Mate Choice Near or Far
When strong positive heritability of fitness arises due to host-parasite coevolution, consequent sosigonic mate preference undermines monogamy through tendencies to extra-pair copulation. “Low” females bonded to “low” males try to parasitise their partnership by obtaining fertilization, surreptitiou...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American zoologist 1990-01, Vol.30 (2), p.341-352 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 352 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 341 |
container_title | American zoologist |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Hamilton, William D. |
description | When strong positive heritability of fitness arises due to host-parasite coevolution, consequent sosigonic mate preference undermines monogamy through tendencies to extra-pair copulation. “Low” females bonded to “low” males try to parasitise their partnership by obtaining fertilization, surreptitiously if possible, from “high” males: correspondingly, in the case of birds, “Low” males may parasite by encouraging egg dumping in their nests by “high” females who have allowed copulation. It follows that nests of birds of low status should sometimes show evidence at times of both types of parasitism while nests of high status should show faithful monogamy. Rather differently from the argument in Hamilton and Zuk (1982), showiness in monogamous species is more likely to be related to such extra-pair objectives than to pair—bonding for nesting. Venereal disease makes males cautious about copulating with any female. Although prevented by true monogamy, when monogamy is partial, venereal disease may become the incentive for increasing female sexual advertisement. In extreme cases it may combine with other ecological factors to initiate sex role reversal, in which the female becomes the non-parenting sex of the species. As regards source of the heritability that backs the sosigonic selection assumed in such speculations, reasons are given for preferring a coevolutionary cycling of ancient, preserved, parasite-defense alleles to the alternatives of an abundant stream of good new defense mutations, or a process of elimination of purely deleterious mutations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/icb/30.2.341 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20438290</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3883605</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3883605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-8c038ef0af2fadac0770ba86d0d0c2c38a603cbce29712cc94f864b8b5a296b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqTfDioXjw5LaTzG4-jlKtVWoVrCheQjbN4ta2W5Mt6L83ZaUHL55m4H0YmJeQYwpdCgp7pc17CF3WxZTukBbNMpEIYLi72VOIO8d9chDCDCCGQFvk5N7UrtN_r0rrOmNnfKfynYHxh2SvMPPgjn5nmzwPrif9YTJ6uLntX44Sm0pVJ9ICSleAKVhhpsaCEJAbyacwBcssSsMBbW4dU4Iya1VaSJ7mMs8MUzyX2Cbnzd2Vrz7XLtR6UQbr5nOzdNU6aAYpSqbgX0gzRRlXIsKzP3BWrf0yPqEZzYTiSvGILhpkfRWCd4Ve-XJh_LemoDdd6tilRtBMxy4jP234LNSV31qUEjlkMU6auAy1-9rGxn9oLlBkevj6pseTO3h5fLrSiD_f-3yd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215796996</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mate Choice Near or Far</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Hamilton, William D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, William D.</creatorcontrib><description>When strong positive heritability of fitness arises due to host-parasite coevolution, consequent sosigonic mate preference undermines monogamy through tendencies to extra-pair copulation. “Low” females bonded to “low” males try to parasitise their partnership by obtaining fertilization, surreptitiously if possible, from “high” males: correspondingly, in the case of birds, “Low” males may parasite by encouraging egg dumping in their nests by “high” females who have allowed copulation. It follows that nests of birds of low status should sometimes show evidence at times of both types of parasitism while nests of high status should show faithful monogamy. Rather differently from the argument in Hamilton and Zuk (1982), showiness in monogamous species is more likely to be related to such extra-pair objectives than to pair—bonding for nesting. Venereal disease makes males cautious about copulating with any female. Although prevented by true monogamy, when monogamy is partial, venereal disease may become the incentive for increasing female sexual advertisement. In extreme cases it may combine with other ecological factors to initiate sex role reversal, in which the female becomes the non-parenting sex of the species. As regards source of the heritability that backs the sosigonic selection assumed in such speculations, reasons are given for preferring a coevolutionary cycling of ancient, preserved, parasite-defense alleles to the alternatives of an abundant stream of good new defense mutations, or a process of elimination of purely deleterious mutations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1540-7063</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1569</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-7023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/icb/30.2.341</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMZOAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Bird nesting ; Birds ; Ecological genetics ; Female animals ; Genetic mutation ; Male animals ; Mating behavior ; Parasite hosts ; Parasites ; Parasites and Sexual Selection ; Sexual behavior ; Sexual selection</subject><ispartof>American zoologist, 1990-01, Vol.30 (2), p.341-352</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1990 The American Society of Zoologists</rights><rights>Copyright Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology 1990</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-8c038ef0af2fadac0770ba86d0d0c2c38a603cbce29712cc94f864b8b5a296b83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3883605$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3883605$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, William D.</creatorcontrib><title>Mate Choice Near or Far</title><title>American zoologist</title><description>When strong positive heritability of fitness arises due to host-parasite coevolution, consequent sosigonic mate preference undermines monogamy through tendencies to extra-pair copulation. “Low” females bonded to “low” males try to parasitise their partnership by obtaining fertilization, surreptitiously if possible, from “high” males: correspondingly, in the case of birds, “Low” males may parasite by encouraging egg dumping in their nests by “high” females who have allowed copulation. It follows that nests of birds of low status should sometimes show evidence at times of both types of parasitism while nests of high status should show faithful monogamy. Rather differently from the argument in Hamilton and Zuk (1982), showiness in monogamous species is more likely to be related to such extra-pair objectives than to pair—bonding for nesting. Venereal disease makes males cautious about copulating with any female. Although prevented by true monogamy, when monogamy is partial, venereal disease may become the incentive for increasing female sexual advertisement. In extreme cases it may combine with other ecological factors to initiate sex role reversal, in which the female becomes the non-parenting sex of the species. As regards source of the heritability that backs the sosigonic selection assumed in such speculations, reasons are given for preferring a coevolutionary cycling of ancient, preserved, parasite-defense alleles to the alternatives of an abundant stream of good new defense mutations, or a process of elimination of purely deleterious mutations.</description><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Ecological genetics</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Genetic mutation</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Parasite hosts</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Parasites and Sexual Selection</subject><subject>Sexual behavior</subject><subject>Sexual selection</subject><issn>1540-7063</issn><issn>0003-1569</issn><issn>1557-7023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqTfDioXjw5LaTzG4-jlKtVWoVrCheQjbN4ta2W5Mt6L83ZaUHL55m4H0YmJeQYwpdCgp7pc17CF3WxZTukBbNMpEIYLi72VOIO8d9chDCDCCGQFvk5N7UrtN_r0rrOmNnfKfynYHxh2SvMPPgjn5nmzwPrif9YTJ6uLntX44Sm0pVJ9ICSleAKVhhpsaCEJAbyacwBcssSsMBbW4dU4Iya1VaSJ7mMs8MUzyX2Cbnzd2Vrz7XLtR6UQbr5nOzdNU6aAYpSqbgX0gzRRlXIsKzP3BWrf0yPqEZzYTiSvGILhpkfRWCd4Ve-XJh_LemoDdd6tilRtBMxy4jP234LNSV31qUEjlkMU6auAy1-9rGxn9oLlBkevj6pseTO3h5fLrSiD_f-3yd</recordid><startdate>19900101</startdate><enddate>19900101</enddate><creator>Hamilton, William D.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>American Society of Zoologists</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900101</creationdate><title>Mate Choice Near or Far</title><author>Hamilton, William D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-8c038ef0af2fadac0770ba86d0d0c2c38a603cbce29712cc94f864b8b5a296b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Ecological genetics</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Genetic mutation</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Parasite hosts</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Parasites and Sexual Selection</topic><topic>Sexual behavior</topic><topic>Sexual selection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, William D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>American zoologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamilton, William D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mate Choice Near or Far</atitle><jtitle>American zoologist</jtitle><date>1990-01-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>341</spage><epage>352</epage><pages>341-352</pages><issn>1540-7063</issn><issn>0003-1569</issn><eissn>1557-7023</eissn><coden>AMZOAF</coden><abstract>When strong positive heritability of fitness arises due to host-parasite coevolution, consequent sosigonic mate preference undermines monogamy through tendencies to extra-pair copulation. “Low” females bonded to “low” males try to parasitise their partnership by obtaining fertilization, surreptitiously if possible, from “high” males: correspondingly, in the case of birds, “Low” males may parasite by encouraging egg dumping in their nests by “high” females who have allowed copulation. It follows that nests of birds of low status should sometimes show evidence at times of both types of parasitism while nests of high status should show faithful monogamy. Rather differently from the argument in Hamilton and Zuk (1982), showiness in monogamous species is more likely to be related to such extra-pair objectives than to pair—bonding for nesting. Venereal disease makes males cautious about copulating with any female. Although prevented by true monogamy, when monogamy is partial, venereal disease may become the incentive for increasing female sexual advertisement. In extreme cases it may combine with other ecological factors to initiate sex role reversal, in which the female becomes the non-parenting sex of the species. As regards source of the heritability that backs the sosigonic selection assumed in such speculations, reasons are given for preferring a coevolutionary cycling of ancient, preserved, parasite-defense alleles to the alternatives of an abundant stream of good new defense mutations, or a process of elimination of purely deleterious mutations.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/icb/30.2.341</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1540-7063 |
ispartof | American zoologist, 1990-01, Vol.30 (2), p.341-352 |
issn | 1540-7063 0003-1569 1557-7023 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20438290 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Bird nesting Birds Ecological genetics Female animals Genetic mutation Male animals Mating behavior Parasite hosts Parasites Parasites and Sexual Selection Sexual behavior Sexual selection |
title | Mate Choice Near or Far |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T13%3A11%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mate%20Choice%20Near%20or%20Far&rft.jtitle=American%20zoologist&rft.au=Hamilton,%20William%20D.&rft.date=1990-01-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=341&rft.epage=352&rft.pages=341-352&rft.issn=1540-7063&rft.eissn=1557-7023&rft.coden=AMZOAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/icb/30.2.341&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3883605%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215796996&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3883605&rfr_iscdi=true |