Prediction of tumor differentiation using sequential PET/CT and MRI in patients with breast cancer
Objective The aim of this study is to assess tumor differentiation using parameters from sequential positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with breast cancer. Methods This retrospective study included 78 patients with breast cancer....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of nuclear medicine 2018-07, Vol.32 (6), p.389-397 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
The aim of this study is to assess tumor differentiation using parameters from sequential positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with breast cancer.
Methods
This retrospective study included 78 patients with breast cancer. All patients underwent sequential PET/CT and MRI. For fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET image analysis, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV
max
) of FDG was assessed at both 1 and 2 h and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). The kinetic analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters was performed using dynamic enhancement curves. We assessed diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)–MRI parameters regarding apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Histologic grades 1 and 2 were classified as low-grade, and grade 3 as high-grade tumor.
Results
Forty-five lesions of 78 patients were classified as histologic grade 3, while 26 and 7 lesions were grade 2 and grade 1, respectively. Patients with high-grade tumors showed significantly lower ADC-mean values than patients with low-grade tumors (0.99 ± 0.19 vs.1.12 ± 0.32,
p
= 0.007). With respect to SUV
max
1, MTV2.5, and TLG2.5, patients with high-grade tumors showed higher values than patients with low-grade tumors: SUV
max
1 (7.92 ± 4.5 vs.6.19 ± 3.05,
p
= 0.099), MTV2.5 (7.90 ± 9.32 vs.4.38 ± 5.10,
p
= 0.095), and TLG2.5 (40.83 ± 59.17 vs.19.66 ± 26.08,
p
= 0.082). However, other parameters did not reveal significant differences between low-grade and high-grade malignancies. In receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, ADC-mean values showed the highest area under the curve of 0.681 (95%CI 0.566–0.782) for assessing high-grade malignancy.
Conclusions
Lower ADC-mean values may predict the poor differentiation of breast cancer among diverse PET–MRI functional parameters. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0914-7187 1864-6433 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12149-018-1259-7 |