Conservation subdivisions: A wildlife perspective
Conservation subdivision is a design concept used by landscape architects and other built environment professionals to conserve wildlife habitat within growing communities. The idea is by clustering homes together to maximize open space, one can conserve urban biodiversity. It is a popular concept u...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Landscape and urban planning 2009-04, Vol.90 (3), p.95-101 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 101 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 95 |
container_title | Landscape and urban planning |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Hostetler, Mark Drake, David |
description | Conservation subdivision is a design concept used by landscape architects and other built environment professionals to conserve wildlife habitat within growing communities. The idea is by clustering homes together to maximize open space, one can conserve urban biodiversity. It is a popular concept used by many planners and landscape architects and is used in many municipalities as an alternative to conventional urban development. In this review paper, we systematically review Randall Arendt's book,
Conservation Design for Subdivisions: A Practical Guide to Creating Open Space Networks, which has championed the conservation design concept. Through this review and our experiences with how the conservation design concept has been applied, we provide suggestions that will (1) maximize the potential of conservation subdivisions to conserve wildlife and their habitats, and (2) promote positive wildlife experiences for residents of conservation subdivisions. We found several recommended design elements that could negatively impact wildlife but of significance, we found that most guidelines and effort in conservation subdivisions are placed on the design phase: construction and post-construction phases are neglected. We discuss the social and ecological elements that warrant consideration during the construction and post-construction phases and how they are necessary in order to conserve functional wildlife habitat within a conservation subdivision. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20441979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169204608001825</els_id><sourcerecordid>20441979</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-55ec36dca6c0c8f6adc73f5f2b0b79c3035813c5b4ca8d26e9851759967033c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-h3rQW2s-mjTxthS_YMGLnkM6SSFLt61JW_Hfm2VFPHqaMHlmhvdB6JrggmAi7nZFZ3o7h2ZMtaAYy9QvMJEnaEVkRXOBBT1Fq8SqnOJSnKOLGHcYY8IFWSFSD310YTGTH_oszo31i4_pHe-zTfbpO9v51mWjC3F0MPnFXaKz1nTRXf3UNXp_fHirn_Pt69NLvdnmwCSdcs4dMGHBCMAgW2EsVKzlLW1wUylgmHFJGPCmBCMtFU5JTiqulKgwYyDZGt0e945h-JhdnPTeR3BdyumGOeoUpiSqUglURxDCEGNwrR6D35vwpQnWB0l6p_9I0gdJh68kKc3e_BwxEUzXBtODj78LKGFlyfmBq4-cS4kX74KO4F0PzvqQtGg7-H9c-wYZEoMY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20441979</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conservation subdivisions: A wildlife perspective</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hostetler, Mark ; Drake, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Hostetler, Mark ; Drake, David</creatorcontrib><description>Conservation subdivision is a design concept used by landscape architects and other built environment professionals to conserve wildlife habitat within growing communities. The idea is by clustering homes together to maximize open space, one can conserve urban biodiversity. It is a popular concept used by many planners and landscape architects and is used in many municipalities as an alternative to conventional urban development. In this review paper, we systematically review Randall Arendt's book,
Conservation Design for Subdivisions: A Practical Guide to Creating Open Space Networks, which has championed the conservation design concept. Through this review and our experiences with how the conservation design concept has been applied, we provide suggestions that will (1) maximize the potential of conservation subdivisions to conserve wildlife and their habitats, and (2) promote positive wildlife experiences for residents of conservation subdivisions. We found several recommended design elements that could negatively impact wildlife but of significance, we found that most guidelines and effort in conservation subdivisions are placed on the design phase: construction and post-construction phases are neglected. We discuss the social and ecological elements that warrant consideration during the construction and post-construction phases and how they are necessary in order to conserve functional wildlife habitat within a conservation subdivision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-2046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6062</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.018</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LUPLEZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation subdivision ; Environment and sustainable development ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping ; General agronomy. Plant production ; General aspects ; Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development ; Landscaping ; Sustainable development ; Urban biodiversity ; Urban ecology ; Urban wildlife</subject><ispartof>Landscape and urban planning, 2009-04, Vol.90 (3), p.95-101</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-55ec36dca6c0c8f6adc73f5f2b0b79c3035813c5b4ca8d26e9851759967033c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-55ec36dca6c0c8f6adc73f5f2b0b79c3035813c5b4ca8d26e9851759967033c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204608001825$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21344558$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hostetler, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drake, David</creatorcontrib><title>Conservation subdivisions: A wildlife perspective</title><title>Landscape and urban planning</title><description>Conservation subdivision is a design concept used by landscape architects and other built environment professionals to conserve wildlife habitat within growing communities. The idea is by clustering homes together to maximize open space, one can conserve urban biodiversity. It is a popular concept used by many planners and landscape architects and is used in many municipalities as an alternative to conventional urban development. In this review paper, we systematically review Randall Arendt's book,
Conservation Design for Subdivisions: A Practical Guide to Creating Open Space Networks, which has championed the conservation design concept. Through this review and our experiences with how the conservation design concept has been applied, we provide suggestions that will (1) maximize the potential of conservation subdivisions to conserve wildlife and their habitats, and (2) promote positive wildlife experiences for residents of conservation subdivisions. We found several recommended design elements that could negatively impact wildlife but of significance, we found that most guidelines and effort in conservation subdivisions are placed on the design phase: construction and post-construction phases are neglected. We discuss the social and ecological elements that warrant consideration during the construction and post-construction phases and how they are necessary in order to conserve functional wildlife habitat within a conservation subdivision.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation subdivision</subject><subject>Environment and sustainable development</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</subject><subject>Landscaping</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Urban biodiversity</subject><subject>Urban ecology</subject><subject>Urban wildlife</subject><issn>0169-2046</issn><issn>1872-6062</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-h3rQW2s-mjTxthS_YMGLnkM6SSFLt61JW_Hfm2VFPHqaMHlmhvdB6JrggmAi7nZFZ3o7h2ZMtaAYy9QvMJEnaEVkRXOBBT1Fq8SqnOJSnKOLGHcYY8IFWSFSD310YTGTH_oszo31i4_pHe-zTfbpO9v51mWjC3F0MPnFXaKz1nTRXf3UNXp_fHirn_Pt69NLvdnmwCSdcs4dMGHBCMAgW2EsVKzlLW1wUylgmHFJGPCmBCMtFU5JTiqulKgwYyDZGt0e945h-JhdnPTeR3BdyumGOeoUpiSqUglURxDCEGNwrR6D35vwpQnWB0l6p_9I0gdJh68kKc3e_BwxEUzXBtODj78LKGFlyfmBq4-cS4kX74KO4F0PzvqQtGg7-H9c-wYZEoMY</recordid><startdate>20090430</startdate><enddate>20090430</enddate><creator>Hostetler, Mark</creator><creator>Drake, David</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090430</creationdate><title>Conservation subdivisions: A wildlife perspective</title><author>Hostetler, Mark ; Drake, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-55ec36dca6c0c8f6adc73f5f2b0b79c3035813c5b4ca8d26e9851759967033c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation subdivision</topic><topic>Environment and sustainable development</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</topic><topic>Landscaping</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Urban biodiversity</topic><topic>Urban ecology</topic><topic>Urban wildlife</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hostetler, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drake, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Landscape and urban planning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hostetler, Mark</au><au>Drake, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conservation subdivisions: A wildlife perspective</atitle><jtitle>Landscape and urban planning</jtitle><date>2009-04-30</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>95-101</pages><issn>0169-2046</issn><eissn>1872-6062</eissn><coden>LUPLEZ</coden><abstract>Conservation subdivision is a design concept used by landscape architects and other built environment professionals to conserve wildlife habitat within growing communities. The idea is by clustering homes together to maximize open space, one can conserve urban biodiversity. It is a popular concept used by many planners and landscape architects and is used in many municipalities as an alternative to conventional urban development. In this review paper, we systematically review Randall Arendt's book,
Conservation Design for Subdivisions: A Practical Guide to Creating Open Space Networks, which has championed the conservation design concept. Through this review and our experiences with how the conservation design concept has been applied, we provide suggestions that will (1) maximize the potential of conservation subdivisions to conserve wildlife and their habitats, and (2) promote positive wildlife experiences for residents of conservation subdivisions. We found several recommended design elements that could negatively impact wildlife but of significance, we found that most guidelines and effort in conservation subdivisions are placed on the design phase: construction and post-construction phases are neglected. We discuss the social and ecological elements that warrant consideration during the construction and post-construction phases and how they are necessary in order to conserve functional wildlife habitat within a conservation subdivision.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.018</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0169-2046 |
ispartof | Landscape and urban planning, 2009-04, Vol.90 (3), p.95-101 |
issn | 0169-2046 1872-6062 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20441979 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences Conservation subdivision Environment and sustainable development Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping General agronomy. Plant production General aspects Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development Landscaping Sustainable development Urban biodiversity Urban ecology Urban wildlife |
title | Conservation subdivisions: A wildlife perspective |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A00%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conservation%20subdivisions:%20A%20wildlife%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20and%20urban%20planning&rft.au=Hostetler,%20Mark&rft.date=2009-04-30&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=95-101&rft.issn=0169-2046&rft.eissn=1872-6062&rft.coden=LUPLEZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20441979%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20441979&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0169204608001825&rfr_iscdi=true |