Performance of marking techniques in the field and laboratory for Diabrotica speciosa (Germar) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
A reliable marking technique was needed for a mark-release-recapture experiment with adults of Diabrotica speciosa (Germar). Four marking techniques, acrylic paint (spattered or brushed on the surface of the insect); and fluorescent pigments (dusted on surfaces or mixed with diet to produce an inges...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied entomology (1986) 2008-06, Vol.132 (5), p.382-386 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 386 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 382 |
| container_title | Journal of applied entomology (1986) |
| container_volume | 132 |
| creator | Mattioli, F Cabrera Walsh, G |
| description | A reliable marking technique was needed for a mark-release-recapture experiment with adults of Diabrotica speciosa (Germar). Four marking techniques, acrylic paint (spattered or brushed on the surface of the insect); and fluorescent pigments (dusted on surfaces or mixed with diet to produce an ingested marker), were tested. Fluorescent pigment durability for the dusting and ingested techniques was evaluated for laboratory conditions and under simulated field conditions. The impact of the techniques on beetle survival was also assessed. Both acrylic paint techniques caused mobility problems in the beetles, and neither technique lasted for more than 48 h. Both fluorescent pigment techniques were more reliable, but the dusting technique showed a significantly higher mortality than the control, and duration variations between laboratory and field conditions. Use of fluorescent pigments added to the diet was the most reliable technique. This technique allowed the manipulation of the marking period, and provided reliable timing of marker persistence in the field. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2007.01257.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20459122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20459122</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-da64f58ab888aec7492288721fc5cb5bdf96110feae3180718df37ec1bf03c823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1v0zAUhiMEEmXwG_ANaLtI8EdSO0hcTGUrTFNBgjHurBPneHVJ42JnWsuvxyFTr_GNLfl5z_F5nGWE0YKl9W5TsFLUOS2ZKjilsqCMV7LYP8lmx4un2YzWguWclup59iLGDaVsXlZ0lv35isH6sIXeIPGWbCH8cv0dGdCse_f7HiNxPRnWSKzDriXQt6SDxgcYfDiQFCUfHTTBD84AiTs0zkcgp0tMNcMZOV34Dv1uwADvyWIdDtFvsXMt4NnL7JmFLuKrx_0ku7m8-L74lF9_WX5enF_nphRzmbcwL22loFFKARpZ1pwrJTmzpjJN1bS2njNGLQIKpqhkqrVComGNpcIoLk6yt1PdXfDjQIPeumiw66BHfx91slLVjI-gmkATfIwBrd4Fl6Y4aEb1KFtv9OhUj071KFv_k633KfrmsQdEA50NyaeLxzynQnDF6sR9mLgH1-Hhv-vrq4vVeEr5fMq7OOD-mE-fpudSyErfrpb65-qHYlflSt8m_vXEW_Aa7kJ60803TpmgNOmUJRd_AWISq_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20459122</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of marking techniques in the field and laboratory for Diabrotica speciosa (Germar) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mattioli, F ; Cabrera Walsh, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Mattioli, F ; Cabrera Walsh, G</creatorcontrib><description>A reliable marking technique was needed for a mark-release-recapture experiment with adults of Diabrotica speciosa (Germar). Four marking techniques, acrylic paint (spattered or brushed on the surface of the insect); and fluorescent pigments (dusted on surfaces or mixed with diet to produce an ingested marker), were tested. Fluorescent pigment durability for the dusting and ingested techniques was evaluated for laboratory conditions and under simulated field conditions. The impact of the techniques on beetle survival was also assessed. Both acrylic paint techniques caused mobility problems in the beetles, and neither technique lasted for more than 48 h. Both fluorescent pigment techniques were more reliable, but the dusting technique showed a significantly higher mortality than the control, and duration variations between laboratory and field conditions. Use of fluorescent pigments added to the diet was the most reliable technique. This technique allowed the manipulation of the marking period, and provided reliable timing of marker persistence in the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-2048</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0418</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2007.01257.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>acrylic paint ; adverse effects ; application methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chrysomelidae ; Coleoptera ; Diabrotica speciosa ; fluorescent labeling ; fluorescent pigments ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; insect marking ; mark-recapture studies ; marker persistence ; methodology ; mortality ; oral administration ; paints ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; pigments ; Protozoa. Invertebrates ; rootworms ; toxicity</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied entomology (1986), 2008-06, Vol.132 (5), p.382-386</ispartof><rights>Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Verlag, Berlin. No claim to original US government works</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-da64f58ab888aec7492288721fc5cb5bdf96110feae3180718df37ec1bf03c823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-da64f58ab888aec7492288721fc5cb5bdf96110feae3180718df37ec1bf03c823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1439-0418.2007.01257.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1439-0418.2007.01257.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20332819$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mattioli, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabrera Walsh, G</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of marking techniques in the field and laboratory for Diabrotica speciosa (Germar) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)</title><title>Journal of applied entomology (1986)</title><description>A reliable marking technique was needed for a mark-release-recapture experiment with adults of Diabrotica speciosa (Germar). Four marking techniques, acrylic paint (spattered or brushed on the surface of the insect); and fluorescent pigments (dusted on surfaces or mixed with diet to produce an ingested marker), were tested. Fluorescent pigment durability for the dusting and ingested techniques was evaluated for laboratory conditions and under simulated field conditions. The impact of the techniques on beetle survival was also assessed. Both acrylic paint techniques caused mobility problems in the beetles, and neither technique lasted for more than 48 h. Both fluorescent pigment techniques were more reliable, but the dusting technique showed a significantly higher mortality than the control, and duration variations between laboratory and field conditions. Use of fluorescent pigments added to the diet was the most reliable technique. This technique allowed the manipulation of the marking period, and provided reliable timing of marker persistence in the field.</description><subject>acrylic paint</subject><subject>adverse effects</subject><subject>application methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chrysomelidae</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Diabrotica speciosa</subject><subject>fluorescent labeling</subject><subject>fluorescent pigments</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>insect marking</subject><subject>mark-recapture studies</subject><subject>marker persistence</subject><subject>methodology</subject><subject>mortality</subject><subject>oral administration</subject><subject>paints</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>pigments</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrates</subject><subject>rootworms</subject><subject>toxicity</subject><issn>0931-2048</issn><issn>1439-0418</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkV1v0zAUhiMEEmXwG_ANaLtI8EdSO0hcTGUrTFNBgjHurBPneHVJ42JnWsuvxyFTr_GNLfl5z_F5nGWE0YKl9W5TsFLUOS2ZKjilsqCMV7LYP8lmx4un2YzWguWclup59iLGDaVsXlZ0lv35isH6sIXeIPGWbCH8cv0dGdCse_f7HiNxPRnWSKzDriXQt6SDxgcYfDiQFCUfHTTBD84AiTs0zkcgp0tMNcMZOV34Dv1uwADvyWIdDtFvsXMt4NnL7JmFLuKrx_0ku7m8-L74lF9_WX5enF_nphRzmbcwL22loFFKARpZ1pwrJTmzpjJN1bS2njNGLQIKpqhkqrVComGNpcIoLk6yt1PdXfDjQIPeumiw66BHfx91slLVjI-gmkATfIwBrd4Fl6Y4aEb1KFtv9OhUj071KFv_k633KfrmsQdEA50NyaeLxzynQnDF6sR9mLgH1-Hhv-vrq4vVeEr5fMq7OOD-mE-fpudSyErfrpb65-qHYlflSt8m_vXEW_Aa7kJ60803TpmgNOmUJRd_AWISq_g</recordid><startdate>200806</startdate><enddate>200806</enddate><creator>Mattioli, F</creator><creator>Cabrera Walsh, G</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200806</creationdate><title>Performance of marking techniques in the field and laboratory for Diabrotica speciosa (Germar) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)</title><author>Mattioli, F ; Cabrera Walsh, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-da64f58ab888aec7492288721fc5cb5bdf96110feae3180718df37ec1bf03c823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>acrylic paint</topic><topic>adverse effects</topic><topic>application methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chrysomelidae</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Diabrotica speciosa</topic><topic>fluorescent labeling</topic><topic>fluorescent pigments</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>insect marking</topic><topic>mark-recapture studies</topic><topic>marker persistence</topic><topic>methodology</topic><topic>mortality</topic><topic>oral administration</topic><topic>paints</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>pigments</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrates</topic><topic>rootworms</topic><topic>toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mattioli, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabrera Walsh, G</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied entomology (1986)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mattioli, F</au><au>Cabrera Walsh, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of marking techniques in the field and laboratory for Diabrotica speciosa (Germar) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied entomology (1986)</jtitle><date>2008-06</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>382</spage><epage>386</epage><pages>382-386</pages><issn>0931-2048</issn><eissn>1439-0418</eissn><abstract>A reliable marking technique was needed for a mark-release-recapture experiment with adults of Diabrotica speciosa (Germar). Four marking techniques, acrylic paint (spattered or brushed on the surface of the insect); and fluorescent pigments (dusted on surfaces or mixed with diet to produce an ingested marker), were tested. Fluorescent pigment durability for the dusting and ingested techniques was evaluated for laboratory conditions and under simulated field conditions. The impact of the techniques on beetle survival was also assessed. Both acrylic paint techniques caused mobility problems in the beetles, and neither technique lasted for more than 48 h. Both fluorescent pigment techniques were more reliable, but the dusting technique showed a significantly higher mortality than the control, and duration variations between laboratory and field conditions. Use of fluorescent pigments added to the diet was the most reliable technique. This technique allowed the manipulation of the marking period, and provided reliable timing of marker persistence in the field.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1439-0418.2007.01257.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0931-2048 |
| ispartof | Journal of applied entomology (1986), 2008-06, Vol.132 (5), p.382-386 |
| issn | 0931-2048 1439-0418 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20459122 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | acrylic paint adverse effects application methods Biological and medical sciences Chrysomelidae Coleoptera Diabrotica speciosa fluorescent labeling fluorescent pigments Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology insect marking mark-recapture studies marker persistence methodology mortality oral administration paints Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection pigments Protozoa. Invertebrates rootworms toxicity |
| title | Performance of marking techniques in the field and laboratory for Diabrotica speciosa (Germar) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T03%3A26%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20marking%20techniques%20in%20the%20field%20and%20laboratory%20for%20Diabrotica%20speciosa%20(Germar)%20(Coleoptera:%20Chrysomelidae)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20entomology%20(1986)&rft.au=Mattioli,%20F&rft.date=2008-06&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=382&rft.epage=386&rft.pages=382-386&rft.issn=0931-2048&rft.eissn=1439-0418&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2007.01257.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20459122%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20459122&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |