothesize that zooplankton may accumulate within the impoundment ditches via migration behaviors (e.g., "selective tidal stream transport").</description><subject>Animal organs</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Copepoda</subject><subject>Culicidae</subject><subject>Culverts</subject><subject>Ditches</subject><subject>Gastropoda</subject><subject>Impoundment</subject><subject>Inlets</subject><subject>Nematoda</subject><subject>Nematodes</subject><subject>Rotifera</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Salt marshes</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><issn>0098-4590</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdzkFPgzAYBuAeNHFOf4JJ48HogfnRFgp66oC5RkYndB5mDKEIics2JmwH_70kMx48fXnzPnnzIWTZMLKB0XsA37OY48MtAeB3HN4Ydx-WQoRSv5MRjAL1SE7Q4M-dofOuWwEQx2HOAL0ulZrHInnWKsFivEhCkQQRFkmIQ5npVI4XWvaVTLCWoYjxTKTZNMqwnM1Vr6MQT1SKZyp7WUitcKASnar4Ap3WxbqrLn_vEOlJpIOpFasnGYjYWnkAFnWNS_gHrW1uG-Mw8InTZ6hoWbslY8bUpetRMECBMaBuQQ2htqm450FlbDpEN8fZXdt8Hapun28-u7Jar4tt1Ry6nIDjAPWhh9f_4Ko5tNv-tZy70BPCeI-ujmjV7Zs237Wfm6L9zgmjxHY5pT8IxmO_</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Sloan, N. J. B.</creator><creator>Goodfriend, E.</creator><creator>Johnson, K. B.</creator><general>The Florida Academy of Sciences, Inc</general><general>Florida Academy of Sciences, Inc</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>ZOOPLANKTON ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION IN TIDAL MARSHES IMPOUNDED FOR MOSQUITO CONTROL</title><author>Sloan, N. J. B. ; Goodfriend, E. ; Johnson, K. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j800-36b627d3f171bb54092527d0e3cf6c44bbfc6830b03044036a3b231be7880eb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animal organs</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Copepoda</topic><topic>Culicidae</topic><topic>Culverts</topic><topic>Ditches</topic><topic>Gastropoda</topic><topic>Impoundment</topic><topic>Inlets</topic><topic>Nematoda</topic><topic>Nematodes</topic><topic>Rotifera</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Salt marshes</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sloan, N. J. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodfriend, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, K. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><jtitle>Florida scientist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sloan, N. J. B.</au><au>Goodfriend, E.</au><au>Johnson, K. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ZOOPLANKTON ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION IN TIDAL MARSHES IMPOUNDED FOR MOSQUITO CONTROL</atitle><jtitle>Florida scientist</jtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>476</spage><epage>488</epage><pages>476-488</pages><issn>0098-4590</issn><abstract>Impounded marshes under different reconnection plans (open vs. RIM) were examined at the culverts and within the interior perimeter ditch to determine if the flow regime influenced the availability of zooplankton. Management plans had no effect on zooplankton abundance, but a significant effect was found with the location within the perimeter ditch, with culverts having a higher overall abundance compared to interior points. The six most abundant taxa, in declining order of abundance, were juvenile flatworms, copepods, nauplii, rotifers, gastropod veligers, and nematodes. Specifically, juvenile flatworms, copepods, nauplii, and nematodes were more abundant at culverts. Dye diffusion studies revealed that areas with the lowest flow rates always had the highest species diversity and 'Evenness' was always higher in the interior of perimeter ditches. Impoundments appear to have the highest zooplankton densities recorded in the literature for any habitat. Canonical Correspondence Analysis of environmental data suggests that different water masses (coastal vs. estuarine) may distinguish the impoundments and drive species differences, while flow into an impoundment is correlated with zooplankton diversity and abundance. We hypothesize that zooplankton may accumulate within the impoundment ditches via migration behaviors (e.g., "selective tidal stream transport").</abstract><cop>Orlando</cop><pub>The Florida Academy of Sciences, Inc</pub><doi>10.1043/0098-4590(2007)70[476:ZAADIT]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0098-4590 |
| ispartof | Florida scientist, 2007-10, Vol.70 (4), p.476-488 |
| issn | 0098-4590 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20550390 |
| source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Animal organs Brackish Copepoda Culicidae Culverts Ditches Gastropoda Impoundment Inlets Nematoda Nematodes Rotifera Salinity Salt marshes Taxa Zooplankton |
| title | ZOOPLANKTON ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION IN TIDAL MARSHES IMPOUNDED FOR MOSQUITO CONTROL |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T10%3A31%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ZOOPLANKTON%20ABUNDANCE%20AND%20DISTRIBUTION%20IN%20TIDAL%20MARSHES%20IMPOUNDED%20FOR%20MOSQUITO%20CONTROL&rft.jtitle=Florida%20scientist&rft.au=Sloan,%20N.%20J.%20B.&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=476&rft.epage=488&rft.pages=476-488&rft.issn=0098-4590&rft_id=info:doi/10.1043/0098-4590(2007)70%5B476:ZAADIT%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24321673%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=760039247&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24321673&rfr_iscdi=true |