Repeatability, interocular correlation and agreement of quantitative swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography macular metrics in healthy subjects

PurposeTo investigate the repeatability, interocular correlation and agreement of quantitative swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) metrics in healthy subjects.MethodsThirty-three healthy normal subjects were enrolled. The macula was scanned four times by an SS-OCTA system...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of ophthalmology 2019-03, Vol.103 (3), p.415-420
Hauptverfasser: Fang, Danqi, Tang, Fang Yao, Huang, Haifan, Cheung, Carol Y, Chen, Haoyu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 420
container_issue 3
container_start_page 415
container_title British journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 103
creator Fang, Danqi
Tang, Fang Yao
Huang, Haifan
Cheung, Carol Y
Chen, Haoyu
description PurposeTo investigate the repeatability, interocular correlation and agreement of quantitative swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) metrics in healthy subjects.MethodsThirty-three healthy normal subjects were enrolled. The macula was scanned four times by an SS-OCTA system using the 3 mm×3 mm mode. The superficial capillary map images were analysed using a MATLAB program. A series of parameters were measured: foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, FAZ perimeter, FAZ circularity, parafoveal vessel density, fractal dimension and vessel diameter index (VDI). The repeatability of four scans was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Then the averaged results were analysed for intereye difference, correlation and agreement using paired t-test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r), ICC and Bland-Altman plot.ResultsThe repeatability assessment of the macular metrics exported high ICC values (ranged from 0.853 to 0.996). There is no statistically significant difference in the OCTA metrics between the two eyes. FAZ area (ICC=0.961, r=0.929) and FAZ perimeter (ICC=0.884, r=0.802) showed excellent binocular correlation. Fractal dimension (ICC=0.732, r=0.578) and VDI (ICC=0.707, r=0.547) showed moderate binocular correlation, while parafoveal vessel density had poor binocular correlation. Bland-Altman plots showed the range of agreement was from −0.0763 to 0.0954 mm2 for FAZ area and from −0.0491 to 0.1136 for parafoveal vessel density.ConclusionsThe macular metrics obtained using SS-OCTA showed excellent repeatability in healthy subjects. We showed high intereye correlation in FAZ area and perimeter, moderate correlation in fractal dimension and VDI, while vessel density had poor correlation in normal healthy subjects.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-311874
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2047250549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2184346903</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b482t-14f23c96cbb5f2373750be7ef1d80532898810ba1124c52721f93396c63d98fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkc9u1DAQxi0EotvCKyBLXDgQ8NhO4hxRBRSpEhKCc2R7JxuvnDi1HdC-DM-Kq7QFcUGcPJ75ffNHHyEU2BsA0bw1x7CMedR-Cr7iDFQlAFQrH5EdyEaVVNs9JjvGWFsBNHBGzlM6li9voH1KzninpGRK7cjPL7igzto47_LpNXVzxhjs6nWkNsSIXmcXZqrnPdWHiDjhnGkY6M2q5-xyqX5Hmn7gkqsU1miRhiU7q32RjxhxLpkcpnCIehlPpc_B3ceT3uZMmKOzqcymI2qfSymt5og2p2fkyaB9wud37wX59uH918ur6vrzx0-X764rIxXPFciBC9s11pi6RK1oa2awxQH2itWCq04pYEYDcGlr3nIYOiEK34h9pwYtLsirre8Sw82KKfeTSxa91zOGNfWcyZbXrJZdQV_-hR7L3XPZruegpJBNx0Sh1EbZGFKKOPRLdJOOpx5Yf-th_6eH_a2H_eZhkb64G7CaCfcPwnvTCiA2wEzH_2krf6seVv6n7BclOcGq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2184346903</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Repeatability, interocular correlation and agreement of quantitative swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography macular metrics in healthy subjects</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Fang, Danqi ; Tang, Fang Yao ; Huang, Haifan ; Cheung, Carol Y ; Chen, Haoyu</creator><creatorcontrib>Fang, Danqi ; Tang, Fang Yao ; Huang, Haifan ; Cheung, Carol Y ; Chen, Haoyu</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeTo investigate the repeatability, interocular correlation and agreement of quantitative swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) metrics in healthy subjects.MethodsThirty-three healthy normal subjects were enrolled. The macula was scanned four times by an SS-OCTA system using the 3 mm×3 mm mode. The superficial capillary map images were analysed using a MATLAB program. A series of parameters were measured: foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, FAZ perimeter, FAZ circularity, parafoveal vessel density, fractal dimension and vessel diameter index (VDI). The repeatability of four scans was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Then the averaged results were analysed for intereye difference, correlation and agreement using paired t-test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r), ICC and Bland-Altman plot.ResultsThe repeatability assessment of the macular metrics exported high ICC values (ranged from 0.853 to 0.996). There is no statistically significant difference in the OCTA metrics between the two eyes. FAZ area (ICC=0.961, r=0.929) and FAZ perimeter (ICC=0.884, r=0.802) showed excellent binocular correlation. Fractal dimension (ICC=0.732, r=0.578) and VDI (ICC=0.707, r=0.547) showed moderate binocular correlation, while parafoveal vessel density had poor binocular correlation. Bland-Altman plots showed the range of agreement was from −0.0763 to 0.0954 mm2 for FAZ area and from −0.0491 to 0.1136 for parafoveal vessel density.ConclusionsThe macular metrics obtained using SS-OCTA showed excellent repeatability in healthy subjects. We showed high intereye correlation in FAZ area and perimeter, moderate correlation in fractal dimension and VDI, while vessel density had poor correlation in normal healthy subjects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-311874</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29844088</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Algorithms ; Asymmetry ; Biometrics ; Clinical science ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Glaucoma ; Imaging ; Medical imaging ; Ophthalmology ; Optical coherence tomography angiography ; Retina ; Symmetry</subject><ispartof>British journal of ophthalmology, 2019-03, Vol.103 (3), p.415-420</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2019 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b482t-14f23c96cbb5f2373750be7ef1d80532898810ba1124c52721f93396c63d98fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b482t-14f23c96cbb5f2373750be7ef1d80532898810ba1124c52721f93396c63d98fa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29844088$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fang, Danqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Fang Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Haifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Carol Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Haoyu</creatorcontrib><title>Repeatability, interocular correlation and agreement of quantitative swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography macular metrics in healthy subjects</title><title>British journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>PurposeTo investigate the repeatability, interocular correlation and agreement of quantitative swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) metrics in healthy subjects.MethodsThirty-three healthy normal subjects were enrolled. The macula was scanned four times by an SS-OCTA system using the 3 mm×3 mm mode. The superficial capillary map images were analysed using a MATLAB program. A series of parameters were measured: foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, FAZ perimeter, FAZ circularity, parafoveal vessel density, fractal dimension and vessel diameter index (VDI). The repeatability of four scans was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Then the averaged results were analysed for intereye difference, correlation and agreement using paired t-test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r), ICC and Bland-Altman plot.ResultsThe repeatability assessment of the macular metrics exported high ICC values (ranged from 0.853 to 0.996). There is no statistically significant difference in the OCTA metrics between the two eyes. FAZ area (ICC=0.961, r=0.929) and FAZ perimeter (ICC=0.884, r=0.802) showed excellent binocular correlation. Fractal dimension (ICC=0.732, r=0.578) and VDI (ICC=0.707, r=0.547) showed moderate binocular correlation, while parafoveal vessel density had poor binocular correlation. Bland-Altman plots showed the range of agreement was from −0.0763 to 0.0954 mm2 for FAZ area and from −0.0491 to 0.1136 for parafoveal vessel density.ConclusionsThe macular metrics obtained using SS-OCTA showed excellent repeatability in healthy subjects. We showed high intereye correlation in FAZ area and perimeter, moderate correlation in fractal dimension and VDI, while vessel density had poor correlation in normal healthy subjects.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Biometrics</subject><subject>Clinical science</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Optical coherence tomography angiography</subject><subject>Retina</subject><subject>Symmetry</subject><issn>0007-1161</issn><issn>1468-2079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkc9u1DAQxi0EotvCKyBLXDgQ8NhO4hxRBRSpEhKCc2R7JxuvnDi1HdC-DM-Kq7QFcUGcPJ75ffNHHyEU2BsA0bw1x7CMedR-Cr7iDFQlAFQrH5EdyEaVVNs9JjvGWFsBNHBGzlM6li9voH1KzninpGRK7cjPL7igzto47_LpNXVzxhjs6nWkNsSIXmcXZqrnPdWHiDjhnGkY6M2q5-xyqX5Hmn7gkqsU1miRhiU7q32RjxhxLpkcpnCIehlPpc_B3ceT3uZMmKOzqcymI2qfSymt5og2p2fkyaB9wud37wX59uH918ur6vrzx0-X764rIxXPFciBC9s11pi6RK1oa2awxQH2itWCq04pYEYDcGlr3nIYOiEK34h9pwYtLsirre8Sw82KKfeTSxa91zOGNfWcyZbXrJZdQV_-hR7L3XPZruegpJBNx0Sh1EbZGFKKOPRLdJOOpx5Yf-th_6eH_a2H_eZhkb64G7CaCfcPwnvTCiA2wEzH_2krf6seVv6n7BclOcGq</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Fang, Danqi</creator><creator>Tang, Fang Yao</creator><creator>Huang, Haifan</creator><creator>Cheung, Carol Y</creator><creator>Chen, Haoyu</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Repeatability, interocular correlation and agreement of quantitative swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography macular metrics in healthy subjects</title><author>Fang, Danqi ; Tang, Fang Yao ; Huang, Haifan ; Cheung, Carol Y ; Chen, Haoyu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b482t-14f23c96cbb5f2373750be7ef1d80532898810ba1124c52721f93396c63d98fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Biometrics</topic><topic>Clinical science</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Optical coherence tomography angiography</topic><topic>Retina</topic><topic>Symmetry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fang, Danqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Fang Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Haifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Carol Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Haoyu</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fang, Danqi</au><au>Tang, Fang Yao</au><au>Huang, Haifan</au><au>Cheung, Carol Y</au><au>Chen, Haoyu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Repeatability, interocular correlation and agreement of quantitative swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography macular metrics in healthy subjects</atitle><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Br J Ophthalmol</stitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>415</spage><epage>420</epage><pages>415-420</pages><issn>0007-1161</issn><eissn>1468-2079</eissn><abstract>PurposeTo investigate the repeatability, interocular correlation and agreement of quantitative swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) metrics in healthy subjects.MethodsThirty-three healthy normal subjects were enrolled. The macula was scanned four times by an SS-OCTA system using the 3 mm×3 mm mode. The superficial capillary map images were analysed using a MATLAB program. A series of parameters were measured: foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, FAZ perimeter, FAZ circularity, parafoveal vessel density, fractal dimension and vessel diameter index (VDI). The repeatability of four scans was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Then the averaged results were analysed for intereye difference, correlation and agreement using paired t-test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r), ICC and Bland-Altman plot.ResultsThe repeatability assessment of the macular metrics exported high ICC values (ranged from 0.853 to 0.996). There is no statistically significant difference in the OCTA metrics between the two eyes. FAZ area (ICC=0.961, r=0.929) and FAZ perimeter (ICC=0.884, r=0.802) showed excellent binocular correlation. Fractal dimension (ICC=0.732, r=0.578) and VDI (ICC=0.707, r=0.547) showed moderate binocular correlation, while parafoveal vessel density had poor binocular correlation. Bland-Altman plots showed the range of agreement was from −0.0763 to 0.0954 mm2 for FAZ area and from −0.0491 to 0.1136 for parafoveal vessel density.ConclusionsThe macular metrics obtained using SS-OCTA showed excellent repeatability in healthy subjects. We showed high intereye correlation in FAZ area and perimeter, moderate correlation in fractal dimension and VDI, while vessel density had poor correlation in normal healthy subjects.</abstract><cop>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>29844088</pmid><doi>10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-311874</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1161
ispartof British journal of ophthalmology, 2019-03, Vol.103 (3), p.415-420
issn 0007-1161
1468-2079
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2047250549
source PubMed Central
subjects Agreements
Algorithms
Asymmetry
Biometrics
Clinical science
Diabetic retinopathy
Glaucoma
Imaging
Medical imaging
Ophthalmology
Optical coherence tomography angiography
Retina
Symmetry
title Repeatability, interocular correlation and agreement of quantitative swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography macular metrics in healthy subjects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T14%3A49%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Repeatability,%20interocular%20correlation%20and%20agreement%20of%20quantitative%20swept-source%20optical%20coherence%20tomography%20angiography%20macular%20metrics%20in%20healthy%20subjects&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Fang,%20Danqi&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=415&rft.epage=420&rft.pages=415-420&rft.issn=0007-1161&rft.eissn=1468-2079&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-311874&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2184346903%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2184346903&rft_id=info:pmid/29844088&rfr_iscdi=true