Continuous In‐Line Virus Inactivation for Next Generation Bioprocessing

Viral inactivation plays a critical role in assuring the safety of monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics. Traditional viral inactivation involves large holding tanks in which product is maintained at a target low pH for a defined hold time, typically 30–60 min. The drive toward continuous processin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biotechnology journal 2019-02, Vol.14 (2), p.e1700718-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Gillespie, Christopher, Holstein, Melissa, Mullin, Lori, Cotoni, Kristen, Tuccelli, Ronald, Caulmare, John, Greenhalgh, Patricia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 2
container_start_page e1700718
container_title Biotechnology journal
container_volume 14
creator Gillespie, Christopher
Holstein, Melissa
Mullin, Lori
Cotoni, Kristen
Tuccelli, Ronald
Caulmare, John
Greenhalgh, Patricia
description Viral inactivation plays a critical role in assuring the safety of monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics. Traditional viral inactivation involves large holding tanks in which product is maintained at a target low pH for a defined hold time, typically 30–60 min. The drive toward continuous processing and improved facility utilization has provided motivation for development of a continuous viral inactivation process. To this end, a lab‐scale prototype viral inactivation system was designed, built, and characterized. Multiple incubation chamber designs are evaluated to identify the optimal design that enables narrow residence time distributions in continuous flow systems. Extensive analysis is conducted supporting rapid low pH viral inactivation and included evaluations with multiple viruses, a range of pH levels, buffer compositions, mAb concentrations, and temperatures. Multiple test conditions are evaluated using the in‐line system and results compared to traditional batch‐mode viral inactivation. Comparability in kinetics of virus inactivation suggests equivalency between the two approaches. Virus clearance in monoclonal antibody processing is critical, where an inactivation step contributes significantly to the overall viral reduction in a process. In this work, the transition of the low pH viral inactivation step from a batch process to a continuous flow process that requires control of two critical pieces, namely virus inactivation kinetics, which were evaluated as a function of different solution conditions, and the incubation chamber, where conditions are maintained to ensure exposure of the process fluid to the inactivation conditions for a set time is evaluated. This work demonstrates the feasibility of transitioning from a traditional batch inactivation process to a fully continuous process enabling the development of a fully continuous downstream process for monoclonal antibodies.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/biot.201700718
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2045271196</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2045271196</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3458-617fd1e15454633cc835dd0cc10aa3e182c6595003ab1366496b6ca214ce8ad93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1OwzAUhS0EoqWwMqKMLCm-sWMnI62gRKroUlgtx3GQUeoUOwG68Qg8I09CSkoZme6PvnuuzkHoHPAYMI6uclM34wgDx5hDcoCGkDAccgL0cNczzpIBOvH-GWMaE0yP0SBKeco5Z0OUTWvbGNvWrQ8y-_XxOTdWB4_G_cxSNeZVNqa2QVm74F6_N8FMW-363cTUa1cr7b2xT6foqJSV12e7OkIPtzfL6V04X8yy6fU8VITGSciAlwVoiGlMGSFKJSQuCqwUYCmJhiRSLE5jjInMgTBGU5YzJSOgSieySMkIXfa63euXVvtGrIxXuqqk1Z0LEXUuIw6Qsg4d96hytfdOl2LtzEq6jQAstvGJbXxiH193cLHTbvOVLvb4b14dkPbAm6n05h85MckWyz_xb9lbfO4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2045271196</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Continuous In‐Line Virus Inactivation for Next Generation Bioprocessing</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Gillespie, Christopher ; Holstein, Melissa ; Mullin, Lori ; Cotoni, Kristen ; Tuccelli, Ronald ; Caulmare, John ; Greenhalgh, Patricia</creator><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, Christopher ; Holstein, Melissa ; Mullin, Lori ; Cotoni, Kristen ; Tuccelli, Ronald ; Caulmare, John ; Greenhalgh, Patricia</creatorcontrib><description>Viral inactivation plays a critical role in assuring the safety of monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics. Traditional viral inactivation involves large holding tanks in which product is maintained at a target low pH for a defined hold time, typically 30–60 min. The drive toward continuous processing and improved facility utilization has provided motivation for development of a continuous viral inactivation process. To this end, a lab‐scale prototype viral inactivation system was designed, built, and characterized. Multiple incubation chamber designs are evaluated to identify the optimal design that enables narrow residence time distributions in continuous flow systems. Extensive analysis is conducted supporting rapid low pH viral inactivation and included evaluations with multiple viruses, a range of pH levels, buffer compositions, mAb concentrations, and temperatures. Multiple test conditions are evaluated using the in‐line system and results compared to traditional batch‐mode viral inactivation. Comparability in kinetics of virus inactivation suggests equivalency between the two approaches. Virus clearance in monoclonal antibody processing is critical, where an inactivation step contributes significantly to the overall viral reduction in a process. In this work, the transition of the low pH viral inactivation step from a batch process to a continuous flow process that requires control of two critical pieces, namely virus inactivation kinetics, which were evaluated as a function of different solution conditions, and the incubation chamber, where conditions are maintained to ensure exposure of the process fluid to the inactivation conditions for a set time is evaluated. This work demonstrates the feasibility of transitioning from a traditional batch inactivation process to a fully continuous process enabling the development of a fully continuous downstream process for monoclonal antibodies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1860-6768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1860-7314</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/biot.201700718</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29797776</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>continuous ; inactivation ; incubation chamber ; kinetics ; virus</subject><ispartof>Biotechnology journal, 2019-02, Vol.14 (2), p.e1700718-n/a</ispartof><rights>2018 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><rights>2018 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3458-617fd1e15454633cc835dd0cc10aa3e182c6595003ab1366496b6ca214ce8ad93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3458-617fd1e15454633cc835dd0cc10aa3e182c6595003ab1366496b6ca214ce8ad93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbiot.201700718$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbiot.201700718$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29797776$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holstein, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullin, Lori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotoni, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuccelli, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caulmare, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenhalgh, Patricia</creatorcontrib><title>Continuous In‐Line Virus Inactivation for Next Generation Bioprocessing</title><title>Biotechnology journal</title><addtitle>Biotechnol J</addtitle><description>Viral inactivation plays a critical role in assuring the safety of monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics. Traditional viral inactivation involves large holding tanks in which product is maintained at a target low pH for a defined hold time, typically 30–60 min. The drive toward continuous processing and improved facility utilization has provided motivation for development of a continuous viral inactivation process. To this end, a lab‐scale prototype viral inactivation system was designed, built, and characterized. Multiple incubation chamber designs are evaluated to identify the optimal design that enables narrow residence time distributions in continuous flow systems. Extensive analysis is conducted supporting rapid low pH viral inactivation and included evaluations with multiple viruses, a range of pH levels, buffer compositions, mAb concentrations, and temperatures. Multiple test conditions are evaluated using the in‐line system and results compared to traditional batch‐mode viral inactivation. Comparability in kinetics of virus inactivation suggests equivalency between the two approaches. Virus clearance in monoclonal antibody processing is critical, where an inactivation step contributes significantly to the overall viral reduction in a process. In this work, the transition of the low pH viral inactivation step from a batch process to a continuous flow process that requires control of two critical pieces, namely virus inactivation kinetics, which were evaluated as a function of different solution conditions, and the incubation chamber, where conditions are maintained to ensure exposure of the process fluid to the inactivation conditions for a set time is evaluated. This work demonstrates the feasibility of transitioning from a traditional batch inactivation process to a fully continuous process enabling the development of a fully continuous downstream process for monoclonal antibodies.</description><subject>continuous</subject><subject>inactivation</subject><subject>incubation chamber</subject><subject>kinetics</subject><subject>virus</subject><issn>1860-6768</issn><issn>1860-7314</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkL1OwzAUhS0EoqWwMqKMLCm-sWMnI62gRKroUlgtx3GQUeoUOwG68Qg8I09CSkoZme6PvnuuzkHoHPAYMI6uclM34wgDx5hDcoCGkDAccgL0cNczzpIBOvH-GWMaE0yP0SBKeco5Z0OUTWvbGNvWrQ8y-_XxOTdWB4_G_cxSNeZVNqa2QVm74F6_N8FMW-363cTUa1cr7b2xT6foqJSV12e7OkIPtzfL6V04X8yy6fU8VITGSciAlwVoiGlMGSFKJSQuCqwUYCmJhiRSLE5jjInMgTBGU5YzJSOgSieySMkIXfa63euXVvtGrIxXuqqk1Z0LEXUuIw6Qsg4d96hytfdOl2LtzEq6jQAstvGJbXxiH193cLHTbvOVLvb4b14dkPbAm6n05h85MckWyz_xb9lbfO4</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Gillespie, Christopher</creator><creator>Holstein, Melissa</creator><creator>Mullin, Lori</creator><creator>Cotoni, Kristen</creator><creator>Tuccelli, Ronald</creator><creator>Caulmare, John</creator><creator>Greenhalgh, Patricia</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Continuous In‐Line Virus Inactivation for Next Generation Bioprocessing</title><author>Gillespie, Christopher ; Holstein, Melissa ; Mullin, Lori ; Cotoni, Kristen ; Tuccelli, Ronald ; Caulmare, John ; Greenhalgh, Patricia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3458-617fd1e15454633cc835dd0cc10aa3e182c6595003ab1366496b6ca214ce8ad93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>continuous</topic><topic>inactivation</topic><topic>incubation chamber</topic><topic>kinetics</topic><topic>virus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holstein, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullin, Lori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotoni, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuccelli, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caulmare, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenhalgh, Patricia</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biotechnology journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gillespie, Christopher</au><au>Holstein, Melissa</au><au>Mullin, Lori</au><au>Cotoni, Kristen</au><au>Tuccelli, Ronald</au><au>Caulmare, John</au><au>Greenhalgh, Patricia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Continuous In‐Line Virus Inactivation for Next Generation Bioprocessing</atitle><jtitle>Biotechnology journal</jtitle><addtitle>Biotechnol J</addtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e1700718</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e1700718-n/a</pages><issn>1860-6768</issn><eissn>1860-7314</eissn><abstract>Viral inactivation plays a critical role in assuring the safety of monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics. Traditional viral inactivation involves large holding tanks in which product is maintained at a target low pH for a defined hold time, typically 30–60 min. The drive toward continuous processing and improved facility utilization has provided motivation for development of a continuous viral inactivation process. To this end, a lab‐scale prototype viral inactivation system was designed, built, and characterized. Multiple incubation chamber designs are evaluated to identify the optimal design that enables narrow residence time distributions in continuous flow systems. Extensive analysis is conducted supporting rapid low pH viral inactivation and included evaluations with multiple viruses, a range of pH levels, buffer compositions, mAb concentrations, and temperatures. Multiple test conditions are evaluated using the in‐line system and results compared to traditional batch‐mode viral inactivation. Comparability in kinetics of virus inactivation suggests equivalency between the two approaches. Virus clearance in monoclonal antibody processing is critical, where an inactivation step contributes significantly to the overall viral reduction in a process. In this work, the transition of the low pH viral inactivation step from a batch process to a continuous flow process that requires control of two critical pieces, namely virus inactivation kinetics, which were evaluated as a function of different solution conditions, and the incubation chamber, where conditions are maintained to ensure exposure of the process fluid to the inactivation conditions for a set time is evaluated. This work demonstrates the feasibility of transitioning from a traditional batch inactivation process to a fully continuous process enabling the development of a fully continuous downstream process for monoclonal antibodies.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>29797776</pmid><doi>10.1002/biot.201700718</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1860-6768
ispartof Biotechnology journal, 2019-02, Vol.14 (2), p.e1700718-n/a
issn 1860-6768
1860-7314
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2045271196
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects continuous
inactivation
incubation chamber
kinetics
virus
title Continuous In‐Line Virus Inactivation for Next Generation Bioprocessing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T16%3A36%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Continuous%20In%E2%80%90Line%20Virus%20Inactivation%20for%20Next%20Generation%20Bioprocessing&rft.jtitle=Biotechnology%20journal&rft.au=Gillespie,%20Christopher&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e1700718&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e1700718-n/a&rft.issn=1860-6768&rft.eissn=1860-7314&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/biot.201700718&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2045271196%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2045271196&rft_id=info:pmid/29797776&rfr_iscdi=true