Occurrence and behavior of four of the most used sunscreen UV filters in a wastewater reclamation plant
Four UV filters, benzophenone-3 (BP-3), 4-methylbenzylidence camphor (4-MBC), ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (EHMC), and octocrylene (OC), have been examined along the different units of a wastewater reclamation plant (WWRP) located in Tianjin, North China. The analytical procedure included solid-phase...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water research (Oxford) 2007-08, Vol.41 (15), p.3506-3512 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Four UV filters, benzophenone-3 (BP-3), 4-methylbenzylidence camphor (4-MBC), ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (EHMC), and octocrylene (OC), have been examined along the different units of a wastewater reclamation plant (WWRP) located in Tianjin, North China. The analytical procedure included solid-phase extraction and gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric analyses. All four UV filters were detected in the influent during the three sampling campaigns (February, July, and September), and the concentrations ranged from 34 to 2128
ng
L
−1. The concentrations of the four UV filters were higher in hot weather (July and September) than in cool weather (February). The monthly average removal ranged from 7.6% to 21% for the selected UV filters during coagulation–flocculation (C–F) treatment. The ozonation treatment achieved the maximum removal (16–28%); on the contrary, the continuous microfiltration (CMF) achieved the lowest removal (3.6–8.2%). The total removal efficiencies along the plant varied from 28% to 43%. These results indicate that the UV filters are not completely removed during WWRP treatment and may be carried over into the environment during the reuse applications. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.039 |