Challenges of bringing a new sedative to market

The current review examines the success and failures of the development of new hypnotic compounds for the human market. One of the important aspects is that one of the key present agents, propofol, is considered by many anaesthesiologists as 'the ideal'. However, all drugs have adverse or...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current opinion in anaesthesiology 2018-08, Vol.31 (4), p.423-430
1. Verfasser: Sear, John W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 430
container_issue 4
container_start_page 423
container_title Current opinion in anaesthesiology
container_volume 31
creator Sear, John W
description The current review examines the success and failures of the development of new hypnotic compounds for the human market. One of the important aspects is that one of the key present agents, propofol, is considered by many anaesthesiologists as 'the ideal'. However, all drugs have adverse or side-effects. The last 30 years since the introduction of propofol has seen many new compounds evaluated; but as at the present time, only three agents may achieve a pivotal position in the market - fospropofol (a sedative agent which may have a role in endoscopic surgery); remimazolam (a short-acting benzodiazepine) whose development is also being focused on the sedation rather than anaesthesia market; and the pregnane steroid, alfaxalone (an anaesthetic agent first introduced in 1972, but withdrawn in 1984 because of adverse allergic reactions to the solvent, Cremophor EL) now solvented in a cyclodextrin. Studies of these three agents thus far have shown that none of them has any major adverse side-effects; all have properties which warrant further clinical evaluation.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000614
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2047924503</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2047924503</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-95a877b3c08e745364321132b6433561802a5fa064917106d00bd31a915c7d053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRbKz-A5E9ekk7-509luAXFHrR87JJJjWaJjWbKv57V1pFHAbeOTzvzPAScslgxsCa-SJfzeBvaSaPSMKkEalWAMckAat4aiyYCTkL4SUy3GZwSiZRIqZVQub5s29b7NYYaF_TYmi6dWzqaYcfNGDlx-Yd6djTjR9ecTwnJ7VvA14cdEqebm8e8_t0ubp7yBfLtBRgxtQqnxlTiBIyNFIJLQVnTPAiDkJplgH3qvagpWWGga4Aikowb5kqTQVKTMn1fu926N92GEa3aUKJbes77HfBcZDGcqlARFTu0XLoQxiwdtuhid9-OgbuOyoXo3L_o4q2q8OFXbHB6tf0k434AkGNYCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2047924503</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Challenges of bringing a new sedative to market</title><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Sear, John W</creator><creatorcontrib>Sear, John W</creatorcontrib><description>The current review examines the success and failures of the development of new hypnotic compounds for the human market. One of the important aspects is that one of the key present agents, propofol, is considered by many anaesthesiologists as 'the ideal'. However, all drugs have adverse or side-effects. The last 30 years since the introduction of propofol has seen many new compounds evaluated; but as at the present time, only three agents may achieve a pivotal position in the market - fospropofol (a sedative agent which may have a role in endoscopic surgery); remimazolam (a short-acting benzodiazepine) whose development is also being focused on the sedation rather than anaesthesia market; and the pregnane steroid, alfaxalone (an anaesthetic agent first introduced in 1972, but withdrawn in 1984 because of adverse allergic reactions to the solvent, Cremophor EL) now solvented in a cyclodextrin. Studies of these three agents thus far have shown that none of them has any major adverse side-effects; all have properties which warrant further clinical evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-7907</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000614</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29847365</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Current opinion in anaesthesiology, 2018-08, Vol.31 (4), p.423-430</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-95a877b3c08e745364321132b6433561802a5fa064917106d00bd31a915c7d053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-95a877b3c08e745364321132b6433561802a5fa064917106d00bd31a915c7d053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29847365$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sear, John W</creatorcontrib><title>Challenges of bringing a new sedative to market</title><title>Current opinion in anaesthesiology</title><addtitle>Curr Opin Anaesthesiol</addtitle><description>The current review examines the success and failures of the development of new hypnotic compounds for the human market. One of the important aspects is that one of the key present agents, propofol, is considered by many anaesthesiologists as 'the ideal'. However, all drugs have adverse or side-effects. The last 30 years since the introduction of propofol has seen many new compounds evaluated; but as at the present time, only three agents may achieve a pivotal position in the market - fospropofol (a sedative agent which may have a role in endoscopic surgery); remimazolam (a short-acting benzodiazepine) whose development is also being focused on the sedation rather than anaesthesia market; and the pregnane steroid, alfaxalone (an anaesthetic agent first introduced in 1972, but withdrawn in 1984 because of adverse allergic reactions to the solvent, Cremophor EL) now solvented in a cyclodextrin. Studies of these three agents thus far have shown that none of them has any major adverse side-effects; all have properties which warrant further clinical evaluation.</description><issn>0952-7907</issn><issn>1473-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRbKz-A5E9ekk7-509luAXFHrR87JJJjWaJjWbKv57V1pFHAbeOTzvzPAScslgxsCa-SJfzeBvaSaPSMKkEalWAMckAat4aiyYCTkL4SUy3GZwSiZRIqZVQub5s29b7NYYaF_TYmi6dWzqaYcfNGDlx-Yd6djTjR9ecTwnJ7VvA14cdEqebm8e8_t0ubp7yBfLtBRgxtQqnxlTiBIyNFIJLQVnTPAiDkJplgH3qvagpWWGga4Aikowb5kqTQVKTMn1fu926N92GEa3aUKJbes77HfBcZDGcqlARFTu0XLoQxiwdtuhid9-OgbuOyoXo3L_o4q2q8OFXbHB6tf0k434AkGNYCw</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Sear, John W</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>Challenges of bringing a new sedative to market</title><author>Sear, John W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-95a877b3c08e745364321132b6433561802a5fa064917106d00bd31a915c7d053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sear, John W</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current opinion in anaesthesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sear, John W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Challenges of bringing a new sedative to market</atitle><jtitle>Current opinion in anaesthesiology</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Opin Anaesthesiol</addtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>423</spage><epage>430</epage><pages>423-430</pages><issn>0952-7907</issn><eissn>1473-6500</eissn><abstract>The current review examines the success and failures of the development of new hypnotic compounds for the human market. One of the important aspects is that one of the key present agents, propofol, is considered by many anaesthesiologists as 'the ideal'. However, all drugs have adverse or side-effects. The last 30 years since the introduction of propofol has seen many new compounds evaluated; but as at the present time, only three agents may achieve a pivotal position in the market - fospropofol (a sedative agent which may have a role in endoscopic surgery); remimazolam (a short-acting benzodiazepine) whose development is also being focused on the sedation rather than anaesthesia market; and the pregnane steroid, alfaxalone (an anaesthetic agent first introduced in 1972, but withdrawn in 1984 because of adverse allergic reactions to the solvent, Cremophor EL) now solvented in a cyclodextrin. Studies of these three agents thus far have shown that none of them has any major adverse side-effects; all have properties which warrant further clinical evaluation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>29847365</pmid><doi>10.1097/ACO.0000000000000614</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0952-7907
ispartof Current opinion in anaesthesiology, 2018-08, Vol.31 (4), p.423-430
issn 0952-7907
1473-6500
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2047924503
source Journals@Ovid Complete
title Challenges of bringing a new sedative to market
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T10%3A02%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Challenges%20of%20bringing%20a%20new%20sedative%20to%20market&rft.jtitle=Current%20opinion%20in%20anaesthesiology&rft.au=Sear,%20John%20W&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=423&rft.epage=430&rft.pages=423-430&rft.issn=0952-7907&rft.eissn=1473-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000614&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2047924503%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2047924503&rft_id=info:pmid/29847365&rfr_iscdi=true