Which type of breast cancers is undetectable on ring-type dedicated breast PET?
To assess the factors causing tumor undetectability on ring-type dedicated breast positron emission tomography (DbPET). A total of 265 patients (288 tumors) underwent DbPET and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a prone position. The distance between the shallowest part of the bre...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical imaging 2018-09, Vol.51, p.186-191 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 191 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 186 |
| container_title | Clinical imaging |
| container_volume | 51 |
| creator | Sasada, Shinsuke Masumoto, Norio Goda, Noriko Kajitani, Keiko Emi, Akiko Kadoya, Takayuki Okada, Morihito |
| description | To assess the factors causing tumor undetectability on ring-type dedicated breast positron emission tomography (DbPET).
A total of 265 patients (288 tumors) underwent DbPET and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a prone position. The distance between the shallowest part of the breast tumor and the front end of the pectoralis major muscle on MRI was considered as the tumor-to-chest wall distance.
Twenty-four tumors (8.3%) were not visualized via DbPET. The tumor-to-chest wall distance for undetectable tumors was shorter than that of the detectable tumors (23.0 mm vs 38.5 mm, P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.05.010 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2049563182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0899707118301517</els_id><sourcerecordid>2049563182</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-dd29b5cab00217af71ec52b580b0cbd3baea784304e42f7f2dcd504929d183583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E9P2zAYx3ELDUHpeAso0i67JHvs2Il9YlPVjUlIcCja0fKfJ-AqTTo7QeLdz6x0h104-fL92daHkCsKFQXafNlWrg9D2JnHigGVFYgKKJyQBZVtXXKu1AeyAKlU2UJLz8lFSlvIQ8XbM3LOlBSKS7Ygd7-egnsqppc9FmNX2IgmTYUzg8OYipCKefA4oZuM7XMxFDEMj-Xf3KMPzkzoj6v79eb6IzntTJ_w8u1ckofv683qpry9-_Fz9e22dLxhU-k9U1Y4YwEYbU3XUnSCWSHBgrO-tgZNK3kNHDnr2o555wVwxZSnshayXpLPh3v3cfw9Y5r0LiSHfW8GHOekWY5FU1PJcvrpv3Q7znHIv9MsW0oBjYJcNYfKxTGliJ3ex8wbXzQF_Uqut_pIrl_JNQidyfPw6u362e7Q_5sdjXPw9RBg9ngOGHVyATOwDzHDaj-G9974A8QSlH0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2101850690</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Which type of breast cancers is undetectable on ring-type dedicated breast PET?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sasada, Shinsuke ; Masumoto, Norio ; Goda, Noriko ; Kajitani, Keiko ; Emi, Akiko ; Kadoya, Takayuki ; Okada, Morihito</creator><creatorcontrib>Sasada, Shinsuke ; Masumoto, Norio ; Goda, Noriko ; Kajitani, Keiko ; Emi, Akiko ; Kadoya, Takayuki ; Okada, Morihito</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the factors causing tumor undetectability on ring-type dedicated breast positron emission tomography (DbPET).
A total of 265 patients (288 tumors) underwent DbPET and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a prone position. The distance between the shallowest part of the breast tumor and the front end of the pectoralis major muscle on MRI was considered as the tumor-to-chest wall distance.
Twenty-four tumors (8.3%) were not visualized via DbPET. The tumor-to-chest wall distance for undetectable tumors was shorter than that of the detectable tumors (23.0 mm vs 38.5 mm, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that proximity to the chest wall and low-grade tumors were independent predicting factors for undetectable cancers. Among the 24 undetectable cancers, 15 tumors were proximal to the chest wall, suggesting that they were outside or at the edge of field of view (FOV), and 7 were low-grade tumors, suggesting insignificant 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake.
The factors of undetectable breast cancers on DbPET are classified into two types; outside or at the edge of FOV and insignificant FDG uptake.
•Sensitivity of dedicated breast positron emission tomography (DbPET) for invasive and noninvasive breast cancers is over 90%.•Tumor-to-chest wall distance significantly affects detective capability of DbPET.•Low FDG uptake is a limitation to DbPET.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-7071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.05.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29859482</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Breast ; Breast - diagnostic imaging ; Breast - pathology ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Chest ; Contrast Media ; Dedicated breast PET ; Emission analysis ; FDG ; Female ; Field of view ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ; Histology ; Humans ; Labeling ; Limit of Detection ; Location ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Mammography ; Medical imaging ; Middle Aged ; Molecular imaging ; Multivariate analysis ; Muscles ; Neoplasm Grading ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Positron emission ; Positron emission tomography ; Positron-Emission Tomography - methods ; Prone Position ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Thoracic Wall ; Tomography ; Tumors ; Undetectability</subject><ispartof>Clinical imaging, 2018-09, Vol.51, p.186-191</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Sep 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-dd29b5cab00217af71ec52b580b0cbd3baea784304e42f7f2dcd504929d183583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-dd29b5cab00217af71ec52b580b0cbd3baea784304e42f7f2dcd504929d183583</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1623-869X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707118301517$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29859482$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sasada, Shinsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masumoto, Norio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goda, Noriko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kajitani, Keiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emi, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadoya, Takayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okada, Morihito</creatorcontrib><title>Which type of breast cancers is undetectable on ring-type dedicated breast PET?</title><title>Clinical imaging</title><addtitle>Clin Imaging</addtitle><description>To assess the factors causing tumor undetectability on ring-type dedicated breast positron emission tomography (DbPET).
A total of 265 patients (288 tumors) underwent DbPET and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a prone position. The distance between the shallowest part of the breast tumor and the front end of the pectoralis major muscle on MRI was considered as the tumor-to-chest wall distance.
Twenty-four tumors (8.3%) were not visualized via DbPET. The tumor-to-chest wall distance for undetectable tumors was shorter than that of the detectable tumors (23.0 mm vs 38.5 mm, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that proximity to the chest wall and low-grade tumors were independent predicting factors for undetectable cancers. Among the 24 undetectable cancers, 15 tumors were proximal to the chest wall, suggesting that they were outside or at the edge of field of view (FOV), and 7 were low-grade tumors, suggesting insignificant 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake.
The factors of undetectable breast cancers on DbPET are classified into two types; outside or at the edge of FOV and insignificant FDG uptake.
•Sensitivity of dedicated breast positron emission tomography (DbPET) for invasive and noninvasive breast cancers is over 90%.•Tumor-to-chest wall distance significantly affects detective capability of DbPET.•Low FDG uptake is a limitation to DbPET.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Breast - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Chest</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Dedicated breast PET</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>FDG</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Field of view</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Labeling</subject><subject>Limit of Detection</subject><subject>Location</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Molecular imaging</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Positron emission</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Prone Position</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Thoracic Wall</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Undetectability</subject><issn>0899-7071</issn><issn>1873-4499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E9P2zAYx3ELDUHpeAso0i67JHvs2Il9YlPVjUlIcCja0fKfJ-AqTTo7QeLdz6x0h104-fL92daHkCsKFQXafNlWrg9D2JnHigGVFYgKKJyQBZVtXXKu1AeyAKlU2UJLz8lFSlvIQ8XbM3LOlBSKS7Ygd7-egnsqppc9FmNX2IgmTYUzg8OYipCKefA4oZuM7XMxFDEMj-Xf3KMPzkzoj6v79eb6IzntTJ_w8u1ckofv683qpry9-_Fz9e22dLxhU-k9U1Y4YwEYbU3XUnSCWSHBgrO-tgZNK3kNHDnr2o555wVwxZSnshayXpLPh3v3cfw9Y5r0LiSHfW8GHOekWY5FU1PJcvrpv3Q7znHIv9MsW0oBjYJcNYfKxTGliJ3ex8wbXzQF_Uqut_pIrl_JNQidyfPw6u362e7Q_5sdjXPw9RBg9ngOGHVyATOwDzHDaj-G9974A8QSlH0</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Sasada, Shinsuke</creator><creator>Masumoto, Norio</creator><creator>Goda, Noriko</creator><creator>Kajitani, Keiko</creator><creator>Emi, Akiko</creator><creator>Kadoya, Takayuki</creator><creator>Okada, Morihito</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1623-869X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Which type of breast cancers is undetectable on ring-type dedicated breast PET?</title><author>Sasada, Shinsuke ; Masumoto, Norio ; Goda, Noriko ; Kajitani, Keiko ; Emi, Akiko ; Kadoya, Takayuki ; Okada, Morihito</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-dd29b5cab00217af71ec52b580b0cbd3baea784304e42f7f2dcd504929d183583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Breast - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Chest</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Dedicated breast PET</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>FDG</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Field of view</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Labeling</topic><topic>Limit of Detection</topic><topic>Location</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Molecular imaging</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Positron emission</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Prone Position</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Thoracic Wall</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Undetectability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sasada, Shinsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masumoto, Norio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goda, Noriko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kajitani, Keiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emi, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadoya, Takayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okada, Morihito</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sasada, Shinsuke</au><au>Masumoto, Norio</au><au>Goda, Noriko</au><au>Kajitani, Keiko</au><au>Emi, Akiko</au><au>Kadoya, Takayuki</au><au>Okada, Morihito</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Which type of breast cancers is undetectable on ring-type dedicated breast PET?</atitle><jtitle>Clinical imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Imaging</addtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>51</volume><spage>186</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>186-191</pages><issn>0899-7071</issn><eissn>1873-4499</eissn><abstract>To assess the factors causing tumor undetectability on ring-type dedicated breast positron emission tomography (DbPET).
A total of 265 patients (288 tumors) underwent DbPET and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a prone position. The distance between the shallowest part of the breast tumor and the front end of the pectoralis major muscle on MRI was considered as the tumor-to-chest wall distance.
Twenty-four tumors (8.3%) were not visualized via DbPET. The tumor-to-chest wall distance for undetectable tumors was shorter than that of the detectable tumors (23.0 mm vs 38.5 mm, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that proximity to the chest wall and low-grade tumors were independent predicting factors for undetectable cancers. Among the 24 undetectable cancers, 15 tumors were proximal to the chest wall, suggesting that they were outside or at the edge of field of view (FOV), and 7 were low-grade tumors, suggesting insignificant 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake.
The factors of undetectable breast cancers on DbPET are classified into two types; outside or at the edge of FOV and insignificant FDG uptake.
•Sensitivity of dedicated breast positron emission tomography (DbPET) for invasive and noninvasive breast cancers is over 90%.•Tumor-to-chest wall distance significantly affects detective capability of DbPET.•Low FDG uptake is a limitation to DbPET.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29859482</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.05.010</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1623-869X</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0899-7071 |
| ispartof | Clinical imaging, 2018-09, Vol.51, p.186-191 |
| issn | 0899-7071 1873-4499 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2049563182 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Breast Breast - diagnostic imaging Breast - pathology Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Breast Neoplasms - pathology Chest Contrast Media Dedicated breast PET Emission analysis FDG Female Field of view Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 Histology Humans Labeling Limit of Detection Location Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Mammography Medical imaging Middle Aged Molecular imaging Multivariate analysis Muscles Neoplasm Grading NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Positron emission Positron emission tomography Positron-Emission Tomography - methods Prone Position Radiopharmaceuticals Thoracic Wall Tomography Tumors Undetectability |
| title | Which type of breast cancers is undetectable on ring-type dedicated breast PET? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T13%3A17%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which%20type%20of%20breast%20cancers%20is%20undetectable%20on%20ring-type%20dedicated%20breast%20PET?&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20imaging&rft.au=Sasada,%20Shinsuke&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=51&rft.spage=186&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=186-191&rft.issn=0899-7071&rft.eissn=1873-4499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.05.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2049563182%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2101850690&rft_id=info:pmid/29859482&rft_els_id=S0899707118301517&rfr_iscdi=true |