Loss Rates for Dorsal Loop and Internal Anchor Tags Applied to Striped Bass

We used a double‐tagging experiment on coastal migratory striped bass Morone saxatilis along the Atlantic coast to determine loss rates of the American Littoral Society's dorsal loop tag and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's internal anchor tag. We double‐tagged 913 fish and released th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:North American journal of fisheries management 1996-05, Vol.16 (2), p.461-464
Hauptverfasser: Sprankle, Kenneth, Boreman, John, Hestbeck, Jay B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 464
container_issue 2
container_start_page 461
container_title North American journal of fisheries management
container_volume 16
creator Sprankle, Kenneth
Boreman, John
Hestbeck, Jay B.
description We used a double‐tagging experiment on coastal migratory striped bass Morone saxatilis along the Atlantic coast to determine loss rates of the American Littoral Society's dorsal loop tag and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's internal anchor tag. We double‐tagged 913 fish and released them into coastal waters off North Carolina and Virginia during the winters of 1991 and 1992. Over a 2‐year period, 127 recaptures were reported. Of the recaptures, 77 fish had both tags present, 9 fish had only the dorsal loop tag, and 36 fish had only the internal anchor tag; the presence or absence of a second tag on the remaining 5 fish could not be determined. Based on a 60‐d interval, tag loss (constant rate) was 7.6% for the dorsal loop tag and 2.6% for the internal anchor tag, translating into annual rates of 38 and 15% for dorsal loop tags and internal anchor tags, respectively. Although the internal anchor tag was retained at a higher rate, the dorsal loop tag is easier to apply and may be of use in volunteer tagging programs.
doi_str_mv 10.1577/1548-8675(1996)016<0461:LRFDLA>2.3.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20545335</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15599535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2641-f7bec7124490d45999f901d8c1256a370b777e360aecf0bb19f0d0463287cdd23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkF9LwzAUxYMoOKffIU-iD93yp2kaFaF2bg47B3M-hzRNtdK1NemQfXtbJ74KPt3LPYdz7_0BMMZohBnnY8z80AsDzi6wEMElwsEN8gN8laymkyS6JSM6ipfX5AAMfp2HYIAIZx4TPj8GJ869I4RYyMgAPCa1c3ClWuNgXls4qa1TJUzquoGqyuC8ao2tuklU6bdOX6tXB6OmKQuTwbaGz60tmq69U86dgqNclc6c_dQheJner-MHL1nO5nGUeJoEPvZynhrNMfF9gTKfCSFygXAWakxYoChHKefc0AApo3OUpljkKOtepCTkOssIHYLzfW5j64-tca3cFE6bslSVqbdOEsR8Rin704hZt519G2d7o7YdDmty2dhio-xOYiR76rJnKXuWsqcuO-qypy731CWRVMZL2d-22Cd9FqXZ_TdGPkXTRS_QL8QMjWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15599535</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Loss Rates for Dorsal Loop and Internal Anchor Tags Applied to Striped Bass</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Sprankle, Kenneth ; Boreman, John ; Hestbeck, Jay B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sprankle, Kenneth ; Boreman, John ; Hestbeck, Jay B.</creatorcontrib><description>We used a double‐tagging experiment on coastal migratory striped bass Morone saxatilis along the Atlantic coast to determine loss rates of the American Littoral Society's dorsal loop tag and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's internal anchor tag. We double‐tagged 913 fish and released them into coastal waters off North Carolina and Virginia during the winters of 1991 and 1992. Over a 2‐year period, 127 recaptures were reported. Of the recaptures, 77 fish had both tags present, 9 fish had only the dorsal loop tag, and 36 fish had only the internal anchor tag; the presence or absence of a second tag on the remaining 5 fish could not be determined. Based on a 60‐d interval, tag loss (constant rate) was 7.6% for the dorsal loop tag and 2.6% for the internal anchor tag, translating into annual rates of 38 and 15% for dorsal loop tags and internal anchor tags, respectively. Although the internal anchor tag was retained at a higher rate, the dorsal loop tag is easier to apply and may be of use in volunteer tagging programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-5947</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-8675</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1577/1548-8675(1996)016&lt;0461:LRFDLA&gt;2.3.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Marine ; Morone saxatilis</subject><ispartof>North American journal of fisheries management, 1996-05, Vol.16 (2), p.461-464</ispartof><rights>1996 American Fisheries Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1577%2F1548-8675%281996%29016%3C0461%3ALRFDLA%3E2.3.CO%3B2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1577%2F1548-8675%281996%29016%3C0461%3ALRFDLA%3E2.3.CO%3B2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sprankle, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boreman, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hestbeck, Jay B.</creatorcontrib><title>Loss Rates for Dorsal Loop and Internal Anchor Tags Applied to Striped Bass</title><title>North American journal of fisheries management</title><description>We used a double‐tagging experiment on coastal migratory striped bass Morone saxatilis along the Atlantic coast to determine loss rates of the American Littoral Society's dorsal loop tag and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's internal anchor tag. We double‐tagged 913 fish and released them into coastal waters off North Carolina and Virginia during the winters of 1991 and 1992. Over a 2‐year period, 127 recaptures were reported. Of the recaptures, 77 fish had both tags present, 9 fish had only the dorsal loop tag, and 36 fish had only the internal anchor tag; the presence or absence of a second tag on the remaining 5 fish could not be determined. Based on a 60‐d interval, tag loss (constant rate) was 7.6% for the dorsal loop tag and 2.6% for the internal anchor tag, translating into annual rates of 38 and 15% for dorsal loop tags and internal anchor tags, respectively. Although the internal anchor tag was retained at a higher rate, the dorsal loop tag is easier to apply and may be of use in volunteer tagging programs.</description><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Morone saxatilis</subject><issn>0275-5947</issn><issn>1548-8675</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkF9LwzAUxYMoOKffIU-iD93yp2kaFaF2bg47B3M-hzRNtdK1NemQfXtbJ74KPt3LPYdz7_0BMMZohBnnY8z80AsDzi6wEMElwsEN8gN8laymkyS6JSM6ipfX5AAMfp2HYIAIZx4TPj8GJ869I4RYyMgAPCa1c3ClWuNgXls4qa1TJUzquoGqyuC8ao2tuklU6bdOX6tXB6OmKQuTwbaGz60tmq69U86dgqNclc6c_dQheJner-MHL1nO5nGUeJoEPvZynhrNMfF9gTKfCSFygXAWakxYoChHKefc0AApo3OUpljkKOtepCTkOssIHYLzfW5j64-tca3cFE6bslSVqbdOEsR8Rin704hZt519G2d7o7YdDmty2dhio-xOYiR76rJnKXuWsqcuO-qypy731CWRVMZL2d-22Cd9FqXZ_TdGPkXTRS_QL8QMjWg</recordid><startdate>199605</startdate><enddate>199605</enddate><creator>Sprankle, Kenneth</creator><creator>Boreman, John</creator><creator>Hestbeck, Jay B.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199605</creationdate><title>Loss Rates for Dorsal Loop and Internal Anchor Tags Applied to Striped Bass</title><author>Sprankle, Kenneth ; Boreman, John ; Hestbeck, Jay B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2641-f7bec7124490d45999f901d8c1256a370b777e360aecf0bb19f0d0463287cdd23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Morone saxatilis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sprankle, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boreman, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hestbeck, Jay B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>North American journal of fisheries management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sprankle, Kenneth</au><au>Boreman, John</au><au>Hestbeck, Jay B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Loss Rates for Dorsal Loop and Internal Anchor Tags Applied to Striped Bass</atitle><jtitle>North American journal of fisheries management</jtitle><date>1996-05</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>461</spage><epage>464</epage><pages>461-464</pages><issn>0275-5947</issn><eissn>1548-8675</eissn><abstract>We used a double‐tagging experiment on coastal migratory striped bass Morone saxatilis along the Atlantic coast to determine loss rates of the American Littoral Society's dorsal loop tag and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's internal anchor tag. We double‐tagged 913 fish and released them into coastal waters off North Carolina and Virginia during the winters of 1991 and 1992. Over a 2‐year period, 127 recaptures were reported. Of the recaptures, 77 fish had both tags present, 9 fish had only the dorsal loop tag, and 36 fish had only the internal anchor tag; the presence or absence of a second tag on the remaining 5 fish could not be determined. Based on a 60‐d interval, tag loss (constant rate) was 7.6% for the dorsal loop tag and 2.6% for the internal anchor tag, translating into annual rates of 38 and 15% for dorsal loop tags and internal anchor tags, respectively. Although the internal anchor tag was retained at a higher rate, the dorsal loop tag is easier to apply and may be of use in volunteer tagging programs.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1577/1548-8675(1996)016&lt;0461:LRFDLA&gt;2.3.CO;2</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0275-5947
ispartof North American journal of fisheries management, 1996-05, Vol.16 (2), p.461-464
issn 0275-5947
1548-8675
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20545335
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Marine
Morone saxatilis
title Loss Rates for Dorsal Loop and Internal Anchor Tags Applied to Striped Bass
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T12%3A32%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Loss%20Rates%20for%20Dorsal%20Loop%20and%20Internal%20Anchor%20Tags%20Applied%20to%20Striped%20Bass&rft.jtitle=North%20American%20journal%20of%20fisheries%20management&rft.au=Sprankle,%20Kenneth&rft.date=1996-05&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=461&rft.epage=464&rft.pages=461-464&rft.issn=0275-5947&rft.eissn=1548-8675&rft_id=info:doi/10.1577/1548-8675(1996)016%3C0461:LRFDLA%3E2.3.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15599535%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15599535&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true