Mate Choice Near or Far

When strong positive heritability of fitness arises due to host-parasite coevolution, consequent sosigonic mate preference undermines monogamy through tendencies to extra-pair copulation. “Low” females bonded to “low” males try to parasitise their partnership by obtaining fertilization, surreptitiou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American zoologist 1990-01, Vol.30 (2), p.341-352
1. Verfasser: Hamilton, William D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 352
container_issue 2
container_start_page 341
container_title American zoologist
container_volume 30
creator Hamilton, William D.
description When strong positive heritability of fitness arises due to host-parasite coevolution, consequent sosigonic mate preference undermines monogamy through tendencies to extra-pair copulation. “Low” females bonded to “low” males try to parasitise their partnership by obtaining fertilization, surreptitiously if possible, from “high” males: correspondingly, in the case of birds, “Low” males may parasite by encouraging egg dumping in their nests by “high” females who have allowed copulation. It follows that nests of birds of low status should sometimes show evidence at times of both types of parasitism while nests of high status should show faithful monogamy. Rather differently from the argument in Hamilton and Zuk (1982), showiness in monogamous species is more likely to be related to such extra-pair objectives than to pair—bonding for nesting. Venereal disease makes males cautious about copulating with any female. Although prevented by true monogamy, when monogamy is partial, venereal disease may become the incentive for increasing female sexual advertisement. In extreme cases it may combine with other ecological factors to initiate sex role reversal, in which the female becomes the non-parenting sex of the species. As regards source of the heritability that backs the sosigonic selection assumed in such speculations, reasons are given for preferring a coevolutionary cycling of ancient, preserved, parasite-defense alleles to the alternatives of an abundant stream of good new defense mutations, or a process of elimination of purely deleterious mutations.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/icb/30.2.341
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20438290</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3883605</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3883605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-8c038ef0af2fadac0770ba86d0d0c2c38a603cbce29712cc94f864b8b5a296b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqTfDioXjw5LaTzG4-jlKtVWoVrCheQjbN4ta2W5Mt6L83ZaUHL55m4H0YmJeQYwpdCgp7pc17CF3WxZTukBbNMpEIYLi72VOIO8d9chDCDCCGQFvk5N7UrtN_r0rrOmNnfKfynYHxh2SvMPPgjn5nmzwPrif9YTJ6uLntX44Sm0pVJ9ICSleAKVhhpsaCEJAbyacwBcssSsMBbW4dU4Iya1VaSJ7mMs8MUzyX2Cbnzd2Vrz7XLtR6UQbr5nOzdNU6aAYpSqbgX0gzRRlXIsKzP3BWrf0yPqEZzYTiSvGILhpkfRWCd4Ve-XJh_LemoDdd6tilRtBMxy4jP234LNSV31qUEjlkMU6auAy1-9rGxn9oLlBkevj6pseTO3h5fLrSiD_f-3yd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215796996</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mate Choice Near or Far</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Hamilton, William D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, William D.</creatorcontrib><description>When strong positive heritability of fitness arises due to host-parasite coevolution, consequent sosigonic mate preference undermines monogamy through tendencies to extra-pair copulation. “Low” females bonded to “low” males try to parasitise their partnership by obtaining fertilization, surreptitiously if possible, from “high” males: correspondingly, in the case of birds, “Low” males may parasite by encouraging egg dumping in their nests by “high” females who have allowed copulation. It follows that nests of birds of low status should sometimes show evidence at times of both types of parasitism while nests of high status should show faithful monogamy. Rather differently from the argument in Hamilton and Zuk (1982), showiness in monogamous species is more likely to be related to such extra-pair objectives than to pair—bonding for nesting. Venereal disease makes males cautious about copulating with any female. Although prevented by true monogamy, when monogamy is partial, venereal disease may become the incentive for increasing female sexual advertisement. In extreme cases it may combine with other ecological factors to initiate sex role reversal, in which the female becomes the non-parenting sex of the species. As regards source of the heritability that backs the sosigonic selection assumed in such speculations, reasons are given for preferring a coevolutionary cycling of ancient, preserved, parasite-defense alleles to the alternatives of an abundant stream of good new defense mutations, or a process of elimination of purely deleterious mutations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1540-7063</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1569</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-7023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/icb/30.2.341</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMZOAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Bird nesting ; Birds ; Ecological genetics ; Female animals ; Genetic mutation ; Male animals ; Mating behavior ; Parasite hosts ; Parasites ; Parasites and Sexual Selection ; Sexual behavior ; Sexual selection</subject><ispartof>American zoologist, 1990-01, Vol.30 (2), p.341-352</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1990 The American Society of Zoologists</rights><rights>Copyright Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology 1990</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-8c038ef0af2fadac0770ba86d0d0c2c38a603cbce29712cc94f864b8b5a296b83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3883605$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3883605$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, William D.</creatorcontrib><title>Mate Choice Near or Far</title><title>American zoologist</title><description>When strong positive heritability of fitness arises due to host-parasite coevolution, consequent sosigonic mate preference undermines monogamy through tendencies to extra-pair copulation. “Low” females bonded to “low” males try to parasitise their partnership by obtaining fertilization, surreptitiously if possible, from “high” males: correspondingly, in the case of birds, “Low” males may parasite by encouraging egg dumping in their nests by “high” females who have allowed copulation. It follows that nests of birds of low status should sometimes show evidence at times of both types of parasitism while nests of high status should show faithful monogamy. Rather differently from the argument in Hamilton and Zuk (1982), showiness in monogamous species is more likely to be related to such extra-pair objectives than to pair—bonding for nesting. Venereal disease makes males cautious about copulating with any female. Although prevented by true monogamy, when monogamy is partial, venereal disease may become the incentive for increasing female sexual advertisement. In extreme cases it may combine with other ecological factors to initiate sex role reversal, in which the female becomes the non-parenting sex of the species. As regards source of the heritability that backs the sosigonic selection assumed in such speculations, reasons are given for preferring a coevolutionary cycling of ancient, preserved, parasite-defense alleles to the alternatives of an abundant stream of good new defense mutations, or a process of elimination of purely deleterious mutations.</description><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Ecological genetics</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Genetic mutation</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Parasite hosts</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Parasites and Sexual Selection</subject><subject>Sexual behavior</subject><subject>Sexual selection</subject><issn>1540-7063</issn><issn>0003-1569</issn><issn>1557-7023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqTfDioXjw5LaTzG4-jlKtVWoVrCheQjbN4ta2W5Mt6L83ZaUHL55m4H0YmJeQYwpdCgp7pc17CF3WxZTukBbNMpEIYLi72VOIO8d9chDCDCCGQFvk5N7UrtN_r0rrOmNnfKfynYHxh2SvMPPgjn5nmzwPrif9YTJ6uLntX44Sm0pVJ9ICSleAKVhhpsaCEJAbyacwBcssSsMBbW4dU4Iya1VaSJ7mMs8MUzyX2Cbnzd2Vrz7XLtR6UQbr5nOzdNU6aAYpSqbgX0gzRRlXIsKzP3BWrf0yPqEZzYTiSvGILhpkfRWCd4Ve-XJh_LemoDdd6tilRtBMxy4jP234LNSV31qUEjlkMU6auAy1-9rGxn9oLlBkevj6pseTO3h5fLrSiD_f-3yd</recordid><startdate>19900101</startdate><enddate>19900101</enddate><creator>Hamilton, William D.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>American Society of Zoologists</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900101</creationdate><title>Mate Choice Near or Far</title><author>Hamilton, William D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-8c038ef0af2fadac0770ba86d0d0c2c38a603cbce29712cc94f864b8b5a296b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Ecological genetics</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Genetic mutation</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Parasite hosts</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Parasites and Sexual Selection</topic><topic>Sexual behavior</topic><topic>Sexual selection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, William D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>American zoologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamilton, William D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mate Choice Near or Far</atitle><jtitle>American zoologist</jtitle><date>1990-01-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>341</spage><epage>352</epage><pages>341-352</pages><issn>1540-7063</issn><issn>0003-1569</issn><eissn>1557-7023</eissn><coden>AMZOAF</coden><abstract>When strong positive heritability of fitness arises due to host-parasite coevolution, consequent sosigonic mate preference undermines monogamy through tendencies to extra-pair copulation. “Low” females bonded to “low” males try to parasitise their partnership by obtaining fertilization, surreptitiously if possible, from “high” males: correspondingly, in the case of birds, “Low” males may parasite by encouraging egg dumping in their nests by “high” females who have allowed copulation. It follows that nests of birds of low status should sometimes show evidence at times of both types of parasitism while nests of high status should show faithful monogamy. Rather differently from the argument in Hamilton and Zuk (1982), showiness in monogamous species is more likely to be related to such extra-pair objectives than to pair—bonding for nesting. Venereal disease makes males cautious about copulating with any female. Although prevented by true monogamy, when monogamy is partial, venereal disease may become the incentive for increasing female sexual advertisement. In extreme cases it may combine with other ecological factors to initiate sex role reversal, in which the female becomes the non-parenting sex of the species. As regards source of the heritability that backs the sosigonic selection assumed in such speculations, reasons are given for preferring a coevolutionary cycling of ancient, preserved, parasite-defense alleles to the alternatives of an abundant stream of good new defense mutations, or a process of elimination of purely deleterious mutations.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/icb/30.2.341</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1540-7063
ispartof American zoologist, 1990-01, Vol.30 (2), p.341-352
issn 1540-7063
0003-1569
1557-7023
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20438290
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Bird nesting
Birds
Ecological genetics
Female animals
Genetic mutation
Male animals
Mating behavior
Parasite hosts
Parasites
Parasites and Sexual Selection
Sexual behavior
Sexual selection
title Mate Choice Near or Far
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T13%3A11%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mate%20Choice%20Near%20or%20Far&rft.jtitle=American%20zoologist&rft.au=Hamilton,%20William%20D.&rft.date=1990-01-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=341&rft.epage=352&rft.pages=341-352&rft.issn=1540-7063&rft.eissn=1557-7023&rft.coden=AMZOAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/icb/30.2.341&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3883605%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215796996&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3883605&rfr_iscdi=true