Application of compressed sensing to 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions

The aim of this study was to assess changes in acquisition time, image quality and evaluation of pancreatic cysts when applying CS to a 3D MRCP sequence. Thirty subjects (17F; 13M) undergoing MRCP for evaluation of pancreatic cyst(s) were prospectively recruited and underwent 3D MRCP and CS 3D MRCP...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance imaging 2018-10, Vol.52, p.131-136
Hauptverfasser: Furlan, Alessandro, Bayram, Ersin, Thangasamy, Senthur, Barley, Dale, Dasyam, Anil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 136
container_issue
container_start_page 131
container_title Magnetic resonance imaging
container_volume 52
creator Furlan, Alessandro
Bayram, Ersin
Thangasamy, Senthur
Barley, Dale
Dasyam, Anil
description The aim of this study was to assess changes in acquisition time, image quality and evaluation of pancreatic cysts when applying CS to a 3D MRCP sequence. Thirty subjects (17F; 13M) undergoing MRCP for evaluation of pancreatic cyst(s) were prospectively recruited and underwent 3D MRCP and CS 3D MRCP (CS factor = 2) on a 3T scanner. The acquisition time was recorded. Two experienced radiologists independently recorded quality of the images, presence of artifacts, visualization of the main pancreatic duct, bile ducts and index pancreatic cyst using a five-point scale. Presence of mural nodules and septations in the cyst, size of the cyst and caliber of the main pancreatic duct were also recorded. A paired sample t-test was used to compare the acquisition time of 3D MRCP and CS 3D MRCP. Image quality metrics and visualization of cyst features were compared with Wilcoxon signed-rank test and McNemar test. The mean acquisition time of CS-3D-MRCP (150 ± 63 s) was significantly lower than that of 3D-MRCP (317 ± 104 s; P 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.mri.2018.05.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2049934351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0730725X18301887</els_id><sourcerecordid>2049934351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-a649b3944f9462a2cf3fcd2f555ae3e43ec14f05bc580d2b0157f3c2948d5b3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtP6zAQRi10EZTHD2Bz5SWbBD-bWKwQbwmJDUjsLMcZt66SONdOK3XNH8dVgeVdjUZz5hvNQeiCkpISOr9alX30JSO0LoksCZUHaEbriheyVuIPmpGKk6Ji8uMYnaS0IoRIxuUROmaqlkqJaoY-b8ax89ZMPgw4OGxDP0ZICVqcYEh-WOApYH6He7MYYPIW52kYzGAB22XozLDwYcxtBDOFRTTjcotdiHhaAoaN6da_0T9UzrDbtCsdpDxLZ-jQmS7B-Xc9Re8P92-3T8XL6-Pz7c1LYQVVU2HmQjVcCeGUmDPDrOPOtsxJKQ1wEBwsFY7IxsqatKzJPirHLVOibmXDDT9Fl_vcMYZ_a0iT7n2y0OUnIKyTZkQoxQWXNKN0j9oYUorg9Bh9b-JWU6J37vVKZ_d6514TqfOtvPP3O37d9ND-bvzIzsD1HoD85MZD1Ml6yCZbH8FOug3-P_Ffg-SYKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2049934351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of compressed sensing to 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Furlan, Alessandro ; Bayram, Ersin ; Thangasamy, Senthur ; Barley, Dale ; Dasyam, Anil</creator><creatorcontrib>Furlan, Alessandro ; Bayram, Ersin ; Thangasamy, Senthur ; Barley, Dale ; Dasyam, Anil</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to assess changes in acquisition time, image quality and evaluation of pancreatic cysts when applying CS to a 3D MRCP sequence. Thirty subjects (17F; 13M) undergoing MRCP for evaluation of pancreatic cyst(s) were prospectively recruited and underwent 3D MRCP and CS 3D MRCP (CS factor = 2) on a 3T scanner. The acquisition time was recorded. Two experienced radiologists independently recorded quality of the images, presence of artifacts, visualization of the main pancreatic duct, bile ducts and index pancreatic cyst using a five-point scale. Presence of mural nodules and septations in the cyst, size of the cyst and caliber of the main pancreatic duct were also recorded. A paired sample t-test was used to compare the acquisition time of 3D MRCP and CS 3D MRCP. Image quality metrics and visualization of cyst features were compared with Wilcoxon signed-rank test and McNemar test. The mean acquisition time of CS-3D-MRCP (150 ± 63 s) was significantly lower than that of 3D-MRCP (317 ± 104 s; P &lt; 0.001). The median score of overall quality (reader 1, 3.7 ± 1.0 vs. 3.4 ± 1.1, P = 0.11; reader 2, 3.8 ± 1.0 vs. 3.7 ± 1.1, P = 0.36), artifacts and visualization of the bile ducts were not significantly different between 3D-MRCP and CS-3D-MRCP. There was no significant difference in the visualization score of the index pancreatic cyst (reader 1, 4.2 ± 0.9 vs. 4.1 ± 0.9, P = 0.42; reader 2, 4.2 ± 0.4 vs. 4.0 ± 0.7, P = 0.27) and no difference in the assessment of cyst features. Applying CS to 3D-MRCP yields a two-fold reduction in acquisition time with comparable image quality and visualization of key pancreatic cyst features.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-725X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5894</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.05.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29859947</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Compressed sensing ; MRCP ; Pancreatic cyst</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance imaging, 2018-10, Vol.52, p.131-136</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-a649b3944f9462a2cf3fcd2f555ae3e43ec14f05bc580d2b0157f3c2948d5b3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-a649b3944f9462a2cf3fcd2f555ae3e43ec14f05bc580d2b0157f3c2948d5b3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X18301887$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29859947$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Furlan, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayram, Ersin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thangasamy, Senthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barley, Dale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasyam, Anil</creatorcontrib><title>Application of compressed sensing to 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions</title><title>Magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to assess changes in acquisition time, image quality and evaluation of pancreatic cysts when applying CS to a 3D MRCP sequence. Thirty subjects (17F; 13M) undergoing MRCP for evaluation of pancreatic cyst(s) were prospectively recruited and underwent 3D MRCP and CS 3D MRCP (CS factor = 2) on a 3T scanner. The acquisition time was recorded. Two experienced radiologists independently recorded quality of the images, presence of artifacts, visualization of the main pancreatic duct, bile ducts and index pancreatic cyst using a five-point scale. Presence of mural nodules and septations in the cyst, size of the cyst and caliber of the main pancreatic duct were also recorded. A paired sample t-test was used to compare the acquisition time of 3D MRCP and CS 3D MRCP. Image quality metrics and visualization of cyst features were compared with Wilcoxon signed-rank test and McNemar test. The mean acquisition time of CS-3D-MRCP (150 ± 63 s) was significantly lower than that of 3D-MRCP (317 ± 104 s; P &lt; 0.001). The median score of overall quality (reader 1, 3.7 ± 1.0 vs. 3.4 ± 1.1, P = 0.11; reader 2, 3.8 ± 1.0 vs. 3.7 ± 1.1, P = 0.36), artifacts and visualization of the bile ducts were not significantly different between 3D-MRCP and CS-3D-MRCP. There was no significant difference in the visualization score of the index pancreatic cyst (reader 1, 4.2 ± 0.9 vs. 4.1 ± 0.9, P = 0.42; reader 2, 4.2 ± 0.4 vs. 4.0 ± 0.7, P = 0.27) and no difference in the assessment of cyst features. Applying CS to 3D-MRCP yields a two-fold reduction in acquisition time with comparable image quality and visualization of key pancreatic cyst features.</description><subject>Compressed sensing</subject><subject>MRCP</subject><subject>Pancreatic cyst</subject><issn>0730-725X</issn><issn>1873-5894</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtP6zAQRi10EZTHD2Bz5SWbBD-bWKwQbwmJDUjsLMcZt66SONdOK3XNH8dVgeVdjUZz5hvNQeiCkpISOr9alX30JSO0LoksCZUHaEbriheyVuIPmpGKk6Ji8uMYnaS0IoRIxuUROmaqlkqJaoY-b8ax89ZMPgw4OGxDP0ZICVqcYEh-WOApYH6He7MYYPIW52kYzGAB22XozLDwYcxtBDOFRTTjcotdiHhaAoaN6da_0T9UzrDbtCsdpDxLZ-jQmS7B-Xc9Re8P92-3T8XL6-Pz7c1LYQVVU2HmQjVcCeGUmDPDrOPOtsxJKQ1wEBwsFY7IxsqatKzJPirHLVOibmXDDT9Fl_vcMYZ_a0iT7n2y0OUnIKyTZkQoxQWXNKN0j9oYUorg9Bh9b-JWU6J37vVKZ_d6514TqfOtvPP3O37d9ND-bvzIzsD1HoD85MZD1Ml6yCZbH8FOug3-P_Ffg-SYKg</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Furlan, Alessandro</creator><creator>Bayram, Ersin</creator><creator>Thangasamy, Senthur</creator><creator>Barley, Dale</creator><creator>Dasyam, Anil</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Application of compressed sensing to 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions</title><author>Furlan, Alessandro ; Bayram, Ersin ; Thangasamy, Senthur ; Barley, Dale ; Dasyam, Anil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-a649b3944f9462a2cf3fcd2f555ae3e43ec14f05bc580d2b0157f3c2948d5b3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Compressed sensing</topic><topic>MRCP</topic><topic>Pancreatic cyst</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Furlan, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayram, Ersin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thangasamy, Senthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barley, Dale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasyam, Anil</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Furlan, Alessandro</au><au>Bayram, Ersin</au><au>Thangasamy, Senthur</au><au>Barley, Dale</au><au>Dasyam, Anil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of compressed sensing to 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>52</volume><spage>131</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>131-136</pages><issn>0730-725X</issn><eissn>1873-5894</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to assess changes in acquisition time, image quality and evaluation of pancreatic cysts when applying CS to a 3D MRCP sequence. Thirty subjects (17F; 13M) undergoing MRCP for evaluation of pancreatic cyst(s) were prospectively recruited and underwent 3D MRCP and CS 3D MRCP (CS factor = 2) on a 3T scanner. The acquisition time was recorded. Two experienced radiologists independently recorded quality of the images, presence of artifacts, visualization of the main pancreatic duct, bile ducts and index pancreatic cyst using a five-point scale. Presence of mural nodules and septations in the cyst, size of the cyst and caliber of the main pancreatic duct were also recorded. A paired sample t-test was used to compare the acquisition time of 3D MRCP and CS 3D MRCP. Image quality metrics and visualization of cyst features were compared with Wilcoxon signed-rank test and McNemar test. The mean acquisition time of CS-3D-MRCP (150 ± 63 s) was significantly lower than that of 3D-MRCP (317 ± 104 s; P &lt; 0.001). The median score of overall quality (reader 1, 3.7 ± 1.0 vs. 3.4 ± 1.1, P = 0.11; reader 2, 3.8 ± 1.0 vs. 3.7 ± 1.1, P = 0.36), artifacts and visualization of the bile ducts were not significantly different between 3D-MRCP and CS-3D-MRCP. There was no significant difference in the visualization score of the index pancreatic cyst (reader 1, 4.2 ± 0.9 vs. 4.1 ± 0.9, P = 0.42; reader 2, 4.2 ± 0.4 vs. 4.0 ± 0.7, P = 0.27) and no difference in the assessment of cyst features. Applying CS to 3D-MRCP yields a two-fold reduction in acquisition time with comparable image quality and visualization of key pancreatic cyst features.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29859947</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.mri.2018.05.015</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0730-725X
ispartof Magnetic resonance imaging, 2018-10, Vol.52, p.131-136
issn 0730-725X
1873-5894
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2049934351
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Compressed sensing
MRCP
Pancreatic cyst
title Application of compressed sensing to 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T09%3A06%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20compressed%20sensing%20to%203D%20magnetic%20resonance%20cholangiopancreatography%20for%20the%20evaluation%20of%20pancreatic%20cystic%20lesions&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Furlan,%20Alessandro&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=52&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=131-136&rft.issn=0730-725X&rft.eissn=1873-5894&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.mri.2018.05.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2049934351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2049934351&rft_id=info:pmid/29859947&rft_els_id=S0730725X18301887&rfr_iscdi=true