Environmental determinants of marine benthic biodiversity dynamics through Triassic–Jurassic time

Ecology is thought to be of crucial importance in determining taxonomic turnover at geological time scales, yet general links between ecology and biodiversity dynamics are still poorly explored in deep time. Here we analyze the relationships between the environmental affinities of Triassic-Jurassic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Paleobiology 2007-06, Vol.33 (3), p.414-434
Hauptverfasser: Kiessling, Wolfgang, Aberhan, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 434
container_issue 3
container_start_page 414
container_title Paleobiology
container_volume 33
creator Kiessling, Wolfgang
Aberhan, Martin
description Ecology is thought to be of crucial importance in determining taxonomic turnover at geological time scales, yet general links between ecology and biodiversity dynamics are still poorly explored in deep time. Here we analyze the relationships between the environmental affinities of Triassic-Jurassic marine benthic genera and their biodiversity dynamics, using a large, taxonomically vetted data set of Triassic-Jurassic taxonomic occurrences. On the basis of binomial probabilities of proportional occurrence counts, we identify environmental affinities of genera for (1) carbonate versus siliciclastic substrates, (2) onshore versus offshore depositional environments, (3) reefs versus level-bottom communities, and (4) tropical versus non-tropical latitudinal zones. Genera with affinities for carbonates, onshore environments, and reefs have higher turnover rates than genera with affinities for siliciclastic, offshore, and level-bottom settings. Differences in faunal turnover are largely due to differences in origination rates. Whereas previous studies have highlighted the direct influence of physical and biological factors in exploring environmental controls on evolutionary rates, our analyses show that the patterns can largely be explained by the partitioning of higher taxa with different evolutionary tempos among environments. The relatively slowly evolving bivalves are concentrated in siliciclastic rocks and in level-bottom communities. Furthermore, separate analyses on bivalves did not produce significant differences in turnover rates between environmental settings. The relationship between biodiversity dynamics and environments in our data set is thus governed by the partitioning of higher taxa within environmental categories and not directly due to greater chances of origination in particular settings. As this partitioning probably has ecological reasons rather than being a simple sampling artifact, we propose an indirect environmental control on evolutionary rates. Affinities for latitudinal zones are not linked to systematically different turnover rates, possibly because of paleoclimatic fluctuations and latitudinal migrations of taxa. However, the strong extinction spike of tropical genera in the Rhaetian calls for an important paleoclimatic component in the end-Triassic mass extinction.
doi_str_mv 10.1666/06069.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20494611</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4500162</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4500162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a393t-565e3f6125917a9beaa6db9d33d43dd619acc1a2b795a9df5969876aab3d1b193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1K5TAYBuAgM-AZFW_ARRgYXUg1adq0WQ7iL8JsnHVIk6-eHNrESVKHs_MevEOvxBwrMgizSsL7kC95Edqn5IRyzk8JJ1yc0C20oIK1Rc0Y_YIWhIiqaFnDttG3GFckn2veLJA-d482eDeCS2rABhKE0TrlUsS-x6MK1gHucrq0GnfWG_sIIdq0xmbt1Gh1xGkZ_HS_xHfBqhitfnl6vpnC2xYnO8Iu-tqrIcLe-7qDfl-c351dFbe_Lq_Pft4WigmWiprXwHpOy1rQRokOlOKmE4YxUzFjOBVKa6rKrhG1EqavBRdtw5XqmKFd_uwOOpzvfQj-zwQxydFGDcOgHPgpypJUouKUZvj9E1z5Kbj8NlmWomSciQ06mpEOPsYAvXwINvexlpTITdPyrWm5kQezXMXkwwerakIoL3N8PMf34KO24DT89WEw_wwlpJGkbVrCsv4x69y1d_Dfoa9PCZay</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229236391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental determinants of marine benthic biodiversity dynamics through Triassic–Jurassic time</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Kiessling, Wolfgang ; Aberhan, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Kiessling, Wolfgang ; Aberhan, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>Ecology is thought to be of crucial importance in determining taxonomic turnover at geological time scales, yet general links between ecology and biodiversity dynamics are still poorly explored in deep time. Here we analyze the relationships between the environmental affinities of Triassic-Jurassic marine benthic genera and their biodiversity dynamics, using a large, taxonomically vetted data set of Triassic-Jurassic taxonomic occurrences. On the basis of binomial probabilities of proportional occurrence counts, we identify environmental affinities of genera for (1) carbonate versus siliciclastic substrates, (2) onshore versus offshore depositional environments, (3) reefs versus level-bottom communities, and (4) tropical versus non-tropical latitudinal zones. Genera with affinities for carbonates, onshore environments, and reefs have higher turnover rates than genera with affinities for siliciclastic, offshore, and level-bottom settings. Differences in faunal turnover are largely due to differences in origination rates. Whereas previous studies have highlighted the direct influence of physical and biological factors in exploring environmental controls on evolutionary rates, our analyses show that the patterns can largely be explained by the partitioning of higher taxa with different evolutionary tempos among environments. The relatively slowly evolving bivalves are concentrated in siliciclastic rocks and in level-bottom communities. Furthermore, separate analyses on bivalves did not produce significant differences in turnover rates between environmental settings. The relationship between biodiversity dynamics and environments in our data set is thus governed by the partitioning of higher taxa within environmental categories and not directly due to greater chances of origination in particular settings. As this partitioning probably has ecological reasons rather than being a simple sampling artifact, we propose an indirect environmental control on evolutionary rates. Affinities for latitudinal zones are not linked to systematically different turnover rates, possibly because of paleoclimatic fluctuations and latitudinal migrations of taxa. However, the strong extinction spike of tropical genera in the Rhaetian calls for an important paleoclimatic component in the end-Triassic mass extinction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8373</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1666/06069.1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PALBBM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boulder: Paleontological Society</publisher><subject>Anthozoa ; Bathymetry ; benthic taxa ; Biodiversity ; Bivalvia ; Brachiopoda ; Carbonates ; Cnidaria ; Coelenterata ; communities ; Community ; Datasets ; Echinodermata ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Environmental control ; Evolution ; Extinction ; Gastropoda ; Genera ; Geological time ; Invertebrata ; invertebrate ; Jurassic ; Marine ecology ; marine environment ; Mass extinction events ; Mass extinctions ; Mesozoic ; Mollusca ; Mollusks ; paleobathymetry ; paleoecology ; paleoenvironment ; Paleontology ; Porifera ; Reefs ; s ; Shellfish ; speciation ; statistical analysis ; Substrates ; Taxa ; Trajectories ; Triassic</subject><ispartof>Paleobiology, 2007-06, Vol.33 (3), p.414-434</ispartof><rights>The Paleontological Society</rights><rights>GeoRef, Copyright 2020, American Geosciences Institute. Reference includes data from GeoScienceWorld @Alexandria, VA @USA @United States. Abstract, Copyright, The Paleontological Society</rights><rights>Copyright 2007 The Paleontological Society</rights><rights>Copyright Paleontological Society Summer 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a393t-565e3f6125917a9beaa6db9d33d43dd619acc1a2b795a9df5969876aab3d1b193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a393t-565e3f6125917a9beaa6db9d33d43dd619acc1a2b795a9df5969876aab3d1b193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1666/06069.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4500162$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,26955,27901,27902,52338,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kiessling, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aberhan, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental determinants of marine benthic biodiversity dynamics through Triassic–Jurassic time</title><title>Paleobiology</title><description>Ecology is thought to be of crucial importance in determining taxonomic turnover at geological time scales, yet general links between ecology and biodiversity dynamics are still poorly explored in deep time. Here we analyze the relationships between the environmental affinities of Triassic-Jurassic marine benthic genera and their biodiversity dynamics, using a large, taxonomically vetted data set of Triassic-Jurassic taxonomic occurrences. On the basis of binomial probabilities of proportional occurrence counts, we identify environmental affinities of genera for (1) carbonate versus siliciclastic substrates, (2) onshore versus offshore depositional environments, (3) reefs versus level-bottom communities, and (4) tropical versus non-tropical latitudinal zones. Genera with affinities for carbonates, onshore environments, and reefs have higher turnover rates than genera with affinities for siliciclastic, offshore, and level-bottom settings. Differences in faunal turnover are largely due to differences in origination rates. Whereas previous studies have highlighted the direct influence of physical and biological factors in exploring environmental controls on evolutionary rates, our analyses show that the patterns can largely be explained by the partitioning of higher taxa with different evolutionary tempos among environments. The relatively slowly evolving bivalves are concentrated in siliciclastic rocks and in level-bottom communities. Furthermore, separate analyses on bivalves did not produce significant differences in turnover rates between environmental settings. The relationship between biodiversity dynamics and environments in our data set is thus governed by the partitioning of higher taxa within environmental categories and not directly due to greater chances of origination in particular settings. As this partitioning probably has ecological reasons rather than being a simple sampling artifact, we propose an indirect environmental control on evolutionary rates. Affinities for latitudinal zones are not linked to systematically different turnover rates, possibly because of paleoclimatic fluctuations and latitudinal migrations of taxa. However, the strong extinction spike of tropical genera in the Rhaetian calls for an important paleoclimatic component in the end-Triassic mass extinction.</description><subject>Anthozoa</subject><subject>Bathymetry</subject><subject>benthic taxa</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Bivalvia</subject><subject>Brachiopoda</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>Cnidaria</subject><subject>Coelenterata</subject><subject>communities</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Echinodermata</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Environmental control</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Extinction</subject><subject>Gastropoda</subject><subject>Genera</subject><subject>Geological time</subject><subject>Invertebrata</subject><subject>invertebrate</subject><subject>Jurassic</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>marine environment</subject><subject>Mass extinction events</subject><subject>Mass extinctions</subject><subject>Mesozoic</subject><subject>Mollusca</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>paleobathymetry</subject><subject>paleoecology</subject><subject>paleoenvironment</subject><subject>Paleontology</subject><subject>Porifera</subject><subject>Reefs</subject><subject>s</subject><subject>Shellfish</subject><subject>speciation</subject><subject>statistical analysis</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Trajectories</subject><subject>Triassic</subject><issn>0094-8373</issn><issn>1938-5331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M1K5TAYBuAgM-AZFW_ARRgYXUg1adq0WQ7iL8JsnHVIk6-eHNrESVKHs_MevEOvxBwrMgizSsL7kC95Edqn5IRyzk8JJ1yc0C20oIK1Rc0Y_YIWhIiqaFnDttG3GFckn2veLJA-d482eDeCS2rABhKE0TrlUsS-x6MK1gHucrq0GnfWG_sIIdq0xmbt1Gh1xGkZ_HS_xHfBqhitfnl6vpnC2xYnO8Iu-tqrIcLe-7qDfl-c351dFbe_Lq_Pft4WigmWiprXwHpOy1rQRokOlOKmE4YxUzFjOBVKa6rKrhG1EqavBRdtw5XqmKFd_uwOOpzvfQj-zwQxydFGDcOgHPgpypJUouKUZvj9E1z5Kbj8NlmWomSciQ06mpEOPsYAvXwINvexlpTITdPyrWm5kQezXMXkwwerakIoL3N8PMf34KO24DT89WEw_wwlpJGkbVrCsv4x69y1d_Dfoa9PCZay</recordid><startdate>20070601</startdate><enddate>20070601</enddate><creator>Kiessling, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Aberhan, Martin</creator><general>Paleontological Society</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>H96</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070601</creationdate><title>Environmental determinants of marine benthic biodiversity dynamics through Triassic–Jurassic time</title><author>Kiessling, Wolfgang ; Aberhan, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a393t-565e3f6125917a9beaa6db9d33d43dd619acc1a2b795a9df5969876aab3d1b193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Anthozoa</topic><topic>Bathymetry</topic><topic>benthic taxa</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Bivalvia</topic><topic>Brachiopoda</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>Cnidaria</topic><topic>Coelenterata</topic><topic>communities</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Echinodermata</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Environmental control</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Extinction</topic><topic>Gastropoda</topic><topic>Genera</topic><topic>Geological time</topic><topic>Invertebrata</topic><topic>invertebrate</topic><topic>Jurassic</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>marine environment</topic><topic>Mass extinction events</topic><topic>Mass extinctions</topic><topic>Mesozoic</topic><topic>Mollusca</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>paleobathymetry</topic><topic>paleoecology</topic><topic>paleoenvironment</topic><topic>Paleontology</topic><topic>Porifera</topic><topic>Reefs</topic><topic>s</topic><topic>Shellfish</topic><topic>speciation</topic><topic>statistical analysis</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Trajectories</topic><topic>Triassic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kiessling, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aberhan, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><jtitle>Paleobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kiessling, Wolfgang</au><au>Aberhan, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental determinants of marine benthic biodiversity dynamics through Triassic–Jurassic time</atitle><jtitle>Paleobiology</jtitle><date>2007-06-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>414</spage><epage>434</epage><pages>414-434</pages><issn>0094-8373</issn><eissn>1938-5331</eissn><coden>PALBBM</coden><abstract>Ecology is thought to be of crucial importance in determining taxonomic turnover at geological time scales, yet general links between ecology and biodiversity dynamics are still poorly explored in deep time. Here we analyze the relationships between the environmental affinities of Triassic-Jurassic marine benthic genera and their biodiversity dynamics, using a large, taxonomically vetted data set of Triassic-Jurassic taxonomic occurrences. On the basis of binomial probabilities of proportional occurrence counts, we identify environmental affinities of genera for (1) carbonate versus siliciclastic substrates, (2) onshore versus offshore depositional environments, (3) reefs versus level-bottom communities, and (4) tropical versus non-tropical latitudinal zones. Genera with affinities for carbonates, onshore environments, and reefs have higher turnover rates than genera with affinities for siliciclastic, offshore, and level-bottom settings. Differences in faunal turnover are largely due to differences in origination rates. Whereas previous studies have highlighted the direct influence of physical and biological factors in exploring environmental controls on evolutionary rates, our analyses show that the patterns can largely be explained by the partitioning of higher taxa with different evolutionary tempos among environments. The relatively slowly evolving bivalves are concentrated in siliciclastic rocks and in level-bottom communities. Furthermore, separate analyses on bivalves did not produce significant differences in turnover rates between environmental settings. The relationship between biodiversity dynamics and environments in our data set is thus governed by the partitioning of higher taxa within environmental categories and not directly due to greater chances of origination in particular settings. As this partitioning probably has ecological reasons rather than being a simple sampling artifact, we propose an indirect environmental control on evolutionary rates. Affinities for latitudinal zones are not linked to systematically different turnover rates, possibly because of paleoclimatic fluctuations and latitudinal migrations of taxa. However, the strong extinction spike of tropical genera in the Rhaetian calls for an important paleoclimatic component in the end-Triassic mass extinction.</abstract><cop>Boulder</cop><pub>Paleontological Society</pub><doi>10.1666/06069.1</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-8373
ispartof Paleobiology, 2007-06, Vol.33 (3), p.414-434
issn 0094-8373
1938-5331
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20494611
source Jstor Complete Legacy; BioOne Complete
subjects Anthozoa
Bathymetry
benthic taxa
Biodiversity
Bivalvia
Brachiopoda
Carbonates
Cnidaria
Coelenterata
communities
Community
Datasets
Echinodermata
Endangered & extinct species
Environmental control
Evolution
Extinction
Gastropoda
Genera
Geological time
Invertebrata
invertebrate
Jurassic
Marine ecology
marine environment
Mass extinction events
Mass extinctions
Mesozoic
Mollusca
Mollusks
paleobathymetry
paleoecology
paleoenvironment
Paleontology
Porifera
Reefs
s
Shellfish
speciation
statistical analysis
Substrates
Taxa
Trajectories
Triassic
title Environmental determinants of marine benthic biodiversity dynamics through Triassic–Jurassic time
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T00%3A47%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20determinants%20of%20marine%20benthic%20biodiversity%20dynamics%20through%20Triassic%E2%80%93Jurassic%20time&rft.jtitle=Paleobiology&rft.au=Kiessling,%20Wolfgang&rft.date=2007-06-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=414&rft.epage=434&rft.pages=414-434&rft.issn=0094-8373&rft.eissn=1938-5331&rft.coden=PALBBM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1666/06069.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4500162%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229236391&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4500162&rfr_iscdi=true