The Debatable Choice of Iliac Inflow Source for Redo Femoropopliteal and Infrapopliteal Bypass

Redo area region operation is associated with a significant morbidity such as neurovascular injury, infection, and lymphorrhea. The traditional management of occluded femoropopliteal grafts often includes redissection of a scarred groin to obtain adequate inflow via the common femoral artery. These...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of vascular surgery 2018-10, Vol.52, p.316.e15-316.e19
Hauptverfasser: Gabrielli, Roberto, Ciocca, Franco, Dante, Angelica, Musilli, Aldo, Maiorano, Maurizio, Ventura, Marco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 316.e19
container_issue
container_start_page 316.e15
container_title Annals of vascular surgery
container_volume 52
creator Gabrielli, Roberto
Ciocca, Franco
Dante, Angelica
Musilli, Aldo
Maiorano, Maurizio
Ventura, Marco
description Redo area region operation is associated with a significant morbidity such as neurovascular injury, infection, and lymphorrhea. The traditional management of occluded femoropopliteal grafts often includes redissection of a scarred groin to obtain adequate inflow via the common femoral artery. These procedures are more technically demanding and require more expertise and judgment than the primary operation. We describe a case of using the ipsilateral iliac branch prosthesis of aortobifemoral bypass as inflow for iliac-peroneal bypass, avoiding the previous groin incisions, to minimize the local complications related to a redo groin dissection and to decrease the operative time required to obtain an adequate inflow source. An 86-year-old man was referred to our hospital with severe pain in the right lower extremity one day before the present admission. He underwent aortobifemoral bypass for Leriché syndrome, in our department, 10 years before the present admission. Eight and 9 years later, a femoral popliteal suprageniculate bypass and jump to deep femoral artery bypass (when femoropopliteal bypass was occluded) were performed with 6-mm polytetrafluoroethylene grafts, both in some other institution. The patient's right foot was colder than the left, and he had some difficulty with movement. Absence of signal Doppler continous wave at right tibial vessels was recorded (category IIA of Rutherford classification for acute limb ischemia). Computed tomography (CT) confirmed the following duplex ultrasound (US) findings: occlusion of the femoral graft and popliteal artery below the knee and preocclusive stenosis of deep femoral artery with patency of aortobifemoral bypass and peroneal artery. Taking into consideration the multiple groin scars and the occlusion of superficial femoral and popliteal arteries and preocclusive lesion of deep femoral artery, we decided to perform a sequential composite and extra anatomical bypass from the right iliac prosthesis to the peroneal artery, with graft tunnellization through the lateral groin subfascial layer. The proximal component of the graft was made with a 6-mm Dacron prosthesis routed through a suprasartorial tunnel from iliac prosthesis to the proximal great saphenous vein. Proximal anastomosis was performed in a conventional side-to-end fashion. A tunnel was created between the abdominal flank incision and the median prosthesis-vein anastomosis of the bypass under inguinal ligament laterally with respect to femoral ves
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.04.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2053270488</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0890509618304291</els_id><sourcerecordid>2053270488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-89589e092c530a87c4dcd6a282ed0154969e997399e07569df06ecef3b56521b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFO3DAURa0K1JlCf4BF5SWbhGcndmypmzKUMhISEgzbWo79Ah5lxsHOUPH3zWhou-vqSVfnXukdQs4YlAyYvFiX9jU_lRyYKqEugVUfyJxJJgqh6-aIzEFpKARoOSOfcl4DMK5q9ZHMuFZKcgZz8nP1jPQKWzvatke6eI7BIY0dXfbBOrrcdn38RR_iLk1xFxO9Rx_pNW5iikMc-jCi7and-j2a7L_o8m2wOZ-S4872GT-_3xPyeP19tbgpbu9-LBffbgtXQTMWSgulETR3ogKrGld756XliqMHJmotNWrdVHqCGiG170Ciw65qhRSctdUJOT_sDim-7DCPZhOyw763W4y7bDiIijdQKzWh_IC6FHNO2JkhhY1Nb4aB2Xs1a7P3avZeDdRm8jqVvrzv79oN-r-VPyIn4OsBwOnL14DJZBdw69CHhG40Pob_7f8GjvWIqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2053270488</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Debatable Choice of Iliac Inflow Source for Redo Femoropopliteal and Infrapopliteal Bypass</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Gabrielli, Roberto ; Ciocca, Franco ; Dante, Angelica ; Musilli, Aldo ; Maiorano, Maurizio ; Ventura, Marco</creator><creatorcontrib>Gabrielli, Roberto ; Ciocca, Franco ; Dante, Angelica ; Musilli, Aldo ; Maiorano, Maurizio ; Ventura, Marco</creatorcontrib><description>Redo area region operation is associated with a significant morbidity such as neurovascular injury, infection, and lymphorrhea. The traditional management of occluded femoropopliteal grafts often includes redissection of a scarred groin to obtain adequate inflow via the common femoral artery. These procedures are more technically demanding and require more expertise and judgment than the primary operation. We describe a case of using the ipsilateral iliac branch prosthesis of aortobifemoral bypass as inflow for iliac-peroneal bypass, avoiding the previous groin incisions, to minimize the local complications related to a redo groin dissection and to decrease the operative time required to obtain an adequate inflow source. An 86-year-old man was referred to our hospital with severe pain in the right lower extremity one day before the present admission. He underwent aortobifemoral bypass for Leriché syndrome, in our department, 10 years before the present admission. Eight and 9 years later, a femoral popliteal suprageniculate bypass and jump to deep femoral artery bypass (when femoropopliteal bypass was occluded) were performed with 6-mm polytetrafluoroethylene grafts, both in some other institution. The patient's right foot was colder than the left, and he had some difficulty with movement. Absence of signal Doppler continous wave at right tibial vessels was recorded (category IIA of Rutherford classification for acute limb ischemia). Computed tomography (CT) confirmed the following duplex ultrasound (US) findings: occlusion of the femoral graft and popliteal artery below the knee and preocclusive stenosis of deep femoral artery with patency of aortobifemoral bypass and peroneal artery. Taking into consideration the multiple groin scars and the occlusion of superficial femoral and popliteal arteries and preocclusive lesion of deep femoral artery, we decided to perform a sequential composite and extra anatomical bypass from the right iliac prosthesis to the peroneal artery, with graft tunnellization through the lateral groin subfascial layer. The proximal component of the graft was made with a 6-mm Dacron prosthesis routed through a suprasartorial tunnel from iliac prosthesis to the proximal great saphenous vein. Proximal anastomosis was performed in a conventional side-to-end fashion. A tunnel was created between the abdominal flank incision and the median prosthesis-vein anastomosis of the bypass under inguinal ligament laterally with respect to femoral vessels, in lateral to median route, avoiding groin scars. The vein segment was orientated in a nonreversed format, with a LeMaitre Valvulotome to secure antegrade flow. The intermediate anastomosis was performed in an end-to-end way, whereas the distal anastomosis was carried out between the vein and peroneal artery in a conventional end-to-side fashion. Immediate intraoperative and postoperative assessments of graft patency were carried out with angiography and hand-held Doppler examination, respectively. Duplex US scan was used for graft surveillance at regular intervals up to 12 months after surgery. The patient recovered at 12 months postoperatively, and the CT imaging demonstrated the good patency of the entire graft. We believe that the external iliac artery (or prosthesis such as in our case) inflow should be considered selectively rather than preferentially, mostly in the subset of patients selected for reoperative distal bypass.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-5096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-5947</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.04.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29886210</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged, 80 and over ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation ; Choice Behavior ; Clinical Decision-Making ; Computed Tomography Angiography ; Femoral Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Femoral Artery - physiopathology ; Femoral Artery - surgery ; Graft Occlusion, Vascular - diagnostic imaging ; Graft Occlusion, Vascular - etiology ; Graft Occlusion, Vascular - physiopathology ; Graft Occlusion, Vascular - surgery ; Humans ; Iliac Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Iliac Artery - physiopathology ; Iliac Artery - surgery ; Male ; Polyethylene Terephthalates ; Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Popliteal Artery - physiopathology ; Popliteal Artery - surgery ; Prosthesis Design ; Regional Blood Flow ; Reoperation ; Saphenous Vein - physiopathology ; Saphenous Vein - surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Patency</subject><ispartof>Annals of vascular surgery, 2018-10, Vol.52, p.316.e15-316.e19</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-89589e092c530a87c4dcd6a282ed0154969e997399e07569df06ecef3b56521b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7192-5076</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2018.04.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29886210$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gabrielli, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciocca, Franco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dante, Angelica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musilli, Aldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiorano, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ventura, Marco</creatorcontrib><title>The Debatable Choice of Iliac Inflow Source for Redo Femoropopliteal and Infrapopliteal Bypass</title><title>Annals of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Redo area region operation is associated with a significant morbidity such as neurovascular injury, infection, and lymphorrhea. The traditional management of occluded femoropopliteal grafts often includes redissection of a scarred groin to obtain adequate inflow via the common femoral artery. These procedures are more technically demanding and require more expertise and judgment than the primary operation. We describe a case of using the ipsilateral iliac branch prosthesis of aortobifemoral bypass as inflow for iliac-peroneal bypass, avoiding the previous groin incisions, to minimize the local complications related to a redo groin dissection and to decrease the operative time required to obtain an adequate inflow source. An 86-year-old man was referred to our hospital with severe pain in the right lower extremity one day before the present admission. He underwent aortobifemoral bypass for Leriché syndrome, in our department, 10 years before the present admission. Eight and 9 years later, a femoral popliteal suprageniculate bypass and jump to deep femoral artery bypass (when femoropopliteal bypass was occluded) were performed with 6-mm polytetrafluoroethylene grafts, both in some other institution. The patient's right foot was colder than the left, and he had some difficulty with movement. Absence of signal Doppler continous wave at right tibial vessels was recorded (category IIA of Rutherford classification for acute limb ischemia). Computed tomography (CT) confirmed the following duplex ultrasound (US) findings: occlusion of the femoral graft and popliteal artery below the knee and preocclusive stenosis of deep femoral artery with patency of aortobifemoral bypass and peroneal artery. Taking into consideration the multiple groin scars and the occlusion of superficial femoral and popliteal arteries and preocclusive lesion of deep femoral artery, we decided to perform a sequential composite and extra anatomical bypass from the right iliac prosthesis to the peroneal artery, with graft tunnellization through the lateral groin subfascial layer. The proximal component of the graft was made with a 6-mm Dacron prosthesis routed through a suprasartorial tunnel from iliac prosthesis to the proximal great saphenous vein. Proximal anastomosis was performed in a conventional side-to-end fashion. A tunnel was created between the abdominal flank incision and the median prosthesis-vein anastomosis of the bypass under inguinal ligament laterally with respect to femoral vessels, in lateral to median route, avoiding groin scars. The vein segment was orientated in a nonreversed format, with a LeMaitre Valvulotome to secure antegrade flow. The intermediate anastomosis was performed in an end-to-end way, whereas the distal anastomosis was carried out between the vein and peroneal artery in a conventional end-to-side fashion. Immediate intraoperative and postoperative assessments of graft patency were carried out with angiography and hand-held Doppler examination, respectively. Duplex US scan was used for graft surveillance at regular intervals up to 12 months after surgery. The patient recovered at 12 months postoperatively, and the CT imaging demonstrated the good patency of the entire graft. We believe that the external iliac artery (or prosthesis such as in our case) inflow should be considered selectively rather than preferentially, mostly in the subset of patients selected for reoperative distal bypass.</description><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Clinical Decision-Making</subject><subject>Computed Tomography Angiography</subject><subject>Femoral Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femoral Artery - physiopathology</subject><subject>Femoral Artery - surgery</subject><subject>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - etiology</subject><subject>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - physiopathology</subject><subject>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iliac Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Iliac Artery - physiopathology</subject><subject>Iliac Artery - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Polyethylene Terephthalates</subject><subject>Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Popliteal Artery - physiopathology</subject><subject>Popliteal Artery - surgery</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Regional Blood Flow</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Saphenous Vein - physiopathology</subject><subject>Saphenous Vein - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular Patency</subject><issn>0890-5096</issn><issn>1615-5947</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFO3DAURa0K1JlCf4BF5SWbhGcndmypmzKUMhISEgzbWo79Ah5lxsHOUPH3zWhou-vqSVfnXukdQs4YlAyYvFiX9jU_lRyYKqEugVUfyJxJJgqh6-aIzEFpKARoOSOfcl4DMK5q9ZHMuFZKcgZz8nP1jPQKWzvatke6eI7BIY0dXfbBOrrcdn38RR_iLk1xFxO9Rx_pNW5iikMc-jCi7and-j2a7L_o8m2wOZ-S4872GT-_3xPyeP19tbgpbu9-LBffbgtXQTMWSgulETR3ogKrGld756XliqMHJmotNWrdVHqCGiG170Ciw65qhRSctdUJOT_sDim-7DCPZhOyw763W4y7bDiIijdQKzWh_IC6FHNO2JkhhY1Nb4aB2Xs1a7P3avZeDdRm8jqVvrzv79oN-r-VPyIn4OsBwOnL14DJZBdw69CHhG40Pob_7f8GjvWIqg</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Gabrielli, Roberto</creator><creator>Ciocca, Franco</creator><creator>Dante, Angelica</creator><creator>Musilli, Aldo</creator><creator>Maiorano, Maurizio</creator><creator>Ventura, Marco</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7192-5076</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>The Debatable Choice of Iliac Inflow Source for Redo Femoropopliteal and Infrapopliteal Bypass</title><author>Gabrielli, Roberto ; Ciocca, Franco ; Dante, Angelica ; Musilli, Aldo ; Maiorano, Maurizio ; Ventura, Marco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-89589e092c530a87c4dcd6a282ed0154969e997399e07569df06ecef3b56521b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Clinical Decision-Making</topic><topic>Computed Tomography Angiography</topic><topic>Femoral Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femoral Artery - physiopathology</topic><topic>Femoral Artery - surgery</topic><topic>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - etiology</topic><topic>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - physiopathology</topic><topic>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iliac Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Iliac Artery - physiopathology</topic><topic>Iliac Artery - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Polyethylene Terephthalates</topic><topic>Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Popliteal Artery - physiopathology</topic><topic>Popliteal Artery - surgery</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Regional Blood Flow</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Saphenous Vein - physiopathology</topic><topic>Saphenous Vein - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular Patency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gabrielli, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciocca, Franco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dante, Angelica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musilli, Aldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiorano, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ventura, Marco</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gabrielli, Roberto</au><au>Ciocca, Franco</au><au>Dante, Angelica</au><au>Musilli, Aldo</au><au>Maiorano, Maurizio</au><au>Ventura, Marco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Debatable Choice of Iliac Inflow Source for Redo Femoropopliteal and Infrapopliteal Bypass</atitle><jtitle>Annals of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>52</volume><spage>316.e15</spage><epage>316.e19</epage><pages>316.e15-316.e19</pages><issn>0890-5096</issn><eissn>1615-5947</eissn><abstract>Redo area region operation is associated with a significant morbidity such as neurovascular injury, infection, and lymphorrhea. The traditional management of occluded femoropopliteal grafts often includes redissection of a scarred groin to obtain adequate inflow via the common femoral artery. These procedures are more technically demanding and require more expertise and judgment than the primary operation. We describe a case of using the ipsilateral iliac branch prosthesis of aortobifemoral bypass as inflow for iliac-peroneal bypass, avoiding the previous groin incisions, to minimize the local complications related to a redo groin dissection and to decrease the operative time required to obtain an adequate inflow source. An 86-year-old man was referred to our hospital with severe pain in the right lower extremity one day before the present admission. He underwent aortobifemoral bypass for Leriché syndrome, in our department, 10 years before the present admission. Eight and 9 years later, a femoral popliteal suprageniculate bypass and jump to deep femoral artery bypass (when femoropopliteal bypass was occluded) were performed with 6-mm polytetrafluoroethylene grafts, both in some other institution. The patient's right foot was colder than the left, and he had some difficulty with movement. Absence of signal Doppler continous wave at right tibial vessels was recorded (category IIA of Rutherford classification for acute limb ischemia). Computed tomography (CT) confirmed the following duplex ultrasound (US) findings: occlusion of the femoral graft and popliteal artery below the knee and preocclusive stenosis of deep femoral artery with patency of aortobifemoral bypass and peroneal artery. Taking into consideration the multiple groin scars and the occlusion of superficial femoral and popliteal arteries and preocclusive lesion of deep femoral artery, we decided to perform a sequential composite and extra anatomical bypass from the right iliac prosthesis to the peroneal artery, with graft tunnellization through the lateral groin subfascial layer. The proximal component of the graft was made with a 6-mm Dacron prosthesis routed through a suprasartorial tunnel from iliac prosthesis to the proximal great saphenous vein. Proximal anastomosis was performed in a conventional side-to-end fashion. A tunnel was created between the abdominal flank incision and the median prosthesis-vein anastomosis of the bypass under inguinal ligament laterally with respect to femoral vessels, in lateral to median route, avoiding groin scars. The vein segment was orientated in a nonreversed format, with a LeMaitre Valvulotome to secure antegrade flow. The intermediate anastomosis was performed in an end-to-end way, whereas the distal anastomosis was carried out between the vein and peroneal artery in a conventional end-to-side fashion. Immediate intraoperative and postoperative assessments of graft patency were carried out with angiography and hand-held Doppler examination, respectively. Duplex US scan was used for graft surveillance at regular intervals up to 12 months after surgery. The patient recovered at 12 months postoperatively, and the CT imaging demonstrated the good patency of the entire graft. We believe that the external iliac artery (or prosthesis such as in our case) inflow should be considered selectively rather than preferentially, mostly in the subset of patients selected for reoperative distal bypass.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29886210</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.avsg.2018.04.013</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7192-5076</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-5096
ispartof Annals of vascular surgery, 2018-10, Vol.52, p.316.e15-316.e19
issn 0890-5096
1615-5947
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2053270488
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Aged, 80 and over
Anastomosis, Surgical
Blood Vessel Prosthesis - adverse effects
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation
Choice Behavior
Clinical Decision-Making
Computed Tomography Angiography
Femoral Artery - diagnostic imaging
Femoral Artery - physiopathology
Femoral Artery - surgery
Graft Occlusion, Vascular - diagnostic imaging
Graft Occlusion, Vascular - etiology
Graft Occlusion, Vascular - physiopathology
Graft Occlusion, Vascular - surgery
Humans
Iliac Artery - diagnostic imaging
Iliac Artery - physiopathology
Iliac Artery - surgery
Male
Polyethylene Terephthalates
Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging
Popliteal Artery - physiopathology
Popliteal Artery - surgery
Prosthesis Design
Regional Blood Flow
Reoperation
Saphenous Vein - physiopathology
Saphenous Vein - surgery
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Patency
title The Debatable Choice of Iliac Inflow Source for Redo Femoropopliteal and Infrapopliteal Bypass
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T02%3A02%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Debatable%20Choice%20of%20Iliac%20Inflow%20Source%20for%20Redo%20Femoropopliteal%20and%20Infrapopliteal%20Bypass&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Gabrielli,%20Roberto&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=52&rft.spage=316.e15&rft.epage=316.e19&rft.pages=316.e15-316.e19&rft.issn=0890-5096&rft.eissn=1615-5947&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.avsg.2018.04.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2053270488%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2053270488&rft_id=info:pmid/29886210&rft_els_id=S0890509618304291&rfr_iscdi=true