ON-FARM WHEAT TRIALS IN BANGLADESH: A STUDY TO REDUCE PERCEIVED CONSTRAINTS TO YIELD IN TRADITIONAL WHEAT AREAS AND SOUTHERN LANDS THAT REMAIN FALLOW DURING THE DRY SEASON
This research set out to find ways to increase wheat production in Bangladesh. The approaches were (1) to increase the area planted to wheat, concentrating on developing a suitable management system for the very hot, often saline and hitherto largely untested fallow lands of the south; and (2) to in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental Agriculture 2007-01, Vol.43 (1), p.21-40 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 40 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 21 |
container_title | Experimental Agriculture |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | RAWSON, H. M. GOMEZ-MACPHERSON, H. HOSSAIN, A. B. S. SAIFUZZAMAN, M. RASHID, H. SUFIAN, M. A. SAMAD, M. A. SARKER, A. Z. AHMED, F. TALUKDER, Z. I. RAHMAN, MOZNUR SIDDIQUE, M. M. A. B. HOSSAIN, I. AMIN, M. |
description | This research set out to find ways to increase wheat production in Bangladesh. The approaches were (1) to increase the area planted to wheat, concentrating on developing a suitable management system for the very hot, often saline and hitherto largely untested fallow lands of the south; and (2) to increase economic and sustainable yield of wheat in the traditional rice-wheat zones. Five mechanized reduced tillage and planting systems were compared. They were used to enable 200 co-operating farmers at 11 locations to plant on time and avoid the reduction in yield that accompanies delays, found in this study to average 2 % d−1. Methods that placed seeds in rows were zero tillage, full or strip surface shallow till, and raised beds. A partially mechanized version of the traditional manual system called New Conventional, in which seeds and fertilizers were broadcast, was also tested. Farmers' wheat yields averaged more than 3.5 t ha−1 for the two seasons of the study. Farmers in the untested lands averaged more than 2.5 t ha−1 on their farms, well above the 0.5 t ha−1 needed to cover all costs and equal to normal production levels in traditional wheat areas. Surprisingly, full and strip till did not produce higher yields overall than New Conventional in either season. Reasons for the lack of difference are discussed in relation to other aspects of management and variation between the farmers themselves. Farmers had varying opinions and mixed success with zero till and beds. The economic consequences to farmers of using the different systems are also discussed with the suggestion that the low-tech New Conventional method will be preferable for novice wheat farmers in the historically fallow lands where the study indicated potential production is 1 million tonnes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0014479706004224 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20462037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0014479706004224</cupid><sourcerecordid>1232353111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-51f00e0dcc3c0ef9d774328de33622d8c5c5bfde72a5d81e80912c89d24843653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV-PlDAUxYnRxHH1A_hk44NvaP9BwbcudAYMW7SF3cxTw0LZsM4sK8wk-pn8kpbMRBOND01z7_mdm5Mcz3uN4HsEEfugIUSUspjBEEKKMX3irRANY59Sip56q0X2F_2592Ke791IYERW3s9S-muursBNJngFKpXzQoNcgksuNwVPhc4-Ag50VadbUJVAibROBPgsVCLya5GCpJS6UjyXlV70bS6KdPG7XZpXeSl5cb7NleAacJkCXdZVJpQEhZucLXOqElfuCFjzoihvQFqrXG6cIkCqtkA7Zylfes_6ZjfbV-f_wqvXokoyvyg3ecILv6UwPvgB6iG0sGtb0kLbxx1jlOCos4SEGHdRG7TBbd9Zhpugi5CNYIxwG8UdphElYUAuvHenu4_T-O1o54PZD3Nrd7vmwY7H2WBIQwwJc-Dbv8D78Tg9uGyOIYhE7jkInaB2Gud5sr15nIZ9M_0wCJqlO_NPd87jnzzDfLDffxua6asJGWGBCTdfTEYuVXLNPpnE8W9OfN-MprmbhtnUGi8dQ-b6D5AjyDlFs7-dhu7O_sn6_xy_ALEPpDE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203138313</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ON-FARM WHEAT TRIALS IN BANGLADESH: A STUDY TO REDUCE PERCEIVED CONSTRAINTS TO YIELD IN TRADITIONAL WHEAT AREAS AND SOUTHERN LANDS THAT REMAIN FALLOW DURING THE DRY SEASON</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>RAWSON, H. M. ; GOMEZ-MACPHERSON, H. ; HOSSAIN, A. B. S. ; SAIFUZZAMAN, M. ; RASHID, H. ; SUFIAN, M. A. ; SAMAD, M. A. ; SARKER, A. Z. ; AHMED, F. ; TALUKDER, Z. I. ; RAHMAN, MOZNUR ; SIDDIQUE, M. M. A. B. ; HOSSAIN, I. ; AMIN, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>RAWSON, H. M. ; GOMEZ-MACPHERSON, H. ; HOSSAIN, A. B. S. ; SAIFUZZAMAN, M. ; RASHID, H. ; SUFIAN, M. A. ; SAMAD, M. A. ; SARKER, A. Z. ; AHMED, F. ; TALUKDER, Z. I. ; RAHMAN, MOZNUR ; SIDDIQUE, M. M. A. B. ; HOSSAIN, I. ; AMIN, M.</creatorcontrib><description>This research set out to find ways to increase wheat production in Bangladesh. The approaches were (1) to increase the area planted to wheat, concentrating on developing a suitable management system for the very hot, often saline and hitherto largely untested fallow lands of the south; and (2) to increase economic and sustainable yield of wheat in the traditional rice-wheat zones. Five mechanized reduced tillage and planting systems were compared. They were used to enable 200 co-operating farmers at 11 locations to plant on time and avoid the reduction in yield that accompanies delays, found in this study to average 2 % d−1. Methods that placed seeds in rows were zero tillage, full or strip surface shallow till, and raised beds. A partially mechanized version of the traditional manual system called New Conventional, in which seeds and fertilizers were broadcast, was also tested. Farmers' wheat yields averaged more than 3.5 t ha−1 for the two seasons of the study. Farmers in the untested lands averaged more than 2.5 t ha−1 on their farms, well above the 0.5 t ha−1 needed to cover all costs and equal to normal production levels in traditional wheat areas. Surprisingly, full and strip till did not produce higher yields overall than New Conventional in either season. Reasons for the lack of difference are discussed in relation to other aspects of management and variation between the farmers themselves. Farmers had varying opinions and mixed success with zero till and beds. The economic consequences to farmers of using the different systems are also discussed with the suggestion that the low-tech New Conventional method will be preferable for novice wheat farmers in the historically fallow lands where the study indicated potential production is 1 million tonnes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0014479706004224</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EXAGAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural management ; Agricultural production ; Crop production ; Crop yield ; Dry season ; economic analysis ; Economics ; fallow ; Farmers ; farmers' attitudes ; grain yield ; on-farm research ; planting ; reduced tillage ; Seasons ; Seeds ; sowing ; Sustainable yield ; Tests ; Tillage ; Triticum aestivum ; Wheat ; yield components</subject><ispartof>Experimental Agriculture, 2007-01, Vol.43 (1), p.21-40</ispartof><rights>2006 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press, Publishing Division Jan 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-51f00e0dcc3c0ef9d774328de33622d8c5c5bfde72a5d81e80912c89d24843653</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0014479706004224/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,775,776,780,789,4010,27900,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>RAWSON, H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOMEZ-MACPHERSON, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOSSAIN, A. B. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAIFUZZAMAN, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RASHID, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUFIAN, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAMAD, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SARKER, A. Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AHMED, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TALUKDER, Z. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAHMAN, MOZNUR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIDDIQUE, M. M. A. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOSSAIN, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AMIN, M.</creatorcontrib><title>ON-FARM WHEAT TRIALS IN BANGLADESH: A STUDY TO REDUCE PERCEIVED CONSTRAINTS TO YIELD IN TRADITIONAL WHEAT AREAS AND SOUTHERN LANDS THAT REMAIN FALLOW DURING THE DRY SEASON</title><title>Experimental Agriculture</title><addtitle>Ex. Agric</addtitle><description>This research set out to find ways to increase wheat production in Bangladesh. The approaches were (1) to increase the area planted to wheat, concentrating on developing a suitable management system for the very hot, often saline and hitherto largely untested fallow lands of the south; and (2) to increase economic and sustainable yield of wheat in the traditional rice-wheat zones. Five mechanized reduced tillage and planting systems were compared. They were used to enable 200 co-operating farmers at 11 locations to plant on time and avoid the reduction in yield that accompanies delays, found in this study to average 2 % d−1. Methods that placed seeds in rows were zero tillage, full or strip surface shallow till, and raised beds. A partially mechanized version of the traditional manual system called New Conventional, in which seeds and fertilizers were broadcast, was also tested. Farmers' wheat yields averaged more than 3.5 t ha−1 for the two seasons of the study. Farmers in the untested lands averaged more than 2.5 t ha−1 on their farms, well above the 0.5 t ha−1 needed to cover all costs and equal to normal production levels in traditional wheat areas. Surprisingly, full and strip till did not produce higher yields overall than New Conventional in either season. Reasons for the lack of difference are discussed in relation to other aspects of management and variation between the farmers themselves. Farmers had varying opinions and mixed success with zero till and beds. The economic consequences to farmers of using the different systems are also discussed with the suggestion that the low-tech New Conventional method will be preferable for novice wheat farmers in the historically fallow lands where the study indicated potential production is 1 million tonnes.</description><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Dry season</subject><subject>economic analysis</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>fallow</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>farmers' attitudes</subject><subject>grain yield</subject><subject>on-farm research</subject><subject>planting</subject><subject>reduced tillage</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>sowing</subject><subject>Sustainable yield</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><subject>yield components</subject><issn>0014-4797</issn><issn>1469-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV-PlDAUxYnRxHH1A_hk44NvaP9BwbcudAYMW7SF3cxTw0LZsM4sK8wk-pn8kpbMRBOND01z7_mdm5Mcz3uN4HsEEfugIUSUspjBEEKKMX3irRANY59Sip56q0X2F_2592Ke791IYERW3s9S-muursBNJngFKpXzQoNcgksuNwVPhc4-Ag50VadbUJVAibROBPgsVCLya5GCpJS6UjyXlV70bS6KdPG7XZpXeSl5cb7NleAacJkCXdZVJpQEhZucLXOqElfuCFjzoihvQFqrXG6cIkCqtkA7Zylfes_6ZjfbV-f_wqvXokoyvyg3ecILv6UwPvgB6iG0sGtb0kLbxx1jlOCos4SEGHdRG7TBbd9Zhpugi5CNYIxwG8UdphElYUAuvHenu4_T-O1o54PZD3Nrd7vmwY7H2WBIQwwJc-Dbv8D78Tg9uGyOIYhE7jkInaB2Gud5sr15nIZ9M_0wCJqlO_NPd87jnzzDfLDffxua6asJGWGBCTdfTEYuVXLNPpnE8W9OfN-MprmbhtnUGi8dQ-b6D5AjyDlFs7-dhu7O_sn6_xy_ALEPpDE</recordid><startdate>200701</startdate><enddate>200701</enddate><creator>RAWSON, H. M.</creator><creator>GOMEZ-MACPHERSON, H.</creator><creator>HOSSAIN, A. B. S.</creator><creator>SAIFUZZAMAN, M.</creator><creator>RASHID, H.</creator><creator>SUFIAN, M. A.</creator><creator>SAMAD, M. A.</creator><creator>SARKER, A. Z.</creator><creator>AHMED, F.</creator><creator>TALUKDER, Z. I.</creator><creator>RAHMAN, MOZNUR</creator><creator>SIDDIQUE, M. M. A. B.</creator><creator>HOSSAIN, I.</creator><creator>AMIN, M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200701</creationdate><title>ON-FARM WHEAT TRIALS IN BANGLADESH: A STUDY TO REDUCE PERCEIVED CONSTRAINTS TO YIELD IN TRADITIONAL WHEAT AREAS AND SOUTHERN LANDS THAT REMAIN FALLOW DURING THE DRY SEASON</title><author>RAWSON, H. M. ; GOMEZ-MACPHERSON, H. ; HOSSAIN, A. B. S. ; SAIFUZZAMAN, M. ; RASHID, H. ; SUFIAN, M. A. ; SAMAD, M. A. ; SARKER, A. Z. ; AHMED, F. ; TALUKDER, Z. I. ; RAHMAN, MOZNUR ; SIDDIQUE, M. M. A. B. ; HOSSAIN, I. ; AMIN, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-51f00e0dcc3c0ef9d774328de33622d8c5c5bfde72a5d81e80912c89d24843653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Dry season</topic><topic>economic analysis</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>fallow</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>farmers' attitudes</topic><topic>grain yield</topic><topic>on-farm research</topic><topic>planting</topic><topic>reduced tillage</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>sowing</topic><topic>Sustainable yield</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><topic>yield components</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RAWSON, H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOMEZ-MACPHERSON, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOSSAIN, A. B. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAIFUZZAMAN, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RASHID, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUFIAN, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAMAD, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SARKER, A. Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AHMED, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TALUKDER, Z. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAHMAN, MOZNUR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIDDIQUE, M. M. A. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOSSAIN, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AMIN, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Experimental Agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RAWSON, H. M.</au><au>GOMEZ-MACPHERSON, H.</au><au>HOSSAIN, A. B. S.</au><au>SAIFUZZAMAN, M.</au><au>RASHID, H.</au><au>SUFIAN, M. A.</au><au>SAMAD, M. A.</au><au>SARKER, A. Z.</au><au>AHMED, F.</au><au>TALUKDER, Z. I.</au><au>RAHMAN, MOZNUR</au><au>SIDDIQUE, M. M. A. B.</au><au>HOSSAIN, I.</au><au>AMIN, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ON-FARM WHEAT TRIALS IN BANGLADESH: A STUDY TO REDUCE PERCEIVED CONSTRAINTS TO YIELD IN TRADITIONAL WHEAT AREAS AND SOUTHERN LANDS THAT REMAIN FALLOW DURING THE DRY SEASON</atitle><jtitle>Experimental Agriculture</jtitle><addtitle>Ex. Agric</addtitle><date>2007-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>21-40</pages><issn>0014-4797</issn><eissn>1469-4441</eissn><coden>EXAGAL</coden><abstract>This research set out to find ways to increase wheat production in Bangladesh. The approaches were (1) to increase the area planted to wheat, concentrating on developing a suitable management system for the very hot, often saline and hitherto largely untested fallow lands of the south; and (2) to increase economic and sustainable yield of wheat in the traditional rice-wheat zones. Five mechanized reduced tillage and planting systems were compared. They were used to enable 200 co-operating farmers at 11 locations to plant on time and avoid the reduction in yield that accompanies delays, found in this study to average 2 % d−1. Methods that placed seeds in rows were zero tillage, full or strip surface shallow till, and raised beds. A partially mechanized version of the traditional manual system called New Conventional, in which seeds and fertilizers were broadcast, was also tested. Farmers' wheat yields averaged more than 3.5 t ha−1 for the two seasons of the study. Farmers in the untested lands averaged more than 2.5 t ha−1 on their farms, well above the 0.5 t ha−1 needed to cover all costs and equal to normal production levels in traditional wheat areas. Surprisingly, full and strip till did not produce higher yields overall than New Conventional in either season. Reasons for the lack of difference are discussed in relation to other aspects of management and variation between the farmers themselves. Farmers had varying opinions and mixed success with zero till and beds. The economic consequences to farmers of using the different systems are also discussed with the suggestion that the low-tech New Conventional method will be preferable for novice wheat farmers in the historically fallow lands where the study indicated potential production is 1 million tonnes.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0014479706004224</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-4797 |
ispartof | Experimental Agriculture, 2007-01, Vol.43 (1), p.21-40 |
issn | 0014-4797 1469-4441 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20462037 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Agricultural management Agricultural production Crop production Crop yield Dry season economic analysis Economics fallow Farmers farmers' attitudes grain yield on-farm research planting reduced tillage Seasons Seeds sowing Sustainable yield Tests Tillage Triticum aestivum Wheat yield components |
title | ON-FARM WHEAT TRIALS IN BANGLADESH: A STUDY TO REDUCE PERCEIVED CONSTRAINTS TO YIELD IN TRADITIONAL WHEAT AREAS AND SOUTHERN LANDS THAT REMAIN FALLOW DURING THE DRY SEASON |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T12%3A42%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ON-FARM%20WHEAT%20TRIALS%20IN%20BANGLADESH:%20A%20STUDY%20TO%20REDUCE%20PERCEIVED%20CONSTRAINTS%20TO%20YIELD%20IN%20TRADITIONAL%20WHEAT%20AREAS%20AND%20SOUTHERN%20LANDS%20THAT%20REMAIN%20FALLOW%20DURING%20THE%20DRY%20SEASON&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20Agriculture&rft.au=RAWSON,%20H.%20M.&rft.date=2007-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=21-40&rft.issn=0014-4797&rft.eissn=1469-4441&rft.coden=EXAGAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0014479706004224&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1232353111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203138313&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0014479706004224&rfr_iscdi=true |