Human papillomavirus vaccine effectiveness by number of doses: Systematic review of data from national immunization programs
Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines were first licensed as a three-dose series; a two-dose series is now recommended in some age groups and there is interest in possible one-dose vaccination. We conducted a systematic literature review of HPV vaccine effectiveness by number of doses, including asses...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2018-08, Vol.36 (32), p.4806-4815 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4815 |
---|---|
container_issue | 32 |
container_start_page | 4806 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Markowitz, Lauri E. Drolet, Melanie Perez, Norma Jit, Mark Brisson, Marc |
description | Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines were first licensed as a three-dose series; a two-dose series is now recommended in some age groups and there is interest in possible one-dose vaccination.
We conducted a systematic literature review of HPV vaccine effectiveness by number of doses, including assessment of biases and impact of varying buffer periods (time between vaccination and outcome counting).
Of 3787 articles identified, 26 full articles were assessed and 14 included in our review. All studies were conducted within the context of recommended three-dose schedules of bivalent (3) or quadrivalent HPV vaccine (11). Two evaluated effectiveness for prevention of HPV prevalence, six anogenital warts, and six abnormal cervical cytology or histology. Many studies found differences between three-, two- and one-dose vaccine recipients, indicating possible differences in HPV exposure prior to vaccination or in risk behavior. Adjusted or stratified analyses were conducted to control for potential confounding. All studies found significant vaccine effectiveness with three doses, 11 with two doses at various intervals, and six with one dose. Most studies showed a relationship (not always statistically significant) between effectiveness and number of doses, with greater decreases in HPV-related outcomes with three, followed by two and one dose(s). Few studies conducted formal comparisons of three vs fewer doses. Three of four studies that examined buffer periods found higher effectiveness and a smaller difference by number of doses with longer periods.
Most post-licensure studies report highest effectiveness with three doses; some found no statistically significant difference between two and three doses. Additionally, almost half found some effectiveness with one dose. Several biases impact estimates, with most biasing two- and one-dose results away from showing effectiveness. Future effectiveness studies, examining persons vaccinated prior to sexual activity and using methods to reduce potential sources of bias, can help inform vaccination policy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.057 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2045289561</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X18301178</els_id><sourcerecordid>2071540487</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-94eb9e28bc6dd512599cbd4a09014a84d1b620cc1538167716c90fb3bbfa773c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-LFDEQxYMo7jj6EZSAFy_dVtJJ__EisqgrLHhQwVtI0tWSoZOMSffIiB_ezM7owYunoqhfvaLeI-Qpg5oBa1_u6oO21gWsObC-BlaD7O6RDeu7puKS9ffJBngrKsHg6xV5lPMOAGTDhofkig898NJuyK-b1etA93rv5jl6fXBpzfQiTXGa0C7ugAFzpuZIw-oNJhonOsaM-RX9dMwLer04SxMeHP64m-lF0ylFT0OZxKBn6rxfg_t519J9it-S9vkxeTDpOeOTS92SL-_efr6-qW4_vv9w_ea2skLAUg0CzYC8N7YdR8m4HAZrRqFhACZ0L0ZmWg7WMtn0rO061toBJtMYM-mua2yzJS_OuuXw9xXzorzLFudZB4xrVhyE5P0gW1bQ5_-gu7im8sGJ6pgUIIrBWyLPlE0x54ST2ifndToqBuoUj9qpi4fqFI8Cpko8Ze_ZRX01Hse_W3_yKMDrM4DFjmJnUtk6DBZHl0oSaozuPyd-A_iOpY0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2071540487</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human papillomavirus vaccine effectiveness by number of doses: Systematic review of data from national immunization programs</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Markowitz, Lauri E. ; Drolet, Melanie ; Perez, Norma ; Jit, Mark ; Brisson, Marc</creator><creatorcontrib>Markowitz, Lauri E. ; Drolet, Melanie ; Perez, Norma ; Jit, Mark ; Brisson, Marc</creatorcontrib><description>Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines were first licensed as a three-dose series; a two-dose series is now recommended in some age groups and there is interest in possible one-dose vaccination.
We conducted a systematic literature review of HPV vaccine effectiveness by number of doses, including assessment of biases and impact of varying buffer periods (time between vaccination and outcome counting).
Of 3787 articles identified, 26 full articles were assessed and 14 included in our review. All studies were conducted within the context of recommended three-dose schedules of bivalent (3) or quadrivalent HPV vaccine (11). Two evaluated effectiveness for prevention of HPV prevalence, six anogenital warts, and six abnormal cervical cytology or histology. Many studies found differences between three-, two- and one-dose vaccine recipients, indicating possible differences in HPV exposure prior to vaccination or in risk behavior. Adjusted or stratified analyses were conducted to control for potential confounding. All studies found significant vaccine effectiveness with three doses, 11 with two doses at various intervals, and six with one dose. Most studies showed a relationship (not always statistically significant) between effectiveness and number of doses, with greater decreases in HPV-related outcomes with three, followed by two and one dose(s). Few studies conducted formal comparisons of three vs fewer doses. Three of four studies that examined buffer periods found higher effectiveness and a smaller difference by number of doses with longer periods.
Most post-licensure studies report highest effectiveness with three doses; some found no statistically significant difference between two and three doses. Additionally, almost half found some effectiveness with one dose. Several biases impact estimates, with most biasing two- and one-dose results away from showing effectiveness. Future effectiveness studies, examining persons vaccinated prior to sexual activity and using methods to reduce potential sources of bias, can help inform vaccination policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.057</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29802000</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Age groups ; Anogenital ; Buffers ; Cellular biology ; Clinical trials ; Cytology ; Histology ; HPV vaccine ; Human papillomavirus ; Human papillomavirus vaccine ; Immunization ; Infections ; Literature reviews ; Medical screening ; Reviews ; Risk taking ; Schedules ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical significance ; Surveillance ; Systematic review ; Vaccine effectiveness ; Vaccine efficacy ; Vaccines ; Warts</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2018-08, Vol.36 (32), p.4806-4815</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Aug 6, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-94eb9e28bc6dd512599cbd4a09014a84d1b620cc1538167716c90fb3bbfa773c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-94eb9e28bc6dd512599cbd4a09014a84d1b620cc1538167716c90fb3bbfa773c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2071540487?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994,64384,64386,64388,72240</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29802000$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Markowitz, Lauri E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drolet, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Norma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jit, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brisson, Marc</creatorcontrib><title>Human papillomavirus vaccine effectiveness by number of doses: Systematic review of data from national immunization programs</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines were first licensed as a three-dose series; a two-dose series is now recommended in some age groups and there is interest in possible one-dose vaccination.
We conducted a systematic literature review of HPV vaccine effectiveness by number of doses, including assessment of biases and impact of varying buffer periods (time between vaccination and outcome counting).
Of 3787 articles identified, 26 full articles were assessed and 14 included in our review. All studies were conducted within the context of recommended three-dose schedules of bivalent (3) or quadrivalent HPV vaccine (11). Two evaluated effectiveness for prevention of HPV prevalence, six anogenital warts, and six abnormal cervical cytology or histology. Many studies found differences between three-, two- and one-dose vaccine recipients, indicating possible differences in HPV exposure prior to vaccination or in risk behavior. Adjusted or stratified analyses were conducted to control for potential confounding. All studies found significant vaccine effectiveness with three doses, 11 with two doses at various intervals, and six with one dose. Most studies showed a relationship (not always statistically significant) between effectiveness and number of doses, with greater decreases in HPV-related outcomes with three, followed by two and one dose(s). Few studies conducted formal comparisons of three vs fewer doses. Three of four studies that examined buffer periods found higher effectiveness and a smaller difference by number of doses with longer periods.
Most post-licensure studies report highest effectiveness with three doses; some found no statistically significant difference between two and three doses. Additionally, almost half found some effectiveness with one dose. Several biases impact estimates, with most biasing two- and one-dose results away from showing effectiveness. Future effectiveness studies, examining persons vaccinated prior to sexual activity and using methods to reduce potential sources of bias, can help inform vaccination policy.</description><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Anogenital</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Cellular biology</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cytology</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>HPV vaccine</subject><subject>Human papillomavirus</subject><subject>Human papillomavirus vaccine</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Risk taking</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical significance</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Vaccine effectiveness</subject><subject>Vaccine efficacy</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Warts</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU-LFDEQxYMo7jj6EZSAFy_dVtJJ__EisqgrLHhQwVtI0tWSoZOMSffIiB_ezM7owYunoqhfvaLeI-Qpg5oBa1_u6oO21gWsObC-BlaD7O6RDeu7puKS9ffJBngrKsHg6xV5lPMOAGTDhofkig898NJuyK-b1etA93rv5jl6fXBpzfQiTXGa0C7ugAFzpuZIw-oNJhonOsaM-RX9dMwLer04SxMeHP64m-lF0ylFT0OZxKBn6rxfg_t519J9it-S9vkxeTDpOeOTS92SL-_efr6-qW4_vv9w_ea2skLAUg0CzYC8N7YdR8m4HAZrRqFhACZ0L0ZmWg7WMtn0rO061toBJtMYM-mua2yzJS_OuuXw9xXzorzLFudZB4xrVhyE5P0gW1bQ5_-gu7im8sGJ6pgUIIrBWyLPlE0x54ST2ifndToqBuoUj9qpi4fqFI8Cpko8Ze_ZRX01Hse_W3_yKMDrM4DFjmJnUtk6DBZHl0oSaozuPyd-A_iOpY0</recordid><startdate>20180806</startdate><enddate>20180806</enddate><creator>Markowitz, Lauri E.</creator><creator>Drolet, Melanie</creator><creator>Perez, Norma</creator><creator>Jit, Mark</creator><creator>Brisson, Marc</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180806</creationdate><title>Human papillomavirus vaccine effectiveness by number of doses: Systematic review of data from national immunization programs</title><author>Markowitz, Lauri E. ; Drolet, Melanie ; Perez, Norma ; Jit, Mark ; Brisson, Marc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-94eb9e28bc6dd512599cbd4a09014a84d1b620cc1538167716c90fb3bbfa773c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Anogenital</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Cellular biology</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cytology</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>HPV vaccine</topic><topic>Human papillomavirus</topic><topic>Human papillomavirus vaccine</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Risk taking</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical significance</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Vaccine effectiveness</topic><topic>Vaccine efficacy</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Warts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Markowitz, Lauri E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drolet, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Norma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jit, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brisson, Marc</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Markowitz, Lauri E.</au><au>Drolet, Melanie</au><au>Perez, Norma</au><au>Jit, Mark</au><au>Brisson, Marc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human papillomavirus vaccine effectiveness by number of doses: Systematic review of data from national immunization programs</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2018-08-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>32</issue><spage>4806</spage><epage>4815</epage><pages>4806-4815</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines were first licensed as a three-dose series; a two-dose series is now recommended in some age groups and there is interest in possible one-dose vaccination.
We conducted a systematic literature review of HPV vaccine effectiveness by number of doses, including assessment of biases and impact of varying buffer periods (time between vaccination and outcome counting).
Of 3787 articles identified, 26 full articles were assessed and 14 included in our review. All studies were conducted within the context of recommended three-dose schedules of bivalent (3) or quadrivalent HPV vaccine (11). Two evaluated effectiveness for prevention of HPV prevalence, six anogenital warts, and six abnormal cervical cytology or histology. Many studies found differences between three-, two- and one-dose vaccine recipients, indicating possible differences in HPV exposure prior to vaccination or in risk behavior. Adjusted or stratified analyses were conducted to control for potential confounding. All studies found significant vaccine effectiveness with three doses, 11 with two doses at various intervals, and six with one dose. Most studies showed a relationship (not always statistically significant) between effectiveness and number of doses, with greater decreases in HPV-related outcomes with three, followed by two and one dose(s). Few studies conducted formal comparisons of three vs fewer doses. Three of four studies that examined buffer periods found higher effectiveness and a smaller difference by number of doses with longer periods.
Most post-licensure studies report highest effectiveness with three doses; some found no statistically significant difference between two and three doses. Additionally, almost half found some effectiveness with one dose. Several biases impact estimates, with most biasing two- and one-dose results away from showing effectiveness. Future effectiveness studies, examining persons vaccinated prior to sexual activity and using methods to reduce potential sources of bias, can help inform vaccination policy.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29802000</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.057</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2018-08, Vol.36 (32), p.4806-4815 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2045289561 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Age groups Anogenital Buffers Cellular biology Clinical trials Cytology Histology HPV vaccine Human papillomavirus Human papillomavirus vaccine Immunization Infections Literature reviews Medical screening Reviews Risk taking Schedules Statistical analysis Statistical significance Surveillance Systematic review Vaccine effectiveness Vaccine efficacy Vaccines Warts |
title | Human papillomavirus vaccine effectiveness by number of doses: Systematic review of data from national immunization programs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T04%3A48%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20papillomavirus%20vaccine%20effectiveness%20by%20number%20of%20doses:%20Systematic%20review%20of%20data%20from%20national%20immunization%20programs&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Markowitz,%20Lauri%20E.&rft.date=2018-08-06&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=32&rft.spage=4806&rft.epage=4815&rft.pages=4806-4815&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.057&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2071540487%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2071540487&rft_id=info:pmid/29802000&rft_els_id=S0264410X18301178&rfr_iscdi=true |