Improvement in quality indicators using NCDR® registries: First international experience

The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR®) Database is commonly used for quality-improvement initiatives in North America, but little is known about the application of this tool in other regions of the world. All consecutive patients admitted due to myocardial infarction (MI) and/or undergoin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cardiology 2018-09, Vol.267, p.13-15
Hauptverfasser: de Barros e Silva, Pedro Gabriel Melo, Ribeiro, Henrique Barbosa, Lopes, Renato Delascio, Macedo, Thiago Andrade, Conejo, Fabio, do Amaral Baruzzi, Antônio Cláudio, Okada, Mariana Yumi, Garcia, Jose Carlos Teixeira, Rodrigues, Marcelo Jamus, Furlan, Valter, Ribeiro, Expedito E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 15
container_issue
container_start_page 13
container_title International journal of cardiology
container_volume 267
creator de Barros e Silva, Pedro Gabriel Melo
Ribeiro, Henrique Barbosa
Lopes, Renato Delascio
Macedo, Thiago Andrade
Conejo, Fabio
do Amaral Baruzzi, Antônio Cláudio
Okada, Mariana Yumi
Garcia, Jose Carlos Teixeira
Rodrigues, Marcelo Jamus
Furlan, Valter
Ribeiro, Expedito E.
description The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR®) Database is commonly used for quality-improvement initiatives in North America, but little is known about the application of this tool in other regions of the world. All consecutive patients admitted due to myocardial infarction (MI) and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from January 2012 until December 2015 in a Brazilian private cardiovascular hospital were included respectively in ACTION REGISTRY®-GWTG™ and CathPCI Registry®. Meetings including all hospital staff were performed quarterly to discuss every NCDR® report. Quality improvement initiatives were developed based on the reports which were also used for evaluation of changes after the interventions. The following indicators were considered a priority 1) Door-to-ECG and door-to-balloon (D2B) times; 2) PCI appropriateness; 3) length of stay; 4) delivery of guideline-based medication. Changes in the quality of care with respect to the over time were assessed using linear and logistic regression for continuous and binary outcomes, respectively. A total of 1.382 patients were included in the ACTION REGISTRY®-GWTG™ and 3.179 patients in the CathPCI Registry®. In the ACTION registry, the overall AMI performance composite of quality indicators improved along the 4 years from 95.0% to 99.6% (p for trend
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.102
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2049935295</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167527317373187</els_id><sourcerecordid>2049935295</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-c66b088365b040231f52bb456b595bcc430b1915b0eef74cd74eed6a25937a0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EoqVwA4SyZJNiO3Z-WCChQqFSBRKCBSvLcSaVq_y0tlPRS3EIToZLCktWM5r53ozeQ-ic4DHBJL5ajvVSSVOMKSbpGHM_pQdoSNKEhSTh7BANPZaEnCbRAJ1Yu8QYsyxLj9GAZmlMCGZD9D6rV6bdQA2NC3QTrDtZabf1baGVdK2xQWd1swieJncvX5-BgYW2zmiw18FUG7sTOTCNdLptZBXAxwr8tlFwio5KWVk429cRepvev04ew_nzw2xyOw9VFFMXqjjOcZpGMc8xwzQiJad5znic84znSrEI5yQjfgtQJkwVCQMoYkl5FiUSF9EIXfZ3vY91B9aJWlsFVSUbaDsr6M50xGnGPcp6VJnWWgOlWBldS7MVBItdqGIp-lDFLlSBuZ9SL7vYf-jyGoo_0W-KHrjpAfA-NxqMsOong0IbUE4Urf7_wzdCnIt-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2049935295</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improvement in quality indicators using NCDR® registries: First international experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>de Barros e Silva, Pedro Gabriel Melo ; Ribeiro, Henrique Barbosa ; Lopes, Renato Delascio ; Macedo, Thiago Andrade ; Conejo, Fabio ; do Amaral Baruzzi, Antônio Cláudio ; Okada, Mariana Yumi ; Garcia, Jose Carlos Teixeira ; Rodrigues, Marcelo Jamus ; Furlan, Valter ; Ribeiro, Expedito E.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Barros e Silva, Pedro Gabriel Melo ; Ribeiro, Henrique Barbosa ; Lopes, Renato Delascio ; Macedo, Thiago Andrade ; Conejo, Fabio ; do Amaral Baruzzi, Antônio Cláudio ; Okada, Mariana Yumi ; Garcia, Jose Carlos Teixeira ; Rodrigues, Marcelo Jamus ; Furlan, Valter ; Ribeiro, Expedito E.</creatorcontrib><description>The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR®) Database is commonly used for quality-improvement initiatives in North America, but little is known about the application of this tool in other regions of the world. All consecutive patients admitted due to myocardial infarction (MI) and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from January 2012 until December 2015 in a Brazilian private cardiovascular hospital were included respectively in ACTION REGISTRY®-GWTG™ and CathPCI Registry®. Meetings including all hospital staff were performed quarterly to discuss every NCDR® report. Quality improvement initiatives were developed based on the reports which were also used for evaluation of changes after the interventions. The following indicators were considered a priority 1) Door-to-ECG and door-to-balloon (D2B) times; 2) PCI appropriateness; 3) length of stay; 4) delivery of guideline-based medication. Changes in the quality of care with respect to the over time were assessed using linear and logistic regression for continuous and binary outcomes, respectively. A total of 1.382 patients were included in the ACTION REGISTRY®-GWTG™ and 3.179 patients in the CathPCI Registry®. In the ACTION registry, the overall AMI performance composite of quality indicators improved along the 4 years from 95.0% to 99.6% (p for trend &lt;0.001). The percentage of appropriate/uncertain PCI in acute and elective scenario increased along the years from 91.1% and 70.9% to 96.6% and 84.7%, respectively (p for trend &lt;0.001). The present novel experience using the NCDR® registries as benchmarks to guide quality-improvement programs in an international site was associated with improvement in quality indicators. •National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR®) is a well-known quality-improvement tool.•The utility of this tool in outside North America is unknown.•The report of an international site in NCDR showed an improvement in medical care.•The results indicate promising application of international registries in different countries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-5273</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-1754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.102</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29861104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Aged ; Brazil - epidemiology ; Cardiovascular disease ; Database management systems ; Elective Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Hospital Mortality ; Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction - diagnosis ; Myocardial Infarction - epidemiology ; Myocardial Infarction - therapy ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - statistics & numerical data ; Quality improvement ; Quality Improvement - organization & administration ; Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards ; Registries - statistics & numerical data ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Time-to-Treatment - standards ; Time-to-Treatment - statistics & numerical data]]></subject><ispartof>International journal of cardiology, 2018-09, Vol.267, p.13-15</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-c66b088365b040231f52bb456b595bcc430b1915b0eef74cd74eed6a25937a0d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-c66b088365b040231f52bb456b595bcc430b1915b0eef74cd74eed6a25937a0d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.102$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29861104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Barros e Silva, Pedro Gabriel Melo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Henrique Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Renato Delascio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macedo, Thiago Andrade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conejo, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>do Amaral Baruzzi, Antônio Cláudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okada, Mariana Yumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Jose Carlos Teixeira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Marcelo Jamus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furlan, Valter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Expedito E.</creatorcontrib><title>Improvement in quality indicators using NCDR® registries: First international experience</title><title>International journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Int J Cardiol</addtitle><description>The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR®) Database is commonly used for quality-improvement initiatives in North America, but little is known about the application of this tool in other regions of the world. All consecutive patients admitted due to myocardial infarction (MI) and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from January 2012 until December 2015 in a Brazilian private cardiovascular hospital were included respectively in ACTION REGISTRY®-GWTG™ and CathPCI Registry®. Meetings including all hospital staff were performed quarterly to discuss every NCDR® report. Quality improvement initiatives were developed based on the reports which were also used for evaluation of changes after the interventions. The following indicators were considered a priority 1) Door-to-ECG and door-to-balloon (D2B) times; 2) PCI appropriateness; 3) length of stay; 4) delivery of guideline-based medication. Changes in the quality of care with respect to the over time were assessed using linear and logistic regression for continuous and binary outcomes, respectively. A total of 1.382 patients were included in the ACTION REGISTRY®-GWTG™ and 3.179 patients in the CathPCI Registry®. In the ACTION registry, the overall AMI performance composite of quality indicators improved along the 4 years from 95.0% to 99.6% (p for trend &lt;0.001). The percentage of appropriate/uncertain PCI in acute and elective scenario increased along the years from 91.1% and 70.9% to 96.6% and 84.7%, respectively (p for trend &lt;0.001). The present novel experience using the NCDR® registries as benchmarks to guide quality-improvement programs in an international site was associated with improvement in quality indicators. •National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR®) is a well-known quality-improvement tool.•The utility of this tool in outside North America is unknown.•The report of an international site in NCDR showed an improvement in medical care.•The results indicate promising application of international registries in different countries.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Brazil - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Database management systems</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - diagnosis</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - epidemiology</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - therapy</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Quality improvement</subject><subject>Quality Improvement - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Registries - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Time-to-Treatment - standards</subject><subject>Time-to-Treatment - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>0167-5273</issn><issn>1874-1754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EoqVwA4SyZJNiO3Z-WCChQqFSBRKCBSvLcSaVq_y0tlPRS3EIToZLCktWM5r53ozeQ-ic4DHBJL5ajvVSSVOMKSbpGHM_pQdoSNKEhSTh7BANPZaEnCbRAJ1Yu8QYsyxLj9GAZmlMCGZD9D6rV6bdQA2NC3QTrDtZabf1baGVdK2xQWd1swieJncvX5-BgYW2zmiw18FUG7sTOTCNdLptZBXAxwr8tlFwio5KWVk429cRepvev04ew_nzw2xyOw9VFFMXqjjOcZpGMc8xwzQiJad5znic84znSrEI5yQjfgtQJkwVCQMoYkl5FiUSF9EIXfZ3vY91B9aJWlsFVSUbaDsr6M50xGnGPcp6VJnWWgOlWBldS7MVBItdqGIp-lDFLlSBuZ9SL7vYf-jyGoo_0W-KHrjpAfA-NxqMsOong0IbUE4Urf7_wzdCnIt-</recordid><startdate>20180915</startdate><enddate>20180915</enddate><creator>de Barros e Silva, Pedro Gabriel Melo</creator><creator>Ribeiro, Henrique Barbosa</creator><creator>Lopes, Renato Delascio</creator><creator>Macedo, Thiago Andrade</creator><creator>Conejo, Fabio</creator><creator>do Amaral Baruzzi, Antônio Cláudio</creator><creator>Okada, Mariana Yumi</creator><creator>Garcia, Jose Carlos Teixeira</creator><creator>Rodrigues, Marcelo Jamus</creator><creator>Furlan, Valter</creator><creator>Ribeiro, Expedito E.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180915</creationdate><title>Improvement in quality indicators using NCDR® registries: First international experience</title><author>de Barros e Silva, Pedro Gabriel Melo ; Ribeiro, Henrique Barbosa ; Lopes, Renato Delascio ; Macedo, Thiago Andrade ; Conejo, Fabio ; do Amaral Baruzzi, Antônio Cláudio ; Okada, Mariana Yumi ; Garcia, Jose Carlos Teixeira ; Rodrigues, Marcelo Jamus ; Furlan, Valter ; Ribeiro, Expedito E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-c66b088365b040231f52bb456b595bcc430b1915b0eef74cd74eed6a25937a0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Brazil - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Database management systems</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - diagnosis</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - epidemiology</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - therapy</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Quality improvement</topic><topic>Quality Improvement - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Registries - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Time-to-Treatment - standards</topic><topic>Time-to-Treatment - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Barros e Silva, Pedro Gabriel Melo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Henrique Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Renato Delascio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macedo, Thiago Andrade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conejo, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>do Amaral Baruzzi, Antônio Cláudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okada, Mariana Yumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Jose Carlos Teixeira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Marcelo Jamus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furlan, Valter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Expedito E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Barros e Silva, Pedro Gabriel Melo</au><au>Ribeiro, Henrique Barbosa</au><au>Lopes, Renato Delascio</au><au>Macedo, Thiago Andrade</au><au>Conejo, Fabio</au><au>do Amaral Baruzzi, Antônio Cláudio</au><au>Okada, Mariana Yumi</au><au>Garcia, Jose Carlos Teixeira</au><au>Rodrigues, Marcelo Jamus</au><au>Furlan, Valter</au><au>Ribeiro, Expedito E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improvement in quality indicators using NCDR® registries: First international experience</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2018-09-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>267</volume><spage>13</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>13-15</pages><issn>0167-5273</issn><eissn>1874-1754</eissn><abstract>The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR®) Database is commonly used for quality-improvement initiatives in North America, but little is known about the application of this tool in other regions of the world. All consecutive patients admitted due to myocardial infarction (MI) and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from January 2012 until December 2015 in a Brazilian private cardiovascular hospital were included respectively in ACTION REGISTRY®-GWTG™ and CathPCI Registry®. Meetings including all hospital staff were performed quarterly to discuss every NCDR® report. Quality improvement initiatives were developed based on the reports which were also used for evaluation of changes after the interventions. The following indicators were considered a priority 1) Door-to-ECG and door-to-balloon (D2B) times; 2) PCI appropriateness; 3) length of stay; 4) delivery of guideline-based medication. Changes in the quality of care with respect to the over time were assessed using linear and logistic regression for continuous and binary outcomes, respectively. A total of 1.382 patients were included in the ACTION REGISTRY®-GWTG™ and 3.179 patients in the CathPCI Registry®. In the ACTION registry, the overall AMI performance composite of quality indicators improved along the 4 years from 95.0% to 99.6% (p for trend &lt;0.001). The percentage of appropriate/uncertain PCI in acute and elective scenario increased along the years from 91.1% and 70.9% to 96.6% and 84.7%, respectively (p for trend &lt;0.001). The present novel experience using the NCDR® registries as benchmarks to guide quality-improvement programs in an international site was associated with improvement in quality indicators. •National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR®) is a well-known quality-improvement tool.•The utility of this tool in outside North America is unknown.•The report of an international site in NCDR showed an improvement in medical care.•The results indicate promising application of international registries in different countries.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29861104</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.102</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-5273
ispartof International journal of cardiology, 2018-09, Vol.267, p.13-15
issn 0167-5273
1874-1754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2049935295
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Aged
Brazil - epidemiology
Cardiovascular disease
Database management systems
Elective Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data
Female
Hospital Mortality
Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction - diagnosis
Myocardial Infarction - epidemiology
Myocardial Infarction - therapy
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - statistics & numerical data
Quality improvement
Quality Improvement - organization & administration
Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards
Registries - statistics & numerical data
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time-to-Treatment - standards
Time-to-Treatment - statistics & numerical data
title Improvement in quality indicators using NCDR® registries: First international experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T13%3A09%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improvement%20in%20quality%20indicators%20using%20NCDR%C2%AE%20registries:%20First%20international%20experience&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=de%20Barros%20e%20Silva,%20Pedro%20Gabriel%20Melo&rft.date=2018-09-15&rft.volume=267&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=13-15&rft.issn=0167-5273&rft.eissn=1874-1754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2049935295%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2049935295&rft_id=info:pmid/29861104&rft_els_id=S0167527317373187&rfr_iscdi=true