The Evolution of Work Team Research Since Hawthorne
Since the Hawthorne studies of the 1920s and 1930s, there has been tremendous progress in the science and the practice of work group effectiveness. We chronicle the evolution of 3 schools of thought concerning work groups that spawned about the time of those studies. We highlight the different empha...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American psychologist 2018-05, Vol.73 (4), p.308-321 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 321 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 308 |
container_title | The American psychologist |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Mathieu, John E. Wolfson, Mikhail A. Park, Semin |
description | Since the Hawthorne studies of the 1920s and 1930s, there has been tremendous progress in the science and the practice of work group effectiveness. We chronicle the evolution of 3 schools of thought concerning work groups that spawned about the time of those studies. We highlight the different emphases of each perspective and how they eventually merged into an integrated view of teamwork. We also illustrate the disciplinary ebbs and flows of work group research over the past quarter century and how many different scholars from diverse institutions are currently contributing to the literature. We highlight the progress that has been made both in terms of scholarly insights and practical advances. We argue that the popular Input-Process-Outcome framework has facilitated progress in the field but has also become a limiting factor. We conclude that future advances will be associated with: (a) the advent of new theories, methodologies, and tools for modeling dynamic team properties; (b) a greater appreciation for, and sophisticated conceptions of, team task environments; and (c) conceptions of teams as entities in multilevel environments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/amp0000255 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2043709509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2043882960</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-cf9ce04d021976c036ecb6fc07977a744a9ea0cd20da858dc606187c8c77afe53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90VtLHTEQB_BQLXq8vPQDyIIv0rJ1ctskj0W8FATBHtG3ELOznLW7m22yq_jtjRxboQ_mZQjz488wQ8gXCt8pcHXs-hHyY1J-IgtquCyNgbsNsm-UpoJzbajidJMsMuIlVNXdNtlJ6SF_Ze5tkW1mlGFCwoLw5QqL08fQzVMbhiI0xW2Iv4slur64xoQu-lXxqx08FhfuaVqFOOAe-dy4LuH-W90lN2eny5OL8vLq_OfJj8vSCSGn0jfGI4gaGDWq8sAr9PdV40EZpZwSwhl04GsGtdNS176Cimrltc_tBiXfJUfr3DGGPzOmyfZt8th1bsAwJ8tAcAVGgsn08D_6EOY45OksoznUMMX5hypnac1MBVl9XSsfQ0oRGzvGtnfx2VKwrwew7wfI-OAtcr7vsf5H_244g29r4EZnx_TsXZxa32Hyc4w4TK9hVnErLAfNXwCCJ4qR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2043882960</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Evolution of Work Team Research Since Hawthorne</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Mathieu, John E. ; Wolfson, Mikhail A. ; Park, Semin</creator><contributor>Salas, Eduardo ; Kazak, Anne E ; Mcdaniel, Susan H</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mathieu, John E. ; Wolfson, Mikhail A. ; Park, Semin ; Salas, Eduardo ; Kazak, Anne E ; Mcdaniel, Susan H</creatorcontrib><description>Since the Hawthorne studies of the 1920s and 1930s, there has been tremendous progress in the science and the practice of work group effectiveness. We chronicle the evolution of 3 schools of thought concerning work groups that spawned about the time of those studies. We highlight the different emphases of each perspective and how they eventually merged into an integrated view of teamwork. We also illustrate the disciplinary ebbs and flows of work group research over the past quarter century and how many different scholars from diverse institutions are currently contributing to the literature. We highlight the progress that has been made both in terms of scholarly insights and practical advances. We argue that the popular Input-Process-Outcome framework has facilitated progress in the field but has also become a limiting factor. We conclude that future advances will be associated with: (a) the advent of new theories, methodologies, and tools for modeling dynamic team properties; (b) a greater appreciation for, and sophisticated conceptions of, team task environments; and (c) conceptions of teams as entities in multilevel environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-066X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781433891731</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1433891735</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-990X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/amp0000255</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29792450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Cooperative Behavior ; Effectiveness ; Group Dynamics ; Group Processes ; Group research ; History, 20th Century ; History, 21st Century ; Humans ; Psychology, Social - history ; Research - history ; Teams ; Teamwork ; Work groups ; Work Teams ; Working groups</subject><ispartof>The American psychologist, 2018-05, Vol.73 (4), p.308-321</ispartof><rights>2018 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2018, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association May/Jun 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-cf9ce04d021976c036ecb6fc07977a744a9ea0cd20da858dc606187c8c77afe53</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-8975-7306 ; 0000-0001-7032-4201 ; 0000-0002-6881-4022</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,33751</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29792450$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Salas, Eduardo</contributor><contributor>Kazak, Anne E</contributor><contributor>Mcdaniel, Susan H</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mathieu, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfson, Mikhail A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Semin</creatorcontrib><title>The Evolution of Work Team Research Since Hawthorne</title><title>The American psychologist</title><addtitle>Am Psychol</addtitle><description>Since the Hawthorne studies of the 1920s and 1930s, there has been tremendous progress in the science and the practice of work group effectiveness. We chronicle the evolution of 3 schools of thought concerning work groups that spawned about the time of those studies. We highlight the different emphases of each perspective and how they eventually merged into an integrated view of teamwork. We also illustrate the disciplinary ebbs and flows of work group research over the past quarter century and how many different scholars from diverse institutions are currently contributing to the literature. We highlight the progress that has been made both in terms of scholarly insights and practical advances. We argue that the popular Input-Process-Outcome framework has facilitated progress in the field but has also become a limiting factor. We conclude that future advances will be associated with: (a) the advent of new theories, methodologies, and tools for modeling dynamic team properties; (b) a greater appreciation for, and sophisticated conceptions of, team task environments; and (c) conceptions of teams as entities in multilevel environments.</description><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Group Dynamics</subject><subject>Group Processes</subject><subject>Group research</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>History, 21st Century</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Psychology, Social - history</subject><subject>Research - history</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><subject>Work groups</subject><subject>Work Teams</subject><subject>Working groups</subject><issn>0003-066X</issn><issn>1935-990X</issn><isbn>9781433891731</isbn><isbn>1433891735</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp90VtLHTEQB_BQLXq8vPQDyIIv0rJ1ctskj0W8FATBHtG3ELOznLW7m22yq_jtjRxboQ_mZQjz488wQ8gXCt8pcHXs-hHyY1J-IgtquCyNgbsNsm-UpoJzbajidJMsMuIlVNXdNtlJ6SF_Ze5tkW1mlGFCwoLw5QqL08fQzVMbhiI0xW2Iv4slur64xoQu-lXxqx08FhfuaVqFOOAe-dy4LuH-W90lN2eny5OL8vLq_OfJj8vSCSGn0jfGI4gaGDWq8sAr9PdV40EZpZwSwhl04GsGtdNS176Cimrltc_tBiXfJUfr3DGGPzOmyfZt8th1bsAwJ8tAcAVGgsn08D_6EOY45OksoznUMMX5hypnac1MBVl9XSsfQ0oRGzvGtnfx2VKwrwew7wfI-OAtcr7vsf5H_244g29r4EZnx_TsXZxa32Hyc4w4TK9hVnErLAfNXwCCJ4qR</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Mathieu, John E.</creator><creator>Wolfson, Mikhail A.</creator><creator>Park, Semin</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8975-7306</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7032-4201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6881-4022</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>The Evolution of Work Team Research Since Hawthorne</title><author>Mathieu, John E. ; Wolfson, Mikhail A. ; Park, Semin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-cf9ce04d021976c036ecb6fc07977a744a9ea0cd20da858dc606187c8c77afe53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Group Dynamics</topic><topic>Group Processes</topic><topic>Group research</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>History, 21st Century</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Psychology, Social - history</topic><topic>Research - history</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><topic>Work groups</topic><topic>Work Teams</topic><topic>Working groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mathieu, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfson, Mikhail A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Semin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mathieu, John E.</au><au>Wolfson, Mikhail A.</au><au>Park, Semin</au><au>Salas, Eduardo</au><au>Kazak, Anne E</au><au>Mcdaniel, Susan H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Evolution of Work Team Research Since Hawthorne</atitle><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle><addtitle>Am Psychol</addtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>308</spage><epage>321</epage><pages>308-321</pages><issn>0003-066X</issn><eissn>1935-990X</eissn><isbn>9781433891731</isbn><isbn>1433891735</isbn><abstract>Since the Hawthorne studies of the 1920s and 1930s, there has been tremendous progress in the science and the practice of work group effectiveness. We chronicle the evolution of 3 schools of thought concerning work groups that spawned about the time of those studies. We highlight the different emphases of each perspective and how they eventually merged into an integrated view of teamwork. We also illustrate the disciplinary ebbs and flows of work group research over the past quarter century and how many different scholars from diverse institutions are currently contributing to the literature. We highlight the progress that has been made both in terms of scholarly insights and practical advances. We argue that the popular Input-Process-Outcome framework has facilitated progress in the field but has also become a limiting factor. We conclude that future advances will be associated with: (a) the advent of new theories, methodologies, and tools for modeling dynamic team properties; (b) a greater appreciation for, and sophisticated conceptions of, team task environments; and (c) conceptions of teams as entities in multilevel environments.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>29792450</pmid><doi>10.1037/amp0000255</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8975-7306</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7032-4201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6881-4022</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-066X |
ispartof | The American psychologist, 2018-05, Vol.73 (4), p.308-321 |
issn | 0003-066X 1935-990X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2043709509 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Cooperative Behavior Effectiveness Group Dynamics Group Processes Group research History, 20th Century History, 21st Century Humans Psychology, Social - history Research - history Teams Teamwork Work groups Work Teams Working groups |
title | The Evolution of Work Team Research Since Hawthorne |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T16%3A32%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Evolution%20of%20Work%20Team%20Research%20Since%20Hawthorne&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20psychologist&rft.au=Mathieu,%20John%20E.&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=308&rft.epage=321&rft.pages=308-321&rft.issn=0003-066X&rft.eissn=1935-990X&rft.isbn=9781433891731&rft.isbn_list=1433891735&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/amp0000255&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2043882960%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2043882960&rft_id=info:pmid/29792450&rfr_iscdi=true |