Possible Mechanisms Leading to a Delay in Carbon Stock Recovery after Land Use Change
Changes in land use sometimes lead to soil C loss, and a long time may be required for the C stock to recover to initial levels. Thus, it is important to evaluate the mechanisms related to accumulation of newly input C following land use changes. In this study, we sought to determine the signature o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Soil Science Society of America journal 2007-09, Vol.71 (5), p.1636-1638 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1638 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1636 |
container_title | Soil Science Society of America journal |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Arai, H Tokuchi, N Koba, K |
description | Changes in land use sometimes lead to soil C loss, and a long time may be required for the C stock to recover to initial levels. Thus, it is important to evaluate the mechanisms related to accumulation of newly input C following land use changes. In this study, we sought to determine the signature of newly input C in the soil profile after land use change. We used stable and radioactive C isotopes with soil fractionation methods in a C3 coniferous plantation converted from C4 grassland in Japan. The difference in delta13C values between the surface litter and the soil organic carbon (SOC) below the litter was 5 ppt or greater; this large isotopic difference was attributed to rapid decomposition in the litter layer and preservation of C derived from the previous C4 vegetation. Most SOC delta14C values were negative throughout the soil profile, suggesting that most of the SOC in the soil profile was recalcitrant and had been preserved for a long time. Only the surface sand values were slightly positive. These results suggest that most newly input C is consumed at the soil surface. The low ability of these soils to preserve newly input C is one factor in the slow recovery of soil C. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2136/sssaj2005.0309 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20538258</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1392428651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5369-79eb0b94635b03db67592d79bb88af0db1a3ee65ab2bd3a983962ad77b0aab93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFv0zAUhy3EJMrGdVcsJHZLebZjJz5wmMpgQ0WgZT1bz8lLSUnjYbeg_vckagUSl11syfp-39Pzj7FLAXMplHmXUsKNBNBzUGCfsZnIlc7AGPGczUAZkWlr9Qv2MqUNgNAWYMZW30JKne-Jf6H6Ow5d2ia-JGy6Yc13gSP_QD0eeDfwBUYfBl7tQv2D31MdflE8cGx3FPkSh4avEvHF6FjTBTtrsU_06nSfs4ePNw-L22z59dPd4nqZ1VoZmxWWPHibG6U9qMabQlvZFNb7ssQWGi9QERmNXvpGoS2VNRKbovCA6K06Z1dH7WMMP_eUdm7bpZr6HgcK--QkaFVKXT4JirxUwshiBN_8B27CPg7jDk4KAzrX-WSbH6E6jp8XqXWPsdtiPDgBbqrC_a3CTVWMgbcnK6Ya-zbiUHfpX8qOYmsn7v2R-931dHjC6qrrz7KqpnN8Os15fcy3GByu4zhjVUkQCqAUuQSj_gC-ZqQN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216054548</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Possible Mechanisms Leading to a Delay in Carbon Stock Recovery after Land Use Change</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Arai, H ; Tokuchi, N ; Koba, K</creator><creatorcontrib>Arai, H ; Tokuchi, N ; Koba, K</creatorcontrib><description>Changes in land use sometimes lead to soil C loss, and a long time may be required for the C stock to recover to initial levels. Thus, it is important to evaluate the mechanisms related to accumulation of newly input C following land use changes. In this study, we sought to determine the signature of newly input C in the soil profile after land use change. We used stable and radioactive C isotopes with soil fractionation methods in a C3 coniferous plantation converted from C4 grassland in Japan. The difference in delta13C values between the surface litter and the soil organic carbon (SOC) below the litter was 5 ppt or greater; this large isotopic difference was attributed to rapid decomposition in the litter layer and preservation of C derived from the previous C4 vegetation. Most SOC delta14C values were negative throughout the soil profile, suggesting that most of the SOC in the soil profile was recalcitrant and had been preserved for a long time. Only the surface sand values were slightly positive. These results suggest that most newly input C is consumed at the soil surface. The low ability of these soils to preserve newly input C is one factor in the slow recovery of soil C.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-5995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0309</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSSJD4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: Soil Science Society</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; atmospheric nuclear tests ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carbon ; Changes ; Chemicals ; coniferous forests ; Cryptomeria japonica ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; forest soils ; Fractionation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; grassland soils ; Grasslands ; isotopes ; isotopic signatures ; Land use ; land use change ; Litter ; Miscanthus sinensis ; Organic carbon ; organic horizons ; plant litter ; soil nutrient dynamics ; soil organic carbon ; Soil profiles ; Soil science ; Soil surfaces ; Soils ; surface layers ; Surficial geology</subject><ispartof>Soil Science Society of America journal, 2007-09, Vol.71 (5), p.1636-1638</ispartof><rights>Soil Science Society of America</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Sep/Oct 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5369-79eb0b94635b03db67592d79bb88af0db1a3ee65ab2bd3a983962ad77b0aab93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5369-79eb0b94635b03db67592d79bb88af0db1a3ee65ab2bd3a983962ad77b0aab93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2136%2Fsssaj2005.0309$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2136%2Fsssaj2005.0309$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19054999$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arai, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokuchi, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koba, K</creatorcontrib><title>Possible Mechanisms Leading to a Delay in Carbon Stock Recovery after Land Use Change</title><title>Soil Science Society of America journal</title><description>Changes in land use sometimes lead to soil C loss, and a long time may be required for the C stock to recover to initial levels. Thus, it is important to evaluate the mechanisms related to accumulation of newly input C following land use changes. In this study, we sought to determine the signature of newly input C in the soil profile after land use change. We used stable and radioactive C isotopes with soil fractionation methods in a C3 coniferous plantation converted from C4 grassland in Japan. The difference in delta13C values between the surface litter and the soil organic carbon (SOC) below the litter was 5 ppt or greater; this large isotopic difference was attributed to rapid decomposition in the litter layer and preservation of C derived from the previous C4 vegetation. Most SOC delta14C values were negative throughout the soil profile, suggesting that most of the SOC in the soil profile was recalcitrant and had been preserved for a long time. Only the surface sand values were slightly positive. These results suggest that most newly input C is consumed at the soil surface. The low ability of these soils to preserve newly input C is one factor in the slow recovery of soil C.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>atmospheric nuclear tests</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Changes</subject><subject>Chemicals</subject><subject>coniferous forests</subject><subject>Cryptomeria japonica</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>forest soils</subject><subject>Fractionation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>grassland soils</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>isotopes</subject><subject>isotopic signatures</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>land use change</subject><subject>Litter</subject><subject>Miscanthus sinensis</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>organic horizons</subject><subject>plant litter</subject><subject>soil nutrient dynamics</subject><subject>soil organic carbon</subject><subject>Soil profiles</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>Soil surfaces</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>surface layers</subject><subject>Surficial geology</subject><issn>0361-5995</issn><issn>1435-0661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFv0zAUhy3EJMrGdVcsJHZLebZjJz5wmMpgQ0WgZT1bz8lLSUnjYbeg_vckagUSl11syfp-39Pzj7FLAXMplHmXUsKNBNBzUGCfsZnIlc7AGPGczUAZkWlr9Qv2MqUNgNAWYMZW30JKne-Jf6H6Ow5d2ia-JGy6Yc13gSP_QD0eeDfwBUYfBl7tQv2D31MdflE8cGx3FPkSh4avEvHF6FjTBTtrsU_06nSfs4ePNw-L22z59dPd4nqZ1VoZmxWWPHibG6U9qMabQlvZFNb7ssQWGi9QERmNXvpGoS2VNRKbovCA6K06Z1dH7WMMP_eUdm7bpZr6HgcK--QkaFVKXT4JirxUwshiBN_8B27CPg7jDk4KAzrX-WSbH6E6jp8XqXWPsdtiPDgBbqrC_a3CTVWMgbcnK6Ya-zbiUHfpX8qOYmsn7v2R-931dHjC6qrrz7KqpnN8Os15fcy3GByu4zhjVUkQCqAUuQSj_gC-ZqQN</recordid><startdate>200709</startdate><enddate>200709</enddate><creator>Arai, H</creator><creator>Tokuchi, N</creator><creator>Koba, K</creator><general>Soil Science Society</general><general>Soil Science Society of America</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200709</creationdate><title>Possible Mechanisms Leading to a Delay in Carbon Stock Recovery after Land Use Change</title><author>Arai, H ; Tokuchi, N ; Koba, K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5369-79eb0b94635b03db67592d79bb88af0db1a3ee65ab2bd3a983962ad77b0aab93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>atmospheric nuclear tests</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Changes</topic><topic>Chemicals</topic><topic>coniferous forests</topic><topic>Cryptomeria japonica</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>forest soils</topic><topic>Fractionation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>grassland soils</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>isotopes</topic><topic>isotopic signatures</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>land use change</topic><topic>Litter</topic><topic>Miscanthus sinensis</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>organic horizons</topic><topic>plant litter</topic><topic>soil nutrient dynamics</topic><topic>soil organic carbon</topic><topic>Soil profiles</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>Soil surfaces</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>surface layers</topic><topic>Surficial geology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arai, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokuchi, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koba, K</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arai, H</au><au>Tokuchi, N</au><au>Koba, K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Possible Mechanisms Leading to a Delay in Carbon Stock Recovery after Land Use Change</atitle><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle><date>2007-09</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1636</spage><epage>1638</epage><pages>1636-1638</pages><issn>0361-5995</issn><eissn>1435-0661</eissn><coden>SSSJD4</coden><abstract>Changes in land use sometimes lead to soil C loss, and a long time may be required for the C stock to recover to initial levels. Thus, it is important to evaluate the mechanisms related to accumulation of newly input C following land use changes. In this study, we sought to determine the signature of newly input C in the soil profile after land use change. We used stable and radioactive C isotopes with soil fractionation methods in a C3 coniferous plantation converted from C4 grassland in Japan. The difference in delta13C values between the surface litter and the soil organic carbon (SOC) below the litter was 5 ppt or greater; this large isotopic difference was attributed to rapid decomposition in the litter layer and preservation of C derived from the previous C4 vegetation. Most SOC delta14C values were negative throughout the soil profile, suggesting that most of the SOC in the soil profile was recalcitrant and had been preserved for a long time. Only the surface sand values were slightly positive. These results suggest that most newly input C is consumed at the soil surface. The low ability of these soils to preserve newly input C is one factor in the slow recovery of soil C.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>Soil Science Society</pub><doi>10.2136/sssaj2005.0309</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0361-5995 |
ispartof | Soil Science Society of America journal, 2007-09, Vol.71 (5), p.1636-1638 |
issn | 0361-5995 1435-0661 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20538258 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions atmospheric nuclear tests Biological and medical sciences Carbon Changes Chemicals coniferous forests Cryptomeria japonica Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology forest soils Fractionation Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology grassland soils Grasslands isotopes isotopic signatures Land use land use change Litter Miscanthus sinensis Organic carbon organic horizons plant litter soil nutrient dynamics soil organic carbon Soil profiles Soil science Soil surfaces Soils surface layers Surficial geology |
title | Possible Mechanisms Leading to a Delay in Carbon Stock Recovery after Land Use Change |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T22%3A33%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Possible%20Mechanisms%20Leading%20to%20a%20Delay%20in%20Carbon%20Stock%20Recovery%20after%20Land%20Use%20Change&rft.jtitle=Soil%20Science%20Society%20of%20America%20journal&rft.au=Arai,%20H&rft.date=2007-09&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1636&rft.epage=1638&rft.pages=1636-1638&rft.issn=0361-5995&rft.eissn=1435-0661&rft.coden=SSSJD4&rft_id=info:doi/10.2136/sssaj2005.0309&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1392428651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216054548&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |