Neighboring phosphoSer‐Pro motifs in the undefined domain of IRAK1 impart bivalent advantage for Pin1 binding
The peptidyl prolyl isomerase Pin1 has two domains that are considered to be its binding (WW) and catalytic (PPIase) domains, both of which interact with phosphorylated Ser/Thr‐Pro motifs. This shared specificity might influence substrate selection, as many known Pin1 substrates have multiple sequen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The FEBS journal 2016-12, Vol.283 (24), p.4528-4548 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4548 |
---|---|
container_issue | 24 |
container_start_page | 4528 |
container_title | The FEBS journal |
container_volume | 283 |
creator | Rogals, Monique J. Greenwood, Alexander I. Kwon, Jeahoo Lu, Kun Ping Nicholson, Linda K. |
description | The peptidyl prolyl isomerase Pin1 has two domains that are considered to be its binding (WW) and catalytic (PPIase) domains, both of which interact with phosphorylated Ser/Thr‐Pro motifs. This shared specificity might influence substrate selection, as many known Pin1 substrates have multiple sequentially close phosphoSer/Thr‐Pro motifs, including the protein interleukin‐1 receptor‐associated kinase‐1 (IRAK1). The IRAK1 undefined domain (UD) contains two sets of such neighboring motifs (Ser131/Ser144 and Ser163/Ser173), suggesting possible bivalent interactions with Pin1. Using a series of NMR titrations with 15N‐labeled full‐length Pin1 (Pin1‐FL), PPIase, or WW domain and phosphopeptides representing the Ser131/Ser144 and Ser163/Ser173 regions of IRAK1‐UD, bivalent interactions were investigated. Binding studies using singly phosphorylated peptides showed that individual motifs displayed weak affinities (> 100 μm) for Pin1‐FL and each isolated domain. Analysis of dually phosphorylated peptides binding to Pin1‐FL showed that inclusion of bivalent states was necessary to fit the data. The resulting complex model and fitted parameters were applied to predict the impact of bivalent states at low micromolar concentrations, demonstrating significant affinity enhancement for both dually phosphorylated peptides (3.5 and 24 μm for peptides based on the Ser131/Ser144 and Ser163/Ser173 regions, respectively). The complementary technique biolayer interferometry confirmed the predicted affinity enhancement for a representative set of singly and dually phosphorylated Ser131/Ser144 peptides at low micromolar concentrations, validating model predictions. These studies provide novel insights regarding the complexity of interactions between Pin1 and activated IRAK1, and more broadly suggest that phosphorylation of neighboring Ser/Thr‐Pro motifs in proteins might provide competitive advantage at cellular concentrations for engaging with Pin1.
Bivalent interactions between Pin1 and phosphopeptides derived from substrate interleukin‐1 receptor‐associated kinase‐1 were investigated by NMR, and quantified using a multi‐state model that allows prediction of binding at lower concentrations. Biolayer interferometry measurements confirmed the predicted affinity enhancement at micromolar concentrations. These studies suggest that phosphorylation of neighboring Ser/Thr‐Pro motifs might impart competitive advantage for binding to Pin1 at cellular protein concentrations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/febs.13943 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2045787148</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835683078</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p3473-a8ee0950f4af475c90203933bd939bacf64457849c4e7b42b50780b5c482dfab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctuFTEMhiMEohfY8AAoEhs2p-Q6SZalaqGigoqCxG6UzDjnpJpJhmSmqLs-As_Ik5DTli7YgCXLlv3FsfUj9IKSA1rtjQdXDig3gj9Cu1QJthKN1I8fcvFtB-2VckkIl8KYp2iHKWWI5s0uSh8hrDcu5RDXeNqkUv0C8q-bn-c54THNwRccIp43gJfYgw8Retyn0dZi8vj08-EHisM42TxjF67sAHHGtr-ycbZrwD5lfB4irb3Y1z-eoSfeDgWe38d99PXk-MvR-9XZp3enR4dnq4kLxVdWAxAjiRfWCyU7QxjhhnPXG26c7XwjhFRamE6AcoI5SZQmTnZCs95bx_fR67u5U07fFyhzO4bSwTDYCGkpLSPb94oK_U-UammEaQSX_4Fy2Whed6noq7_Qy7TkWG_eDmTGKNawSr28pxY3Qt9OOYw2X7d_BKoAvQN-hAGuH_qUtFvp26307a307cnx24vbjP8GAUGgWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1852997262</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neighboring phosphoSer‐Pro motifs in the undefined domain of IRAK1 impart bivalent advantage for Pin1 binding</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Rogals, Monique J. ; Greenwood, Alexander I. ; Kwon, Jeahoo ; Lu, Kun Ping ; Nicholson, Linda K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rogals, Monique J. ; Greenwood, Alexander I. ; Kwon, Jeahoo ; Lu, Kun Ping ; Nicholson, Linda K.</creatorcontrib><description>The peptidyl prolyl isomerase Pin1 has two domains that are considered to be its binding (WW) and catalytic (PPIase) domains, both of which interact with phosphorylated Ser/Thr‐Pro motifs. This shared specificity might influence substrate selection, as many known Pin1 substrates have multiple sequentially close phosphoSer/Thr‐Pro motifs, including the protein interleukin‐1 receptor‐associated kinase‐1 (IRAK1). The IRAK1 undefined domain (UD) contains two sets of such neighboring motifs (Ser131/Ser144 and Ser163/Ser173), suggesting possible bivalent interactions with Pin1. Using a series of NMR titrations with 15N‐labeled full‐length Pin1 (Pin1‐FL), PPIase, or WW domain and phosphopeptides representing the Ser131/Ser144 and Ser163/Ser173 regions of IRAK1‐UD, bivalent interactions were investigated. Binding studies using singly phosphorylated peptides showed that individual motifs displayed weak affinities (> 100 μm) for Pin1‐FL and each isolated domain. Analysis of dually phosphorylated peptides binding to Pin1‐FL showed that inclusion of bivalent states was necessary to fit the data. The resulting complex model and fitted parameters were applied to predict the impact of bivalent states at low micromolar concentrations, demonstrating significant affinity enhancement for both dually phosphorylated peptides (3.5 and 24 μm for peptides based on the Ser131/Ser144 and Ser163/Ser173 regions, respectively). The complementary technique biolayer interferometry confirmed the predicted affinity enhancement for a representative set of singly and dually phosphorylated Ser131/Ser144 peptides at low micromolar concentrations, validating model predictions. These studies provide novel insights regarding the complexity of interactions between Pin1 and activated IRAK1, and more broadly suggest that phosphorylation of neighboring Ser/Thr‐Pro motifs in proteins might provide competitive advantage at cellular concentrations for engaging with Pin1.
Bivalent interactions between Pin1 and phosphopeptides derived from substrate interleukin‐1 receptor‐associated kinase‐1 were investigated by NMR, and quantified using a multi‐state model that allows prediction of binding at lower concentrations. Biolayer interferometry measurements confirmed the predicted affinity enhancement at micromolar concentrations. These studies suggest that phosphorylation of neighboring Ser/Thr‐Pro motifs might impart competitive advantage for binding to Pin1 at cellular protein concentrations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-464X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-4658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/febs.13943</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27790836</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Amino Acid Motifs ; Amino Acid Sequence ; Binding Sites - genetics ; Binding, Competitive ; Biosensing Techniques - methods ; bivalent interaction ; Catalytic Domain ; interferometry ; Interferometry - methods ; interleukin-1 ; Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinases - chemistry ; Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinases - genetics ; Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinases - metabolism ; interleukin‐1 receptor‐associated kinase‐1 ; Kinases ; Kinetics ; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy ; Models, Chemical ; Models, Molecular ; multi‐state equilibrium ; NIMA-Interacting Peptidylprolyl Isomerase - chemistry ; NIMA-Interacting Peptidylprolyl Isomerase - genetics ; NIMA-Interacting Peptidylprolyl Isomerase - metabolism ; NMR titration ; nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy ; Peptides ; Peptides - chemistry ; Peptides - genetics ; Peptides - metabolism ; peptidylprolyl isomerase ; phosphopeptides ; Phosphorylation ; Pin1 ; Proline - genetics ; Proline - metabolism ; Protein Binding ; Protein Domains ; Proteins ; Serine - genetics ; Serine - metabolism ; stable isotopes ; Substrates</subject><ispartof>The FEBS journal, 2016-12, Vol.283 (24), p.4528-4548</ispartof><rights>2016 Federation of European Biochemical Societies</rights><rights>2016 Federation of European Biochemical Societies.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Federation of European Biochemical Societies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ffebs.13943$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ffebs.13943$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,1430,27911,27912,45561,45562,46396,46820</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27790836$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rogals, Monique J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, Alexander I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Jeahoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Kun Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholson, Linda K.</creatorcontrib><title>Neighboring phosphoSer‐Pro motifs in the undefined domain of IRAK1 impart bivalent advantage for Pin1 binding</title><title>The FEBS journal</title><addtitle>FEBS J</addtitle><description>The peptidyl prolyl isomerase Pin1 has two domains that are considered to be its binding (WW) and catalytic (PPIase) domains, both of which interact with phosphorylated Ser/Thr‐Pro motifs. This shared specificity might influence substrate selection, as many known Pin1 substrates have multiple sequentially close phosphoSer/Thr‐Pro motifs, including the protein interleukin‐1 receptor‐associated kinase‐1 (IRAK1). The IRAK1 undefined domain (UD) contains two sets of such neighboring motifs (Ser131/Ser144 and Ser163/Ser173), suggesting possible bivalent interactions with Pin1. Using a series of NMR titrations with 15N‐labeled full‐length Pin1 (Pin1‐FL), PPIase, or WW domain and phosphopeptides representing the Ser131/Ser144 and Ser163/Ser173 regions of IRAK1‐UD, bivalent interactions were investigated. Binding studies using singly phosphorylated peptides showed that individual motifs displayed weak affinities (> 100 μm) for Pin1‐FL and each isolated domain. Analysis of dually phosphorylated peptides binding to Pin1‐FL showed that inclusion of bivalent states was necessary to fit the data. The resulting complex model and fitted parameters were applied to predict the impact of bivalent states at low micromolar concentrations, demonstrating significant affinity enhancement for both dually phosphorylated peptides (3.5 and 24 μm for peptides based on the Ser131/Ser144 and Ser163/Ser173 regions, respectively). The complementary technique biolayer interferometry confirmed the predicted affinity enhancement for a representative set of singly and dually phosphorylated Ser131/Ser144 peptides at low micromolar concentrations, validating model predictions. These studies provide novel insights regarding the complexity of interactions between Pin1 and activated IRAK1, and more broadly suggest that phosphorylation of neighboring Ser/Thr‐Pro motifs in proteins might provide competitive advantage at cellular concentrations for engaging with Pin1.
Bivalent interactions between Pin1 and phosphopeptides derived from substrate interleukin‐1 receptor‐associated kinase‐1 were investigated by NMR, and quantified using a multi‐state model that allows prediction of binding at lower concentrations. Biolayer interferometry measurements confirmed the predicted affinity enhancement at micromolar concentrations. These studies suggest that phosphorylation of neighboring Ser/Thr‐Pro motifs might impart competitive advantage for binding to Pin1 at cellular protein concentrations.</description><subject>Amino Acid Motifs</subject><subject>Amino Acid Sequence</subject><subject>Binding Sites - genetics</subject><subject>Binding, Competitive</subject><subject>Biosensing Techniques - methods</subject><subject>bivalent interaction</subject><subject>Catalytic Domain</subject><subject>interferometry</subject><subject>Interferometry - methods</subject><subject>interleukin-1</subject><subject>Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinases - chemistry</subject><subject>Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinases - genetics</subject><subject>Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinases - metabolism</subject><subject>interleukin‐1 receptor‐associated kinase‐1</subject><subject>Kinases</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy</subject><subject>Models, Chemical</subject><subject>Models, Molecular</subject><subject>multi‐state equilibrium</subject><subject>NIMA-Interacting Peptidylprolyl Isomerase - chemistry</subject><subject>NIMA-Interacting Peptidylprolyl Isomerase - genetics</subject><subject>NIMA-Interacting Peptidylprolyl Isomerase - metabolism</subject><subject>NMR titration</subject><subject>nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy</subject><subject>Peptides</subject><subject>Peptides - chemistry</subject><subject>Peptides - genetics</subject><subject>Peptides - metabolism</subject><subject>peptidylprolyl isomerase</subject><subject>phosphopeptides</subject><subject>Phosphorylation</subject><subject>Pin1</subject><subject>Proline - genetics</subject><subject>Proline - metabolism</subject><subject>Protein Binding</subject><subject>Protein Domains</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Serine - genetics</subject><subject>Serine - metabolism</subject><subject>stable isotopes</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><issn>1742-464X</issn><issn>1742-4658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctuFTEMhiMEohfY8AAoEhs2p-Q6SZalaqGigoqCxG6UzDjnpJpJhmSmqLs-As_Ik5DTli7YgCXLlv3FsfUj9IKSA1rtjQdXDig3gj9Cu1QJthKN1I8fcvFtB-2VckkIl8KYp2iHKWWI5s0uSh8hrDcu5RDXeNqkUv0C8q-bn-c54THNwRccIp43gJfYgw8Retyn0dZi8vj08-EHisM42TxjF67sAHHGtr-ycbZrwD5lfB4irb3Y1z-eoSfeDgWe38d99PXk-MvR-9XZp3enR4dnq4kLxVdWAxAjiRfWCyU7QxjhhnPXG26c7XwjhFRamE6AcoI5SZQmTnZCs95bx_fR67u5U07fFyhzO4bSwTDYCGkpLSPb94oK_U-UammEaQSX_4Fy2Whed6noq7_Qy7TkWG_eDmTGKNawSr28pxY3Qt9OOYw2X7d_BKoAvQN-hAGuH_qUtFvp26307a307cnx24vbjP8GAUGgWA</recordid><startdate>201612</startdate><enddate>201612</enddate><creator>Rogals, Monique J.</creator><creator>Greenwood, Alexander I.</creator><creator>Kwon, Jeahoo</creator><creator>Lu, Kun Ping</creator><creator>Nicholson, Linda K.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201612</creationdate><title>Neighboring phosphoSer‐Pro motifs in the undefined domain of IRAK1 impart bivalent advantage for Pin1 binding</title><author>Rogals, Monique J. ; Greenwood, Alexander I. ; Kwon, Jeahoo ; Lu, Kun Ping ; Nicholson, Linda K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p3473-a8ee0950f4af475c90203933bd939bacf64457849c4e7b42b50780b5c482dfab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Amino Acid Motifs</topic><topic>Amino Acid Sequence</topic><topic>Binding Sites - genetics</topic><topic>Binding, Competitive</topic><topic>Biosensing Techniques - methods</topic><topic>bivalent interaction</topic><topic>Catalytic Domain</topic><topic>interferometry</topic><topic>Interferometry - methods</topic><topic>interleukin-1</topic><topic>Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinases - chemistry</topic><topic>Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinases - genetics</topic><topic>Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinases - metabolism</topic><topic>interleukin‐1 receptor‐associated kinase‐1</topic><topic>Kinases</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy</topic><topic>Models, Chemical</topic><topic>Models, Molecular</topic><topic>multi‐state equilibrium</topic><topic>NIMA-Interacting Peptidylprolyl Isomerase - chemistry</topic><topic>NIMA-Interacting Peptidylprolyl Isomerase - genetics</topic><topic>NIMA-Interacting Peptidylprolyl Isomerase - metabolism</topic><topic>NMR titration</topic><topic>nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy</topic><topic>Peptides</topic><topic>Peptides - chemistry</topic><topic>Peptides - genetics</topic><topic>Peptides - metabolism</topic><topic>peptidylprolyl isomerase</topic><topic>phosphopeptides</topic><topic>Phosphorylation</topic><topic>Pin1</topic><topic>Proline - genetics</topic><topic>Proline - metabolism</topic><topic>Protein Binding</topic><topic>Protein Domains</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Serine - genetics</topic><topic>Serine - metabolism</topic><topic>stable isotopes</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rogals, Monique J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, Alexander I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Jeahoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Kun Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholson, Linda K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>The FEBS journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rogals, Monique J.</au><au>Greenwood, Alexander I.</au><au>Kwon, Jeahoo</au><au>Lu, Kun Ping</au><au>Nicholson, Linda K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neighboring phosphoSer‐Pro motifs in the undefined domain of IRAK1 impart bivalent advantage for Pin1 binding</atitle><jtitle>The FEBS journal</jtitle><addtitle>FEBS J</addtitle><date>2016-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>283</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>4528</spage><epage>4548</epage><pages>4528-4548</pages><issn>1742-464X</issn><eissn>1742-4658</eissn><abstract>The peptidyl prolyl isomerase Pin1 has two domains that are considered to be its binding (WW) and catalytic (PPIase) domains, both of which interact with phosphorylated Ser/Thr‐Pro motifs. This shared specificity might influence substrate selection, as many known Pin1 substrates have multiple sequentially close phosphoSer/Thr‐Pro motifs, including the protein interleukin‐1 receptor‐associated kinase‐1 (IRAK1). The IRAK1 undefined domain (UD) contains two sets of such neighboring motifs (Ser131/Ser144 and Ser163/Ser173), suggesting possible bivalent interactions with Pin1. Using a series of NMR titrations with 15N‐labeled full‐length Pin1 (Pin1‐FL), PPIase, or WW domain and phosphopeptides representing the Ser131/Ser144 and Ser163/Ser173 regions of IRAK1‐UD, bivalent interactions were investigated. Binding studies using singly phosphorylated peptides showed that individual motifs displayed weak affinities (> 100 μm) for Pin1‐FL and each isolated domain. Analysis of dually phosphorylated peptides binding to Pin1‐FL showed that inclusion of bivalent states was necessary to fit the data. The resulting complex model and fitted parameters were applied to predict the impact of bivalent states at low micromolar concentrations, demonstrating significant affinity enhancement for both dually phosphorylated peptides (3.5 and 24 μm for peptides based on the Ser131/Ser144 and Ser163/Ser173 regions, respectively). The complementary technique biolayer interferometry confirmed the predicted affinity enhancement for a representative set of singly and dually phosphorylated Ser131/Ser144 peptides at low micromolar concentrations, validating model predictions. These studies provide novel insights regarding the complexity of interactions between Pin1 and activated IRAK1, and more broadly suggest that phosphorylation of neighboring Ser/Thr‐Pro motifs in proteins might provide competitive advantage at cellular concentrations for engaging with Pin1.
Bivalent interactions between Pin1 and phosphopeptides derived from substrate interleukin‐1 receptor‐associated kinase‐1 were investigated by NMR, and quantified using a multi‐state model that allows prediction of binding at lower concentrations. Biolayer interferometry measurements confirmed the predicted affinity enhancement at micromolar concentrations. These studies suggest that phosphorylation of neighboring Ser/Thr‐Pro motifs might impart competitive advantage for binding to Pin1 at cellular protein concentrations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>27790836</pmid><doi>10.1111/febs.13943</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1742-464X |
ispartof | The FEBS journal, 2016-12, Vol.283 (24), p.4528-4548 |
issn | 1742-464X 1742-4658 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2045787148 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Amino Acid Motifs Amino Acid Sequence Binding Sites - genetics Binding, Competitive Biosensing Techniques - methods bivalent interaction Catalytic Domain interferometry Interferometry - methods interleukin-1 Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinases - chemistry Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinases - genetics Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinases - metabolism interleukin‐1 receptor‐associated kinase‐1 Kinases Kinetics Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Models, Chemical Models, Molecular multi‐state equilibrium NIMA-Interacting Peptidylprolyl Isomerase - chemistry NIMA-Interacting Peptidylprolyl Isomerase - genetics NIMA-Interacting Peptidylprolyl Isomerase - metabolism NMR titration nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy Peptides Peptides - chemistry Peptides - genetics Peptides - metabolism peptidylprolyl isomerase phosphopeptides Phosphorylation Pin1 Proline - genetics Proline - metabolism Protein Binding Protein Domains Proteins Serine - genetics Serine - metabolism stable isotopes Substrates |
title | Neighboring phosphoSer‐Pro motifs in the undefined domain of IRAK1 impart bivalent advantage for Pin1 binding |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T11%3A53%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neighboring%20phosphoSer%E2%80%90Pro%20motifs%20in%20the%20undefined%20domain%20of%20IRAK1%20impart%20bivalent%20advantage%20for%20Pin1%20binding&rft.jtitle=The%20FEBS%20journal&rft.au=Rogals,%20Monique%20J.&rft.date=2016-12&rft.volume=283&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=4528&rft.epage=4548&rft.pages=4528-4548&rft.issn=1742-464X&rft.eissn=1742-4658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/febs.13943&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1835683078%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1852997262&rft_id=info:pmid/27790836&rfr_iscdi=true |