Distribution of care-giving effort in a communally breeding lace bug: fair guarding without coercion
Cooperative care of offspring is a hallmark of animal sociality, but it is unclear how conflicts over care-giving effort are resolved in taxa that do not use dominance and physical force to induce cooperation efforts in others. To ascertain if taxa without dominance-enforcing traits such as stings o...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of insect behavior 2006, Vol.19 (1), p.19-30 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 30 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 19 |
| container_title | Journal of insect behavior |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Loeb, M.L.G Bell, L.K |
| description | Cooperative care of offspring is a hallmark of animal sociality, but it is unclear how conflicts over care-giving effort are resolved in taxa that do not use dominance and physical force to induce cooperation efforts in others. To ascertain if taxa without dominance-enforcing traits such as stings or biting mouthparts show conflicts over offspring care, we used a lace bug (Heteroptera: Tingidae) that has communal guarding of young but lacks morphologies for dominance or coercion. In Leptobyrsa decora females oviposit communally and then aggressively guard communal broods from arthropod predators. Since guarding has mortality risks, we tested if individuals lower their own risk by behaving less aggressively than the partner guard. We show that effort towards protecting brood, and thus guard risk of death, is strongly positively correlated between guarding partners. This finding suggests that mechanisms other than dominance or coercion are used by L. decora to establish an equitable and possibly conflict-minimizing distribution of care-giving effort.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10905-005-9005-0 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20498715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20498715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-76624f27055f59e3b3c4501845278948ee5fdca7714ec80ab22f79fb54cdb0903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtvGyEUhVGUSnXc_ICugio1u2kvLwPZVU5fkqUsEq8Rg2FKNB4SmEnkfx-mjhQpC0DifvdwzwGhzwS-EQD5vRDQIBqoS88bnKAFEZI2Sil9ihagNG2kEOwjOivlHgC0EnKBdtexjDm20xjTgFPAzmbfdPEpDh32IaQ84jhgi13a76fB9v0Bt9n73VzvrfO4nborHGzMuJts_n__HMd_aRprj8-u6n5CH4Ltiz9_PZdo--vn3fpPs7n5_Xf9Y9M4DjA2crWiPFAJQgShPWuZ4wKI4oJKpbnyXoSds1IS7p0C21IapA6t4G7XVvtsiS6Pug85PU6-jGYfi_N9bwefpmIocK0kERX88g68T1Ou7oqRor4PTLAKkSPkciol-2AectzbfDAEzBy6OYZuat5mDt3ME3x9FbbF2T5kO7hY3hqlYqI6qdzFkQs2GdvlymxvKRAGBOovac5eAOc6ipQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>757050353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distribution of care-giving effort in a communally breeding lace bug: fair guarding without coercion</title><source>SpringerLink</source><creator>Loeb, M.L.G ; Bell, L.K</creator><creatorcontrib>Loeb, M.L.G ; Bell, L.K</creatorcontrib><description>Cooperative care of offspring is a hallmark of animal sociality, but it is unclear how conflicts over care-giving effort are resolved in taxa that do not use dominance and physical force to induce cooperation efforts in others. To ascertain if taxa without dominance-enforcing traits such as stings or biting mouthparts show conflicts over offspring care, we used a lace bug (Heteroptera: Tingidae) that has communal guarding of young but lacks morphologies for dominance or coercion. In Leptobyrsa decora females oviposit communally and then aggressively guard communal broods from arthropod predators. Since guarding has mortality risks, we tested if individuals lower their own risk by behaving less aggressively than the partner guard. We show that effort towards protecting brood, and thus guard risk of death, is strongly positively correlated between guarding partners. This finding suggests that mechanisms other than dominance or coercion are used by L. decora to establish an equitable and possibly conflict-minimizing distribution of care-giving effort.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-7553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8889</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10905-005-9005-0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIBEE8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Springer</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal ethology ; Animal reproduction ; Arthropoda ; Biological and medical sciences ; brood protection ; brood rearing ; communal guarding ; cooperative behavior ; defensive behavior ; Entomology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Health risks ; Hemiptera ; insect behavior ; Insects ; Leptobyrsa decora ; Mortality risk ; Offspring ; offspring care ; Predators ; Protozoa. Invertebrata ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; social behavior ; Tingidae</subject><ispartof>Journal of insect behavior, 2006, Vol.19 (1), p.19-30</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-76624f27055f59e3b3c4501845278948ee5fdca7714ec80ab22f79fb54cdb0903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-76624f27055f59e3b3c4501845278948ee5fdca7714ec80ab22f79fb54cdb0903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17835948$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loeb, M.L.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, L.K</creatorcontrib><title>Distribution of care-giving effort in a communally breeding lace bug: fair guarding without coercion</title><title>Journal of insect behavior</title><description>Cooperative care of offspring is a hallmark of animal sociality, but it is unclear how conflicts over care-giving effort are resolved in taxa that do not use dominance and physical force to induce cooperation efforts in others. To ascertain if taxa without dominance-enforcing traits such as stings or biting mouthparts show conflicts over offspring care, we used a lace bug (Heteroptera: Tingidae) that has communal guarding of young but lacks morphologies for dominance or coercion. In Leptobyrsa decora females oviposit communally and then aggressively guard communal broods from arthropod predators. Since guarding has mortality risks, we tested if individuals lower their own risk by behaving less aggressively than the partner guard. We show that effort towards protecting brood, and thus guard risk of death, is strongly positively correlated between guarding partners. This finding suggests that mechanisms other than dominance or coercion are used by L. decora to establish an equitable and possibly conflict-minimizing distribution of care-giving effort.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Arthropoda</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>brood protection</subject><subject>brood rearing</subject><subject>communal guarding</subject><subject>cooperative behavior</subject><subject>defensive behavior</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hemiptera</subject><subject>insect behavior</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Leptobyrsa decora</subject><subject>Mortality risk</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>offspring care</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrata</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>social behavior</subject><subject>Tingidae</subject><issn>0892-7553</issn><issn>1572-8889</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtvGyEUhVGUSnXc_ICugio1u2kvLwPZVU5fkqUsEq8Rg2FKNB4SmEnkfx-mjhQpC0DifvdwzwGhzwS-EQD5vRDQIBqoS88bnKAFEZI2Sil9ihagNG2kEOwjOivlHgC0EnKBdtexjDm20xjTgFPAzmbfdPEpDh32IaQ84jhgi13a76fB9v0Bt9n73VzvrfO4nborHGzMuJts_n__HMd_aRprj8-u6n5CH4Ltiz9_PZdo--vn3fpPs7n5_Xf9Y9M4DjA2crWiPFAJQgShPWuZ4wKI4oJKpbnyXoSds1IS7p0C21IapA6t4G7XVvtsiS6Pug85PU6-jGYfi_N9bwefpmIocK0kERX88g68T1Ou7oqRor4PTLAKkSPkciol-2AectzbfDAEzBy6OYZuat5mDt3ME3x9FbbF2T5kO7hY3hqlYqI6qdzFkQs2GdvlymxvKRAGBOovac5eAOc6ipQ</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Loeb, M.L.G</creator><creator>Bell, L.K</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Distribution of care-giving effort in a communally breeding lace bug: fair guarding without coercion</title><author>Loeb, M.L.G ; Bell, L.K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-76624f27055f59e3b3c4501845278948ee5fdca7714ec80ab22f79fb54cdb0903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Arthropoda</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>brood protection</topic><topic>brood rearing</topic><topic>communal guarding</topic><topic>cooperative behavior</topic><topic>defensive behavior</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hemiptera</topic><topic>insect behavior</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Leptobyrsa decora</topic><topic>Mortality risk</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>offspring care</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrata</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>social behavior</topic><topic>Tingidae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loeb, M.L.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, L.K</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Journal of insect behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loeb, M.L.G</au><au>Bell, L.K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distribution of care-giving effort in a communally breeding lace bug: fair guarding without coercion</atitle><jtitle>Journal of insect behavior</jtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>19-30</pages><issn>0892-7553</issn><eissn>1572-8889</eissn><coden>JIBEE8</coden><abstract>Cooperative care of offspring is a hallmark of animal sociality, but it is unclear how conflicts over care-giving effort are resolved in taxa that do not use dominance and physical force to induce cooperation efforts in others. To ascertain if taxa without dominance-enforcing traits such as stings or biting mouthparts show conflicts over offspring care, we used a lace bug (Heteroptera: Tingidae) that has communal guarding of young but lacks morphologies for dominance or coercion. In Leptobyrsa decora females oviposit communally and then aggressively guard communal broods from arthropod predators. Since guarding has mortality risks, we tested if individuals lower their own risk by behaving less aggressively than the partner guard. We show that effort towards protecting brood, and thus guard risk of death, is strongly positively correlated between guarding partners. This finding suggests that mechanisms other than dominance or coercion are used by L. decora to establish an equitable and possibly conflict-minimizing distribution of care-giving effort.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10905-005-9005-0</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0892-7553 |
| ispartof | Journal of insect behavior, 2006, Vol.19 (1), p.19-30 |
| issn | 0892-7553 1572-8889 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20498715 |
| source | SpringerLink |
| subjects | Animal behavior Animal ethology Animal reproduction Arthropoda Biological and medical sciences brood protection brood rearing communal guarding cooperative behavior defensive behavior Entomology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Health risks Hemiptera insect behavior Insects Leptobyrsa decora Mortality risk Offspring offspring care Predators Protozoa. Invertebrata Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry social behavior Tingidae |
| title | Distribution of care-giving effort in a communally breeding lace bug: fair guarding without coercion |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T16%3A17%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distribution%20of%20care-giving%20effort%20in%20a%20communally%20breeding%20lace%20bug:%20fair%20guarding%20without%20coercion&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20insect%20behavior&rft.au=Loeb,%20M.L.G&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=19-30&rft.issn=0892-7553&rft.eissn=1572-8889&rft.coden=JIBEE8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10905-005-9005-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20498715%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=757050353&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |