The evolution of mutual ornamentation
Many conspicuous ornamental traits in animals are expressed in both males and females. Despite this, most research has focused on sexually dimorphic ornamentation. Mutual ornamentation has often been viewed as a result of either a nonadaptive genetic correlation between the sexes or similar selectio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Animal behaviour 2007-10, Vol.74 (4), p.657-677 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 677 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 657 |
container_title | Animal behaviour |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Kraaijeveld, Ken Kraaijeveld-Smit, Femmie J.L. Komdeur, Jan |
description | Many conspicuous ornamental traits in animals are expressed in both males and females. Despite this, most research has focused on sexually dimorphic ornamentation. Mutual ornamentation has often been viewed as a result of either a nonadaptive genetic correlation between the sexes or similar selection pressures in both sexes. Here, we review the theoretical underpinning and empirical evidence for these ideas. Few studies have attempted to test empirically whether a genetic correlation between the sexes can constrain the evolution of sexual dimorphism, and the results have been mixed. By contrast, there is good evidence that mutual ornaments can have a signal function in both sexes, especially in terms of mate choice. Other possible signalling functions have received little attention. Social status signalling is especially likely to be important, because competition over nonsexual resources is more balanced between the sexes than sexual competition. There is a need for experimental studies that explicitly test these hypotheses simultaneously in both sexes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.12.027 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20437449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003347207002540</els_id><sourcerecordid>20437449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-3643547fb459b239733bb1dad7f3192018a065ec9fc350895dde87c20ee1086f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_ghCEekuc_Ug2OYkUv6DgpZ6XzWZCN6TZupsU_PduaUHw4mmY4ZmZl4eQWwoZBVo8dJkeatzofcYAioyyDJg8IzMKVZ6WrGTnZAYAPOVCsktyFUIX2yKHfEYW6w0muHf9NFo3JK5NttM46T5xftBbHEZ9mF-Ti1b3AW9OdU4-X57Xy7d09fH6vnxapUYIMaa8EDwXsq1FXtWMV5LzuqaNbmTLacWAljq-RVO1hudQVnnTYCkNA0QKZdHyObk_3t159zVhGNXWBoN9rwd0U1AMBJdCVBG8-wN2boqJ-8gwETNQWUQoP0LGuxA8tmrn7Vb7b0VBHcypTp3MqYM5RZmK5uLe4nRcB6P71uvB2PC7XDFaSgmRezxyGJXsLXoVjMXBYGM9mlE1zv7z6QdJa4Q4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224547176</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The evolution of mutual ornamentation</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kraaijeveld, Ken ; Kraaijeveld-Smit, Femmie J.L. ; Komdeur, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kraaijeveld, Ken ; Kraaijeveld-Smit, Femmie J.L. ; Komdeur, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>Many conspicuous ornamental traits in animals are expressed in both males and females. Despite this, most research has focused on sexually dimorphic ornamentation. Mutual ornamentation has often been viewed as a result of either a nonadaptive genetic correlation between the sexes or similar selection pressures in both sexes. Here, we review the theoretical underpinning and empirical evidence for these ideas. Few studies have attempted to test empirically whether a genetic correlation between the sexes can constrain the evolution of sexual dimorphism, and the results have been mixed. By contrast, there is good evidence that mutual ornaments can have a signal function in both sexes, especially in terms of mate choice. Other possible signalling functions have received little attention. Social status signalling is especially likely to be important, because competition over nonsexual resources is more balanced between the sexes than sexual competition. There is a need for experimental studies that explicitly test these hypotheses simultaneously in both sexes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8282</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.12.027</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANBEA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kent: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal communication ; Animal ethology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Correlation analysis ; Evolution ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; genetic correlation ; Genetics ; meta-analysis ; mutual ornamentation ; mutual sexual selection ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Sexes ; social selection</subject><ispartof>Animal behaviour, 2007-10, Vol.74 (4), p.657-677</ispartof><rights>2007 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd. Oct 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-3643547fb459b239733bb1dad7f3192018a065ec9fc350895dde87c20ee1086f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-3643547fb459b239733bb1dad7f3192018a065ec9fc350895dde87c20ee1086f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.12.027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19218770$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kraaijeveld, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraaijeveld-Smit, Femmie J.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komdeur, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>The evolution of mutual ornamentation</title><title>Animal behaviour</title><description>Many conspicuous ornamental traits in animals are expressed in both males and females. Despite this, most research has focused on sexually dimorphic ornamentation. Mutual ornamentation has often been viewed as a result of either a nonadaptive genetic correlation between the sexes or similar selection pressures in both sexes. Here, we review the theoretical underpinning and empirical evidence for these ideas. Few studies have attempted to test empirically whether a genetic correlation between the sexes can constrain the evolution of sexual dimorphism, and the results have been mixed. By contrast, there is good evidence that mutual ornaments can have a signal function in both sexes, especially in terms of mate choice. Other possible signalling functions have received little attention. Social status signalling is especially likely to be important, because competition over nonsexual resources is more balanced between the sexes than sexual competition. There is a need for experimental studies that explicitly test these hypotheses simultaneously in both sexes.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal communication</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>genetic correlation</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>meta-analysis</subject><subject>mutual ornamentation</subject><subject>mutual sexual selection</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Sexes</subject><subject>social selection</subject><issn>0003-3472</issn><issn>1095-8282</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_ghCEekuc_Ug2OYkUv6DgpZ6XzWZCN6TZupsU_PduaUHw4mmY4ZmZl4eQWwoZBVo8dJkeatzofcYAioyyDJg8IzMKVZ6WrGTnZAYAPOVCsktyFUIX2yKHfEYW6w0muHf9NFo3JK5NttM46T5xftBbHEZ9mF-Ti1b3AW9OdU4-X57Xy7d09fH6vnxapUYIMaa8EDwXsq1FXtWMV5LzuqaNbmTLacWAljq-RVO1hudQVnnTYCkNA0QKZdHyObk_3t159zVhGNXWBoN9rwd0U1AMBJdCVBG8-wN2boqJ-8gwETNQWUQoP0LGuxA8tmrn7Vb7b0VBHcypTp3MqYM5RZmK5uLe4nRcB6P71uvB2PC7XDFaSgmRezxyGJXsLXoVjMXBYGM9mlE1zv7z6QdJa4Q4</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Kraaijeveld, Ken</creator><creator>Kraaijeveld-Smit, Femmie J.L.</creator><creator>Komdeur, Jan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>The evolution of mutual ornamentation</title><author>Kraaijeveld, Ken ; Kraaijeveld-Smit, Femmie J.L. ; Komdeur, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-3643547fb459b239733bb1dad7f3192018a065ec9fc350895dde87c20ee1086f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal communication</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>genetic correlation</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>meta-analysis</topic><topic>mutual ornamentation</topic><topic>mutual sexual selection</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Sexes</topic><topic>social selection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kraaijeveld, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraaijeveld-Smit, Femmie J.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komdeur, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kraaijeveld, Ken</au><au>Kraaijeveld-Smit, Femmie J.L.</au><au>Komdeur, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The evolution of mutual ornamentation</atitle><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>657</spage><epage>677</epage><pages>657-677</pages><issn>0003-3472</issn><eissn>1095-8282</eissn><coden>ANBEA8</coden><abstract>Many conspicuous ornamental traits in animals are expressed in both males and females. Despite this, most research has focused on sexually dimorphic ornamentation. Mutual ornamentation has often been viewed as a result of either a nonadaptive genetic correlation between the sexes or similar selection pressures in both sexes. Here, we review the theoretical underpinning and empirical evidence for these ideas. Few studies have attempted to test empirically whether a genetic correlation between the sexes can constrain the evolution of sexual dimorphism, and the results have been mixed. By contrast, there is good evidence that mutual ornaments can have a signal function in both sexes, especially in terms of mate choice. Other possible signalling functions have received little attention. Social status signalling is especially likely to be important, because competition over nonsexual resources is more balanced between the sexes than sexual competition. There is a need for experimental studies that explicitly test these hypotheses simultaneously in both sexes.</abstract><cop>Kent</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.12.027</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-3472 |
ispartof | Animal behaviour, 2007-10, Vol.74 (4), p.657-677 |
issn | 0003-3472 1095-8282 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20437449 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Animal behavior Animal communication Animal ethology Biological and medical sciences Correlation analysis Evolution Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology genetic correlation Genetics meta-analysis mutual ornamentation mutual sexual selection Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Sexes social selection |
title | The evolution of mutual ornamentation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T02%3A54%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20evolution%20of%20mutual%20ornamentation&rft.jtitle=Animal%20behaviour&rft.au=Kraaijeveld,%20Ken&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=657&rft.epage=677&rft.pages=657-677&rft.issn=0003-3472&rft.eissn=1095-8282&rft.coden=ANBEA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.12.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20437449%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224547176&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0003347207002540&rfr_iscdi=true |